Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Regarding the allegation that an uncleared adult had access to the infants in care, specifically that a temporary employee walked into the facility without being asked for a form of identification. Interviews revealed that staff were aware that a temporary employee was coming into the facility to assist with coverage. When the staff arrived, staff were aware of the temporary employee and did not feel that identification was needed. Regarding the allegation that staff operate out of ratio, specifically that when staff need a quick break there is not staff to cover putting the room out of ratio. During the visit on 9/17/24 LPA’s observed 2 staff to 8 infants. Based on record review staff rotate throughout the rooms to extend coverage to all staff so breaks can be taken. Interviews revealed that the facility is never out of ratio because of the rotated schedule. From the information received by interviews and observation the above allegation cannot be verified. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the allegations did or did not occur, therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Deseree Armstead, a Notice of Site Visit posted, and a copy of this report was provided to the facility on this date and time

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 101223(a)(7)Type B

    (a) The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights:(7) Not to be placed in any restraining device.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in allowing infants to be placed on highchairs for a prolonged period of time before and after meals or activities which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 101438.3(e)Type B

    Indoor activity space for infants (e) The indoor activity space shall be equipped with a variety of age appropriate washable toys and equipment.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in ensuring that the infants in care were engaged with age and developmental appropriate toys which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 23, 2024 inspection of A RISING STAR ACADEMY CHILDCARE CENTER, INC.?

This was a complaint inspection of A RISING STAR ACADEMY CHILDCARE CENTER, INC. on September 23, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to A RISING STAR ACADEMY CHILDCARE CENTER, INC. on September 23, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.