F 0550
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or
her rights.
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' rights to be
treated with dignity and respect were honored for seven of 35 sampled residents when:1. Staff were
observed standing over Resident 25 and Resident 90 while assisting them to eat their lunch meal on
9/29/25; and,2. Resident 23, Resident 46, Resident 86, Resident 56, and Resident 4 who required the use
of incontinent briefs (a type of absorbent material worn to soak up urine and/or contain feces) were told by
unidentified nursing staff to urinate and/or defecate (feces) in their bed, due to the lack of available
incontinent briefs during the weekend of Saturday 9/27/25 and Sunday 9/28/25. These failures had the
potential to negatively impact Resident 25, Resident 90, Resident 23, Resident 46, Resident 86, Resident
56, and Resident 4's psychosocial well-being.Findings:1a. During an observation on 9/29/25, at 1:09 PM, in
the shared dining room, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 6 was observed standing over Resident 25,
while Resident 25 was seated at the table, assisting Resident 25 to eat his lunch. During an interview on
9/29/25, at 1:10 PM, (CNA) 6 confirmed she was standing next to Resident 25, while he was seated in a
chair, to assist him to eat his lunch. CNA 6 stated she should have sat down in a chair next to Resident 25
per facility expectations. CNA 6 further stated they did not always follow the policy due to time constraints
and because they needed to feed other residents.1b. During an observation on 9/29/25, at 1:09 PM, in the
shared dining room, CNA 4 was observed standing next to Resident 90, while she was seated in a chair at
the table, to assist her to eat her lunch.During an interview on 9/30/25, at 8:18 AM, CNA 4 confirmed they
were standing next to Resident 90 during the lunch meal yesterday. CNA 4 further stated the facility
process was to sit down next to the residents while assisting with their meal. CNA 4 explained it was
important to be seated at the same level as the residents to watch them eat and protect their right of
dignity.During an interview on 9/29/25, at 1:11 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) 10 confirmed CNA 4 and CNA 6
were standing over Resident 25 and Resident 90 while they assisted them with their lunch meal. LN 10
stated CNA 4 and CNA 6 should have been sitting next to the residents at the same level, so it was easier
for the residents to eat. LN 10 further stated sitting next to the residents while assisting them with their
meals was important to maintain the resident's dignity.During an interview on 10/2/25, at 11:21 PM, the
Director of Nursing (DON) stated her expectation when residents were assisted with meals was that staff
should be seated next to the residents, on the same level, and standing was not acceptable. The DON
further stated being seated at the same level as the residents was important because the staff could not
see if the residents were having a hard time properly chewing food which could lead to choking. The DON
explained being seated with the residents, was important so the residents were not rushed and was more
respectful and protected the resident's dignity. A review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Dignity,
revised February 2021, indicated, .Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and
enhances his or her sense of well-being.feeling of self-worth.Residents are treated with dignity and respect
at all times.When assisting
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 34
Event ID:
055735
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0550
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
with care .residents are supported.provided with a dignified dining experience.2a. A review of Resident 23's
admission RECORD, indicated Resident 23 was admitted to the facility in Summer of 2022 with diagnoses
including anxiety disorder (a mental health condition characterized by feelings of fear, worry, unease, and
nervousness).A review of Resident 23's Minimum Data Set, (MDS - a resident assessment tool), Section C:
Cognitive Patterns, (an assessment of the mental abilities and functions the brain uses to think, learn,
remember, pay attention, process information and solve problems) dated 9/16/25, indicated Resident 23's
BIMS (BIMS - Brief Interview for Mental Status - a screening tool used in long-term care to assess a
resident's cognitive function [the mental processes like thinking, memory, and perception, that a person
uses to understand and respond to their environment] Scoring = 13-15 indicates normal intact cognitive
function, 8-12 moderate cognitive impairment, 0-7 signifies severe cognitive impairment) was 15 out of 15
indicated Resident 23 had normal intact cognitive function.A review of Resident 23's MDS, Section H:
Bladder [part of the body that holds urine] and Bowel [part of the body that holds feces], dated 9/16/25,
indicated Resident 23 was always incontinent (when a person has no control of when they pass urine or
feces) of bladder and bowel. A review of Resident 23's care plan, (a personalized document that outlines a
resident's healthcare needs, goals, and interventions) revised 6/10/24, indicated, . [Resident 23] has bowel
and bladder incontinence.Impaired mobility [a limitation in a person's ability to purposefully move their body,
affecting their independence].Requesting x4 [4 briefs to be in the residents room] large briefs.During a
concurrent observation and interview on 9/29/25, at 10:20 AM, with Resident 23, in Resident 23's room,
five incontinent briefs were observed in a small clear bag located on Resident 23's bed. Resident 23 stated
the briefs were returned to her today. Resident 23 was observed crying and upset. Resident 23 stated the
facility ran out of briefs on 9/27/25 and 9/28/25 and that the facility had also run out of incontinent briefs a
few weeks prior to 9/29/25. Resident 23 explained that Central Supply (CS 1 - the person in charge of
ordering and stocking supplies) was on leave (absent from work) and when CS 1 went on leave the facility
supplies were not available as usual. Resident 23 cried and explained that she should not have to worry
about when she received her next incontinent brief and that she had never felt so uncared for in her life.
During an interview on 9/29/25, at 1:21 PM, with CS 2, CS 2 confirmed the facility ran out of briefs on
9/27/25 and 9/28/25. CS 2 further stated the Administrator (ADM) had to borrow briefs on Monday 9/29/25,
from other facilities because the delivery of the incontinent briefs was delayed.During an interview on
9/30/25, at 8:04 AM, with CNA 5, CNA 5 verified the facility ran out of incontinent briefs on 9/27/25 and
9/28/25. CNA 5 explained that when she checked other nursing stations and supply closets in the facility,
the areas did not have incontinent briefs available. CNA 5 stated that she did not have any briefs to put on
the residents when she changed them and told a few residents if they went in the bed she would change
them. When asked if CNA 5 could recall which residents she told to go in their bed, she stated she could
not recall.During a follow-up interview on 9/30/25, at 8:07 AM, Resident 23 stated the facility had run out of
incontinent briefs on Sunday, 9/28/25. Resident 23 stated she had saved a couple of briefs just in case the
facility ran out. Resident 23 further stated an unidentified staff member came into her room on 9/28/25 and
took the incontinent briefs from her and stated the incontinent briefs were needed for another unnamed
resident. Resident 23 cried and stated she had to go to the bathroom in her bed, and Resident 23 felt
embarrassed, degraded, and further stated, .it took every bit of dignity I had left away. Resident 23 had
three briefs left on her bed and stated she felt like she had to guard them. 2b. A review of Resident 46's
admission RECORD, indicated Resident 46 was admitted to the facility in mid-2024 with diagnoses
including muscle weakness and difficulty walking.A review of Resident 46's
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0550
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
MDS Section C: Cognitive Pattern, dated 8/28/25, indicated Resident 46's BIMS was 15 out of 15 which
showed Resident 46 had normal intact cognitive function.A review of Resident 46's MDS Section H:
Bladder and Bowel, dated 8/28/25, indicated Resident 46 was always incontinent of bladder and bowel.A
review of Resident 46's care plan, revised 9/29/25, indicated, .[Resident 46] has Bowel
Incontinence.Resident [46] will be clean and dry with use of incontinence products and prompt incontinence
care.A review of Resident 46's care plan, revised 8/24/23, indicated, .[Resident 46] has self care deficit with
ADL [ADL - activities of daily living are basic routine tasks that are necessary for independent self- care]
functions: bathing, personal hygiene.toileting.[Resident 46] will be clean, dry, odor free.The resident will
maintain dignity and self-esteem.During an interview on 9/30/25, at 12:58 PM, in Resident 46's room,
Resident 46 stated the facility ran out of incontinent briefs over the weekend (9/27/25 and 9/28/25) and
further stated the shortage of incontinent briefs had happened before. Resident 46 explained she was
upset because it was undignified (lacking dignity) and unsanitary (not clean) to go without incontinent
briefs.During a follow-up interview on 10/2/25, at 7:15 AM, in Resident 46's room, Resident 46 stated that
last Sunday (9/28/25) a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) whose name she could not recall, had come into
her room looking for incontinent briefs and took two incontinent briefs from her dresser. Resident 46 further
stated she asked the CNA what the facility was doing with the residents' money that incontinent briefs could
not be provided. Resident 46 explained that the unidentified CNA did not respond to Resident 46's
questions and just told Resident 46 that other unnamed residents needed them more and walked out of the
room. Resident 46 stated she was upset and felt frustrated about the lack of incontinent briefs.2c. A review
of Resident 86's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 86 was admitted to the facility early 2024 with
diagnoses including paralytic syndrome (a condition characterized by loss of voluntary muscle control),
muscle weakness, and reduced mobility (a physical impairment that restricts a person's ability to move
freely/easily).A review of Resident 86's MDS Section C: Cognitive Pattern, dated 7/16/25, indicated
Resident 86's BIMS was 15 out of 15 which showed Resident 86 had normal intact cognitive function.A
review of Resident 86's MDS Section H: Bladder and Bowel, dated 7/16/25, indicated Resident 86 was
always incontinent of both bladder and bowel.A review of Resident 86's care plan, revised 1/6/25, indicated,
.Resident [86] at risk for pressure ulcer development [area of skin damage].r/t [related to] bladder and
bowel Impairment.Will identify.provide treatment intervention.Follow facility policies.for the
prevention/treatment of skin breakdown [a condition where the skin becomes damaged or injured leading to
infection] .During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/30/25, at 8:12 AM, with CNA 3, in Resident
86's room, CNA 3 checked Resident 86's room and confirmed Resident 86 did not have any incontinent
briefs. CNA 3 further confirmed that the facility ran out of incontinent briefs over the weekend (9/27/25 and
9/28/25). CNA 3 stated the facility received some briefs on 9/29/25 from other facilities, but stated it was not
enough for all the residents that needed them. CNA 3 further stated their usual process for providing
residents with their needed incontinent briefs was that the previous shift's (a specific block of time during
which a nurse works) CNAs' were responsible to ensure each resident had the needed incontinence briefs
before the CNA left for the day. CNA 3 explained on 9/28/25, CNA 3 alerted LN 9 and explained that the
facility had run out of incontinent briefs. CNA 3 further explained LN 9 told her the Administrator (ADM) was
contacted about the short supply of incontinence briefs.During an interview on 9/30/25, at 8:18 AM, CNA 4
stated that she worked on the weekend (9/27/25 and 9/28/25) and the facility had run out of incontinent
briefs. CNA 4 further stated the facility also ran out of incontinent briefs a few weeks prior. CNA 4 explained
that CS 1 normally ordered supplies but was out on leave. CNA 4 stated that after CS 1 went on leave, the
facility
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0550
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
had problems with maintaining the supply of incontinent briefs, as well as making sure each nursing station
(a centralized area in a healthcare facility for nurse coordination, patient care, and record-keeping) had
enough supplies prior to the weekends. CNA 4 further explained that the CNAs from each nursing station
had gone and searched the facility and in the residents' rooms for incontinent briefs. CNA 4 stated they
(CNA 4 and other CNAs who worked the weekend) had to ask some residents to share their incontinent
briefs with other residents, and had to tell the residents to go to the bathroom in their bed, and added they
told the residents they would change them right away.During an interview on 10/1/25, at 10:21 AM,
Resident 86 stated when the facility ran out of incontinence briefs, he was upset because he was handed a
towel by an unidentified CNA and was told to urinate in the towel. Resident 86 further stated it made him,
.feel uncomfortable. since he could not get out of bed to use the bathroom. Resident 86 further stated it was
not right that he was told he had to urinate in a towel.2d. A review of Resident 56's admission RECORD,
indicated Resident 56 was admitted to the facility mid-2025 with diagnoses including muscle weakness,
and abnormalities of gait and mobility (a difference in a person's normal ability to walk, resulting from
issues with coordination, balance or movement).A review of Resident 56's MDS Section C: Cognitive
Pattern, dated 9/22/25, indicated Resident 56's BIMS was 15 out of 15 which showed Resident 86 had
normal intact cognitive function.A review of Resident 56's MDS Section H: Bladder and Bowel, dated
9/22/25, indicated Resident 86 was always incontinent to both bladder and bowel.A review of Resident 56's
care plan revised 8/14/25, indicated, .[Resident 56] is incontinent of urine.[Resident 56] will have
incontinence care needs met by staff to maintain dignity and comfort.Use absorbent products.Utilize
appropriate continent product [help manage the symptoms of poor bladder and bowel control].A review of
Resident 56's care plan revised 4/4/25, indicated, .[Resident 56] is incontinent of bowel.[Resident 56] will
have incontinence care need met by staff to maintain dignity and comfort and to prevent incontinence
related complications.Provide privacy and comfort.Use absorbent products.Utilize appropriate continent
products.During the resident council meeting (a gathering of residents in a shared nursing home to discuss
concerns, rights, quality of life, and to advocate for improvement) on 10/1/25, at 10:37 AM, Resident 56
