Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

SANTA CLARITA POST-ACUTE CARE CENTERCMS #0557281 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

055728 12/09/2025 Santa Clarita Post-Acute Care Center 23801 Newhall Avenue Newhall, CA 91321
F 0684 Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 3) by failing to: 1. Ensure licensed nurses monitored Resident 1's medical status after the resident's changes of condition (COC) on 11/15/2025 and 11/29/2025. 2. Ensure Resident 1's physician order for oxygen therapy (O2 therapy - a treatment that provides a person with supplemental or extra oxygen) at two liters per minute was followed. On 1/30/2025, Resident 1's oxygen therapy was at three liters per minute (lpm - unit of measurement). 3. Ensure licensed nurses monitored Resident 3's gastrointestinal (stomach and intestines) status after the resident's COC on 12/4/2025. These deficient practices had the potential to place Resident 1 and Resident 3 at risk for undetected and worsening medical conditions which could negatively impact the residents' health and safety.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (undated), the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 1/13/2025 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar [glucose]), anemia (condition in which the body does not get enough oxygen-rich blood) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a lung disease characterized by long term poor airflow). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 1/17/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1's cognitive (conscious mental activities including thinking, reasoning, understanding, learning, and remembering) skills for daily decision making were severely impaired. During an interview on 12/9/2025 at 11:46 a.m. and concurrent record review of Resident 1's medical records, reviewed with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 stated Resident 1's Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation (SBAR) Communication Forms indicated the resident had a COC on 1/15/2025 and 1/29/2025. LVN 1 stated on 1/15/2025, Resident 1 had two COCs for low hemoglobin (amount of oxygen-carrying protein in the red blood cells) and hematocrit (percentage of blood volume made up of red blood cells) levels and for a mass on Resident 1's left arm. LVN 1 stated Resident 1's Progress Notes indicated there was no documented evidence that monitoring was done on 1/16/2025 and 1/17/2025, 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. shifts. LVN 1 stated Resident 1's SBAR Communication Form, dated 1/29/2025, indicated the resident had a COC for high blood urea nitrogen (BUN - checks the waste products in the blood to test the kidney function) level, low potassium (a mineral the body needs to work properly), and high ammonia (a waste product from protein breakdown in the blood). LVN 1 stated Resident 1's Progress Notes indicated there was no documented evidence that monitoring was done on 1/29/2025, 3 p.m. to 11 p.m. shift and on 1/30/2025, 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. shift. LVN 1 stated residents should be monitored every shift for 72 hours after a COC. LVN 1 stated Resident 1's medical condition had the potential to be missed and worsen. Resident 1's Physician Orders, dated 1/13/2025, indicated an order for continuous oxygen at two lpm using a nasal cannula (a device used to deliver supplemental oxygen). Resident 1's SBAR Communication Form, dated 1/30/2025, indicated the resident had oxygen at three liters per Residents Affected - Some Page 1 of 2 055728 055728 12/09/2025 Santa Clarita Post-Acute Care Center 23801 Newhall Avenue Newhall, CA 91321
F 0684 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Some minute using nasal cannula. LVN 1 stated the licensed nurses did not follow Resident 1's oxygen therapy order. LVN 1 stated Resident 1 had the potential to be over oxygenated that may cause respiratory distress (difficulty breathing). During an interview on 12/9/2025 at 2:57 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated Resident 1 should be monitored every shift for at least 72 hours after the resident's COC. The DON stated there was no documented evidence that Resident 1 was monitored on 1/16/2025 and 1/17/2025, 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. shift, after the resident's COC on 1/15/2025. The DON stated there was no documented evidence that Resident 1 was monitored on 1/29/2025, 3 p.m. to 11 p.m. shift, and on 1/30/2025, 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. shift, after the resident's COC on 1/29/2025. The DON stated Resident 1's oxygen therapy was administered at three lpm instead of two lpm. The DON stated not following the physician's oxygen therapy order had the potential to negatively affect the resident's health. The DON stated the facility failed to ensure the licensed nurses monitored and documented Resident 1's condition after the resident's COC. The DON stated the facility failed to ensure Resident 1's physician order on oxygen therapy was followed. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (PnP) titled, Acute Condition Changes - Clinical Protocol, last reviewed on 5/29/2025, the PnP indicated, The staff will monitor and document the resident/patient's progress and responses to treatment, and the physician will adjust treatment accordingly. During a review of the facility's PnP titled, Oxygen Administration, last reviewed on 5/29/2025, the PnP indicated The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. The PnP indicated verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (undated), the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 5/8/2024 with diagnoses including gastro-esophageal reflux disease (a condition in which the stomach contents leak backward from the stomach into the esophagus [food pipe]), anemia, and essential hypertension (an abnormally high blood pressure that was not a result of a medical condition). During a review of Resident 3's MDS, dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 3's cognitive skills for daily decision making were intact. During a review of Resident 3's SBAR Communication Form, dated 12/4/2025, the SBAR Communication Form indicated Resident 3 had diarrhea for two days. During a review of Resident 3's Progress Notes, dated 12/4/2025 to 12/8/2025, the Progress Notes indicated there was no documented evidence that Resident 3 was monitored on the following days and shifts: a. 12/4/2025 (3 p.m. to 11 p.m. and 11 p.m. to 7 a.m. shifts),b. 12/5/2025 (7 a.m. to 3 p.m. shift), and c. 12/6/2025 (7 a.m. to 3 p.m. shift). During an interview on 12/9/2025 at 2:57 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated Resident 3 should be monitored every shift for at least 72 hours after the resident's COC. The DON stated the facility failed to ensure the licensed nurses monitored and documented Resident 3's condition after the resident's COC. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (PnP) titled, Acute Condition Changes - Clinical Protocol, last reviewed on 5/29/2025, the PnP indicated The staff will monitor and document the resident/patient's progress and responses to treatment, and the physician will adjust treatment accordingly. 055728 Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0684GeneralS&S Epotential for harm

    F684 - Quality of care

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 9, 2025 survey of SANTA CLARITA POST-ACUTE CARE CENTER?

This was a inspection survey of SANTA CLARITA POST-ACUTE CARE CENTER on December 9, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at SANTA CLARITA POST-ACUTE CARE CENTER on December 9, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.