complaint·April 16, 2025

A1 also denied the allegation stating that they love children and will bring children things when they stop by. A1 further stated that they do not help with the daycare children, even when they\342\200\231re in the bathroom, and has never been left alone with them. Parent and children interviews resulted in no concerns or issues with the daycare and no disclosures or claims of inappropriate actions were made. All of the children interviewed C2, C3, C4 and C5; confirmed that A1 would visit the daycare home. One child interviewed denies that A1 provides care but visits the daycare to visit the daycare owner who is her sister. The remaining children interviewed did not provide evidence to support that the allegations did or did not occur. The children enjoyed being at the daycare and were not in fear of attending the daycare home. Based on interviews with parent\342\200\231s P1, P2 and P3, not all of the parent\342\200\231s knew who A1 is but none of the parents had concerns with their children being at the facility. Medical records indicated that the doctor\342\200\231s exam was completed without abnormal findings. No other info was provided by the examiner. C1 was not available for interview and law enforcement suspended the case due to insufficient evidence. Based on the IB investigation, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to support the allegations. Therefore, the allegation that an Adult in home touched child inappropriately and Staff yelled at day care child is unsubstantiated. This report was read and reviewed with the Licensee. This licensing report is public information and will be available for review. There were no Title 22 deficiencies cited related to this complaint allegation. Appeal rights were provided. The Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 days.