F 0584
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited
to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for
one of one sampled resident (Residents 11) by not ensuring Resident 11 was provided a functional wall
clock in the room. This deficient practice had the potential to cause disorientation and Resident 11
verbalizing feelings of frustration. Findings: During a review of Resident 11's admission Record (AR), the
AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 11 on 4/14/2025 with diagnoses that included dementia
(progressive decline in cognitive function, memory, and thinking abilities that can impact daily life),
osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease, in which the tissues in the joint break down over time), and
muscle wasting. During a review of Resident 11's History and Physical Examination (H&P), dated
4/16/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 11 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a
review of Resident 11's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 4/18/2025, the MDS
indicated Resident 11 required supervision or touching assistance (Helper provides verbal cues and or
touching steadying) with eating, partial/moderate assistance (helper does less than half the effort) with
personal hygiene, substantial/maximal assistance (helper does more than half the effort) with bathing and
dressing, and dependent (helper does all the effort) with toileting. During a concurrent observation and
interview on 6/24/2025 at 9:30 AM with Resident 11 and Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 2, in Resident
11's room, Resident 11 was observed staring at the wall clock that indicated the current time as 6:05
(shorthand pointed at #6 and long hand pointed at #1). Resident 11 stated, the time on the wall clock was
wrong, and that Resident 11 was frustrated since she had to ask facility staff for the current time. CNA 2
stated the time on the wall clock was wrong and she would inform the maintenance right away to fix
Resident 11's wall clock since it caused confusion and frustration to Resident 11. During an interview on
6/24/2025 at 9:37 AM with license Vocational Nurse (LVN)2 in Resident 11's room, LVN 2 stated, it was
important to ensure residents' wall clocks indicated the accurate time to help with her orientation and to
minimize frustration. LVN 2 stated having a functional clock that indicates the accurate time was part of
providing a homelike environment to Resident 11. During an interview on 6/25/2025 at 10:59 AM with the
Director of Nurses (DON), DON stated, to create a homelike environment for the residents would include
having a wall clock that indicated the accurate time in every room. DON stated, not having an accurate time
on Resident 11's wall clock had the potential for disorientation and resulted in frustration, and not a
homelike environment. A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, , Homelike Environment,
revised 5/2017 indicated: a) Residents are provided with a safe, clean , comfortable and homelike
environment, b) staff shall provide person-centered care that emphasizes the residents comfort ,
independence and personal needs and preferences and, c) the facility staff and management shall
maximize to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflects a personalized, homelike
setting.
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 24
Event ID:
055845
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055845
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Leisure Glen Post Acute Care Center
330 Mission Road
Glendale, CA 91205
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0585
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must
establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a prompt response to address
grievances for one of one sampled resident (Resident 5) Resident Representative (FAM 1), when FAM 1
reported missing clothing items belonging to Resident 5. This deficient practice delayed the process of
investigating Resident 5's missing clothing items and violated the residents' right to have grievances
addressed promptly. Findings: During a review of Resident 5's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the
facility originally admitted Resident 5 on 4/26/2023 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included
dementia (progressive decline in cognitive function, memory, and thinking abilities that can impact daily
life), atherosclerotic heart disease (thickening or hardening of the arteries), and chronic kidney disease (a
condition in which the kidneys are damaged and can't filter blood as well as they should). The AR indicated
Resident 5 had a Representative for her care (FAM 1). During a review of Resident 5's History and Physical
Examination (H&P), dated 6/12/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 5 does not have the capacity to
understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident
assessment tool), dated 4/18/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 5 required supervision or touching
assistance (Helper provides verbal cues and or touching steadying) with eating, partial/moderate
assistance (helper does less than half the effort) with personal hygiene, substantial/maximal assistance
(helper does more than half the effort) with bathing and dressing and dependent (helper does all the effort)
with toileting. During an interview on 6/24/2025 at 1:45 PM with FAM 1, FAM 1 stated when Resident 5 was
discharged home on 6/3/2025, FAM 1 informed Social Service Assistant (SSA) that Resident 5 was missing
two pants and a blouse. FAM 1 stated the facility had not informed FAM 1 regarding the outcome of the
missing clothing for Resident 5. FAM 1 stated, the facility was aware that she does the laundry, and FAM 1
was concerned that Resident 5's clothing would get lost again. During an interview on 6/24/2025 at 2:28
PM with SSA, SSA stated Resident 5 was discharged to home on 6/3/2025 and readmitted to the facility on
