F 0842
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in
accordance with accepted professional standards.
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and
accurately documented for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when scheduled showers were not
documented accurately in Resident 1's electronic medical record (EMR).This failure had the potential for
the records not to fully reflect Resident 1's scheduled showers being provided that could impact his health,
hygiene and dignity.Findings: Review of Resident 1's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 1 was
admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes (a condition when the blood
sugar is too high), hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or
inability to move one side of the body) affecting the right dominant side and generalized muscle weakness.
Review of the facility's shower schedule indicated Resident 1's showers were designated for Sunday and
Wednesday during the PM (evening) shift. Review of Resident 1's EMR titled, BATHING, for the timeframe
from 1/1/26 to 1/30/26, indicated Response not required was documented for all shifts except for the
following:- 1/17/26 at 13:59 [1:59 p.m.] - Resident not available- 1/18/26 at 16:00 [4 p.m.] - bed bath 1/29/26 at 13:9 [1:59 p.m.] - bed bath During an interview on 1/28/26, at 4:29 p.m., with Resident 1,
Resident 1 stated he refused showers and preferred bed baths. Resident 1 further stated he got a bed bath
every Wednesday. During an interview on 1/30/26, at 11:10 a.m., with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1,
CNA 1 stated a CNA would fill out the shower sheet (a documentation tool used to record a resident's
bathing routine, skin condition, and overall well-being during a shower or bed bath) and get it signed by a
Licensed Nurse (LN) after a shower was given to a resident. CNA 1 further stated if a resident refused the
scheduled shower, she would notify the LN and would offer two to three more times throughout the shift.
CNA 1 stated she would then document in the resident's chart of the resident's shower refusal. During an
interview on 1/30/26, at 12:22 p.m., with CNA 2, CNA 2 stated all residents received showers twice in a
week. CNA 2 further stated Resident 1 was scheduled for PM shift showers but was always given a bed
bath during the morning shift. CNA 2 stated she would chart in Resident 1's chart that she gave him a bed
bath. CNA 2 further stated the CNA staff would be the one to chart for showers and bed baths provided to
the residents. CNA 2 stated the CNA staff would also document in the resident's chart if a resident refused
the showers. During an interview on 1/30/26, at 3:41 p.m., with CNA 3, CNA 3 stated Resident 1 was
known to have refused showers and preferred bed baths. CNA 3 stated the CNA staff would document in
the resident's chart when a shower or bed bath was done. During an interview on 1/30/26, at 10:51 AM,
with Licensed Nurse (LN) 1, LN 1 stated the residents got a minimum of two showers per week. LN 1
further stated during showers the CNA would check on the resident's skin to see if there was any redness,
bruising or any skin issue. LN 1 stated the CNA would document in the resident's chart if a shower was
given. LN 1 further stated the risk of not getting the showers as scheduled would be the risk of infection,
skin integrity could be compromised, and skin frictions (the physical force generated when the outer layer of
the skin
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 2
Event ID:
055289
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055289
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/30/2026
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Lodi Creek Post Acute
321 West Turner Road
Lodi, CA 95240
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0842
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
rubs or slides against another surface) could happen. During a concurrent interview and record review on
1/30/26, at 11:54 a.m., with LN 2, the facility's shower schedule was reviewed. LN 2 confirmed Resident 1
was scheduled for his showers every Sunday and Wednesday on the PM schedule. LN 2 stated the risk of
not getting scheduled showers would be the potential for skin breakdown, possible pressure ulcers
(localized injuries to the skin and underlying tissue, usually over a bony prominence, resulting from
prolonged pressure, friction, or shear) and other skin issues. During a concurrent interview and record
review on 1/30/26, at 12:43 p.m., with LN 3, Resident 1's EMR was reviewed. LN 3 stated Resident 1 had a
known history of refusing showers. LN 3 further stated it was expected for the CNA staff to notify the LN or
the treatment nurse if a resident refused the scheduled shower and to offer alternatives. LN 3 reviewed
Resident 1's bathing task report from 1/1/26 to 1/30/26 and stated the CNA staff documented response not
required instead of documenting refused. LN 3 verified two documented bed baths were done on 1/29/26
during the AM (morning) shift and 1/18/26 during the PM shift. LN 3 stated the expectation from CNA staff
was to document refusal and not to document response not required. LN 2 further stated the CNA staff
should have charted correctly in Resident 1's chart.During a concurrent interview and record review on
1/30/26, at 1:01 p.m., with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), Resident 1's bathing report for the
month of January was reviewed. The DSD confirmed Resident 1 had two documented bed baths on
1/18/26 and 1/29/26 for the month. The DSD further confirmed Resident 1's EMR should have at least eight
total showers documented for the month if he was getting them done twice a week. The DSD stated if the
resident was not scheduled for a shower then the CNA should have documented did not occur or not
applicable. The DSD further stated a resident's shower chart documentation was important for the CNA to
complete. The DSD confirmed Resident 1's shower charting for the month of January was not consistent.
The DSD stated it was very important to document in a resident's chart accurately because if it was not
documented then it did not happen. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/30/26, at 3:57
p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 1's bathing report for the month of January was
reviewed. The DON stated this did not meet her expectations and staff were expected to have documented
appropriate responses with the correct coding. The DON further stated it was important to have
documented accurately to know what was going on with the resident. The DON stated the risk of not
documenting accurately could be the risk of missing something or for the potential of worsening of an issue
that was not being tracked. Review of an undated facility policy titled, Bath, Shower/Tub, indicated,
.Purpose.The purpose of this procedure are to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident and to
observe the condition of the resident's skin.Documentation .1. The date and time the shower/tub bath was
performed.5. If the resident refused the shower/tub bath, the reason(s) why and the intervention taken.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055289
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 2