stated a staff nurse, whose name could not be recalled, went into the shared room of Resident 56 and
Resident 4 and took away their incontinent briefs. Resident 56 further stated the facility ran out of
incontinent briefs and that she was told to use incontinent briefs from other residents, because Resident 56
was on dialysis (a medical procedure that removes urine and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys
are unable to) and did not produce as much urine as other residents who were not on dialysis.During an
interview on 10/2/25, at 7:31 AM, with Resident 56, in Resident 56's room, Resident 56 stated that on
9/27/25, and 9/28/25, a nurse whose name could not be recalled, walked into Resident 56's room without
knocking, looked through her and her roommate's (Resident 4) personal belongings and took a few
incontinent briefs that Resident 56 had on her dresser. Resident 56 stated the nurse did not say anything to
her while she looked through her belongings, so Resident 56 stated, wait what are you doing. and
explained to the nurse that she could not just walk in and take her belongings. Resident 56 stated the nurse
then explained that other unidentified residents needed the incontinent briefs and told Resident 56 to share
incontinent briefs with Resident 4. Resident 56 stated it made her upset, and she felt like she did not matter
to the facility nursing staff. Resident 56 stated that she was a reasonable person and if the lack of supply of
incontinent briefs had been explained to Resident 56 prior to taking hers, she might have been okay with
what they did, instead, she felt like she was not viewed as a human. Resident 56 further explained that
since CS 1 had left on leave a few weeks ago, the supplies had been very disorganized. Resident 56 stated
at some point
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0550
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
the staff brought her a few incontinent briefs to replace the ones they took, but the incontinent briefs were
too small and did not fit her. Resident 56 further stated it was not until after the Department showed up for
survey on Monday 9/29/25 (investigation to ensure facility compliance with rules and regulations) that their
incontinent briefs were replaced.2e. A review of Resident 4's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 4
was admitted to the facility in mid-2025 with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, (UTI - and infection
that affects any part of the urinary system, including the kidneys, ureters and bladder), hemiplegia and
hemiparesis (hemiplegia -complete paralysis [inability to move] of one side of the body, hemiparesis -is the
weakness of one side of the body), muscle weakness, and abnormalities of gait and mobility.A review of
Resident 4's MDS Section C: Cognitive Pattern, dated 8/15/25, indicated Resident 4's BIMS was 15 out of
15 which showed Resident 4 had normal intact cognitive function.A review of Resident 4's MDS Section H:
Bladder and Bowel, dated 7/23/25, indicated Resident 4 was frequently incontinent to both bladder and
bowel. A review of Resident 4's care plan, revised 7/23/25, indicated, .[Resident 4] is incontinent of urine
and bowels.Goal.Resident will have incontinence care needs met by staff to maintain dignity and
comfort.During an interview on 10/2/25, at 7:39 AM, with Resident 4, in Resident 4's room, Resident 4
stated that on 9/27/25 and 9/28/25 a nurse came into her shared room with Resident 56 and took two
incontinent briefs from Resident 4's dresser. Resident 4 further stated she needed the incontinent briefs
because she took medication that caused her to urinate large amounts of urine. Resident 4 stated she was
incontinent and did not know when she had to urinate and she urinated in bed. Resident 4 stated when she
urinated in bed, it made her feel, .upset and terrible.During an interview on 10/1/25, at 8:55 AM, LN 7
verified the entire facility ran out of briefs on 9/27/25 and 9/28/25. LN 7 stated she contacted the Assistant
Director of Nursing (ADON) for assistance about the lack of incontinence briefs. LN 7 further stated the
ADON checked the outside storage area and found a box of briefs that were size small. LN 7 explained the
small briefs were child sized and too small for most of their residents and not enough for the facility. LN 7
further explained that the CNAs, (whose names could not be remembered), went into other residents'
rooms to find briefs to use for other residents when the residents they were taking the incontinent briefs
from did not have enough of their own. LN 7 stated the nursing staff had to instruct some of the (unnamed)
residents to urinate or have bowel movements in their beds, due to lack of incontinent briefs. LN 7 further
stated the lack of briefs still had not been resolved when LN 7 had finished her shift in the afternoon on
Sunday, 9/28/25. LN 7 stated the incontinent briefs were important to residents who had no control of their
bladder or bowels, because the incontinent briefs helped the residents maintain their dignity and prevented
the residents' skin from rashes and infections.During an interview on 10/1/25, at 10:25 AM, LN 8 verified
the facility ran out of incontinent briefs for the incontinent residents on Sunday 9/28/25. LN 8 stated that the
management team, (LN 8 would not state which management team members were aware), were aware the
briefs were running low, and the ordering supply had not been accurate since CS 1 went on leave. LN 8
further stated the residents on her shift either had to stay dirty of urine and feces or go in their bed until
they received more incontinent briefs. LN 8 explained it was not fair or right for the residents to go without
the needed incontinent briefs and stated the residents deserved better.During an interview on 10/1/25 at
12:59 PM, with the ADON, the ADON verified that the person who oversaw ordering and stocking the units
with supplies, CS 1, had been out of the facility for three to four weeks. The ADON stated in CS 1's
absence, part of CS 2's job included distributing supplies throughout the facility and the central supply
room. The ADON further stated that the ordering of necessary supplies was now being done by the
Administrator (ADM) and the Sub-Acute Director (Sub-Acute -a specialized
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0550
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
unit for patients who require more specialized treatment than a standard skilled nursing unit) (SAD). The
ADON confirmed she was contacted by staff on Sunday 9/28/25 that the facility had run out of incontinent
briefs. The ADON stated she went outside to check the storage Pods (temporary storage containers) for
additional incontinent briefs. The ADON further stated she found three boxes of unknown sized incontinent
briefs and distributed them to the units. The ADON stated they had a total of five units in the facility. The
ADON stated she did not know how many incontinent briefs were in the boxes and what sizes they were.
During an interview on 10/1/25 at 1:15 PM with the Sub-Acute Director (SAD), the SAD stated the facility
had approximately 80-85 residents in the facility who were incontinent and that each resident used about
six briefs a day. The SAD stated there were 85 residents that needed approximately six briefs a day, which
amounted to 510 briefs per day that were needed for the residents who were incontinent. The SAD further
stated that since CS 1 had been on leave, she and the ADM were ordering supplies twice a week in the
same manner CS 1 had done. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/1/25 at 1:27 PM with
CS 2, the storage Pods (a large cargo metal box like a train box-car) was observed outside of the facility in
a patio area. CS 2 showed the Department where the Central Supply Department had received their
shipment of incontinent briefs on 9/30/25. CS 2 verified the boxes indicated a quantity of 32 incontinent
briefs on the outside of the individual incontinent briefs box. During an interview on 10/1/25 at 1:54 PM with
the Administrator (ADM), the ADM stated that she had not heard that the facility ran out of briefs over the
weekend. The ADM further stated on 9/29/25 (Monday) morning, she borrowed briefs from several facilities
in the area to supply the residents with until the recent order of supplies was delivered. The ADM explained
the supply delivery company was behind on delivery supplies which included incontinent briefs. The ADM
stated the risk to the residents for running out of incontinent briefs was that their urine and/or feces soiled
clothes or sheets would not be changed timely. The ADM further stated that if the residents were not
changed timely the residents would be at risk for skin breakdown, skin irritation, and could have a
psychosocial effect on them mentally. A review of facility policy and procedure titled (P&P), Abuse
Prohibition Policy and Procedure, effective 2/23/21, indicated, .prohibit abuse, mistreatment, neglect,
misappropriation of resident property.Mental abuse includes, but is not limited to
humiliation.deprivation.Mental abuse may occur through.nonverbal conduct which causes or has the
potential to cause the patient to experience humiliation.shame.degradation.Mistreatment is defined as
inappropriate treatment.Neglect is defined as the failure of the Center, its employees.to provide goods and
services to a patient that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional
distress.Actions to prevent abuse, neglect.Identifying, correcting, and intervening in situations in which
abuse, neglect.is more likely to occur. A review of facility P&P titled, Continence Management, effective
11/15/21, indicated, .To provide appropriate treatment and services for patients with urinary incontinence.To
provide appropriate treatment and services for patients with incontinent of bowel. A review of facility P&P
titled, Dignity, revised 2/21, indicated, .Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and
enhances his or her sense of well-being.Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times.facility
culture supports dignity and respect for residents by honoring resident goals, choices,
preferences.Resident's private space and property are respected at all times.do not handle or move a
resident's personal belongings without the resident's permission.Demeaning practices and standards of
care that compromise dignity are prohibited. A review of facility P&P titled, Resident Rights, revised 12/21,
indicated, .Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity.Federal and state laws
guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include.a dignified existence.free
from abuse, neglect.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 6 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0655
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being
admitted
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of
admission as required, to address resident-specific care needs for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident
76).This failure placed Resident 76 at risk for not receiving effective person-centered care, and preventing
to reach the highest potential for mental, emotional, and/or psychosocial health and well-being.Findings:A
review of Resident 76's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 76 was originally admitted to the facility in
2017, readmitted in 2020 and then readmitted in 2021 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease (COPD, a group of lung disease that cause progressive airflow obstruction and
breathing difficulties), chronic diastolic congestive heart failure (a condition where the heart muscle is stiff
and cannot relax properly during the filling phase called diastole. This prevents the heart from filling with
enough blood, which can lead to symptoms of heart failure), hypertensive heart disease with heart failure
(a condition where prolonged high blood pressure damages the heart and leads to heart failure), type 2
diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease (a condition where high blood sugar from poorly
controlled type 2 diabetes damages the blood vessels in the kidneys, leading to their reduced ability to filter
waste from the blood).A review of Resident 76's medical record indicated that a baseline care plan had not
been created within 48 hours of admission, and/or re-admissions as required.During a concurrent interview
and record review on 10/1/25, at 2:07 PM, with Licensed Nurse (LN) 9, Resident 76's medical record
including care plans were reviewed. LN 9 confirmed that a baseline care plan had not been created within
48 hours of Resident 76's readmission in March 2021. LN 9 stated baseline care plans should be created
within 48 hours of admission, and/or re-admission. LN 9 further stated it was necessary to create a
baseline care plan and follow the interventions to provide person-centered care to meet Resident 76's
physical and psychosocial needs. During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/2/25, at 12:30 PM,
with the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDS) 2, (MDS, a healthcare professional, typically a registered
nurse, who manages the detailed resident assessments required for long-term care facilities to receive
reimbursement), Resident 76's care plans were reviewed. The MDS 2 confirmed that a baseline care plan
had not been created for Resident 76. The MDS 2 further stated that a baseline care plan should be
created within 48 hours of admission, or re-admission to provide quality of care. The MDS 2 stated a
baseline care plan was an instruction guide providing directions for nursing staff to collaborate and deliver
effective person-centered care. The MDS 2 further stated it was a requirement to follow the facility's policy
and procedure (P&P) for baseline care planning. The MDS 2 stated the facility's P&P was not followed. The
MDS 2 further stated there was a risk to negatively affect Resident 76's health that could lead to a decline
in his physical health and psychosocial well-being. Review of the facility's P&P titled, CARE
PLAN-BASELINE, dated 8/25/21, indicated, .A baseline care plan for each resident that includes the
instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional
standards of quality care shall be developed and implemented for each resident by the Interdisciplinary
Team [a group of healthcare professionals from different fields who collaborate to create a holistic care plan
for a patient].The baseline care plan is developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission.The baseline
care plan includes the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 7 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and
actions that can be measured.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident centered care plan for 2 of 35 sampled
residents (Resident 65 and Resident 76) when:1. Resident 65 was taking a blood thinner medication and
there was no care plan developed to monitor for potential side effects or risk of bleeding; and,2. Resident 76
did not have a care plan for blood thinning medications. These failures placed Resident 65 and Resident 76
at risk for potentially serious complications and not receiving effective and person-centered care.