[DATE]. SSA stated, she was aware that family did Resident 5's laundry, and prior to Resident 5's discharge
from the facility on 6/3/2025, FAM 1 informed SSA that Resident 5 was missing some clothes. SSA stated
she thought FAM 1 would come to the facility to find Resident 5's missing clothing. SSA stated, she did not
initiate a grievance report nor did SSA follow up with FAM 1. SSA stated she should have initiated a
grievance report when FAM 1 informed the SSA of Resident 5's missing clothes. SSA stated it was a
violation of resident's rights that a grievance report was not initiated when the facility became aware of
Resident 5's missing clothing items. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 6/24/2025 at 4:27
PM with SSA, the facility document titled Concern/Grievance Log, dated June/2025 was reviewed. The Log
did not indicate any grievance initiated from Resident 5 and/or FAM 1. SSA stated, grievance from FAM 1
was not initiated, and that with any grievances filed the DON (Director of Nurses) and the Administrator
should have been informed. During an interview on 6/25/2025 at 10:53 AM with DON, DON stated SSA
should have reached out to FAM 1 regarding Resident 5's missing clothing, and that a grievance report
should have been initiated. DON stated not promptly addressing Resident 5 and/or FAM 1 grievance
violates resident rights. During an interview on 6/25/2025 at 2:20 PM, with the Administrator (ADM), ADM
stated, she was not aware Resident 5's clothes were missing. The ADM stated a grievance report should
have promptly been initiated in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure, and by not promptly
conducting a grievance report violated residents rights. A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P)
titled, Grievances/Complaints, Filing, revised 4/2017 indicated; a)Residents and their
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055845
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 24
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055845
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Leisure Glen Post Acute Care Center
330 Mission Road
Glendale, CA 91205
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0585
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
representative have the right to file grievances, either orally or in writing to the facility staff or to agency
designated to hear grievances, b) the administrator and staff will make prompt efforts to resolve grievances
to the satisfaction of the resident and/or representative, c) resident representative may file grievance or
complaint regarding resident stay in the facility, and d) all grievances concerning resident care will be
considered and actions on the issues will be responded to in writing, including rationale for the response. A
review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Resident Rights, revised 12/2016 indicated: a)
employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect and dignity, b) resident rights include voice
grievances to the facility and have the facility respond to his or her grievances.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055845
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 24
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055845
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Leisure Glen Post Acute Care Center
330 Mission Road
Glendale, CA 91205
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0641
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a
federally mandated standardized assessment and care-screening tool) and Quarterly Risk Assessment
was accurate for two (2) of 2 sampled residents (Resident 69 and 102) who had a diagnosis of dementia
and was not evaluated for elopement risk. These deficient practices had the potential to result in Resident
69 and 102 not receiving appropriate treatment and/or services.
Residents Affected - Few
Findings:
1. A review of Resident 69’s admission Record indicated Resident 69 was initially admitted to the
facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (change in how the brain works
due to an underlying condition), unspecified dementia (general term for loss of memory, language,
problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), and
Alzheimer’s disease (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental
functions).
During a review of Resident 69’s Admission/readmission Initial assessment dated [DATE] indicated
resident walked frequently (walks outside room at least twice a day and inside room at least once every two
hours during waking hours) with no limitation. The MDS assessment indicated an evaluation of resident
elopement risk was not completed. The evaluation of resident elopement risk indicated resident was not
independently mobile.
During a review of Resident 69’s History and Physical (H&P) dated 3/27/2025 indicated Resident 69
did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions.
During a review of Resident 69’s MDS dated [DATE], indicated Resident 69 was independent with
indoor mobility (walking from room to room [with or without a device such as a cane, crutch, or walker]).
During a review of Resident 69’s Quarterly Risk assessment dated [DATE] indicated resident walked
frequently with no limitation. The assessment indicated an evaluation of resident elopement risk was not
completed. The evaluation of resident elopement risk indicated resident was not independently mobile.
During a review of Resident 69’S MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident 69 required
partial/moderate assistance to walk 10 feet and walk 50 feet with two turns.
During a concurrent interview and record review of Resident 69’s Admission/readmission Initial
assessment dated [DATE] on 6/26/2025 at 12:03 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) 2 stated she should have
documented Resident 69 walked occasionally instead of frequently because resident was only walking
inside the room. RN 2 stated the level of activity should have been documented accurately because the
admission assessment is the baseline of the resident.
