complaint·August 30, 2023

During the initial visit, S1-S2 were interviewed. S1 was interviewed at 11:00 AM and stated she is the primary assistant and that anyone that provides supervision has been cleared. S1 stated that A1 visits often, however, only when picking up or dropping off her child, and does not provide supervision to children during those times. S1 stated they would never put tape on a child’s mouth. S2 was interviewed at 11:18 AM and stated that A1 never is alone with the children when she is on site. S2 stated they would never put tape on a child’s mouth. On August 18, 2023, LPA attempted to interview 6 client/parents (P1-P6), 4 were successful. P1, P2, P4 and P6 all stated they were familiar with S1 & S2 and have no concerns with uncleared persons providing supervision. P1, P2, P4 and P6 and stated they have no concerns regarding taping on children’s mouths, or of the children being properly supervised while in care. On August 21, 2023, at 12:40 PM, LPA interviewed W1. W1 stated she has worked with licensee for 6 months and has no issues or concerns with her regarding any of the allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated . Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the Licensee Shana Lyons. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100.