Findings:
1. Review of Resident 65's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 65 was admitted with multiple
diagnoses which included but not limited to DVT (Deep Vein Thrombosis – when a blood clot forms
in a deep vein, usually in the leg), hypertension (high blood pressure), and abnormalities of gait and
mobility.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/1/25, at 4:01 PM, with Licensed Nurse (LN) 3, LN 3
stated Resident 65 was taking apixaban (blood thinner medication) for DVT. LN 3 confirmed there was no
order to monitor the side effects of apixaban since it was prescribed upon admission on [DATE]. LN 3
stated she never recorded monitoring of apixaban side effects in the Medication Administration Record
(MAR). LN 3 further stated it was essential to monitor the side effects of apixaban, such as bleeding, tarry
(black) stools, or dark urine, due to its potential adverse and serious complications. LN 3 stated further not
monitoring these side effects was unacceptable.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/2/25, at 9:36 AM, with Director of Nursing (DON),
the DON stated that staff should monitor Resident 65 for bleeding each shift and check the mouth, urine,
and stool for any signs of bleeding due to apixaban use. The DON confirmed there were no orders or care
plans to monitor the side effects of apixaban for Resident 65. The DON stated that staff were expected to
monitor the side effects, particularly since apixaban could cause serious and potentially life-threatening
adverse reactions. The DON further stated without adequate monitoring, there was a risk that Resident 65
might experience internal bleeding, including the possibility of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (bleeding
visible in the stool or vomit), which could remain undetected.
During a review of the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Care Plan Comprehensive, dated
8/25/21, the P&P indicated, .Purpose: An individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable
objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs shall be
developed for each resident.III. Procedure 1. Each resident's comprehensive care plan is designed to: a.
Incorporate identified problem areas b. Incorporate risk and contributing factors associated with identified
problems.5. Identifying problem areas and their causes and developing interventions that are targeted and
meaningful to the resident.
2. A review of Resident 76's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 76 was readmitted in 2021 with
diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a group of lung disease that cause
progressive airflow obstruction and breathing difficulties), chronic diastolic congestive heart failure (a
condition where the heart muscle is stiff and cannot relax properly during the filling phase called diastole.
This prevents the heart from filling with enough blood, which can lead to symptoms of heart failure),
hypertensive heart disease with heart failure (a condition where prolonged high
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 8 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
blood pressure damages the heart and leads to heart failure), type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic
kidney disease (a condition where high blood sugar from poorly controlled type 2 diabetes damages the
blood vessels in the kidneys, leading to their reduced ability to filter waste from the blood).
Review of Resident 76's medical record titled, Medication Review Report, dated 10/1/25, indicated
Resident 76 had an active order for aspirin (blood thinner medication) 81 MG (milligram, unit of
measurement) chewable tablet orally one time a day for DVT prophylaxis (prevention) which was started on
6/4/22, and also an active order for Eliquis (blood thinner medication) 5 MG 1 tablet orally two times a day
for DVT prophylaxis that was started on 12/17/24.
During a concurrent interview, and record review on 10/1/25, at 2:07 PM, with LN 9, Resident 76's
medication review report and care plans were reviewed. LN 9 confirmed that Resident 76 was taking aspirin
and Eliquis as blood thinner medications for DVT prophylaxis. LN 9 further confirmed that a care plan for
blood thinner medications had not been created. LN explained the importance of care planning and stated
a care plan was a guiding tool for nursing staff to provide person-centered care to meet Resident 76's
medical and physical needs. LN 9 further stated to coordinate care, nurses should create care plans and
MDS coordinator would review and revise care plans quarterly and annually to ensure care plans were
applied to residents' conditions to prevent or reduce declines in residents' health status.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/2/25, at 10:34 AM, with the DON, Resident 76's
medication record, care plans, and the P&P titled, CARE PLAN COMPREHENSIVE, dated 8/25/21 were
reviewed. The DON confirmed Resident 76 had active orders for blood thinner medications such as aspirin
which was started on 6/4/22 and Eliquis with a start date of 12/17/24, and there was no corresponding care
plan for Resident 76. The DON stated her expectation from nursing staff was to create a person-centered
care plan for blood thinners and implement interventions that were applicable to Resident 76's health
status. The DON further stated a care plan was a written document to communicate Resident 76's care and
overall health conditions properly. Review of the facility's P&P indicated, .An individualized comprehensive
care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, physical,
mental and psychosocial needs shall be developed for each resident.PROCEDURE 1. Each resident's
comprehensive care plan is designed to.h. Aid in preventing or reducing declines in the resident's functional
status and/or functional levels.2 . The comprehensive care plan includes the following: a. The services that
are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and
psychosocial well-being. The DON acknowledged that the facility's P&P was not followed. The DON stated
her expectation was not met by nursing staff.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 9 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0688
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM
and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and
services were provided when one of 35 sampled residents (Resident 97) did not receive the appropriate
range of motion (ROM - the distance and direction a joint can move) services. This failure had the potential
to result in decreased ROM, further functional decline, and/or pain and discomfort for Resident 97.
Findings:During a review of Resident 97's clinical record titled, admission RECORD, the record indicated
Resident 97 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included hemiplegia (inability to move of one
side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (a
condition where blood flow to the brain is interrupted), and functional quadriplegia (a person is unable to
move their arms and legs, and needed total care from nursing staff).A review of Resident 97's clinical
record titled, Care Plan, dated 4/23/24, indicated Resident 97 was dependent on nursing staff for activities
of daily living (ADL, basic self-care tasks that individuals perform to maintain their daily lives).A review of
Resident 97's clinical record titled, Section GG - Functional Abilities, (part of a comprehensive assessment)
dated 8/4/25, indicated Resident 97 had impairments with ROM to both sides of the upper extremities
(shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand) and lower extremities (hip, knee, ankle, foot).During a concurrent interview
and record review on 10/1/25 at 1:42 p.m. with the Director of Rehab (DOR), Resident 97's clinical record
titled, Joint Mobility Screen, dated 9/19/25 was reviewed. The joint mobility screen indicated Resident 97's
right-wrist, left-hand, and right-hand had severe impairment (reflecting approximately 25% or less of full
ROM). The DOR verified Resident 97 was not on restorative nursing therapy (a therapy program where
nursing staff, often with guidance from physical and occupational therapists, works with a resident to
restore or maintain their independence). The DOR stated Resident 97 should have been offered restorative
nursing therapy for passive range of motion (PROM, if a person can't move their own joint, a caregiver or
nurse gently moves it for them) exercises. The DOR further stated Resident 97 could potentially experience
pain and discomfort due to loss of range of motion. During an interview on 10/2/2 at 10:10 a.m., with the
Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), the ADON stated Resident 97 should have been offered restorative
nursing therapy services when he experienced a decline in ROM. The ADON further stated Resident 97
was at risk of further decline in the ROM of his joints.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure
(P&P) titled, Restorative Nursing Services, dated 7/2017, the P&P indicated, .Residents will receive
restorative nursing care as needed to help promote optimal safety and independence.Residents may be
started on restorative nursing program upon admission, during the course of stay or when discharged from
rehabilitative care.Restorative goals may include.Developing, maintaining or strengthening his/her
physiological and psychological resources.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 10 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to
prevent accidents.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe and hazard free environment
when:1. Safe water temperatures were not maintained in 2 of 4 sampled resident bathrooms; and,2.
Resident 10's post mobility assessment was not done after she fell in the bathroom. These failures had the
potential to cause physical injuries to residents who resided in the facility.Findings:
1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/1/25, at 2:59 PM, with the Regional Maintenance
Consultant (RMC) and the Maintenance Director (MD), the MD stated they checked the water temperature
monthly. Water temperatures were checked in different areas of the facility with the RMC and the MD.
During the testing, water temperatures were found to be 80 degrees Fahrenheit (°F, a measurement of
temperature) in room [ROOM NUMBER], 130°F in room [ROOM NUMBER], 125°F in the kitchen
and laundry, 118°F in room [ROOM NUMBER], and 135°F in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The boiler
tanks were set to 120°F for the subacute (a level of care that is defined as a level of care needed by a
patient who does not require hospital acute care but who requires more intensive licensed skilled nursing
care than is provided to the majority of patients in a skilled nursing facility) and long-term areas, while the
kitchen and laundry areas had boiler temperatures set to 160°F.
During an interview on 10/1/25, at 3:56 PM, with the Director of Staff Development (DSD) and the Infection
Preventionist (IP), both the DSD and IP stated that the water temperature on the resident bathrooms and
shower rooms should be 120°F or under and if it was more than 120°F, it could cause burns on
the residents.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/1/25, at 4:10 PM, with Certified Nursing Assistant
(CNA) 1, CNA 1 was observed in the hallway with Resident 17 who was in a shower bed about to go into
the shower room. CNA 1 stated the water in the shower should be warm and not hot because there would
be a risk of burning the skin of the resident.
During an interview on 10/1/25, at 4:15 PM, with Licensed Nurse (LN) 1, LN 1 stated the water temperature
in the resident's bathroom should be below 120°F and if it did exceed 120°F it could cause skin
irritation, burns and skin breakdown. LN 1 further stated the water temperature should be lukewarm and
under 120°F.
During an interview on 10/2/25, at 9:33 AM, with Resident 67 in room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident 67
stated the water in the bathroom would get too hot, but he did not report it. Resident 67 further stated if the
water in the bathroom was too hot, he just stopped using it. Resident 67 stated he was mobile and used the
bathroom by himself.
During an interview on 10/2/25, at 9:11 AM, with the Sub-acute Director (SAD), the SAD stated the water
should be at an appropriate temperature and it should not cause scalding. The SAD further stated if a
resident or staff used the hot water, it would burn their skin.
During an interview on 10/2/25, at 10:04 AM, with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated the water
used by the residents should be below 120°F, and if it was more than 120°F, there would be
chances for burn and skin damage. The DON stated water temperature between 130°F -135°F
used for showers or washing hands was not acceptable.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 11 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
A review of the undated facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Safety of Water Temperatures, the P&P
indicated, .Water heaters that service resident rooms, bathrooms, common areas, and tub/shower areas
shall be set to temperature of no more than 120F (48.8C), or the maximum allowable temperature per state
regulation.
A review of the facility's P&P titled, Safety and Supervision of Residents, dated 2001, Revised July 2017,
the P&P indicated, .Resident Risks and Environmental Hazards 1. Due to their complexity and scope,
certain resident risk factors and environmental hazards are addressed in dedicated policies and
procedures. These risk factors and environmental hazards include:.h. Water Temperatures.
2. A review of Resident 10's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in 2024
with diagnoses that included dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and
other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life; a decline in memory or other
thinking skills severe enough to reduce a person's ability to perform everyday activities), and diabetes
mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar).
A review of Resident 10's Change in Condition SBAR [a communication tool for sharing information with
teams and stands for Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation or Requests]
Communication Form and Progress Note, dated 5/27/25, indicated, .The change in condition.is.Falls.This
started on 05/27/2025.Does the resident have pain? Yes.Description/location of pain: Left trochanter
(hip),/Left thigh (front), /Left thigh (rear), /Left knee (front), /Left knee (rear), /Left lower leg (front), /Left
lower leg (rear).Intensity of pain (rate on a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the worst): 10.Summarize your
observations and evaluation: At 0555 [5:55 a.m.] CNA heard pt [resident] calling out yelling that she fell and
is in pain. CNA entered the room and found pt sitting on the floor in the bathroom in a puddle of urine. CNA
called writer and full head to toe assessment completed, no skin condition found. Pt refused to be pulled up
into wheel chair [sp] stating her whole left leg and left hip hurt too much.Dr [physician].was notified and
order was to send her to the ER [acute care facility emergency department].