During an interview on 6/26/2025 at 12:28 PM, Minimum Data Set Nurse (MDSN) 2 stated she has seen
Resident 69 walk and exercise around the facility. MDSN 2 stated Resident 69 was able to walk around to
activities room, facility patio, and resident rooms to speak with other residents.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055845
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 24
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055845
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Leisure Glen Post Acute Care Center
330 Mission Road
Glendale, CA 91205
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0641
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
During a concurrent interview and record review of Resident 69’s Quarterly Risk Assessments
dated 6/19/2025 on 6/26/2025 at 12:37 PM, MDSN 2 confirmed she did not complete the evaluation for
elopement risk. MDSN 2 stated she used her own judgment that Resident 69 was not a
“wanderer” (moving from one place to another aimlessly) and selected “no” for
the first question “is the resident independently mobile.” MDSN 2 stated she misinterpreted
the question and chose “no” because from her understanding, Resident 69 was not an
elopement risk. MDSN 2 stated she knew Resident 69 was independently mobile and she was just focused
on the elopement risk and decided Resident 69 was not an elopement risk. MDSN 2 stated it was important
for documentation to be accurate so the whole facility knows that Resident 69 could have potential to
wander or elope.
During the same interview on 6/26/2025 at 12:43 PM, MDSN 2 stated when documenting the quarterly
evaluation of Elopement Risk, she always thinks about elopement, “I didn’t really think
dementia could be a risk for elopement and misinterpreted the questions.” MDSN 2 stated residents
with dementia repeat themselves, are agitated and irritable, only remember certain things and are forgetful.
MDSN 2 stated when she was doing the quarterly assessment, she would see the residents and assess
them from head to toe, ask other staff like certified nursing assistants, charge nurses about the resident.
MDSN 2 stated she should have been answering questions for the quarterly risk assessment as a
cumulative of the resident’s current status.
During an interview on 6/26/2025 at 1:18 PM, MDSN 1 stated she focuses on resident admission when
they are admitted to facility and oversees MDSN 2 who focuses on quarterly assessments when residents
are in long term care. MDSN 1 stated she has to review and sign off MDSN 2’s quarterly risk
assessments.
During a concurrent interview and record review of Resident 69’s Quarterly Risk Assessments
dated 6/19/2025 on 6/26/2025 at 1:24 PM, MDSN 1 confirmed the evaluation for elopement risk should
have been filled out correctly. MDSN 1 stated this was “so you have a proper idea of where the
residents are, functionally.” MDSN 1 stated because of this, there was a discrepancy on the MDS,
the MDS provides an overview of what kind of care the resident needs. MDSN 1 stated the assessment
needs to be accurate so the facility knows who would need individualized care.
During the same interview on 6/26/2025 at 1:30 PM, MDSN 1 stated MDSN 2 documents residents
quarterly risk assessment and quarterly MDS. MDSN 1 stated she reviews MDSN 2’s
documentation. MDSN 1 stated “I was not focusing on elopement because we know our patients
here. MDSN 2 misinterpreted the question, I trust her, and I didn’t check.” MDSN 1 stated
she reassessed all the residents of the facility yesterday. MDSN 1 stated she should be reviewing for
accuracy so that it would be a correct reflection of the resident and to show that MDSN 2 was competent in
assessing. MDSN 1 stated this showed MDSN 2’s failure to accurately assess residents.
During an interview on 6/27/2025 at 1:38 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the elopement risk
assessment should have been accurate and filled out completely in order to provide an accurate
intervention for resident. The DON stated if a resident was high risk for elopement they need to have
appropriate placement. The DON stated if there was a resident who tried to elope, the facility needs to
provide intervention right away and look for placement because the facility was not an appropriate place for
resident who was at high risk for elopement.
2. A review of Resident 102’s admission Record indicated Resident 102 was initially admitted to the
facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia, muscle wasting and
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055845
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 24
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055845
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Leisure Glen Post Acute Care Center
330 Mission Road
Glendale, CA 91205
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0641
atrophy and cognitive communication deficit.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
During a review of Resident 102’s History and Physical (H&P) dated 8/14/2024 indicated Resident
102 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions.
Residents Affected - Few
During a review of Resident 102’s MDS dated [DATE], indicated Resident 102 was independent with
indoor mobility (walking from room to room [with or without a device such as a cane, crutch, or walker]).
