Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

SIERRA VALLEY REHAB CENTERCMS #0555682 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 2 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

055568 07/24/2024 Sierra Valley Rehab Center 301 West Putnam Porterville, CA 93257
F 0656 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was implemented for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was not provided a bed alarm (device that alerts staff when a resident gets out of bed). This failure had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for falls resulting in injuries. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan (CP) , dated 5/16/17, the CP indicated, [Resident 1] is at risk for falls with or without injury related to poor safety awareness. Interventions: Bed alarm, ensure in proper working order, answer promptly. During an observation on 7/19/24 at 11:30 a.m. in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 did not have a bed alarm on his bed. During an interview on 7/19/24 at 12:35 p.m. with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), ADON stated Resident 1 is at risk for falls. ADON stated, [Resident 1] will hang his feet on the side of the bed. He will attempt to transfer. During an interview on 7/19/24 at 12:39 p.m. with Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC), MDSC stated, [Resident 1] tries to get out of bed occasionally. During a review of Resident 1's Fall Risk Observation/Assessment (FROA), dated 7/5/24, the FROA indicated Resident 1 had a score of 24 (score of 16-42 means high risk for falls). During an interview on 7/19/24 at 12:52 p.m. with ADON, ADON stated Resident 1's care plan was not followed and she expects Resident 1 to have a bed alarm. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated December 2016, the P&P indicated, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Page 1 of 2 055568 055568 07/24/2024 Sierra Valley Rehab Center 301 West Putnam Porterville, CA 93257
F 0919 Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for one of six sampled residents (Resident 5). This failure had the potential for Resident 5 to be unable to call for help and his needs not being met. Residents Affected - Few Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/24/24 at 11:46 a.m. with Resident 5 in Resident 5's room, Resident 5 was lying in bed and his call light was hanging on the wall behind his bedside drawer. Resident 5 stated he cannot find his call light. He stated, Where is it [call light]? During an interview on 7/24/24 at 11:50 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2, CNA 2 stated Resident 5's call light was not within his reach. CNA 2 stated Resident 5's call light should have been placed within his reach. During a review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS – an assessment tool), dated 5/17/24, the MDS indicated Resident 5 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 7 (score of 0-7 means severe cognitive impairment). The MDS indicated Resident 5's both lower extremities have limitation that interfered with daily functions. During a review of Resident 5's Care Plan (CP), CP indicated, [Resident 5] has an ADL [Activities of daily living – activities related to personal care] self care performance deficit r/t [related to] general weakness/impaired balance/transfer, bilateral AKA [Above the knee amputation- both lower limbs were surgically removed], need assistance for personal care. Interventions: Bed Mobility: dependent. Dressing: dependent. Personal Hygiene: dependent. Toileting: dependent. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Call Light, Use of, dated 2018, the P&P indicated, Be sure all call lights are placed within the reach of each resident, never on the floor or bedside stand. 055568 Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

2 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0656GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F656 - Comprehensive Care Plans

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • 0919GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F919 - Resident Call System

    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 24, 2024 survey of SIERRA VALLEY REHAB CENTER?

This was a inspection survey of SIERRA VALLEY REHAB CENTER on July 24, 2024. The surveyor cited 2 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at SIERRA VALLEY REHAB CENTER on July 24, 2024?

Yes, 2 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be ..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.