A Review of Resident 10's Interdisciplinary Care [IDT, a group of healthcare professionals with various
levels of expertise who work together toward the goals of their residents] Conference Meeting Notes, dated
5/27/25 indicated, .Type of Interdisciplinary Care Conference.Fall Incident.Name and Title of
Attendees.Director of Nursing [DON], Assistant Director of Nursing [ADON], Minimum Data Set Coordinator
[MDS], Health Information Management [HIM], Director of Staff Development [DSD], Social Services
Assistant [SSA].Date and time of fall incident.05/27/2025 05:30 [5:30 a.m.].Fall Report.CNA reported to LN
that resident is on the floor. Immediately went to assess and resident is observed sitting on the bathroom
floor between the toilet and sink; puddle of urine is also noted on the floor and no urine or bm [bowel
movement] is noted in toilet bowl. Resident wasn't wearing any pants and noted to be barefooted at the
time of fall. Resident denies hitting head. Two CNA's [sp] and two LN [sp] attempted to transfer resident in
w/c [wheelchair] but resident was in severe pain stating her left hip and left leg is hurting. RN (LN) on duty
stated to not touch resident since resident is in severe pain. RN called MD [physician] and ordered for
resident to be sent out. Staff stayed with resident until [ambulance] arrived. [Ambulance] then assisted
resident off the floor and into the gurney.History of falls.None.IDT Recommendations.Rehab
Referral.Transfer to acute care hospital for further evaluation.
A review of Resident 10's Care Plan Report, dated 5/27/25, indicated .Focus.The resident has had an
actual fall on 5/27/25 with left leg & hip pain.date initiated.5/27/2025.Goal.The resident's left
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 12 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
leg pain will resolve without complication.Interventions.Educating resident on asking for assistance to the
restroom.Send to ER for further eval for leg pain.Use non-skid footwear when ambulating or transferring.
During an interview on 9/29/25, at 2:41 p.m., with LN 2, LN 2 stated that she was not on duty when
Resident 10 fell. LN 2 stated that she would completed a fall assessment on a resident if she saw that the
resident was weak, after a resident's fall incident, when the resident was admitted , and if there was a
change in the resident's condition. LN 2 further stated that she would also update the resident's care plan.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/29/25, at 4:10 p.m., with the DON, Resident 10's
electronic medical record (EMR) was reviewed. The DON stated the expectation was that upon admission,
staff would check the resident's history to see if they were independent or needed assistance with activities
of daily living (ADLs, tasks of everyday life including eating, dressing, bathing, or showering, and using the
bathroom; activities related to daily care), if they had a history of falls, and if they needed assistance going
to the bathroom. The DON further stated that she also expected staff to do a care plan upon admission if
the resident was at risk for falls. The DON stated that the rehabilitation department (a specialized unit within
an organization, such as a health care facility, that focuses on providing services and support for individuals
recovering from injuries, illnesses, or disabilities) did quarterly joint mobility screens (a tool used to assess
and evaluate a person's mobility and stability during movement. It identifies imbalances in mobility and
stability, which can indicate functional movement deficiencies) on residents, and did the joint mobility
screens after a resident had a fall. The DON confirmed that Resident 10 had a quarterly joint mobility
screen done on 5/23/25, which was before Resident 10's fall. The DON further confirmed that Resident 10
did not have a joint mobility screen done after she fell. The DON stated that the risk of not completing the
joint mobility screen after Resident 10 fell was that the resident would be at an increased risk of falls
because the staff would not know the mobility status. The DON confirmed that the facility policy was not
followed.
A review of a facility P&P titled, Fall Risk Assessment, revised July 2013, indicated, .The nursing staff, in
conjunction with the attending physician, consultant pharmacist, therapy staff, and others, will seek to
identify and document resident risk factors for falls and establish a resident-centered falls prevention plan
based on relevant assessment information.Policy Interpretation and Implementation.1. Upon admission, the
nursing staff and the physician will review a resident's record for a history of falls.2. The nursing staff will
ask the resident and/or his/her family about any history of falls.5. The attending physician and nursing staff
will.assess the resident for medical conditions.or sensory impairments.that may predispose to falls.9. The
staff and attending physician will collaborate to identify and address modifiable risk factors.
A review of a facility P&P titled, Falls Management, revised November 2012, indicated, .Policy.It is the
policy of this facility that our physical environment remains as free of accident hazards as possible.
Residents will be assessed for fall risk and interventions will be implemented to reduce the risk of
falls.Procedure for risk Identification/Prevention: 1. On the day of admission, each resident is assessed by a
licensed nurse using a Fall Risk Assessment tool to determine possible risk of sustaining a fall.3. Residents'
fall risk will be re-assessed with each significant change of condition.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 13 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0692
Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper hydration (process of
providing fluid to the body) for one of 35 sampled residents (Resident 5) when Resident 5's water was out
of reach.This failure placed Resident 5 at risk of dehydration (condition where your body loses more fluid
than it takes in, resulting in insufficient water for its normal functions). Findings:A review of Resident 5's,
clinical record titled, admission RECORD, indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis
that included Chronic congestive heart failure (a condition where the heart can't pump blood efficiently,
causing a backup of fluid in the body and leading to symptoms like shortness of breath, fatigue, and
swelling).A review of Resident 5's clinical record titled, Care Plan, dated 4/24/25, indicated Resident 5 was
at risk for dehydration because he used a diuretic medication (medications that increase urine output,
helping the body eliminate excess fluid).During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/29/25 at 11:31
a.m., with Regional Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized clinical assessment) Support (RMDS, a
support person who reviews MDS assessments), in Resident 5's room, Resident 5 unsuccessfully
attempted to reach his water pitcher on a nightstand. RMDS stated the water pitcher should have been
within Resident 5's reach. RMDS also stated water within reach was important to have access to maintain
adequate hydration and without access, Resident 5 was at risk for dehydration.During a concurrent
observation and interview on 10/1/25 at 10:00 a.m., with the certified nursing assistant (CNA) 8, in
Resident 5's room, Resident 5's bedside table was observed against the wall with his water pitcher on the
bedside table. Resident 5 stated the staff had moved the bedside table when they picked up his breakfast
tray. CNA 8 verified Resident 5's water pitcher was not within reach and stated CNA 8 had moved the
bedside table when he picked up the breakfast trays and forgot to put the bedside table back within reach of
Resident 5.During an interview on 10/1/25 at 10:10 a.m. with the Licensed Nurse (LN) 7, LN 7 stated
Resident 5 was on diuretic medication and Resident 5 was at risk of dehydration. LN 7 further stated
Resident 5 should have always had a water pitcher within reach to prevent dehydration.During an interview
on 10/1/25 at 2:20 p.m. with the Director of Nursing, (DON) the DON stated that because Resident 5 was
on a diuretic medication, he was at increased risk for dehydration; and therefore, should have had water
available at the bedside.A review of the facility's undated policy and procedure titled, Resident Hydration
and Prevention of Dehydration, dated indicated, .this facility will strive to provide adequate hydration and to
prevent and treat dehydration.Nurses' Aides will provide and encourage intake of bedside snack and meal
fluids, on a daily routine basis.
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 14 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0745
Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide medically- related social services for 1 of
35 sampled residents (Resident 19) when the facility failed to honor Resident 19's requests and wishes to
be transferred to a facility closer to home.This failure placed Resident 19's health and psychosocial
well-being at risk for potentially serious complications which could have impacted his quality of life and
could have lowered his self-esteem (confidence in one's own worth or abilities). Findings:A review of
Resident 19's clinical record titled, admission RECORD, indicated Resident 19's admitting diagnoses
included cerebral palsy (a group of disorders that affect movement, muscle tone, and posture due to brain
damage) and paresthesia of skin (an abnormal sensation characterized by tingling, prickling, burning, or
numbness in the skin).During an interview on 9/29/25, at 8:34 AM, with Resident 19, Resident 19 stated
that before his admission to the facility, he lived in a different area of the state. Resident 19 stated that he
was admitted to the facility in 2019 and since the admission date, he had requested multiple times to be
transferred to a facility that was closer to his home. Resident 19 further stated he was upset that the facility
was not working proactively on his transfer/discharging to a different facility. Resident 19 stated, I have the
right to request to live in the area that I want.A review of Resident 19's various clinical records indicated
Resident 19 expressed his desire and requested assistance to be transferred to a facility closer to home. A
review of the following clinical records indicated the following:- Care Plan, date initiated on 11/23/20,
indicated, .Resident [Resident 19] is requesting to discharge and live independently in [CITY NAME].,-Care
Plan Meeting, dated 2/1/24, indicated, .Resident [Resident 19] also requests assistance in alternate
placement, however, resident [Resident 19] does not receive any income and has no living family in the
[COUNTY Name] county area.,-Social Services Assessment & Documentation, dated 2/2/24, indicated, .C.
Mental Health & [and] . 5. Comments .Wellness Comments.Resident [Resident 19] mental health/ wellbeing
appears compromised d/t [due to] placement in the facility far from [COUNTY NAME] where resident
[Resident 19] was previously residing.,- Social Service Progress Note, dated 12/18/24, indicated, .SS
[Social Services] spoke with.R/T [related to] that he [Resident 19] is requesting to be transferred back to his
hometown [CITY NAME] ., - Social Service Progress Note, dated 5/5/25, indicated, .Resident [Resident 19]
states he wants to be medically discharged to a financial institution in [CITY NAME].,- Nurses Progress
Note, dated 7/22/25, indicated, .Resident [Resident 19] made writer aware he would like to speak with SS
[Social Services] regarding his discharge.,- Nurses Progress Note, dated 9/3/25, indicated, .Resident
[Resident 19] was observed laying with his feet off the bed, holding onto the side rail. Writer asked resident
[Resident 19] if we can help reposition him back in bed. Resident [Resident 19] responded.I told myself
September 3rd will be the day I leave.Resident [Resident 19] yelled at writer .7 years, 7 years I have been
here. I'm leaving.,- Social Service Progress Note, dated 9/3/25, indicated, .The patient [Resident 19]
expressed.I have been stuck in this place for seven years.I can live on the streets., - .Change in Condition
Evaluation ., dated 9/24/25, indicated, .Review Findings and Provider Notifications.4.Writer was called to
resident's [Resident 19] room for reported single episode of self harm. Resident [Resident 19] stated he is
upset d/t [due to] not being able to live in [CITY NAME] .Resident [Resident 19] stated, It was a brief
moment of sadness.,- Nurses Progress Note, dated 9/24/25, indicated, .resident [Resident 19] reported
single episode of self harm. Resident [Resident 19] stated he was upset that he has not been moved back
to his hometown.Resident [Resident 19] stated.it's been too long, 7 years I have been here.,- Social
Service Progress Note, dated 9/25/25, indicated, .The patient [Resident 19] expressed that he has been in
the facility for seven years.He has been trying to return to
Residents Affected - Few
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 15 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0745
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
[COUNTY NAME], specifically [CITY NAME], his home city. Over the years, he [Resident 19] has met
numerous staff members, but none have been able to help him achieve this goal.Patient [Resident 19]
expressed that he considers himself philosophical and intelligent, but feels that no one ever wants to listen
to him.he feels like he has been in this facility forever. During a concurrent interview and record review on
10/1/25, at 1:20 PM, with the Social Service Director (SSD), Resident 19's clinical records titled, Care Plan
Meeting, dated 2/1/24; Social Services Assessment & Documentation, dated 2/2/24; Social Service
Progress Note, dated 12/18/24; Nurses Progress Note, dated 9/3/25 and 9/24/25; and Social Service
Progress Note, dated 9/25/25 were reviewed. The SSD explained the process of transfer/discharge to other
facilities and stated that upon residents' requests to transfer or discharge, the SSD contacted facilities, or
area that residents preferred to be transferred to, and if beds were available. The SSD stated they would
send residents' medical records and social service notes to those facilities and then would follow up with
the facilities for placement. The SSD confirmed that several times Resident 19 requested to be transferred
to [COUNTY NAME] and specifically [CITY NAME], his home city since 11/22/20. Upon further review of
Nurses Progress Note, dated 4/4/25, with the SSD, the progress notes indicated, .Resident [Resident 19] is
alert and oriented x3 [person, place, time], verbalizes needs, made writer aware that he wants to be
discharged to [CITY NAME] SNF. Writer made SS aware. SS states they have faxed his [Resident 19]
paperwork to facility above . The SSD stated that she received Resident 19's wishful request to be
transferred to one of the facilities in [COUNTY NAME] in April 2025, and added referrals were sent;
however, the SSD was unable to provide documentation that the referrals were sent. The SSD confirmed
that on 9/25/25, Resident 19 expressed his feeling of being upset about staying in the facility for many
years and that he had been trying to return to his home city. The SSD stated she should have acted
proactively to contact facilities in [COUNTY NAME] and [CITY NAME] as it was requested by Resident 19
several times prior to Resident 19 expressing his feeling of self-harm on 9/24/25. The SSD stated Resident
19's discharge goal was to be transferred closer to his home, and his wishes that were not met by the
facility. The SSD further stated, feeling upset about staying in the facility affected Resident 19's
psychosocial well-being, and caused him emotional distress.During a concurrent interview and record
review on 10/1/25, at 2:02 PM, with Licensed Nurse (LN) 9, Resident 19's medical record titled, .Change in
Condition Evaluation ., dated 9/24/25, was reviewed. Review of the record indicated, .Review Findings and
Provider Notifications. 4. called to resident's [Resident 19] room for reported single episode of self harm.