During a review of Resident 102’s Quarterly Risk assessment dated [DATE] indicated resident
walked occasionally with no limitation. The assessment indicated an evaluation of resident elopement risk
was not completed. The evaluation of resident elopement risk indicated resident was not independently
mobile.
During a review of Resident 102’s Quarterly Risk assessment dated [DATE] indicated resident
walked occasionally with no limitation. The assessment indicated an evaluation of resident elopement risk
was not completed. The evaluation of resident elopement risk indicated resident was not independently
mobile.
During a review of Resident 102’s Quarterly Risk assessment dated [DATE] indicated resident
walked occasionally with no limitation. The assessment indicated an evaluation of resident elopement risk
was not completed. The evaluation of resident elopement risk indicated resident was not independently
mobile.
During a review of Resident 102’s MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident 102 required
partial/moderate assistance to walk 10 feet and walk 50 feet with two turns.
During a concurrent interview and record review of Resident 102’s Quarterly Risk assessment
dated [DATE] on 6/26/2025 at 12:43 PM, MDSN 2 confirmed Resident 102’s elopement risk
evaluation was not completed. MDSN 2 stated when documenting Resident 102’s elopement risk
she “did not think dementia could be a risk for elopement and misinterpreted the question.”
During a concurrent interview and record review of Resident 102’s Quarterly Risk assessment
dated [DATE] on 6/26/2025 at 1:46 PM, MDSN 1 confirmed Resident 102’s elopement risk was
incorrect and should have been filled out correctly. MDSN 1 stated need to make sure documentation was
accurate to get a proper picture of the resident and what their activity levels and needs are.
A review of the facility’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled “Resident Assessments”
dated 12/2024 indicated risk assessments will be conducted on admission, quarterly, and as needed to
include fall, elopement, pain, Braden scale, bowel and bladder and dehydration risk assessments. The P&P
indicated all persons who have completed any portion of the MDS resident assessment form must sign the
document attesting to the accuracy of such information. The P&P indicated the results of the assessments
are used to develop, review, and revise the resident’s comprehensive care plan.
A review of the facility’s P&P titled “Charting and Documentation” dated 7/2017
indicated documentation in the medical record will be objective (not opinionated or speculative), complete,
and accurate.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055845
If continuation sheet
Page 6 of 24
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055845
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Leisure Glen Post Acute Care Center
330 Mission Road
Glendale, CA 91205
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0657
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed,
and revised by a team of health professionals.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was revised for two of two sampled
residents (Resident 69 and 102) who had an active care plan for a diagnosis for dementia (a progressive
brain disorder that results in a decline in memory and thought process).This deficient practice had the
potential result in Resident 69 and 102 no receiving appropriate interventions and treatment and/or
services. Cross Referenced to F641 and F744
Findings:
1. A review of Resident 69’s admission Record indicated Resident 69 was initially admitted to the
facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (change in how the brain works
due to an underlying condition), unspecified dementia (general term for loss of memory, language,
problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), and
Alzheimer’s disease (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental
functions).
During a review of Resident 69’s History and Physical (H&P) dated 3/27/2025 indicated Resident 69
did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions.
During a review of Resident 69’s MDS dated [DATE], indicated Resident 69 was independent with
indoor mobility (walking from room to room [with or without a device such as a cane, crutch, or walker]).
During a review of Resident 69’s Dementia Care plan dated 3/17/2025 did not indicate resident
specific behaviors to monitor.
During an interview on 6/26/2025 at 11:53 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) 2 stated Resident 69 stated in the
past 2 weeks resident has become more mobile. RN 2 stated if Resident 69 had a behavior of going into
the wrong resident room she would tell the charge nurses and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) to
monitor for when Resident 69 goes into other resident rooms. RN 2 stated a care plan should be created for
this to protect other residents' privacy. RN 2 stated the care plan is developed to ensure specific
interventions for her tailored to her and her behaviors. RN 2 stated this should be added to Resident
69’s care plan. RN 2 stated licensed nurses can update or create care plan.
During an interview on 6/26/2025 at 12:28 PM, Minimum Data Set Nurse (MDSN) 2 stated she has seen
Resident 69 walk and exercise around the facility. MDSN 2 stated Resident 69 was able to walk around to
activities room, facility patio, and resident rooms to speak with other residents.
