F 0641
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments
were accurate for 2 (Resident #65 and Resident #72) of 19 sampled residents.
Residents Affected - Few
Findings included:
During an interview on 11/20/2024 at 10:16 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the facility did not
have a policy on MDS accuracy.
1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #72 on 10/12/2024. According to the
admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of bipolar disorder, major
depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder.
An admission MDS, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/19/2024, revealed Resident #72 had
a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition.
The MDS revealed that the resident was not considered by the state Level II Preadmission Screening and
Resident Review (PASRR) process to have a serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related
condition.
A letter from the California Department of Health Care Services, dated 09/26/2024, revealed a Level II
evaluation was conducted on 09/26/2024 and specialized services were recommended.
During an interview on 11/21/2024 at 8:43 AM, the MDS Coordinator stated she reviewed the electronic
and paper chart, observed the resident, and interviewed the resident and staff to complete an accurate
MDS. The MDS Coordinator indicated that to complete the admission MDS she reviewed the hospital
documentation and the resident's history and physical.
During an interview on 11/21/2024 at 9:35 AM, the DON stated she expected for the MDS to be accurate.
The DON stated it was important for information to be true and accurate because the MDS needed to
reflect the actual state of the resident.
During an interview on 11/21/2024 at 9:54 AM, the MDS Coordinator stated Resident #72's PASRR Level II
was missed and should have been coded on the resident's admission MDS.
During an interview on 11/21/2024 at 10:06 AM, the Administrator stated he expected the MDS to be
completed accurately and in a timely manner. The Administrator stated it was important to capture the
correct information so the MDS would be accurate.
2. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #65 on 07/02/2024. According to the
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 6
Event ID:
055510
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055510
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/21/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Redding Post Acute
1836 Gold Street
Redding, CA 96001
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0641
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease, chronic peptic ulcer, and hypertension.
An admission MDS, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/09/2024, revealed Resident #65 had
a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. Per
the MDS, Resident #65 did not use tobacco at the time of the assessment.
Resident #65's care plan included a focus area initiated 09/19/2024 that indicated the resident was a
smoker. Interventions directed staff to educate the resident regarding the facility's smoking policy,
designated smoking areas, and the storage of smoking materials.
Resident #65's Progress Notes dated 07/02/2024 indicated the resident was a current smoker and was
interested in the facility smoking schedule.
During an interview on 11/20/2024 at 8:50 AM, Resident #65 stated they had been a smoker since before
admission to the facility.
During an interview on 11/21/2024 at 8:43 AM, the MDS Coordinator stated she reviewed the resident's
chart and interviewed staff and the resident when completing their MDS. The MDS Coordinator further
stated she thought when she interviewed Resident #65 upon admission that they were not smoking, but the
resident was in fact smoking with the activities department.
During an interview on 11/21/2024 at 9:35 AM, the DON stated she expected the MDS to be completed to
accurately reflect the resident's status to ensure facility staff provided the appropriate care for each
resident.
During an interview on 11/21/2024 at 10:06 AM, the Administrator stated he expected the MDS to be
completed accurately and in a timely manner.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055510
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 6
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055510
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/21/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Redding Post Acute
1836 Gold Street
Redding, CA 96001
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0644
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for
services as needed.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to initiate a Level I Preadmission
Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for a resident who received a psychiatric diagnosis, prior to
readmission, for 1 (Resident #16) of 3 residents reviewed for PASRR.
Findings included:
An undated facility policy titled, PASRR Completion Policy revealed, The Center will make sure that all
admissions have the appropriate Patient Assessment and Resident Review (PASRR) completed.
An admission Record revealed the facility originally admitted Resident #16 on 01/10/2024 and re-admitted
the resident on 08/01/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that
included diagnosis of dementia with behavioral disturbance.
A Medicare 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/05/2024,
revealed Resident #16 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, which indicated the
resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated the resident had active psychiatric diagnoses
of anxiety and psychotic disorder. Per the MDS, the resident received antipsychotic and antianxiety
medication during the assessment timeframe.
Resident #16's care plan included a focus area revised on 01/29/2024, that indicated the resident had the
potential to be physically aggressive towards staff. Interventions directed staff to analyze the time of day,
place, circumstances, triggers, and what de-escalates the behavior (initiated 01/29/2024); to assess and
address for contributing sensory deficits (initiated 01/29/2024); and when the resident becomes agitated,
intervene before agitation escalates (initiated 01/29/2024). The care plan included a focus area initiated on
06/07/2024, that indicated the resident used psychotropic medications related to psychosis, as evidenced
by verbal and physical aggression, sexual outbursts, and the inability to redirect. Interventions directed staff
to administer psychotropic medications as ordered by the physician, and to monitor for side effects and
effectiveness (initiated 06/07/2024).
Resident #16's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I Screening, dated
12/28/2023, prior to Resident #16's first admission to the facility, indicated the resident did not have a
serious diagnosed mental disorder. The Level I Screening indicated a Level II Mental Health Evaluation was
not required.
Resident #16's Census List, dated 11/19/2024, revealed Resident #16 was transferred to the hospital on
[DATE] and discharged from the facility after seven days, on 07/19/2024. The Census List further revealed
Resident #16 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE].
An IDT [Interdisciplinary Team] Review note dated 07/11/2024 revealed Resident #16 was sent to a facility
for psychiatric care for two to four weeks because of aggressive behaviors and would return to the facility
when completed.
A General Note dated 08/02/2024 revealed Resident #16 arrived back at the facility and was adjusting well.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055510
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 6
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055510
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/21/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Redding Post Acute
1836 Gold Street
Redding, CA 96001
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0644
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
A hospital Discharge Summary dated 08/01/2024, revealed Resident #16 had a new diagnosis of
unspecified psychosis, in addition to an existing diagnosis of dementia with behavioral disturbance.