Resident [Resident 19] upset d/t [due to] not being able to live in [CITY NAME]. LN 9 stated Resident 19
requested to be transferred to his home city multiple times. LN 9 further stated Resident 19 was very
overwhelmed after living in the facility for many years, to the point that Resident 19 expressed his feeling of
self-harm. LN 9 stated the situation could have negatively affected Resident 19's health and psychosocial
well-being and placed him at risk for emotional distress, anxiety, and depression. During a concurrent
interview and record review on 10/1/25, at 2:20 PM, with LN 12, Resident 19's medical records titled,
Nurses Progress Note, dated 4/4/25 and 7/22/25 were reviewed. The nurses notes dated 4/4/25, indicated,
.Resident [Resident 19].made writer aware that he wants to be discharged to [CITY NAME] SNF.made SS
aware., and review of nurses note dated 7/22/25, indicated, .Resident [Resident 19].would like to speak
with SS regarding his discharge. Social Services.made aware. LN 12 confirmed Reside 19 requested to be
discharged from the facility several times throughout his stay in the facility. LN 12 stated Resident 19 was
upset about living in the facility for many years and was emotionally distressed about being unable to live
close to his home city. LN 12 further stated Resident 19 was on every hour visual monitoring related to an
episode of wanting to inflict
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 16 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0745
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
self-harm due to being unable to live in his home city.During a concurrent interview and record review on
10/1/25, at 3:54 PM, with the Health Informative Manager (HIM, a healthcare professional responsible for
managing and protecting patient health information), the HIM stated that Social Services Department was
responsible for sending referrals and, upon receiving confirmation by fax, was expected to attach the
confirmation and provide all related documentation to her for uploading into Resident 19's medical records.
A review of Resident 19's record with HIM confirmed that the records did not include copies of the transfer
or discharge referrals. HIM stated she had not received any transfer or discharge referrals from Social
Service Department. The HIM further explained that such referrals were considered legal documents that
must be uploaded to Resident 19's medical records and made available for review when needed.During a
concurrent interview and record review on 10/2/25, at 10:34 AM, with the Director of Nursing (DON),
Resident 19's medical records and the facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Referrals, Social Services,
revised in 12/08, were reviewed. Review of the record titled, Care Plan Meeting, dated 2/1/24, indicated,
.Resident [Resident 19] also requests assistance in alternate placement.in the [COUNTY NAME] SS will
continue to monitor and provide assistance as needed. Review of the record titled, Social Service Progress
Note, dated 9/3/25, indicated, .The patient [Resident 19] expressed, I do not want to be here. I have been
stuck in this place for seven years.I want to go home. Review of the record titled, Nurses Progress Note,
dated 9/24/25, indicated, .called to resident's [Resident 19] room d/t [due to] resident {Resident 19]
reported single episode of self harm. Resident stated he was upset that he has not been moved back to his
hometown. The DON confirmed that Resident 19 expressed his wishes to be transferred to [COUNTY
NAME], and [CITY NAME] specifically several times throughout his stay in the facility. The DON stated
Resident 19 was emotionally distressed and was upset when he expressed his feeling of harming self, due
to the facility not working proactively on his transfer/discharge. The DON stated her expectation from Social
Service department was to work proactively to find placement for Resident 19. The DON added her
expectation was not met. The DON further stated Resident 19's requests and wishes to be transferred to
live close to his home city were not fulfilled by the facility which placed Resident 19 at risk for emotional
distress by negatively affecting his psychosocial well-being. The DON acknowledged that copies of transfer
and discharge referrals were not maintained in Resident 19's records. The DON clarified that her
expectation was for the SSD to proactively send referrals and furnish the medical record department with
the corresponding confirmation documents was not met. A review of the facility provided P&P for referrals
indicated, . Referrals, Social Services. Social services personnel shall coordinate most resident referrals
with outside agencies. Policy Interpretation and Implementation. 4. Social services will document the
referral in the resident's medical record. The DON confirmed that the facility's P&P was not followed by the
Social Services Department, and it was essential to adhere to these policies and procedures. The DON
further stated that failure to do so posed a potential risk of not meeting Resident 19's expectations and
wishes regarding transfer or discharge to the requested destination closer to his home city.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 17 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0755
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a
licensed pharmacist.
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide medications which met the
needs of 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 46) when on 10/2/25 the following medications were not
administered and left on the residents bedside table:Nephro-Vite 1 tablet (used to treat vitamin deficiencies
in people with kidney disease),Senna 1 tablet (used to treat constipation); and,Sevelamar - 2 tablets (used
to treat high phosphate in the blood in people with kidney disease).This failure had the potential for
Resident 46 to experience worsening kidney disease (a decline in kidney function over time),
hyperphosphatemia (medical condition characterized by elevated levels of phosphate in the blood in people
with kidney failure), and constipation (a condition in which there is difficulty in emptying the bowels or hard
feces).Findings:A review of Resident 46's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 46 was admitted to the
facility in 2024, with diagnoses which included, chronic kidney disease stage 4 severe (CKD -kidneys are
severely damaged and their function is significantly reduced) and dependence on renal dialysis (a medical
treatment that artificially replaces the function of the kidneys when they are unable to do so).During a
concurrent observation and interview on 10/2/25, at 7:13 AM, in Resident 46's room, a medication cup with
4 pills was observed left on Resident 46's bedside table. Resident 46 stated it was common for the nurse to
leave the medications at bedside for her. Resident 46 further stated she liked to take her medications with
coffee and was waiting for coffee to be delivered by her Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA).During a
concurrent interview and record review on 10/2/25, at 7:23 AM, with Licensed Nurse (LN) 13, Resident 46's
Medication Administration Record (MAR - a legal document that serves as a detailed log of all medications
given to a patient by healthcare professionals) was reviewed and LN 13 was able to identify the 3
medications given, a total of 4 tablets. LN 13 confirmed she left the medications at bedside for Resident 46
to take when her CNA brought her coffee. LN 13 stated she knew it was against policy to leave medications
unattended at bedside. LN 13 further stated the expectation for nurses administering medication was to
watch and encourage the resident's to take their medications. LN 13 reviewed Resident 46's record and
stated she had not been evaluated to self-administer medications and could not find documentation of it
was in her care plan. LN 13 stated the risk of leaving medications unattended in a resident's room was that
another resident could take the medication and not knowing whether the resident the medication was
intended for, took the medication.During an interview on 10/2/25, at 11:29 AM, with the Director of Nursing
(DON), the DON stated that medications should not be left at bedside, and the nurse should be present
when the resident took all the medication. The DON further stated the risk of leaving medications
unattended was ineffective medications if the resident did not take them, or a risk of another resident taking
them. The DON explained if another resident took the medications it could affect their health and safety.A
review of the facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Administering Medications, revised April 2019,
indicated, .Medications are to be administered in a safe and timely manner.A review of the facility P&P
titled, Administering Oral Medications, revised, October 2010, indicated, .22. Remain with the resident until
all medications have been taken.A review of the facility P&P titled, PREPARATION AND GENERAL
GUIDELINES IIA2: MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION-GENERAL GUIDELINES, effective, October 2017,
indicated, .15) The resident is always observed after administration to ensure that the dose was completely
ingested.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 18 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0757
Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe monitoring and assessment of blood
pressure (BP -the force of your blood pushing against the walls of your arteries as your heart pumps blood
and was measured as two numbers: systolic [when the heart beats] and diastolic [when the heart rests
between beats]) and heart rate (HR -frequently of your heart beats per minute) for a medication used to
treat low (hypotension) BP for two of six sampled residents (Resident 17 and Resident 80), when:1.
Resident 17's physician prescribed hold parameters (a set of numbers that guide the nursing staff when to
not give [hold] a medication) for Midodrine (a medication used to treat low blood pressure) were not
followed 13 times between 8/15/25 and 10/1/25; and,2. Resident 80's physician prescribed hold parameters
for Midodrine were not followed 13 times between 8/1/25 and 9/30/25.This failure had the potential to put
Resident 17 and Resident 80 at risk of adverse drug effects including hypertension (HTN - high blood
pressure) and increased Resident 17 and Resident 80's risk of having a severe medical
emergency.Findings:1. A review of Resident 17's Order Details, dated 8/2025, indicated Midodrine was
ordered by a physician with parameters (a measurable blood pressure value used to assess a patient's
condition and guide treatment) to .Hold if SBP [SBP - systolic blood pressure] > [greater than] 100.During a
concurrent interview and record review on 10/2/25, at 11:13 AM, with the Director of Nursing (DON),
Resident 17's, Medication Administration Record, (MAR - a document used in healthcare setting to track
and record medication given to residents) dated 8/1/25 through 10/1/25 was reviewed. The DON confirmed
that Midodrine was given in error, outside of doctor ordered parameters, 13 times on the following
dates:8/15/25, 8/19/25, 8/26/25, 8/27/25, 8/30/25, 9/2/25, 9/4/25, 9/6/25, 9/9/25, 9/13/25, 9/14/25, 9/28/25,
and 10/1/25.2. A review of Resident 80's Order Details, dated 8/16/24, indicated Midodrine was ordered by
a physician with parameters to, .HOLD FOR SBP [systolic blood pressure] GREATER THAN 100.During a
concurrent interview and record review on 10/2/25, at 11:13 AM, with the DON, Resident 80's MAR dated
8/1/25 through 9/30/25 was reviewed. The DON confirmed that Midodrine was given in error, outside of
doctor ordered parameters, 13 times on the following dates:8/1/25, 8/2/25, 8/5/25, 8/14/25 at 6 AM, 8/14/25
at 1 PM, 8/14/25 at 6PM, 8/17/25, 8/18/25, 8/28/25, 9/11/25, 9/19/25, 9/28/25, and 9/30/25.During an
interview on 10/2/25, at 11:05 AM, with Licensed Nurse (LN) 14, LN 14 stated that Midodrine was used for
Hypotension (low blood pressure). LN 14 further stated that they had parameters given by the physician
that if the SBP was above 100, the nurses were expected to not give the medication to the residents. LN 14
explained it was important to not give the medication because it might make the resident's blood pressure
high causing hypertension, (HTN - high blood pressure) and put the resident at risk for a stroke (a sudden
interruption of blood flow to part of the brain causing brain cells to die) and other medical
complications.During an interview on 10/2/25, at 11:18 AM, with the DON, the DON stated her expectation
was for the LN to give the medication as ordered and that expectation included not to give the Midodrine if it
did not meet the physician ordered hold parameters. The DON further stated the risk to the residents when
the medication was given in error, would increase the residents blood pressure more and could affect their
health status. The DON stated it could create additional medical problems for the residents.A review of the
facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Administering Medications, revised April 2019, indicated,
.Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed.Medications are
administered in accordance with prescriber orders.The following information is checked/verified for reach
resident prior to administering medications.Vital signs [VS -include checking the residents heart rate and
blood pressure].