During an interview on 6/26/2025 at 1:35 PM, MDSN 1 stated for residents with dementia care plan would
include medication, activities, and reorienting the resident if needed. MDSN 1 stated the care plan should
be created on admission and updated quarterly or as needed if there was a change. MDSN 1 stated when
staff notice behaviors, they should notify the charge nurse, and the care plan should be updated specific to
Resident 69. MDSN 1 stated if Resident 69 walks into another resident’s room, there could be a
“terrible altercation” if the other resident does not want Resident 69 in the room.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055845
If continuation sheet
Page 7 of 24
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055845
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Leisure Glen Post Acute Care Center
330 Mission Road
Glendale, CA 91205
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0657
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
During a concurrent interview and record review of Resident 69’s Dementia Care Plan on 6/27/2025
at 11:14 AM, MDSN 1 stated there was no actual behavior indicated to increase monitoring for Resident 69.
MDSN 1 stated the care plan was not resident specific.
2. A review of Resident 102’s admission Record indicated Resident 102 was initially admitted to the
facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia, muscle wasting and atrophy and
cognitive communication deficit.
During a review of Resident 102’s History and Physical (H&P) dated 8/14/2024 indicated Resident
102 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions.
During a review of Resident 102’s MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident 102 required
partial/moderate assistance to walk 10 feet and walk 50 feet with two turns.
During a review of Resident 102’s Dementia Care plan dated 8/12/2024 did not indicate the specific
resident’s behaviors to be monitor.
During a concurrent interview and record review of Resident 102’s Dementia Care Plan on
6/27/2025 at 11:16 AM, MDSN 1 stated there was no actual resident behavior to monitor for Resident 102.
MDSN 1 stated the care plan was not resident specific.
During an interview on 6/27/2025 at 1:40 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the residents care plan
should have specific behavior so that licensed nurses and staff could be aware of residents' specific
behaviors and interventions for the behaviors to ensure everyone was aware of what was going on and
what to do. The DON stated care plan should be revised to show patient specific behaviors to monitor.
A review of the facility’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled “Care Plans, Comprehensive
Person-Centered” dated 12/2016 indicated a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that
includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident’s physical, psychosocial and
functional needs was developed and implemented for each resident. The P&P indicated assessments of
residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the
residents’ conditions change. The P&P indicated the interdisciplinary team must review and update
the care plan at least quarterly, in conjunction with the required quarterly MDS assessment.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055845
If continuation sheet
Page 8 of 24
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055845
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Leisure Glen Post Acute Care Center
330 Mission Road
Glendale, CA 91205
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0686
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to set the Alternating Pressure
Mattress (APM, mattress that provides pressure redistribution by filling and un-filling air cells within the
mattress so that contact points with the body are reduced) according to the resident's weight as indicated in
the manufacturer's recommendation and physicians orders for one of [three] residents (Resident 94). This
deficient practice had the increased potential for Resident 94 to develop new pressure ulcer or injury (skin
injury due to prolonged unrelieved pressure or skin friction) and/or delay the resident's wound to heal.
Residents Affected - Few
Findings:
During a review of Resident 94's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 1
on 2/22/2008 with diagnoses that included fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur [the section of
the thigh bone (femur) that connects the femoral head (the ball of the hip joint) to the femoral shaft (the
main part of the thigh bone)], muscle wasting and atrophy (loss of muscle mass and strength), type 2
diabetes mellitus (DM2 – a condition that results in too much sugar circulating in the blood).
During a review of Resident 94’s History and Physical (H&P), dated 2/24/2025, the H&P indicated
the Resident 94 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions.
During a review of Resident 94’s Order Summary Report (OSR), the OSR indicated the physician
ordered on 2/26/2025, without an end date, indicated that Resident 94 may have Low Air Loss mattress
(LALM-a type of the APM) for skin management and to monitor for function and settings every shift.
During a review of Resident 94’s “Pressure Ulcer Assessment,” dated 3/4/2025, the
assessment indicated Resident 94 had a healed unstageable right sacrococcyx [a single bony structure
formed by the fusion of the sacrum (a large, triangular bone at the base of the spine) and the coccyx (also
known as the tailbone)] due to Deep Tissue Injury (DTI, damage to the tissues beneath the skin, often
caused by sustained pressure and/or shear forces). The assessment indicated Resident 94 remained at
risk for further skin breakdown due to recent hospitalization and the preventive measures included a LAL
mattress.
