Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

SALINAS VALLEY POST ACUTECMS #0557391 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

055739 08/01/2024 Salinas Valley Post Acute 637 East Romie Lane Salinas, CA 93901
F 0623 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Ombudsman (resident advocate) office was notified of hospital transfers for two of three sampled residents (Residents 2 and 3). This failure had the potential to result in the residents not having someone to advocate for their admission, transfer, and discharge rights. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 2's clinical record indicated he was admitted on [DATE] and had a fracture (break) of the left foot and a laceration (cut) on the left hand. Review of Resident 2's Progress Notes, dated 11/9/23, indicated the physician examined Resident 2's left hand wound and told the facility to transfer the resident to the hospital. Review of Resident 2's Hospital Transfer Form, dated 11/9/23, indicated he was transferred to the hospital at 6:58 p.m. There was no documentation in the clinical record that indicated the facility notified the Ombudsman office of Resident 2's hospital transfer. During an interview and concurrent record review with social services staff A (SS A) on 8/1/24, at 11:19 a.m., SS A stated the facility was supposed to notify the Ombudsman office of hospital transfers either by fax or email. SS A reviewed Resident 2's clinical record and confirmed there was no documentation that indicated the facility notified the Ombudsman office of Resident 2's hospital transfer on 11/9/23. 2. Review of Resident 3's clinical record indicated he was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the brain). Review of Resident 3's Progress Notes, dated 2/28/24, indicated Resident 3 was lethargic (sluggish), pale, and clammy (damp and sticky). The Progress Notes indicated the physician gave an order indicating it was okay to transfer Resident 3 to the hospital. Review of Resident 3's Hospital Transfer Form, dated 2/28/24, indicated he was transferred to the hospital at 1:40 p.m. There was no documentation in the clinical record that indicated the facility notified the Ombudsman office of Resident 3's hospital transfer. During an interview and concurrent record review with SS A on 8/1/24, at 11:19 a.m., SS A reviewed Resident 3's clinical record and confirmed there was no documentation that indicated the facility Page 1 of 2 055739 055739 08/01/2024 Salinas Valley Post Acute 637 East Romie Lane Salinas, CA 93901
F 0623 notified the Ombudsman office of Resident 3's hospital transfer on 2/28/24. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm All Facilities Letter (AFL) 17-27, dated 12/26/17 and addressed to long-term care facilities, indicated, Effective January 1, 2018, AB 940 requires a LTC facility to notify the local LTC Ombudsman at the same time notice is provided to the resident or the resident's representatives when a facility-initiated transfer or discharge occurs. The facility must send notice to the local LTC Ombudsman for any transfer or discharge that is initiated by the facility, whether or not the resident agrees with the facility's decision. AFL 17-27 further indicated, The facility is required to provide a copy of the notice to the LTC Ombudsman as soon as practicable if a resident is subject to a facility-initiated transfer to a general acute care hospital on an emergency basis. Residents Affected - Few 055739 Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0623GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F623 - Transfer and discharge-

    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 1, 2024 survey of SALINAS VALLEY POST ACUTE?

This was a inspection survey of SALINAS VALLEY POST ACUTE on August 1, 2024. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at SALINAS VALLEY POST ACUTE on August 1, 2024?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before tran..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.