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 19 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0759
Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication
administration practices when the medication error rate was more than 5% ( % percentage - number or
ratio expressed as a fraction of 100) with a resident census of 104. Medication administration observations
were conducted over multiple days, in random locations throughout the facility. The facility had a total of 2
errors out of 32 opportunities which resulted in a facility wide medication error rate of 6.25% for 2 of 6
residents (Resident 68 and Resident 17) observed for medication administration.These failures had the
potential to result in unsafe medication use and medication errors affecting the resident's health and
well-being.Findings:a. During a medication administration observation on 9/29/25, at 9:15 AM, with
Licensed Nurse (LN) 4, the following medication was observed given to Resident 68:LN 4 was observed
administering 4 units of Insulin Lispro (a human-made rapid acting insulin analog to treat high blood sugar
levels) subcutaneously (applied under the skin) in the upper right arm to Resident 68 on 9/29/25, at 9:15
AM.A review of Resident 68's order for, Insulin Lispro injection solution.Inject 4 units [measure of dosage]
subcutaneously [applied under the skin].3 x [times] a day before meals. dated, 1/29/25, was documented as
given on Resident 68's medication administration record (MAR -a legal document that serves as a detailed
log of all medications given to a patient by healthcare professionals) on 9/29/25, at 8 AM.During an
interview on 9/30/25, at 7:55 AM, with LN 4, LN 4 stated that Resident 68 had breakfast at 8 AM on 9/29/25
and that it was around the normal time for trays to be delivered to the rooms. LN 4 confirmed the order for
Resident 68's insulin was supposed to be given before meals and that she gave it late on 9/29/25, at 9:15
AM. LN 4 stated the insulin should be given before meals and if given late the risk to the resident was that
the insulin would not be as effective. b. During a medication administration observation on 10/1/25, at 8:18
AM, LN 5 administered a total of 8 medications to Resident 17, including 1 drop of Visine Dry Eye Relief, in
each eye.During a record review of Resident 17's MAR, dated 10/2025, the following order indicated, Visine
Dry Eye Relief Ophthalmic [an eye drop medication used to treat dry eyes].Instill 2 drop in both eyes two
times a day for dry eye.During a concurrent interview and record review, on 10/1/25, at 8:45 AM, with LN 4,
LN 4 reviewed Resident 17's MAR, dated 10/1/25, Visine Dry Eye Relief, order. LN 4 confirmed he was
supposed to put 2 drops in each eye but only administered 1 drop in each eye. LN 4 stated he made the
medication error because he had never seen an order for more than one drop in each eye before. LN 4
further stated the risk to the resident for not receiving the prescribed dose was continued dry eyes and the
medication not being as effective or therapeutic. During an interview on 10/2/25, at 11:25 AM, with the
Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated her expectation was for the nurses to double check the orders
and follow the rights of medication administration including, right order, right resident, right time, right dose,
right route, and right documentation. The DON further stated it was important to follow the doctor's order
and directions for giving insulin before meals. The DON explained the risk to the resident when insulin was
given at the wrong time is that the insulin would not be as effective and it could also cause a blood glucose
drop (the amount of glucose a simple sugar in the bloodstream). The DON stated it was her expectation to
give the medication as ordered, for example, giving the wrong dosage of a medication like eye drops was a
medication error and expected the doctor to be notified.A review of facility policy and procedure (P&P)
titled, Administering Medications, revised, April 2019, indicated, .Medications are administered in a safe
and timely manner, and as prescribed.Medication are administered in accordance with prescriber orders,
including any required time frame.Medications are administered within one (1) hour of their prescribed time,
unless otherwise specified (for example, before and after meal orders.The individual administering the
Residents Affected - Few
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 20 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0759
medication checks the label THREE (3) times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage,
right time and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 21 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0761
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted
professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately
locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage and labeling
practices in two out of three medication rooms and four out of five medication carts when:1. An external
air-conditioning (ac) unit that had a filter with grayish colored dust and debris, was placed on top of a
medication refrigerator in Medication Storage room [ROOM NUMBER],2. Two bottles of Drug Buster (an
eco-friendly, liquid solution designed for safe and effective disposal of unwanted or expired medications. It
dissolves pills, tablets, capsules, and other forms of medication on contact, rendering them non-toxic and
safe for disposal in regular trash) were found soiled and in active use in two different medication carts,3.
Four pill cutters (a device used to safely and accurately divide medication tablets, vitamins, and
supplements) were found with white and grayish residue in three different medication carts,4. Medications
were opened in a medication cart and medication room without being labeled with an open date; and,5. A
Topical medication was opened and not labeled with date opened, and sterile single use wound care
supplies were opened and available for use in a treatment cart.These failures had the potential for unsafe
medication use in the facility.Findings:
1. During a concurrent interview and inspection of the facility's medication storage room at Station 1, on
9/29/25, at 8:35 AM, accompanied by the Infection Preventionist (IP), an ac unit that takes air from the
facility and removes it to the outside environment had a vent filter with grayish colored dust and debris
placed on top of a medication refrigerator. The IP confirmed that the vent filter was dirty and had dust and
debris build-up. The IP stated that the debris could get inside the medication refrigerator and that the filter
should have been clean.
During an interview on 10/1/25, at 9:10 AM, with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the DSD stated
that dust bunnies and spores could get inside of the medication refrigerator if the ac vent filter was dirty.
The DSD further stated dirt and debris could get on the medications that were in the refrigerator.
During an interview on 10/1/25 at 9:25 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated that the ac
filter vents needed to be maintained and kept clean. The DON also stated that it could be a environmental
hazard having the medication refrigerator being exposed to various dust and debris. The DON further
stated that the medications could have been damaged, and that the efficacy of the medications could also
be impacted.
During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, MEDICATION STORAGE IN THE
FACILITY, dated 04/08, the P&P indicated, .Medication storage areas are kept clean.
2. During a concurrent interview and inspection of the facility's medication cart at Station 1, on 9/29/25, at
10:24 AM, accompanied by Licensed Nurse (LN) 3, a bottle of Drug Buster solution was observed to be
soiled and dirty. LN 3 confirmed that the bottle of Drug Buster was soiled and making the medication cart
dirty. LN 3 stated that it was an issue having a dirty Drug Buster available for use in the medication cart.
During a concurrent interview and inspection of the facility's medication cart at Station 3, on 9/29/25, at
10:36 AM, accompanied by LN 4, a bottle of Drug Buster solution was observed to be soiled and dirty. LN 4
confirmed that the bottle of Drug Buster was soiled and making the medication cart
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 22 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0761
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
dirty. LN 4 stated that the Drug Buster solution should have been clean, and it posed a cross-contamination
risk for the medications stored in the medication cart.
During an interview on 10/1/25, at 9:10 AM, with the DSD, the DSD stated that the chemical solution could
mix with other medications and cause unwanted drug-to-drug interactions (occur when the effect of one
drug is changed by the presence of another drug. This interaction can result in the drug being less effective,
more effective, or causing new, unexpected side effects to occur.
During an interview on 10/1/25, at 9:25 AM, with the DON, the DON stated that having a dirty Drug Buster
solution available in the medication cart would make the cart sticky and hard to clean. The DON further
stated that the solution could seep into other medications and damage the cart.
During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated 9/18/23, the
P&P indicated, .An infection prevention and control program (IPCP) is established and maintained to
provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and
transmission of communicable diseases and infections .
3. During a concurrent interview and inspection of the facility's medication cart at Station 2, on 9/29/25, at
10:18 AM, accompanied by LN 2, two pill cutters were observed to have a whitish and grayish colored
residue on them. LN 2 confirmed that the two pill cutters were dirty and should have been cleaned. LN 2
stated that cross-contamination of other medications could occur with the residue being on the pill cutters.
During a concurrent interview and inspection of the facility's medication cart at Station 1, on 9/29/25, at
10:24 AM, accompanied by LN 3, a pill cutter was observed to have a whitish and grayish colored residue
on it. LN 3 confirmed that the pill cutter was dirty.
During a concurrent interview and inspection of the facility's medication cart at Station 3, on 9/29/25, at
10:36 AM, accompanied by LN 4, a pill cutter was observed to have a whitish and grayish colored residue
on it. LN 4 confirmed that the pill cutter was dirty. LN 4 stated that previous medications that were cut using
the pill cutter could interact with other medications. LN 4 further stated that it was a cross-contamination
risk and that the pill cutter should have been clean.
During an interview on 10/1/25, at 9:25 AM, with the DON, the DON stated that pill cutters should have
been kept clean while in use. The DON also stated that having dirty pill cutters could increase the chances
of unwanted drug-to-drug interactions.
4a. During a concurrent medication storage observation and interview on 10/1/25, at 7:59 AM accompanied
by LN 5, the Sub-Acute Medication Cart 1 had one opened and undated bottle floor stock supply (supply of
commonly used medications kept on hand and available for use) of Miralax (laxative powder mixed into
water to help relieve constipation) available for use in the cart. LN 5 stated it was the facility stock bottle and
used for multiple residents. LN 5 further stated it was facility policy to label the medication bottles with the
date opened.
b. During a concurrent medication storage observation and interview on 10/1/25, at 8:04 AM, accompanied
by LN 5, the medication storage room located on the Sub-Acute Unit (a specialized unit for patients who
require more specialized treatment than a standard skilled nursing unit) in the refrigerator, an opened and
used box of Bisacodyl suppositories (a laxative used to insert into the rectum to relieve constipation) was
not labeled with the date opened. LN 5 stated it was important to label
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 23 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0761
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
medications with the date opened because some medications have a different expiration date once
opened. LN 5 further stated the risk to the resident for taking expired medication was the medication would
not be as effective.
5a. During a concurrent medication storage and treatment cart (a mobile, wheeled unit in a healthcare
setting used to store and transport medical supplies, equipment and medications for patient care and
wounds) observation and interview on 10/1/25, at 7:32 AM, accompanied by LN 6, the medication storage
top drawer of the treatment care on the Sub-Acute unit, contained an opened bottle of prescription
Clobetasol Propionate Topical Solution (a high-potency corticosteroid medication) that was unlabeled with
the opened date. LN 6 stated it was important to label the medication with the opened date because it was
only good for 28 days once opened.
b. An opened single use, Suresite Transparent Film Dressing, (waterproof, breathable, comfortable dressing
that protects skin and wounds) was observed opened and available for use in the treatment cart. The
package instructions indicated, .Sterile (free from living microorganisms including bacteria, viruses, and
fungi) in unopened, undamaged package. Single use only. LN 6 confirmed the finding and stated it the rest
of the package should have been thrown away and not be available for use. LN 6 further stated the risk to
the residents if was used, was that the package was opened and no longer sterile.
c. An opened single use, Bordered Gauze, (three-layered wound dressing with an absorbent pad) was
observed opened and available for use in the treatment cart. The package instructions reviewed with LN 6,
indicated, .Single use only.Sterile in unopened undamaged package. LN 6 confirmed the finding and stated
it should not be opened and available for use in the treatment cart.
d. An opened single use, Gentac Silicone Island Dressing, (a medical wound dressing with a central
absorbent and gentle skin-safe silicone adhesive border) was observed opened and available for use in the
treatment cart. The package instruction reviewed with LN 6, indicated, .Sterile wound dressings. LN 6
confirmed the finding and stated that should have been throw out, once opened it was no longer sterile. LN
6 further stated any product that was single use only and labeled as sterile should not be opened. LN 6
explained once opened the contents were no longer sterile and the risk to the resident was infection.
During an interview on 10/2/25, at 11:25 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that it was important to
label all opened medications in the medication carts. The DON further stated it was important because
some medications have different expiration dates once opened. The DON explained the risk to the
residents for using expired medications was that the medication could not be effective. The DON stated that
sterile dressings should not be opened up and put back into the treatment carts because they were no
longer sterile once opened. The DON further stated once sterile supplies were opened they were exposed
to the environment and the risk to the resident was delayed wound healing or could cause infection.
A review of an undated facility policy and procedure titled, MEDICATION ORDERING AND RECEIVING
FROM PHARMACY, indicated, .Floor stock medications are labeled.label should include.Expiration date.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 24 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0812
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve
food in accordance with professional standards.
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food per
safety standards when:1. Three tomatoes were found with mold and a discolored, flattened, and mushy
apple were in the walk-in refrigerator,2. Frozen fish fillets, beef patties, meatballs, and veggie patties were
left open to the environment in the reach in meat freezer,3. Small wares (three bowls and a cutting board)
were not replaced when worn,4. The cool down log was not followed; and,5. The two-compartment sink did
not have an air gap (a break in the plumbing to prevent unsanitary water from flowing back into the sink).