During a review of Resident 75's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning
tool), dated 6/1/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 94’s cognition (ability to think, remember, and
reason) was severely impaired. The MDS indicated Resident 94 needed set up/clean up assistance in
eating and oral hygiene; and needed moderate assistance (helper lifts, holds, or supports trunk or limbs,
but provides less than half the effort) in toileting hygiene and shower.
During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/24/2025 at 9:26 AM with Licensed Vocational Nurse
(LVN 3) in Resident 94’s room, Resident 94 was lying in bed in supine position with the head of bed
slightly elevated and the LAL mattress setting was set at 350 lbs. There was a yellow circle sticker with
Resident 94’s room and bed number with 120-180 lbs. written on it. LVN 3 confirmed Resident
94’s mattress setting was at 350 lbs. LVN 3 stated, she did not know what the correct setting for
Resident 94’s LALM was supposed to be as the Treatment Nurse (TN) was the one who is in charge
of adjusting the LALM settings for the residents.
During a concurrent interview and observation on 6/24/2025 at 9:56 AM with TN 1 in Resident
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055845
If continuation sheet
Page 9 of 24
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055845
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Leisure Glen Post Acute Care Center
330 Mission Road
Glendale, CA 91205
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0686
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
94’s room, the TN 1 stated Resident 94’s LAL mattress should always be in the correct
setting according to the resident’s weight range as indicated in the yellow sticker pasted on Resident
94’s LALM. TN 1 stated, Resident 94’s LALM setting should be between 120-180 pounds
maximum to help Resident 94 prevent further pressure injury as Resident 94 was not mobile and had a
previous sacrococcyx pressure injury in the past. TN 1 stated, she did not know why the LALM was set at
350 lbs., which was not the correct setting for the Resident 94. During a review of manufacture’s
guidelines for Drive-Med Aire Melody control unit, indicated the following:
- The Med Aire Melody Alternating Pressure and Low Air Loss Mattress is indicated for the prevention and
treatment of any and all stage pressure ulcers when used in conjunction with a comprehensive pressure
ulcer management program.
- Operating instructions Step 6: Determine the patients' weight and set the control knob to that weight
setting on the control unit.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055845
If continuation sheet
Page 10 of 24
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055845
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Leisure Glen Post Acute Care Center
330 Mission Road
Glendale, CA 91205
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to
prevent accidents.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide safe and hazard free environment and
interventions for safety and supervision for four of four sampled residents (Residents 7,69,102, and 79) the
facility failed to: 1.Ensure Resident 7's bed alarm was in the working condition. 2.Provide adequate
supervision and safety measures to ensure safety to Residents 69 and 102 who are at risk for elopement
(leaving the facility without permission) keeping the patio gate closed and not kept opened with a wire.
3a.Ensure Certified Nurse Assistants 3 and 4 maintain Resident 79, environment free from
accidents/hazards, by using caution during transfers and bed mobility, to prevent striking the resident's
arms, legs, and hands against any sharp or hard surface to prevent bruising/bleeding for Resident 79, who
was assessed at risk for bleeding and bruising due to Lovenox (an anticoagulant) medication, in
accordance with the resident's developed care plans. 3b. Ensure that LVN 6 notified Resident 79's
representative (RP 1) of Resident 79's accident that resulted to an open ecchymosis and bleeding on the
right dorsal forearm on 6/13/25, in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Safety
and Supervision of Residents. 3c. Ensure Resident 79's information recorded in the resident's record titled
Situation Background Report (SBAR) report was accurately documented to include that RP 1 was notified
of Resident 79's open ecchymosis and bleeding to the right dorsal forearm on 6/13/25, in accordance with
the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Safety and Supervision of Residents. 3d. Ensure Resident
79's information recorded in the resident's record titled Situation Background Report (SBAR) report was
accurately documented to include that Resident 79's open ecchymosis was bleeding on the right dorsal
forearm on 6/13/25, as reported by Resident 79 and CNA 4, in accordance with the facility's policy and
procedure (P&P) titled Safety and Supervision of Residents. LVN 6 verbalized on 6/27/25 at 11:22 AM
during an interview that Resident 79's right forearm skin tear was bleeding on 6/13/25, but the SBAR
documentation indicated No bleeding noted. LVN 6 verbalized on 6/27/25 at 11:22 AM during an interview
that she did not notify RP 1 of Resident 79's skin tear to the right dorsal forearm, but the SBAR
documentation indicated [RP 1] was made aware. These deficient practices had placed the residents:
Resident 7 at risk for fall and injury. Resident 69 and 102 to be at risk for elopement and potential harm,
which could lead to serious injury and decline in the resident's well-being. and for Resident 79 to be at risk
for injury and harm. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 7's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated
the facility originally admitted Resident 7 on 7/22/2022 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that
included dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning) and
repeated falls. During a review of Resident 7's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated
4/9/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 7 had severely impaired memory and cognition (ability to think and
reasonably). The MDS indicated Resident 7 required partial/moderate assistance with eating and oral
hygiene, and substantial/maximal assistance with personal hygiene, toileting hygiene, shower/bathe self
and chair/bed-to-chair transfer. During a review of Resident 7's Order Summary Report, dated 6/24/2025,
the Report indicated the physician ordered sensor bed alarm (a device placed on or under a bed that alerts
caregivers when someone starts to get up or get out of bed) for safety every shift, starting on 1/9/2024.
