F 0656
Level of Harm - Potential for
minimal harm
Residents Affected - Some
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and
actions that can be measured.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to develop the comprehensive
plans of care to reflect the individual care needs for two of five sampled residents (Residents 1 and 5). *
The facility failed to develop a care plan to address Resident 1's laceration to the right temporal area. * The
facility failed to develop a care plan to address Resident 5's skin tear to the left forearm. These failures had
the potential risk of not providing appropriate, consistent, and individualized care to these
residents.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered revised
12/2016 showed a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and
timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and
implemented for each resident. 1. Closed medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 7/16/25.
Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged on 6/19/25. Review of Resident 1's
H&P examination dated 2/27/25, showed the resident had no capacity to understand and make decisions.
Review of Resident 1's SBAR Communication Form - General dated 3/11/25, showed the resident had an
unwitnessed fall and had a laceration to the right temporal area. Review of Resident 1's plan of care failed
to show a care plan was developed to address the resident's laceration to the right temporal area. On
8/1/25 at 1453 hours, an interview and concurrent closed medical record review was conducted with RN 2.
RN 2 was not able to show a care plan was developed to address Resident 1's laceration to the right
temporal area. RN 2 stated the licensed nurse should have made a care plan for Resident 1's fall because it
was a change of condition. On 8/5/25 at 1400 hours, an interview and concurrent closed medical record
review was conducted with the DON. The DON verified Resident 1 had unwitnessed fall with laceration to
the right temporal area on 3/11/25, however there was no care plan to address the resident's laceration to
the right temporal area. The DON stated Resident 1 was transferred out to acute care hospital for further
evaluation and the licensed nurse did not do the care plan. The DON stated the care plan should have been
initiated to reflect the interventions provided prior to Resident 1's transfer to the acute care hospital. 2.
Medical record review for Resident 5 was initiated on 7/17/25. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on
[DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 5's H&P examination dated 4/26/25, showed the
resident had no capacity to make decisions. Review of Resident 5's SBAR Communication Form - General
dated 7/1/25, showed the resident had unwitnessed fall with skin tear on the left forearm. Review of
Resident 5's plan of care failed to show a care plan to address the resident's skin tear to the left forearm.
On 8/1/25 at 1128 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review was conducted with LVN 3.
LVN 3 verified there was no care plan for Resident 5's skin tear on the left forearm. LVN 3 stated the
licensed nurse should have initiated the care plan after doing the SBAR. On 8/5/25 at 1339 hours, an
interview and concurrent medical record review was conducted with the DON. The DON verified Resident 5
had left forearm skin tear from an unwitnessed fall on
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 4
Event ID:
055330
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055330
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/05/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Advanced Rehab Center of Tustin
2210 E. First Street
Santa Ana, CA 92705
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0656
7/1/25, and there was no care plan to address the resident's left forearm skin tear. The DON stated the
licensed nurse who identified the change of condition should have initiated the care plan for Resident 5.
Level of Harm - Potential for
minimal harm
Residents Affected - Some
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055330
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 4
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055330
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/05/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Advanced Rehab Center of Tustin
2210 E. First Street
Santa Ana, CA 92705
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0686
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the Braden scale
assessment was performed for one of the three sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for the pressure
injury. This failure had the potential to result in a delay in interventions being put in place to prevent further
decline.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Pressure Injury/Ulcer Risk Assessment revised 3/2024
showed the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the structured assessment and
identification of residents at risk of developing new pressure injuries or worsening of existing pressure
injuries or pressure ulcers. The General Guidelines section showed to repeat the risk assessment/Braden
scale assessment weekly for the first four weeks, if there is a significant change in condition, or as often as
is required based on the resident's condition. Closed medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on
7/16/25. Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged on 6/19/25. Review of
Resident 1's H&P examination dated 2/27/25, showed the resident had no capacity to understand and
make decisions. Review of Resident 1's Pressure Ulcer Assessment - V 4 dated 4/2/25, showed the initial
identified wound to the coccyx Stage 1 pressure injury declined to Stage 2 pressure injury. Review of
Resident 1's SBAR Communication Form - General dated 4/2/25, showed the resident's coccyx Stage 1
pressure injury declined to Stage 2 pressure injury. Review of Resident 1's Pressure Ulcer Assessment - V
4 dated 5/29/25, showed the wound to the coccyx area was re-classified to Stage 3 but was smaller in size.