Resident #16's medical record revealed no other PASRR had been completed since re-admission to the
facility on [DATE], and no evidence that indicated a referral was made to the appropriate state-designated
authority after receiving a new psychiatric diagnosis.
During an interview on 11/20/2024 at 10:16 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated a new PASRR should
have been completed when Resident #16 was readmitted to the facility in August 2024.
During a subsequent interview on 11/20/2024 at 11:15 AM, the DON stated she was going to have the
Social Services Director (SSD) submit a new Level I Screening, as it should have been done when the
resident returned from a psychiatric stay with a diagnosed mental illness of psychosis.
During an interview on 11/21/2024 at 8:23 AM, the SSD stated the Level I Screening was to be completed
at the hospital prior to a resident's admission to the facility, and the Business Office Manager (BOM) would
make sure the paperwork was present prior to admission.
During an interview on 11/21/2024 at 8:27 AM, the BOM stated the hospital completed the PASRR prior to
a resident coming to a skilled nursing facility. The BOM stated that the accuracy of the PASRR was
assessed by the DON, and if the resident had an issue with mental illness after admission, the facility would
initiate an additional PASRR. She also stated if the resident triggered a positive Level I PASRR and
required a Level II assessment, both should be completed at the hospital prior to admission.
During an interview on 11/21/2024 at 8:32 AM, the DON stated all admissions were reviewed for
medications and diagnoses that would trigger a positive Level I PASRR prior to admission. She stated the
Admissions Director would bring the PASRR to her to review if it did not match the diagnoses available in
the resident's medical history. The DON stated that if the PASRR was incorrect, the facility would notify the
hospital's PASRR department so they could educate their team on what was incorrect. The DON stated
there was a lack of training regarding Resident #16's PASRR. The DON stated the facility Resident #16 was
sent to for psychiatric inpatient care did not participate in the PASRR program and did not complete a Level
I assessment prior to discharge. She stated it was the responsibility of the facility to complete the Level I
PASRR when the resident returned. The DON stated they should have completed another assessment for
Resident #16, and the facility would start the assessment process. The DON stated her expectation going
forward was for the PASRR to be reviewed by the Admissions Director, who is a nurse, prior to admission.
The DON stated if there was a question or concern regarding a medication or diagnosis, she could get
clarification. She stated she reviewed admissions as well and corrected or initiated a new PASRR if needed
and notified the hospital of errors. The DON stated the PASRR system needed work and more training so
the facility could have a good and functioning PASRR program.
During an interview on 11/21/2024 at 10:06 AM, the Administrator stated the PASRRs should come from
the hospital, and if a Level II was needed, it should happen at the hospital prior to admission. He stated the
PASRRs needed to be accurate with proper psychiatric diagnoses and he would defer to the DON on the
importance of the PASRR process.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055510
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 6
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055510
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/21/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Redding Post Acute
1836 Gold Street
Redding, CA 96001
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0645
PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Based on interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to
accurately complete a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for 1 (Resident #24)
of 3 residents reviewed for PASRR. Specifically, Resident #24 had a diagnosis of schizophrenia that was
not captured on their Level I PASRR.
Residents Affected - Few
Findings included:
An undated facility policy titled, PASRR Completion Policy, indicated, The Center will make sure that all
admissions have the appropriate Patient Assessment and Resident Review (PASRR) completed.
An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #24's on 06/03/2024. According to the
admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of schizophrenia with an
onset date of 06/03/2024 and major depressive disorder with an onset date of 06/03/2024.
An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/10/2024,
revealed Resident #24 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the
resident had intact cognition. Per the MDS, Resident #24 was not considered by the state Level II PASARR
process to have a serious mental illness.
Resident #24's care plan included a focus area initiated on 06/03/2024 that indicated the resident used
psychotropic medications related to schizophrenia as evidenced by auditory hallucinations. Interventions
directed staff to monitor for any adverse reactions of psychotropic medications and to monitor and record
the occurrence of target behavior symptoms.
Resident #24's Order Summary Report contained an order dated 08/24/2024, for Aripiprazole
(antipsychotic) oral tablet 30 milligrams (mg) with instructions to give 30 mg by mouth one time a day as
evidenced by auditory hallucinations related to schizophrenia.
Resident #24's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I Screening, dated
06/03/2024, indicated the resident had a serious diagnosed mental disorder of depression. The screening
revealed schizophrenia was not listed as a diagnosed mental disorder.
A letter from the State of California Health and Human Services Agency Department of Health Care
Services dated 06/03/2024 indicated the state was unable to complete a Level II evaluation because
Resident #24 had no serious mental illness.
During an interview on 11/21/2024 at 8:24 AM, the Social Services Director (SSD) stated the Level I
PASRR was completed at the hospital prior to admission.
During an interview on 11/21/2024 at 8:25 AM, the Business Office Manager (BOM) stated the hospital
completed the Level I PASRR and the Director of Nursing (DON) was responsible for ensuring the accuracy
of these screenings. The BOM further stated the facility accepted the hospital-completed Level I PASRR for
admission.
During an interview on 11/21/2024 at 8:32 AM, the DON stated the BOM had access to the PASRR
screening system, and she reviewed them prior to a resident's admission for accuracy. The DON further
stated Resident #24's schizophrenia diagnosis was not listed on their Level I PASRR and that it needed
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055510
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 6
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055510
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/21/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Redding Post Acute
1836 Gold Street
Redding, CA 96001
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0645
to be redone and resubmitted to include that diagnosis.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
During an interview on 11/21/2024 at 10:06 AM, the Administrator stated that Level I PASRRs were
completed at the hospital prior to admission, and they needed to accurately reflect a resident's mental
health diagnosis.
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055510
If continuation sheet
Page 6 of 6