Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

A subsequent, unannounced complaint investigation inspection was conducted by Licensing Program Analyst Jennifer Velasco (LPA), who met with Licensee Gwendolen Foursha (L1). It was alleged the facility operated both over capacity and out of ratio; specifically, on multiple occasions an assistant (S1) was the sole care provider to as many as 16 children, and on multiple occasions L1 was the sole care provider to as many as 12 children. L1 denied the allegations and stated the facility operates within ratio and capacity regulations. On 09/13/2021, LPA conducted an initial complaint investigation inspection, during which the facility was toured, documents were obtained, and interviews were conducted. During the investigation, LPA reviewed facility documents and conducted interviews on 09.08.21, 09.13.21, 11.05.21, and 11.16.21. LPA interviewed one child (C4), four adults (A1, A3-A5), and L1. Witness interviews and document reviews failed to corroborate the allegations that the facility operated over capacity and/or out of ratio. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, and the findings are UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted. The Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 days.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • PERSONAL RIGHTS

    On multiple dates in 2021, Licensee (L1) did not ensure the personal rights of children in care to safe and healthful accommodations and engaged in conduct inimical to the health, welfare, and safety of persons in care, in that facility staff did not ensure children two years of age and over wore face coverings while in the facility, as required by the CA Dept. of Public Health Guidance on the Use of Face Coverings issued June 18, 2020 and updated November 16, 2020, and an individual mask exception did not apply.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 17, 2021 inspection of FOURSHA, GWENDOLEN FAMILY CHILD CARE HOME?

This was a complaint inspection of FOURSHA, GWENDOLEN FAMILY CHILD CARE HOME on November 17, 2021. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to FOURSHA, GWENDOLEN FAMILY CHILD CARE HOME on November 17, 2021?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.