Review of Resident 1's SBAR Communication Form - General dated 5/29/25, showed Resident 1 had
wound to the coccyx area was re-classified to sacrococcyx Stage 3 pressure injury. Further review of
Resident 1's closed medical record failed to show documented evidence Resident 1 received repeated risk
assessments or Braden scale assessments for Stage 2 and Stage 3 pressure injury. On 8/1/25 at 1153
hours, an interview and concurrent closed medical record review was conducted with LVN 2. LVN 2 verified
Resident 1's Stage 2 pressure injury was developed on 4/2/25, and the risk assessment or Braden scale
assessment for the Stage 2 pressure injury was not performed. In addition, LVN 2 verified Resident 1's
Stage 3 pressure injury was developed on 5/29/25, and the risk assessment or Braden scale assessment
for the Stage 3 pressure injury was not performed. LVN 2 stated the licensed nurse performed the Braden
scale on the residents' admission to the facility but did not perform the Braden scale for a change of
condition on the wound. LVN stated she would verify with the DON if the licensed nurse needed to perform
the Braden scale for a change of condition on the wound. On 8/5/25 at 1400 hours, an interview and
concurrent closed medical record review was conducted with the DON. The SBAR Communication Form General showed Resident 1 had a Stage 2 pressure injury on 4/2/25, and a Stage 3 pressure injury on
5/29/25. The DON verified Resident 1 had change of condition of pressure injuries on 4/2 and 5/29/25, and
the Braden Scale assessments were not done. The DON stated there was a change in Resident 1's skin
and the Braden scale assessment should have been completed by the licensed nurse who identified the
changes in the resident's skin condition.
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055330
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 4
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055330
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/05/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Advanced Rehab Center of Tustin
2210 E. First Street
Santa Ana, CA 92705
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0842
Level of Harm - Potential for
minimal harm
Residents Affected - Some
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in
accordance with accepted professional standards.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was
accurate for one of three sampled residents (Resident 4). This failure posed the risk for Resident 4 not to
receive the accurate and necessary care.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Fall Risk Assessment
copyright 2001 showed the nursing staff, in conjunction with the attending physician, consultant pharmacist,
therapy staff, and others, will seek to identify and document resident risk factors for falls and establish a
resident-centered falls prevention plan based on relevant assessment information. Review of the facility's
P&P titled Charting and Documentation revised 7/2017 under the Policy Interpretation and Implementation
section showed documentation in the medical record will be objective (not opinionated or speculative),
complete, and accurate. Medical record review for Resident 4 was initiated on 7/17/25. Resident 4 was
admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 4's H&P examination
dated 3/25/25, showed the resident could make his needs known and medical decisions. Review of
Resident 4's SBAR Communication Form - General dated 4/5/25, showed the resident had unwitnessed fall
and no changes was observed. However, review of Resident 4's Fall Risk Assessment - V 2 dated 4/5/25,
showed the resident had no falls in the past three months. On 8/1/25 at 1433 hours, an interview and
concurrent medical record review was conducted with RN 2. RN 2 verified Resident 4 fell on 4/5/25, and the
Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE], showed Resident 4 had no falls in the past three months. RN 2 stated it
should have been marked as one to two falls in the past three months because Resident 4 fell. On 8/5/25 at
1318 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review was conducted with the DON. The DON
verified the Fall Risk Assessment was inaccurate. The DON acknowledged Resident 4 had an unwitnessed
fall on 4/5/25, however the Fall Risk Assessment showed no falls in the past three months. The DON stated
the licensed nurse should have clicked one to two falls in the past three months instead of no falls in the
past three months.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055330
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 4