Skip to main content
ReadyRule homepageReadyRule

Inspection visit

complaint

KING OF GLORY PRESCHOOLLicense 561711043
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

LPA reviewed records did not reveal any incidents regarding the allegation stated. Staff present, were qualified in their roles, displayed knowledge of protocols in providing care. Staff denied the allegations staff injured child while in care and staff spoke to child inappropriately . Parents interviewed shared no concerns with care and supervision. Overall, parents were satisfied with the care and supervision provided at the center. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were cited for today. Notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Appeal Rights were provided report was reviewed. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the director Shannon Meyerson

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 101223(a)(1)(3)Type B
  • 101223(a)(3)Type A

    PERSONAL RIGHTS

    101223 Personal Rights(a) The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights:3) To be free from corporal or unusual punishment...This requirements is not met as evidence by: Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above which poses/posed a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 101212(a)(d)(C)(D)Type B

    101212 Reporting Requirements(a) Each licensee or applicant shall furnish to the Department reports as required by the Department including, but not limited to, the following:...This requirements is not met as evidence by: Based on interviews and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in which poses/posed a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 30, 2025 inspection of KING OF GLORY PRESCHOOL?

This was a complaint inspection of KING OF GLORY PRESCHOOL on May 30, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to KING OF GLORY PRESCHOOL on May 30, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.