Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

YUBA CITY POST ACUTECMS #0550921 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0609 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on Interview and Record Review the facility failed to report a crime or abuse incident for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) when Resident 2 ' s Family Member (FM) exposed himself to Resident 1 while in Resident 1 and Resident 2 ' s shared room. This failure to report to proper authorities placed all residents at risk for allegations of abuse to go unreported. Findings: During a review of the facility ' s policy and procedure titled, Abuse Investigation and Reporting, revised December 2018, the Abuse Investigation and Reporting policy indicated, All reports of resident abuse .(and) mistreatment .shall be promptly reported to local state and federal agencies . A review of Resident 1 ' s medical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, Right Femur Fracture, R Femur Surgical Intervention, and History of Falls. The Minimum Data Set (MDS, Tool for evaluating and implementing a standardized assessment) Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, Section C assessing cognitive function) score dated 1/8/25, indicated Resident 1 rated 15/15, which equates to being cognitively intact. Resident 1 is their own representative (RP) and make their own medical decisions. During an interview on 1/21/25 at 08:30 am, with Resident 1 over the phone, Resident 1 stated Resident 2 ' s Family Member (FM) came out of the shared bathroom and stood at the foot of the bed, made sounds of clearing the throat for attention, and exposed his genitals. I did not feel abused, just very uncomfortable. During an interview with Social Services Director (SSD), in SSD office, on 1/21/25 at 11:00 am, SSD indicated, SSD was aware of the incident, and interviewed both Resident 1 and FM. Resident 1 informed SSD there were no feelings of abuse, just felt very uncomfortable and requested a discharge from the facility. The facility did not file a report based on Resident 1 ' s response. During an interview with Administrator (Admin) in Admin ' s office, on 1/21/25 at 2:10 pm, Admin confirmed he is aware of the incident ' s occurrence, and the investigation was complete. Resident 1 did not wish to pursue reporting or feel the incident was abuse, thus, the facility did not file a report. Based on Interview and Record Review the facility failed to report a crime or abuse incident for 1 (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 055092 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 055092 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 01/21/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Yuba City Post Acute 1220 Plumas St Yuba City, CA 95991 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0609 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm of 3 residents (Resident 1) when Resident 2's Family Member (FM) exposed himself to Resident 1 while in Resident 1 and Resident 2's shared room. This failure to report to proper authorities placed all residents at risk for allegations of abuse to go unreported. Residents Affected - Few During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Abuse Investigation and Reporting , revised December 2018, the Abuse Investigation and Reporting policy indicated, All reports of resident abuse .(and) mistreatment .shall be promptly reported to local state and federal agencies . A review of Resident 1's medical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, Right Femur Fracture, R Femur Surgical Intervention, and History of Falls. The Minimum Data Set (MDS, Tool for evaluating and implementing a standardized assessment) Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, Section C assessing cognitive function) score dated 1/8/25, indicated Resident 1 rated 15/15, which equates to being cognitively intact. Resident 1 is their own representative (RP) and make their own medical decisions. During an interview on 1/21/25 at 08:30 am, with Resident 1 over the phone, Resident 1 stated Resident 2's Family Member (FM) came out of the shared bathroom and stood at the foot of the bed, made sounds of clearing the throat for attention, and exposed his genitals. I did not feel abused, just very uncomfortable. During an interview with Social Services Director (SSD), in SSD office, on 1/21/25 at 11:00 am, SSD indicated, SSD was aware of the incident, and interviewed both Resident 1 and FM. Resident 1 informed SSD there were no feelings of abuse, just felt very uncomfortable and requested a discharge from the facility. The facility did not file a report based on Resident 1's response. During an interview with Administrator (Admin) in Admin's office, on 1/21/25 at 2:10 pm, Admin confirmed he is aware of the incident's occurrence, and the investigation was complete. Resident 1 did not wish to pursue reporting or feel the incident was abuse, thus, the facility did not file a report. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 055092 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0609GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F609 - The facility must develop and implement written policies and procedures that:

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 21, 2025 survey of YUBA CITY POST ACUTE?

This was a inspection survey of YUBA CITY POST ACUTE on January 21, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at YUBA CITY POST ACUTE on January 21, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.