complaint·March 9, 2026

On 03/04/26, LPA called 7 parents. All parents who were interviewed stated they did not observe the classrooms and shared area unclean. LPA also contacted Reporting Party by email and received no further information. Based on LPA’s observation and interviews, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report was reviewed in Mandarin with the teacher, Yaping Qiao. A copy of Appeal Rights was given. NOTICE OF SITE VISIT WAS ISSUED AND IS TO BE POSTED FOR 30 DAYS. On 03/04/26, LPA called 7 parents. All parents who were interviewed stated they did not observe teacher / children ratio and lack of supervision issues. Based on LPA’s interviews which were conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. As a result, Type A deficiency was cited on the following page: LPA informed the teacher, Yaping Qiao, that this report dated 03/09/2026 document one Type A citation which shall be posted for 30 consecutive days as there is immediate risk to the health, safety, or personal rights of children in care. Also, LPA informed the teacher to provide a copy of this licensing report dated 03/09/2026 that documents any Type A citation to parents/guardians of all children currently enrolled by the next business day or the next day the children are in care, and to any newly enrolled parents/guardians for 12 months from the date of this report. A signed Acknowledgement of Receipt of Licensing Report (LIC 9224), or other written statement, must be placed in the child's file for verification. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report was reviewed in Mandarin with the teacher, Yaping Qiao. A copy of Appeal Rights was given. NOTICE OF SITE VISIT WAS ISSUED AND IS TO BE POSTED FOR 30 DAYS.