Health inspection·August 26, 2025

F 0658 Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide nursing services that met professional standards of quality for three residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3) out of a sampled seven residents when licensed nurses did not:1. Initiate a care plan that included a recent occurrence of resident-to-resident abuse for Resident 1 and Resident 2; and,2. Conduct 72-hour monitoring following Resident 3's fall.These failures had the potential to place Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3 at risk for serious harm, health deterioration and a loss of quality of life.1.A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with Alzheimer's Disease (a disease characterized by progressive decline in mental abilities).A review of Resident 1's care plans indicated the following:- On 10/25/24 a care plan was initiated and indicated Resident 1 had the potential to be physically aggressive related to dementia (a decline in memory, reasoning, thinking and judgement). Staff were expected to implement interventions which included monitoring Resident 1 for signs and symptoms of posing a danger to himself or others. -On 5/19/25 a care plan was initiated and indicated Resident 1 had a behavior problem with spontaneous short bursts of anger which was evidenced by striking out at other residents. Staff were expected to intervene as necessary to protect safety and rights of others and to de-escalate when behavior is triggered.A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool), dated 6/2/25, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- an assessment used to measure cognition (a person's ability to process information and understanding)) score of 6 which indicated severe impairment. A review of Resident 2's admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis (paralysis or weakness on one side of the body) following other non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (bleeding within the skull) affecting left non-dominant side. A review of Resident 2's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 2 had a BIMS score of 3 which indicated severe impairment. A review of Resident 1's Progress Notes dated 8/12/25 at 8 p.m., indicated Resident 1 was standing in the corner of the hallway near the double doors.[Resident 1] grabbed [Resident 2's] arm and it provoked or possible (sic) scared [Resident 2]. During an interview on 8/26/25 at 10:05 a.m., Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1) stated she witnessed the occurrence between Resident 1 and Resident 2. She stated Resident 2 was propelling himself down the hallway near the double door entrance while Resident 1 was standing in the corner by the entrance. As Resident 2 approached the entrance, Resident 1 grabbed Resident 2's arm, scaring Resident 2. LN 1 immediately separated Resident 1 and Resident 2. During an interview on 8/26/25 at 12:10 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Director of Staff Development (DSD) stated that staff should have created or edited care plans for Residents 1 and 2 following their occurrence. The DON and DSD confirmed no care plans were ever created or updated to reflect the occurrence; therefore, staff were provided with no guidance on appropriate interventions. 2. A review of Resident 3's admission Record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the Residents Affected - Few (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 055003 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 055003 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 08/26/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Eureka Rehabilitation & Wellness Center, LP 2353 Twenty Third St Eureka, CA 95501 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)