These failures had the potential to lead to cross-contamination and food borne illness for the 85 residents
eating facility prepared meals.Findings:1. During the initial kitchen tour on 9/29/25, at 8:30 a.m., a
discolored, flattened, and mushy apple was found in the walk-in refrigerator.During a concurrent
observation and interview on 10/1/25, at 8:52 a.m., with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) 1. CDM 1
verified three moldy tomatoes with a receive date of 9/25/25 were in the walk-in refrigerator. CDM 1 stated
the moldy tomatoes should not have been there, if served to residents they would be at risk of getting sick
from food born illness.During an interview on 10/1/25, at 9:45 a.m., with the Registered Dietitian (RD), the
RD stated it was her expectation kitchen staff check food for quality daily. The RD further stated if the moldy
tomatoes or apple were served would be a risk for food borne illness.2. During the initial kitchen tour on
9/29/25, at 9:15 a.m., frozen fish fillets and frozen beef patties were left open to the environment in the
reach in meat freezer.During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/30/25, at 12:30 p.m., with the
District Dietary Manager (DDM), frozen meatballs and frozen veggie patties were left open to the
environment in the reach in meat freezer. The DDM stated the frozen meatballs and frozen veggie patties
should have been completely covered to prevent food being covered in frost. DDM further stated food open
to the environment in the reach in freezer could potentially affect the quality and nutritional value of the
food.During an interview on 10/1/25, at 9:45 a.m., with the RD, the RD stated it was her expectation food
stored in the reach in freezer should be tightly closed and not exposed to open air. The RD further stated
food left open to air in the freezer could potentially affect palatability of the food stored.3. During the initial
kitchen tour on 9/29/25, at 9 a.m., three bowls were worn, chipped, and without glaze on the ready to use
shelves.During the initial kitchen tour on 9/29/25, at 9:05 a.m., a green cutting board stored ready for use
was visibly worn with deep gouges.During an interview on 10/1/25, at 9:30 a.m., with CDM 2, CDM 2 stated
bowls that were worn, chipped, and without glaze should have been thrown away because they cannot be
cleaned properly. CDM 2 further stated the cutting board should have been thrown away and stated the
bowls and cutting boards that were worn are at risk of bacterial growth potentially leading to food borne
illness.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Equipment, dated 9/2017, the P&P
indicated, .All foodservice equipment will be clean, sanitary, and in proper working order.Review of the US
Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Food Code Section 4-501.12 of the 2022 Food Code on Cutting
Surfaces indicated Cutting surfaces such as cutting boards and blocks that become scratched and scored
may be difficult to clean and sanitize. As a result, pathogenic microorganisms transmissible through food
may build up or accumulate. These microorganisms may be transferred to foods that are prepared on such
surfaces.4. During the initial kitchen tour on 9/29/25, at 9:13 a.m., the food cool down log was reviewed. The
cool down log for egg salad dated 9/27/25, did not indicate when the egg salad reached 40 degrees
Fahrenheit (F, a unit of measurement for temperature) or less.During an interview on 10/1/25, at 9:30 a.m.,
with CDM 2, CDM 2 stated it was important to follow the cool down log to ensure food that is being logged
is safe for
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 25 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0812
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
consumption. CDM 2 stated when the cool down log was not followed there is a risk the food that should
have been logged could cause a food born illness.During an interview 10/1/25, at 9:45 a.m., with the RD,
the RD stated following the cool down log process was important, not following the cool down log process
risks bacteria growth on foods.Review of US FDA 2022 Food Code section 3-501.14 on Cooling indicated
(A) Cooked time/temperature control for safety food shall be cooled: (1) Within 2 hours from.135 degrees
Fahrenheit (F, a unit of measurement ) to.70 degrees F: and (2) Within a total of 6 hours from.135 degrees
F to 41 degrees F or less. (B) TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD shall be cooled
within 4 hours to 41 degrees F or less if prepared from ingredients at ambient temperature, such as
reconstituted FOODS and canned tuna. It further indicated that Safe cooling requires removing heat from
food quickly enough to prevent microbial growth. Excessive time for cooling of time/temperature control for
safety foods has been consistently identified as one of the leading contributing factors to foodborne
illness.5. During the initial kitchen tour on 9/29/25, at 8:30 a.m., the two compartment sink did not have an
air gap.During an interview on 9/29/25, at 3:15 p.m., with the DDM, the DDM verified the two compartment
sink in the kitchen did not have an air gap. The DDM stated without an air gap there is risk of sewage
backflow into the sink. During an interview on 10/1/25, at 9:30 a.m., with CDM 2, CDM 2 stated the two
compartment sink was used to rinse pots and pans before going into the dishwasher, and in the event,
dishwasher is down used for manual dishwashing. CDM further stated the two compartment sink should
have an air gap, an air gap prevents back flow of contaminated water into the sink.Review of US FDA 2022
Section 5-402.11 Backflow Prevention, (A) Except as specified in (B), (C), and (D) of this section, a direct
connection may not exist between the sewage system and a drain originating from equipment in which
food, portable equipment, or utensils are placed.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 26 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0880
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to practice appropriate infection
prevention and control measures for a census of 104, when:Urinals were found inside the trash can instead
of being placed in the provided urinal receptacle and were not replaced with a clean urinal for Resident 62;
and,Flying pests were found inside Resident 65's room; and,Licensed Nurse (LN) 4 did not clean, sanitize,
and disinfect a glucometer (device used to measure blood sugar) per manufacturer guidelines.These
failures had the potential to spread infections to residents residing in the facility, negatively impacting their
health and well-being.1. Review of Resident 62's admission Record, indicated Resident 62 was admitted
with multiple diagnoses which included but not limited to cerebral infarction (when part of the brain doesn't
get enough blood causing brain cells in that area to die), heart failure (a condition where the heart cannot
pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), and chronic kidney disease (kidneys are slowly losing their
ability to clean your blood and remove waste from your body).
Residents Affected - Some
During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/29/25 at 9:15 AM, in Resident 62's room, there was
three labeled urinals hooked by the urinal handle onto the inside of the trash can. The urinals, all marked
with the resident's name and room number, all contained small amounts of yellow urine, and the urinal lids
had dark stains. Only one urinal had a date written on the urinal and was dated 9/15/25. The trash can also
contain used tissue paper, gloves, and an empty medicine cup, while the blue-colored urinal holder
attached to Resident 62's bed frame remained empty. Resident 62 stated, I'm using a urinal. Staff don't
have time to replace my urinal. Staff were not consistent in replacing my urinal. I need to press my call
button for someone to come and replace it. I wish they would do it routinely. It's not my preference to put it
inside the trash can.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/29/25, at 9:30 AM, in Resident 62's room, Certified
Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 confirmed Resident 62 had three urinals located in the garbage can. CNA 2
stated Resident 62 required only one urinal at a time, and the urinal should not be placed in the garbage
can as this was not acceptable and did not follow standard procedures. CNA 2 stated the urinal needed to
be placed in the designated urinal holder located at the side of the bed that was within reach. CNA 2 stated
urinals placed inside a trash can, posing an infection control risk that could impact Resident 62's safety and
physical condition.
During an interview on 10/1/25 at 12:48 PM with Infection Preventionist (IP), the IP stated that she
expected the CNAs and nurses to store one urinal at the bedside using the designated blue-colored urinal
holder attached to the bedframe. The IP stated staff should properly dump the contents into the toilet and
return the urinal to the designated holder. The IP stated the urinals needed to label with the resident's name
and room number. The IP stated if the urinal was dirty, the staff must replace the urinal. The IP stated each
resident should have only one labeled urinal. The IP explained it was unacceptable to have urinals inside
the garbage can. The IP stated that using a urinal placed inside the trash could result in germ
contamination, which may pose a risk to Resident 62. The IP stated that proper storage of clean urinals
was essential for preventing infection and maintaining cleanliness.
During an interview on 10/1/25 at 1:17 PM with Director of Staff Development (DSD), the DSD stated CNAs
needed to label the urinal with the resident's name and room number and place it in the blue-colored urinal
holder. The DSD stated each resident should ideally have only one urinal unless they preferred more. The
DSD stated nurses should not allow urinals to be placed inside the trash can. The DSD stated further that
germs in the trash could spread and pose an infection risk to Resident 62.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 27 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0880
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
During an interview on 10/2/25 at 9:36 AM with Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated CNAs must
clean the urinal after each use and place it back in the designated urinal holder. The DON stated if the
urinal was dirty, it should be thrown away and replaced with a new one. The DON stated throwing away
dirty urinals and replacing the urinal with a new one would reduce the risk of infection and potential cross
contamination.
Residents Affected - Some
Review of the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled Bedpan/Urinal, Offering/Removing dated 2/18, the
P&P indicated, . Policy Preparation: 1. Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of
the resident. General Guidelines: 3. If the resident prefers to keep a urinal at his bedside, check it
frequently. Empty and clean it as necessary. Note on the resident's care plan his request to keep the urinal
at his bedside. After Assisting the Resident: 8. Clean the bedpan or urinal. Wipe dry with a clean paper
towel. Store the bedpan or urinal per facility policy.
2. Review of Resident 65's admission Record, indicated Resident 65 was admitted with multiple diagnoses
which included but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a common lung disease
causing restricted airflow and breathing problems), adult failure to thrive (someone is not eating well, losing
weight and feeling weak), and generalized muscle weakness.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/29/25 at 11:53 AM with Licensed Nurse (LN) 2, LN 2
confirmed the presence of an uncollected empty fruit cup containing used tissue paper and a spoon, a dark
blue plastic mug with a small amount of coffee, an empty glass, and another plastic cup with a small
amount of water, all of which had insects present. LN 2 stated that this situation was unsanitary,
unacceptable, and presented an infection control concern that required immediate cleaning. LN 2 stated
that the presence of multiple gnats in Resident 65's room should prompt CNAs to report the unclean
environment to licensed nurses, who would then inform housekeeping to ensure proper cleaning.
During an interview on 10/1/25 at 8:08 AM, in Resident 65's room, Resident 65 stated that staff were not
cleaning his room regularly, and it was dirty. Resident 65 stated that he was not receiving consistent
assistance from the staff and noted that his meal tray was not being picked up once he had finished.
Resident 65 confirmed the presence of multiple flying insects in his room on 9/29/25 and expressed
concern that this could attract more gnats, which might affect his health, particularly his breathing. Resident
65 stated that he did not decline the staff's assistance in cleaning his room.
During an interview on 10/1/25 at 8:21 AM with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2, CNA 2 stated that she
prepared Resident 65 for meals, served the meal tray, and collected it once Resident 65 finished eating.
CNA 2 stated Resident 65 occasionally asked to leave juice or coffee on the bedside table, and she later
checked if it was suitable to pick it up. CNA 2 stated that leaving empty fruit cups or glasses of juice on the
bedside table can attract insects and increase the risk of infection for Resident 65.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/1/25 at 12:48 PM with Infection Preventionist (IP),
the IP confirmed the absence of a non-compliance care plan in Resident 65's records pertaining to staff not
being permitted to pick up empty cups and glasses, as well as the refusal to have his room cleaned. The IP
stated the presence of gnats in the environment could increase the risk of infection.
During an interview on 10/1/25 at 1:17 PM with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the DSD stated
that CNAs must remove the meal tray as soon as Resident 65 finishes eating and if Resident 65
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 28 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0880
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
prefers to keep food at the bedside, nurses need to provide education about the associated risks and
benefits. The DSD stated leaving food at the bedside may attract bugs, which could present an infection
control concern and potentially impact Resident 65's health and safety. The DSD stated that it was her
expectation for Resident 65's refusal of meal tray removal or room cleaning to be care planned and
communicated during shift reports however, she confirmed that this did not occur with Resident 65.
Residents Affected - Some
During an interview on 10/2/25 at 9:36 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated that old food
remaining at the bedside can lead to bacterial growth and food poisoning. The DON stated there should be
no old food or meal trays left at the bedside. The DON stated leaving moldy old food at the bedside posed
risks, including gastrointestinal (includes the stomach and intestines) issues like diarrhea, nausea, and
vomiting.
Review of the facility's P&P titled Assistance with Meals dated 3/22, the P&P indicated, . Residents shall
receive assistance with meals in a manner that meets the individual needs of each resident. Resident
Confined to Bed: 3. The nursing staff . will take food trays into resident's rooms. 4. Nursing services . will
pick up resident's food trays after each meal .
Review of the facility's P&P titled Pest Control dated 5/08, the P&P indicated, . Our facility shall maintain an
effective pest control program. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. This facility maintains an
on-going pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free of insects and rodents. 5. Garbage
and trash are not permitted to accumulate and removed from the facility daily.
3. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/1/25 at 9:23 AM, (LN) 7 was observed cleaning the
glucometer after use. LN 7 took one (name brand pre-moistened disinfectant) towelette and cleansed the
glucometer for 10 seconds and then placed the glucometer on top of the medication cart (a mobile unit
used in healthcare settings to store and transport medications for patient delivery). LN 7 stated she
cleansed the glucometer for about 10 seconds and did not realize she needed to cleanse it longer or with a
second disinfectant towelette for a wet-contact time (how long a disinfectant needs to stay wet on a surface
to be effective) of two minutes. A review of the side of the disinfectant towelette label with LN 7 indicated,
.Disinfects in 2 minutes.Allow surface to remain visibly wet for contact time(s) listed on the label. LN 7
stated the risk to the residents for not cleaning the glucometer per instructions was the spread of infection.
During an interview on 10/2/25 at 9:50 AM, the IP stated the expectation for glucometer cleaning was for it
to be cleansed with one towelette first, and then a second towelette to disinfect, with the pre-moistened
facility provided purple wipes for a total wet contact time of 2 minutes. The IP further stated the cleaning
process was as directed on the glucometer manufacturer's instructions. The IP explained the risk to the
residents if it was not cleansed properly was the spread of infection.
During an interview on 10/2/24 at 11:24 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the glucometers should
be cleansed with the, .purple wipes. with 2 separate disinfectant wipes for a set time of 2 minutes. The DON
further stated it was important to prevent cross contamination (the process where bacteria or other
microorganisms (undetectable to the eye organisms) that can cause disease are transferred from one
substance or object to another, with harmful effect).
A review of an undated facility provided document titled, GUIDELINES FOR CLEANING AND
DISINFECTING THE ASSURE PLATINUM METER, the document indicated, .To minimize the risk of
transmitting blood-borne
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 29 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0880
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
pathogens, the cleaning and disinfecting procedure should be performed as recommended in the
instructions below.The meter should be cleaned and disinfected after use on each patient.Clean and
disinfect the meter following step-by-step instructions.CLEANING.Step 1 Wear appropriate protective
gear.Step 2.pull out 1 towelette.Step 3 Wipe surface of the meter to clean blood and other body fluids.Step
4.Dispose of used towelette.The meter should be cleaned prior to each disinfection
step.DISINFECTING.Step 5 Pull out 1 new towelette and wipe entire surface.Step 6 Treated surface must
remain wet for recommended contact time.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 30 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0883
Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review, the facility failed to offer, obtain informed consent and provide education to a
resident or resident representative (RP) about influenza (or the flu, is a contagious viral infection of the
respiratory system that can range from mild to severe, causing symptoms like fever, cough, sore throat,
muscle aches, and fatigue) vaccine and pneumococcal (a serious bacterial infection that can cause
respiratory illness) vaccine for two out of five sampled residents (Resident 13 and Resident 65) when:1.
Resident 13 was not offered the flu vaccine for 2 years.2. Resident 65 was not offered the pneumococcal
vaccine within 30 days of admission.These failures had the potential for Resident 13, Resident 65, and
resident's responsible parties to not be fully informed about the risks and benefits, and potential side-effects
of the pneumococcal vaccine and flu vaccine prior to receiving or declining the vaccination and it violated
Resident's right to make an informed choice.1. During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/1/25,
at 12:49 PM, with the Infection Preventionist (IP), the IP stated they have an upcoming influenza,
COVID-19, and pneumococcal vaccination clinic on 10/14/25. The IP stated they offer the flu vaccine
annually to residents during the flu season (typically begins in October and ends in May). The IP stated that
either her or the Licensed Nurse (LN) will obtain signed consents from the resident or the RP. The IP
explained that they inform the resident or the RP about the availability of the vaccine being offered and if
they agree, they are asked to sign the consent form. The IP stated if the resident or the RP were not
interested in getting the vaccine, the risks of not receiving the vaccine and the benefits of getting it would
be explained to them and if they still refused, they were asked to sign the refusal form. The IP stated they
still offer the flu vaccine after their scheduled vaccination clinic if it is still Flu season. The IP stated when a
resident gets admitted to the facility during the off season of the flu, they wait until October for the next flu
season and offer the vaccine to the residents. Resident 13's medical record was reviewed with the IP and
the IP stated Resident 13's last flu vaccine was given on 9/20/22. The IP confirmed there was no refusal
form signed for Resident 13's flu vaccine during the 23/14 and 24/25 flu season. The IP stated the flu
vaccine should have been offered to Resident 13 during the 23/24 and 24/25 flu season. During an
interview on 10/2/25, at 9:11 AM, with the Sub-acute Director (SAD), the SAD stated they always offer the
flu vaccine upon admission. The SAD stated the flu vaccine was offered yearly and if they offered it, they
should educate the RP or the resident if and it should be documented that education was provided and
indicate if the vaccine was refused or accepted. During a concurrent interview and record review on
10/2/25, at 10:04 AM, with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated they offered the flu vaccine every
year and upon admission even if it was not the flu season. Resident 13's medical record was reviewed with
the DON, and the DON stated Resident 13's last flu vaccine was in 2022. The DON stated Resident 13 is
nonverbal, and Resident 13's mother was the RP and if the RP refused the vaccine, it should have been
documented. The DON confirmed that there was no documentation that the flu vaccine was offered for
Resident 13. The DON stated they usually have the consent form, and she expected the nurses to
document that the resident or the RP was educated with the risk and benefits of the vaccine and put it on
the consent form and progress notes. The DON stated if the flu vaccine was not offered annually, there
would be a chance of getting a respiratory infection or flu and that would deteriorate the resident's
condition.A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Influenza Vaccine, revision date 8/25,
the P&P indicated, .Between October 1st and March 31st each year, the influenza vaccine is offered to
residents and employees, unless the vaccine is medically contraindicated or the resident or employee has
already been immunized.The
Residents Affected - Few
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 31 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0883
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
resident (or representative) has the right to refuse vaccines. If refused, the date of and state reason for the
refusal of the vaccine are documented in the resident's medical record. 2. During a concurrent interview
and record review on 10/1/25, at 12:49 PM, with the Infection Preventionist (IP), the IP stated they offer the
pneumococcal vaccine upon admission, but they could still get it during flu season vaccination clinic. The IP
stated they offered pneumococcal vaccine for residents [AGE] years old and above, and if the resident is
below [AGE] years old, they do not offer the pneumococcal vaccine. The admitting nurse is the one
responsible for offering the vaccine and getting consent upon admission. The IP reviewed Resident 65's
medical record and confirmed Resident 65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and there was no vaccine
administration record. The IP stated Resident 65 will be offered the COVID-19, flu, and pneumococcal
vaccine next week. The IP stated she did not know what happen and why the pneumococcal vaccine was
not offered. The IP stated Resident 65 was admitted with pneumonia, he was on an antibiotic (medication to
treat infection) for 7 days and the last dose of antibiotic was on 8/25/25. The IP stated Resident 65 was put
back on antibiotics on 9/14/25 due to pneumonia. The IP stated the pneumococcal vaccine should have
been offered to Resident 65 during the 2-week span after his last dose of the antibiotic. During an interview
on 10/2/25, at 9:11 AM, with the Sub-acute Director (SAD), the SAD stated they always offer the
pneumococcal vaccine upon admission but still depends on the type of pneumococcal vaccine that they
have and the one that was received by the resident before because there were pneumococcal vaccines that
varied depending on the age of the receiver. During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/2/25, at
10:04 AM, with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated they offered pneumococcal vaccines upon
admission and if the resident had a preference when to get the vaccine, the resident could always reach out
to the charge nurse. The DON stated the nurses should document if the vaccine was refused and if the
resident wanted the vaccine to be administered later, there should be a note in the medical record
regarding that. Resident 65's medical record was reviewed with the DON and the DON confirmed Resident
65 was above [AGE] years old and would be eligible to receive a pneumonia vaccine. The DON stated she
did not see a consent form for the pneumococcal vaccine or a progress note that it was offered. The DON
stated she was not sure if it was offered. The DON stated it should have been documented that the resident
was educated and if the resident agreed or refused. The DON stated that the pneumococcal vaccine is
provided for residents aged 65 and older who have low immunity and are at a higher risk of developing
pneumonia. The DON stated if the pneumococcal vaccine was not offered to the resident, the resident
might be at risk for pneumonia. The DON stated Resident 65 should have been offered the pneumococcal
vaccine after he finished his antibiotic treatment and if he refused, there should have been documentation
in the medical record. The DON stated there was a possibility that Resident 65 might get pneumonia again.
A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Pneumococcal Vaccine, revision date 12/25, the
P&P indicated, .Policy Statement All residents are offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing
pneumonia/pneumococcal infections. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. Prior to or upon
admission, residents are assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series, and when
indicated, are offered the vaccine series within thirty (30) days of admission to the facility unless medically
contraindicated or the resident has completed the current recommended vaccine series.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 32 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0887
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and
staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide COVID-19 vaccine, for one out of five sampled
residents (Resident 65) when:1. Resident 65s' clinical record did not contain documented evidence that the
COVID-19 vaccine was administered within 30 days upon admission.2. Resident 65's COVID-19 vaccine
information history was not obtained and documented in the medical record.This deficient practice put
Resident 65 at risk to be infected with COVID-19 virus that could lead to severe illness, hospitalization,
and/or death.During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/1/25, at 12:49 PM, with the Infection
Preventionist (IP), the IP stated the facility offered a COVID-19 vaccine to all residents upon admission. The
IP stated that the admitting nurse is the one responsible for offering the COVID-19 vaccine and obtaining
consent upon admission. The IP stated that once the consent was signed, the nurse would put the order in
for the pharmacy to deliver the vaccine. The IP stated when a resident had a COVID-19 vaccine prior to
admission to the facility, the facility would obtain the administration record of the COVID-19 vaccine and if
the resident or the resident's responsible party (RP) could not provide the documentation of the COVID-19
vaccine administration information, they would just take their word for it. Resident 65's medical record was
reviewed with the IP and the IP confirmed Resident 65 was admitted on [DATE], and he would be offered
the flu vaccine (protect against infection by influenza viruses), the COVID-19 vaccine, and the
pneumococcal vaccine (to prevent certain types of infection) next week. The IP stated the COVID-19
vaccine was offered to Resident 65, and he agreed to have it administered during the flu season
vaccination clinic. The IP confirmed that there is no documentation that Resident 65 agreed to get the
COVID-19 vaccine during flu season and it should have been documented. The IP stated Resident 65
signed a consent form on the day of his admission to the facility on 8/20/25 to receive the COVID-19
vaccine, but the vaccine had not yet been given to Resident 65. During an interview on 10/2/25, at 9:11 AM,
with the Sub-acute Director (SAD), the SAD stated the facility offers the COVID-19 vaccine upon
admission, and they can also provide it upon request. The SAD stated if the staff offered the vaccine, they
should educate the RP or the resident and document whether they refused or accepted the vaccine.During
a concurrent interview and record review on 10/2/25, at 10:04 AM, with the Director of Nursing (DON),
Resident 65's medical record was reviewed with the DON. The DON stated they have a signed consent
form of Resident 65's COVID-19 vaccine dated 8/20/25. The DON stated she did not see Resident 65's
previous COVID-19 vaccine information. The DON stated the COVID-19 vaccine information history should
have been documented. The DON stated that the immunization record does not provide evidence of
administration, thus it is unclear whether Resident 65 received the vaccine. The DON stated she did not
see any completed or active or discontinued doctor orders of the COVID-19 vaccine from Resident 65's
order list therefore, the COVID-19 vaccine was not given yet. The DON stated the potential outcome when
residents were not provided with the COVID-19 vaccine would be risks of getting COVID-19, respiratory
issues, and the possibility of spreading COVID-19 infection to other residents and staff too.A review of
Resident 65's admission RECORD, dated October 1, 2025, indicated, Resident 65's COVID Booster
Vaccine Status and COVID Vaccine Status was left blank.A review of the undated facility's policy and
procedure (P&P) titled, Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) - Vaccination of Residents, indicated, .If a
resident requests vaccination, but missed earlier opportunities for any reason, the vaccine will be offered to
that resident as soon as possible. Efforts to help the resident obtain vaccination are documented
.Documentation and Reporting 1. The resident's medical record includes documentation that indicated, at a
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 33 of 34
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055735
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Delta Oaks Post Acute
6940 Pacific Avenue
Stockton, CA 95207
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0887
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
minimum, the following: .c. Each dose of COVID-19 vaccine that was administered to the resident. 2. If the
resident did not receive the COVID-19 vaccine due to medical contraindications, prior vaccination or
refusal, appropriate documentation is made in the resident's record .
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055735
If continuation sheet
Page 34 of 34