Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

BRIGHTON POST ACUTECMS #0554101 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0623 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Long Term Care Ombudsman office (LTC-Ombudsman, a resident advocacy agency) of transfer to the hospital for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when the facility failed to send a copy of Resident 1's transfer and discharge notification to the local LTC-Ombudsman office. This failure resulted in the LTC-Ombudsman not aware of Resident 1's discharge circumstances should appeals be filed by the resident or his representative. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR, documents containing resident demographic information and medical diagnosis), undated, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Metabolic Encephalopathy (a disorder caused by a buildup of toxins in the brain that can happen with advanced liver disease), Pneumonia (lung infection caused by bacteria), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a disorder in which blood sugar or glucose levels are abnormally high), Hypertension (high blood pressure), Congestive Heart Failure (the heart cannot pump blood or fill adequately), and End Stage Renal Diseases (inability of the kidney to function resulting to build up of toxins in the body and affecting major body organs). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool which indicates physical, medical and cognitive abilities), dated 3/7/24, the MDS indicated Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 14 out of 15 which indicated Resident 1 had no cognitive impairment (0-7 indicated severe cognitive impairment - [memory loss, poor decision making-skills], 8-12 moderate cognitive impairment, 13-15 cognitively intact). During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/25/24, at 11:30 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 1's Nursing Progress Note (NPN), dated 3/31/24 was reviewed. The NPN indicated, . Situation: edema to abdomen and scrotum. Resident requesting to be sent to [hospital] . Orders to send to [acute hospital] for eval and treatment. Resident owns Responsible Party . DON stated Resident 1 did not return to the facility after he was transferred to acute hospital on 3/31/24. During an interview on 4/25/24, at 11:40 a.m., with the Social Services Director (SSD), the SSD stated he did not notify the State LTC Ombudsman office when Resident 1 was transferred to acute hospital on 3/31/24. SSD stated he was not aware of the requirements to notify the local LTC-Ombudsman office when a resident was transferred and admitted to the hospital. The SSD stated, I send a notice of discharge to the Ombudsman office via fax for residents who went home after discharge from the (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 055410 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 055410 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 04/25/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Brighton Post Acute 361 E. Grangeville Blvd Hanford, CA 93230 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0623 facility, but not for residents transferred to the hospital. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm During a phone interview on 4/25/24, at 1:00 p.m., with LTC-Ombudsman, LTC-Ombudsman stated she did not receive a copy of Resident 1's transfer and discharge notification from the facility. LTC-Ombudsman stated without the transfer and discharge notification, she could not act promptly should appeals be filed by Resident 1 or his legal representative. LTC-Ombudsman stated she was not getting any transfer and discharge notification from the facility for any resident who went to the hospital. Residents Affected - Few During a phone interview on 4/26/24, at 2:10 p.m., with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), the ADON stated the facility failed to notify the LTC Ombudsman office of Resident 1's transfer to the hospital on 3/31/24. The ADON stated without the knowledge of Resident 1's discharge circumstances, the LTCOmbudsman could not act promptly should appeals be filed by the resident or his representative. During a review of Professional reference titled, CMS Issues Clarification of Notice Requirements to Long-Term Care Ombudsman when Resident is transferred or discharged from Long-Term Care Facility dated 7/24/17, (found at https://www.hallrender.com/2017/07/24/cms-issues-clarification-of notice requirements) indicated . On May 12, 2017, the Survey and Certification Group at Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a memorandum, Implementation Issues, Long-Term Care Regulatory Changes . Clarification of Notice before Transfer or Discharge Requirements clarifying the requirements of the Final Rule regarding the timing for providing notice to the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman in the event a resident is transferred or discharged from the long-term care facility. Facilities must immediately review and revise their discharge and transfer notice practices, policies and procedures . Emergency Transfers, when a resident is temporarily transferred on an emergency basis to an acute care facility, notice of the transfer may be provided to the resident and resident representative as soon as practicable . Copies of notices for emergency transfers must also still be sent to the Ombudsman . FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 055410 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0623GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F623 - Transfer and discharge-

    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 25, 2024 survey of BRIGHTON POST ACUTE?

This was a inspection survey of BRIGHTON POST ACUTE on April 25, 2024. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at BRIGHTON POST ACUTE on April 25, 2024?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before tran..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.