Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Interviews on 5/2/22 with 1 out of 1 staff, indicated that she never witnessed anyone getting bruised or hurt at the day care. The staff stated every time you turned around a group of siblings were fighting but staff were always present, intervening and supervising them. Interviews on 5/2/22 with 3 out of 3 children indicated that staff were always present and that no fighting has been observed. Interviews on 5/4/22 and 5/6/22 with 7 out of 7 witnesses indicated that the siblings involved in the alterations have a prior history of being physical while under supervision. None of the witnesses expressed concerns with the licensee and lack of supervision being provided, other then witness 7 who indicated that the licensee or staff were only present for some of the incidents. The LPA has determined that though some altercations have occurred between children in care, the staff is generally, present and intervening, however, the LPA could not rule out that there may have been a time when the licensee or assistant may have been focused on addressing another issue and did not intervene for every incident. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated. A Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 days.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 102417(d)Type A

    OPERATION OF A FAMILY CHILD CARE HOME

    Operation of a Family Child Care Home - The home shall provide safe toys, play equipment and materials.This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interviews the play equipment had torn clothes and caused scratches.This poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 1597.467(c)(1)Type B

    Reporting Requirements 1597.467(c)(1) Any suspected child abuse or neglect, as defined in Penal Code Section 11165.6, of any child in care, in addition to reporting requirements pursuant to Penal Code Section 11166. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interviews the facility failed to report children who were coming to the program hungry every day.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 11, 2022 inspection of MEDINA, ELIZABETH FAMILY CHILD CARE HOME?

This was a complaint inspection of MEDINA, ELIZABETH FAMILY CHILD CARE HOME on May 11, 2022. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to MEDINA, ELIZABETH FAMILY CHILD CARE HOME on May 11, 2022?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.