Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

SOCAL POST-ACUTE CARECMS #0551681 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

055168 04/18/2025 Socal Post-Acute Care 7931 S. Sorenson Ave. Whittier, CA 90606
F 0684 Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services as ordered by the physician and as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) after experiencing a fall on 4/4/25 and reported having pain on 4/6/25. Residents Affected - Few Resident 1's x-ray (a medical imaging test that creates images of the inside of the body) that was ordered by the physician 4/6/25 at 7:48 AM due to the resident's complaint of pain on the ankle and x-ray was taken on 4/7/25 at 10:59AM. The facility did not follow up to with the Radiology (company that specialize in x-rays) company of the resident's x-ray to obtain the x-ray result. As a result of this deficient practice the X-ray result was not received until 4/9/25 that showed ankle fracture (broken bone) which delayed Resident 1's care and hospitalization after a fall to receive care which could potentially result in long term functional limitation, persistent pain, and limited of range of motion affecting the resident's quality of life negatively. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 3/25/2023 with diagnoses that included dementia (a term for a range of conditions that affect the brain's ability to think, remember, and function normally) and osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease, affecting joints over time, leading to pain, stiffness, and swelling). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool), dated 1/17/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had moderately impaired memory and cognition (ability to think and reason). The MDS indicated Resident 1 required setup or clean-up assistance with eating and oral hygiene, and partial/moderate assistance with shower/bathe self, and personal hygiene and chair/bed-to-chair transfer. During a review of Resident 1's SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation, a structured communication tool, particularly common in healthcare) Communication Form, dated 4/4/2025, the SBAR indicated Resident 1 had a witnessed fall on 4/4/2025. During a review of Resident 1's Progress Notes, dated 4/6/2025 at 7:48 AM, Resident 1 continued with to experience pain after the fall, the physician ordered an x-ray of left ankle. During a review of Resident 1's X-ray Report of left ankle, dated 4/7/2025 at 7:54 PM, from an x-ray that was taken on 4/7/2025 at 10:59 AM, indicated the resident had nondisplaced complete transverse fracture (a clean and straight break across the bone) of medial malleolus (a bone located on the Page 1 of 3 055168 055168 04/18/2025 Socal Post-Acute Care 7931 S. Sorenson Ave. Whittier, CA 90606
F 0684 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few inner side of the ankle) is noted and complete transverse fracture of distal fibula diaphysis (a lower end of the bone at ankle area) is noted with lateral angulation of distal fractured fragment (in fractures refers to the tilt of the lower end of the fractured fragment of the broken bone away from its normal alignment). During a review of Resident 1's SBAR Communication Form, dated 4/9/2025, the SBAR indicated abnormal x-ray showing fracture to ankle. The SBAR indicated the physician was notified on 4/9/2025 at 5 PM. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/18/2025 at 1:29 PM, Resident 1 was lying on the bed with her left ankle and foot stabilized with the splints and wrapped in the elastic bandages. Resident 1 stated she was having pain at level 10/10 pain when she tried to move her left foot, and she could not get up of bed or stand anymore. During an interview on 4/18/2025 at 1:25 PM with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 stated Resident 1's x-ray of left ankle was done by an outside radiology company on 4/7/2025 around 11 AM. LVN 1 stated the nurse who worked in the evening shift and the nurse who worked on the next day did not follow up the X-ray result did not report to the physician within 24 hours after the x-ray of left ankle was done to prevent a delayed treatment to Resident 1. During an interview on 4/18/2025 at 4:02 PM with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, RN 1 stated she worked the evening shift on 4/7/2025 and she did not receive a phone call or a fax of Resident 1's x-ray result on the left ankle. RN 1 stated she did not follow up with the result with the radiology company. During an interview on 4/18/2025 at 4:15 PM with LVN 1, LVN 1 stated she worked the morning shift on 4/8/2025, but she did not get any endorsement to follow up with Resident 1's x-ray report on the left ankle, so she did not follow up with the radiology company for the result. LVN 1 stated, someone notified the physician on 4/9/25, but she did not know when and who received Resident 1's x-ray report and reported to the physician. LVN 1 stated the physician called back and ordered to transfer the resident to the hospital in the afternoon on 4/9/2025. During an interview on 4/18/2025 at 4:38 PM with LVN 2, LVN 2 stated when she started to work the evening shift on 4/8/2025 and she noticed Resident 1's x-ray of left ankle report was blank. LVN 2 stated she asked LVN 1 why the report was blank and LVN 1 said she did not know the reason. LVN 2 stated she called the radiology company, and the representative of the radiology company told her that the radiology company was having issues of sending out the reports for the past two days and the representative did not have the report available to provide a verbal report to the nurse at that time. LVN 2 stated she did not report this issue to the Director of Nursing (DON) immediately. During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/18/2025 at 4:40 PM with the DON, the report of Resident 1's x-ray of left ankle, dated 4/7/2025, and Resident 1's SBAR, dated 4/9/2025, were reviewed. The DON stated the time stamp of the received fax of the x-ray report indicated the report was received on 4/9/2025 at 5 PM. The DON stated the nurse notified the physician on 4/9/2025 at 5 PM. The DON stated he did not know the facility was having issues of obtaining the x-ray report from the radiology company because the staff did not report it to him. The DON stated the nurse should report the issue to him, so he could reach out to the supervisor of the radiology company to escalate the request and make sure they obtained the report and notified the physician within 24 hours once the x-ray was taken to prevent any delayed care for Resident 1. The DON stated any delay treatment could lead to the functional limitation, pain, and the loss of motion of Resident 1' left ankle because of 055168 Page 2 of 3 055168 04/18/2025 Socal Post-Acute Care 7931 S. Sorenson Ave. Whittier, CA 90606
F 0684 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few the fractured ankle. The DON stated it was the facility's standard of practice to obtain a x-ray result and report to the physician within 24 hours when the test was done to prevent any delayed care and potential adverse complication for the residents. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P), dated 5/2017, the P&P indicated Prior to notifying the Physician or healthcare provider, the nurse will make detailed observations and gather relevant and pertinent information for the provider and except in medical emergencies, notifications will be made within twenty-four (24) hours of a change occurring in the resident's medical/mental condition or status. 055168 Page 3 of 3

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0684GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F684 - Quality of care

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 18, 2025 survey of SOCAL POST-ACUTE CARE?

This was a inspection survey of SOCAL POST-ACUTE CARE on April 18, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at SOCAL POST-ACUTE CARE on April 18, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.