F 0700
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a
resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed
consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the proper
use of bed rails for six of six sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6).
* Resident 1 was observed with bilateral bed rails elevated, however, had a physician ' s order, assessment,
and care plan problem for the right siderail use only.
* Resident 2 was observed with bilateral bed rails elevated, with no physician ' s order, assessment, nor
care plan problem in place.
* Resident 3 was observed with upper and lower left ½ (half) bed rails elevated. Resident 3 did not
have a physician ' s order, assessment, or care plan problem for the use of the bed rails.
* Resident 4 was observed with bilateral ½ length bed rails elevated, with the right siderail padded.
Resident 4 ' s physician ' s order was only for the left padded half bed rail.
* Resident 5 was observed with left bed rail elevated with no physician ' s order, assessment, or care plan
problem for bed rail use.
* Resident 6 was observed with the left full bed rails elevated without a physician ' s order, assessment, or
care plan problem in place for the use of bed rails.
These failures put the residents at risk for entrapment and death.
Findings:
Review of the facility ' s P&P titled Proper Use of Siderails revised 12/16 showed the side rails are only
permissible if they are used to treat a resident ' s medical symptoms or to assist with mobility and transfer
of residents. An assessment will be made to determine the resident ' s symptoms, risk of entrapment, and
reason for using siderails. The use of side rails as an assistive device will be addressed in the resident care
plan.
1. On 12/7/23 at 0900 hours, an observation was made at Resident 5 ' s bedside. Resident 5 was observed
in bed with the left side of the bed against the wall and ½ (half) bed rail elevated.
On 12/7/23 at 1034 hours, an additional observation was made at Resident 5 ' s bedside. Resident 5
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 3
Event ID:
055671
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055671
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/13/2023
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Parkview Healthcare Center
1514 E. Lincoln Avenue
Anaheim, CA 92805
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0700
was again observed in bed with the left ½ length bed rail elevated.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Medical record review for Resident 5 was initiated on 12/7/23. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on
[DATE], and readmitted [DATE].
Residents Affected - Some
Review of the Physician Orders failed to show any order for the use of the bed rails.
Review of Resident 5 ' s plan of care failed to show any care plan problem addressing the use of the
siderails.
Further review of the medical record failed to show an assessment indicating the necessity of using the
siderailsfor Resident 5.
2. On 12/7/23 at 0928 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 3 at
the bedside. Resident 3 was observed with the right side of the bed against the wall and upper and lower
½ length siderails elevated on the left side. Resident 3 was asked if he used the rails and stated he
could not get out of bed.
Medical record review for Resident 3 was initiated on 12/7/23. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on
[DATE].
Review of the Physician Orders failed to show any order for the use of the bed rails.
Review of Resident 3 ' s plan of care failed to show any care plan problem addressing the use of the
siderails.
Further review of the medical record failed to show an assessment indicating the necessity of using the
siderailsfor Resident 3.
3. On 12/7/23 at 0928 hours, an observation was made at Resident 4 ' s bedside. Resident 4 was observed
in bed with padded bilateral ½ (half) length bed rails elevated with the right side against the wall.
On 12/7/23 at 1030 hours, another observation showed Resident 4 remained in bed with bilateral ½
bed rails elevated, the left siderail was padded.
Medical record review for Resident 4 was initiated on 12/7/23. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on
[DATE], and readmitted on [DATE].
Review of Resident 4 ' s Physician Orders showed an order dated 9/14/23, to place the resident ' s bed at
the lowest position with a padded left half siderail up for mobility and positioning.
There was no physician ' s order for the side of the right ½ siderailuse for the resident.
4. On 12/7/23 at 0931 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted at Resident 6 ' s
bedside with LVN 1. Resident 6 was observed in bed with upper and lower bed rails elevated on the left
side, and right side of the bed was against the wall. LVN 1 verified this observation.
Medical record review for Resident 6 was initiated on 12/7/23. Resident 6 was admitted to the
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055671
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 3
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055671
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/13/2023
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Parkview Healthcare Center
1514 E. Lincoln Avenue
Anaheim, CA 92805
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0700
facility on [DATE].
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Review of Resident 6 ' s Physician Orders failed to show an order for the bed rail use.
Review of Resident 6 ' s plan of care failed to show a care plan problem addressing the use of siderails.
Residents Affected - Some
5. On 12/7/23 at 0935 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted at Resident 2 ' s
bedside with CNA 1. Resident 2 was observed in bed with the left bed rail elevated. CNA 1 stated the side
rail was elevated due to Resident 2 experiencing spasms at times. When asked if she had seen Resident 2
hit the bed rail when there was a spasm, CNA 1 stated yes, but there was no injury.
Medical record review for Resident 2 was initiated on 12/7/23. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on
[DATE], and readmitted on [DATE].
Review of Resident 2 ' s Physician Orders failed to show an order for bed rail use.
Review of Resident 2 ' s plan of care failed to show a care plan problem addressing the use of the siderails.
6. On 12/7/23 at 0957 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 1 at
the bedside. Resident 1 was observed with bilateral ½ (half) length bed rails elevated. The left side of
the bed was against the wall.
Medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 12/7/23. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on
[DATE], and readmitted on [DATE].
Review of Resident 1 ' s Physician Orders showed an order dated 1/23/23, for right ½ siderail
elevated for mobility and positioning.
Review of Resident 1 ' s Safety Assessment for Siderail Usage dated 9/27/21,showed left ½ siderail
up when in bed for mobility and positioning.
Review of Resident 1 ' s plan of care showed a care plan problem dated 1/21/23, for the risk for
injury/entrapment with an intervention to use the right ½ siderail.
There was no physician ' s order and care plan developed for the use of the left side rail. In addition, there
was no assessment for the use of the right ½ bed rail when in bed.
On 12/7/23 at 1132 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review was conducted with the
DON. The DON was asked about the process for the siderail use. The DON stated if the bed was against
the wall, there should be no siderail on that side. The DON stated the resident would need a safety
assessment and physician ' s order for the use of the siderails. The DON verified all the above findings.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055671
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 3