Complaint·February 26, 2025

LPA conducted interviews with four adults, Adult 2 – Adult 5 (A2-A5) between 02/19/25 and 02/21/25. Interviews with adults, A2-A5 gave corroborating statements, stating that they are very happy with the care provided by Mayra (L1), that L1 is very communicative about their child’s day, and that they feel their children are safe in L1’s care and have never experienced any unexplained injuries of their children. A2 specifically stated that L1 has called her to ask about a bruise L1 noticed on her child’s face, inquiring if A2 was aware of it. A2 confirmed with L1 that her child was playing with their sibling at home and hit their head, resulting in a bruise. A2 said she appreciated that L1 was so attentive. A3 stated that their child had not sustained any injuries in L1’s care. A5 stated that L1 will text or send photos during the day if any little injury occurs. Although LPA received photo evidence on 01/16/25, 01/22/25 and 01/29/25, showing that C1 had red marks near their armpit and on the back of their neck, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the marks/injuries occurred in L1’s care. Based on interviews conducted, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that an alleged violation occurred, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. There were no Title 22 deficiencies cited during today's inspection. This report was reviewed and discussed with the Licensee, Mayra Escobedo. Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 days from today's visit.