Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

CLAREMONT HEIGHTS POST ACUTECMS #0553442 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 2 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

055344 12/17/2025 Claremont Heights Post Acute 590 S. Indian Hill Blvd. Claremont, CA 91711
F 0580 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse 4 (LVN 4) immediately notified the physician and the family for one of six sampled residents (Resident 2) after Resident 2's unwitnessed fall on 11/12/2025 at 6:30 pm. This failure had the potential for Resident 2 to receive inappropriate care and had the potential to delay the assessment and treatment of Resident 2. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 2 on 3/30/2018 with diagnoses that included osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of cartilage), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 2's History and Physical (H&P), dated 3/8/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 2 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 12/2/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 2's cognition (thinking, knowing, and being aware) was severely impaired. The MDS indicated Resident 2 had impaired movement of both upper and lower extremities and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs- activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily) and to move around in bed. During a review of Resident 2's SBAR (situation, background, assessment, recommendation-a communication tool used by healthcare workers when there is a change of condition among the residents) Communication Form, dated 11/14/2025, the SBAR indicated while an unidentified staff provided care to Resident 2, Resident 2's right knee was observed to be swollen and Resident 2 did not complain of pain. The SBAR indicated Resident 2's physician was informed Resident 2's change in condition on 11/14/2025 at 4:13 am and Resident 2's family was informed on 11/14/2025 at 4:20 am. During a review of Resident 2's SBAR, dated 11/17/2025, the SBAR indicated Resident 2 had a discoloration behind both knees and back of thighs. The SBAR indicated Resident 2's family was informed on 11/17/2025 at 4 pm and Resident 2's physician was informed on 11/17/2025 at 5:30 am. During a review of Resident 2's SBAR, dated 11/20/2025, the SBAR indicated Resident 2 had a displaced (bone is out of alignment) comminuted (bone is broken into pieces) fracture (break in the bone) of the left thigh bone and an acute oblique fracture (sudden angled break) in the lower part of the right thigh bone. The SBAR indicated Resident 2's physician and family were notified on 11/20/2025 at 6 am. During a review of Resident 2's physician order (PO), dated 11/20/2025 and timed at 11:26 am, the PO indicated to send Resident 2 to General Acute Care Hospital 1 (GACH 1) for further evaluation and treatment of Resident 2's right and left thigh fractures. During a review of Resident 2's Discharge/Transfer Documentation (DTD) from GACH 1, dated 11/21/2025, the DTD indicated Resident 2 underwent surgical intervention that included intramedullary nailing (insertion of a metal rod to repair bone fractures) of Resident 2's left and right thigh bones fracture. During an interview on 12/16/2025 at 1:27 pm with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated Resident Page 1 of 4 055344 055344 12/17/2025 Claremont Heights Post Acute 590 S. Indian Hill Blvd. Claremont, CA 91711
F 0580 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few 2 slid out of bed and was found on the floor during the 3 pm to 11 pm shift on 11/12/2025. Resident 2 was assessed and was not in pain. The DON stated Resident 2's family and physician were not informed on 11/12/2025 after Resident 2 was found on the floor. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/16/2025 at 3:53 pm with the DON, the DON reviewed Resident 2's medical record and stated there was no SBAR or Change of Condition (COC) note in Resident 2's medical record regarding Resident 2's fall on 11/12/2025. The DON stated the DON did not know Resident 2 fell on [DATE] until LVN 3 told the DON on 11/20/2025. Resident 2's physician was informed on 11/20/2025 that Resident 2 fell on [DATE]. During a phone interview on 12/17/2025 at 11:46 am with LVN 3, LVN 3 stated LVN 3 did not take care of Resident 2 during the 3 pm to 11 pm shift on 11/12/2025. LVN 3 stated on 11/12/2025 at 6:30 pm, LVN 3 assisted LVN 4 and Certified Nursing Assistant 8 (CNA 8) to put Resident 2, who was sitting on the floor mat by Resident 2's bed, back to bed. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/17/2025 at 3:02 pm with the DON, the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Change of Condition Notification, dated 4/1/2025, was reviewed. The P&P indicated, A licensed nurse will notify the resident's attending physician and legal representative or an appropriate family member when there is an incident/accident involving the resident. The DON stated the Change of Condition Notification policy applied to Resident 2's unwitnessed fall on 11/12/2025. The DON stated Resident 2's physician and family should have been notified on 11/12/2025 regarding Resident 2's fall. During a phone interview on 12/17/2025 at 3:12 pm with LVN 4, LVN 4 stated on 11/12/2025, while LVN 4 worked the 3 pm to 11 pm shift, CNA 8 informed LVN 4 that CNA 8 found Resident 2 on the floor mat by Resident 2's bed at around 6:30 pm. LVN 4 stated LVN 4, LVN 3, and CNA 8 assisted Resident 2 back to bed. LVN 4 stated LVN 4 did not report to anyone and did not document Resident 2's fall because Resident 2 did not have any injury. LVN 4 stated if Resident 2 had an injury or was in distress then LVN 4 would have reported Resident 2's fall. 055344 Page 2 of 4 055344 12/17/2025 Claremont Heights Post Acute 590 S. Indian Hill Blvd. Claremont, CA 91711
