complaint·March 11, 2025

However, investigation statements revealed that the care was performed during the weekend and outside the stated hours of operation. It is noted that child #1 is listed on the facility roster as a day-care child. Some statements appeared to affirm that one of the authorized representatives of child #1 had requested the licensees to provide care for the weekend continuously due to an emergency event and as a favor, the department was not able to obtain verifiable information from other sources to corroborate that day-care services being provided or whether compensation was received. There is not sufficient evidence to support the allegation that the licensees were providing day-care services to the child for monetary purposes. Although the above allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence at this time to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 1, no deficiency cited. Exit interview was conducted with the licensee. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided to licensee, Silvia Garcia