complaint·March 27, 2024

Both S1 and S2 denied allegations. S1 stated that the highest number of children in care is thirteen. S2 stated there is 14 or more children enrolled but has not seen 20 children all at once. S1 reported that L1 has a good relationship with parents and would call or talk to the parents if something happened, \342\200\234I haven\342\200\231t seen nothing bad, no accidents\342\200\235. S2 reported that there have been no unusual incident reports were parents had to be called recently. S2 further added that if something happens out of the ordinary L1 notifies the parents through weekly letters, text and talking to parents at pick up. According to LPA\342\200\231s observations on 01/31/2024 and 02/20/2024, the facility was observed to be within ratio and capacity. In addition, parent statements did not present any concerns regarding the allegations stating that the facility has two or three staff supervising the children. Parents stated that they have been notified of their child\342\200\231s incidents, illness or facility events through telephone calls, text or a printout provided by L1 on a monthly basis. Children's interviews did not corroborate allegations. Based on the information gathered during this investigation, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegations occurred and therefore are determined to be unsubstantiated. There were no Title 22 deficiencies cited. This report was reviewed and discussed with Licensee, Tanisha Huff. Appeal rights were provided. Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 days from today's visit.