F 0600 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment and protect one of six sampled residents (Resident 3) from physical abuse (aggressive or violent behavior with the intention to cause physical harm) and mistreatment when Certified Nursing Assistant 6 (CNA 6) roughly placed Resident 3 into a wheelchair, brushed Resident 2's hair roughly, and yelled at Resident 3 on 11/25/2025. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 3 at risk for physical and psychosocial harm.Findings: a. During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 3 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's Disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities) and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 3's History and Physical (H&P, physician's clinical evaluation and examination of the resident), dated 3/19/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 3 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 11/19/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 3's cognition (thinking, knowing, and being aware) was severely impaired. The MDS indicated Resident 3 required partial/moderate assistance (helper lifts, holds, or supports trunk or limbs, but provides less than half the effort) for most activities of daily living (ADLsactivities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily). b. During a review of Resident 4's AR, the AR indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing). The AR indicated Resident 4 stayed in the same room as Resident 3. During a review of Resident 4's H&P, dated 6/4/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 4 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of the facility's Interview Record (IR) with Resident 4, dated 11/25/2025, the IR indicated Resident 4 was interviewed by the facility regarding her observations made while CNA 6 was providing care to her roommate, Resident 3. The IR indicated Resident 4 stated that while CNA 6 was assisting Resident 3 with personal care, Resident 4 noticed that CNA 6 was speaking to Resident 3 in a loud and firm voice, repeatedly telling Resident 3 not to get up. Resident 4 stated that CNA 6 appeared to be holding Resident 3 tightly by the hands and guided Resident 3 to the wheelchair in a manner that Resident 4 described as fast and rough. Resident 4 further reported that while CNA 6 was combing Resident 3's hair, Resident 4 observed CNA 6 brushing Resident 3's hair hard enough that it seemed like it was pulling Resident 3's hair, which caused Resident 4 to become concerned for Resident 3's comfort. During a review of the facility's IR with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), dated 11/25/2025, the IR indicated that at approximately 3:25 pm while in the DSD's office, a CNA (unknown) came to report to the DSD that the CNA heard another CNA yelling at a resident (Resident 3). The IR indicated the CNA told the DSD to ask Resident 4 because Resident 4 heard it as well. The DSD spoke with Resident 4 who was under the care of CNA 6. The IR indicated Resident 4 told the DSD CNA 6 was rough with Resident 3 when CNA 6 grabbed Resident 3 by the arms and placed Resident 3 down (in the wheelchair). Resident 4 stated that when CNA 6 brushed Resident 3's hair CNA 6 was rough and yelled at Resident 3. During a review of the facility's IR with CNA 5, dated 11/26/2025, the IR indicated that CNA 5 stated that CNA 5 believed reporting the incident was the appropriate action. The IR indicated CNA 5 observed that Resident 3 appeared uncomfortable while CNA 6 was providing care and noted that CNA 6 spoke to Resident 3 in a loud tone of voice. CNA 5 stated that CNA 5 would not feel comfortable if CNA 5's own grandmother or family member were treated in that manner and this prompted CNA 5 to report the incident. During an interview on 12/15/2025 at 2:19 pm with Resident 3, 055344 Page 3 of 4 055344 12/17/2025 Claremont Heights Post Acute 590 S. Indian Hill Blvd. Claremont, CA 91711
F 0600 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Resident 3 stated Resident 3 did not remember the incident between Resident 3 and CNA 6. During an interview on 12/15/2025 at 2:25 pm with Resident 4, Resident 4 stated CNA 6 would practically throw Resident 3 into the (wheel)chair and would pull on Resident 3's hair while combing the knots out of Resident 3's hair. Resident 4 stated Resident 4 refused to have CNA 6 take care of Resident 4. During an interview on 12/16/2025 at 9:36 am with Social Worker Director (SWD), the SWD stated that on 11/25/2025 she went to speak to Resident 3 and Resident 3 stated the ugly and rude nurse (CNA 6) assisted Resident 3 to the restroom and yelled at Resident 3 not to get up, then CNA 6 got Resident 3 up and placed Resident 3 hard on the chair. Resident 3 stated Resident 3 did not like CNA 6. The SWD stated Resident 3's roommate, Resident 4, witnessed the incident and stated it happened between 3:30 pm and 4 pm on 11/25/2025. During an interview on 12/16/2025 at 11:39 am with the DSD, the DSD stated Resident 4 had requested not to have CNA 6 because CNA 6 has too much attitude and Resident 4 did not want CNA 6 to care for Resident 4. During an interview on 12/16/2025 at 1:27 pm with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated there were 2 residents who requested not to be cared for by CNA 6 including Resident 4. The DON also stated there was only one recorded grievance between CNA 6 and Resident 3 and the decision to let CNA 6 go had to do with Resident 4's statement because the facility believed an incident did occur. The DON stated CNA 5 also overheard CNA 6's tone of voice when CNA 6 spoke to Resident 3. A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Abuse Prevention and Management, dated 5/30/2024, indicated, The facility does not condone any form of resident abuse.and/or mistreatment.The facility identifies, corrects, and intervenes in situations in which abuse, neglect.and/or mistreatment is more likely to occur. 055344 Page 4 of 4

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

2 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0580GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F580 - Notification of Changes

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • 0600GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F600 - Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 17, 2025 survey of CLAREMONT HEIGHTS POST ACUTE?

This was a inspection survey of CLAREMONT HEIGHTS POST ACUTE on December 17, 2025. The surveyor cited 2 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at CLAREMONT HEIGHTS POST ACUTE on December 17, 2025?

Yes, 2 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) tha..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.