During a review of Resident 7's Care Plan, dated 1/9/2024, the Care Plan indicated interventions for a
sensor pad in bed for safety was implemented to prevent falls. During a review of Resident 7's Quarterly
Risk Assessment and Assessment Outcomes, dated 4/9/2025, the assessment indicated Resident 7 had a
total score of 14 for fall risk, which represented high risk for fall. During a concurrent observation and
interview on 6/24/2025 at 9:29 AM with Registered
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055845
If continuation sheet
Page 11 of 24
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055845
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Leisure Glen Post Acute Care Center
330 Mission Road
Glendale, CA 91205
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
Nurse (RN) 1 in Resident 7's room, Resident 7's bed alarm monitor was observed on the floor next to
Resident 7's bed, with the sensor pad plug disconnected from the sensor mat jack. RN 1 inserted the
sensor pad plug into the sensor mat jack on the monitor and hung the sensor pad on the bed rail, but the
sensor pad plug fell out the sensor mat jack. on the monitor. RN 1 stated, the sensor pad plug was loose,
and since the sensor mat plug could be easily disconnected, the bed alarm monitor was not in good
working condition. RN 1 stated, Resident 7 was at risk for falls and the resident could get out of bed without
staff's knowledge, which could lead to fall and injury. During an interview on 6/24/25 at 11:04 AM with
Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA 1 stated she did not check Resident 7's bed alarms this morning
(6/24/25) and did not know Resident 7's bed alarm monitor's sensor plug was loose. CNA 1 stated, if the
bed alarm was not working, the bed alarm would not trigger to alert facility staff that Resident 7 attempted
to get out of bed. CNA 1 stated the bed alarm monitor was used to assist and aid in the prevention of fall.
when the resident was trying to get out of bed in time to prevent fall. During an interview on 6/27/25 at 9:24
AM with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated staff must check and make sure bed alarms were
in place and working properly every shift. The DON stated, if the resident's bed alarm was not working
properly, it could place the resident at risk for fall and injury. During a review of the undated facility's policy
and procedures (P&P) titled, User Manual, the P&P indicated to insert the sensor pad's telephone style
plug into the ‘sensor Mat' jack on the monitor until you hear or feel the ‘click' of the plug locking in place.
During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Falls-Clinical Protocol, dated 3/2018, the P&P indicated Based
on the proceeding assessment, the staff and physician will identify pertinent interventions to try to prevent
subsequent falls and to address the risks of clinically significant consequences of falling.Examples of such
interventions may include.use of bed and wheelchair alarm. 2a. During an observation of the facility's
outdoor patio on 6/25/2025 at 4:35 PM, a visitor was observed exiting through patio get that was held open.
The patio gate held open by gray wire that was tied onto nearby bush. Patio exits gate leads to main
residential street. During a concurrent observation of the open patio gate and interview on 6/25/2025 at
4:37 PM, treatment nurse (TN) 2 confirmed patio gate was left open and tied onto a nearby bush with a
gray wire. TN 2 stated he did not know who tied the wire to the bush to hold the patio gate open. TN 2
stated the gate was not locked from the inside (patio area) and there was no alarm to indicate the patio
gate was open. TN 2 stated the patio gate was locked from the outside so no one can enter. During a
concurrent observation of the open patio gate and interview on 6/25/2025 at 4:47 PM, the Administrator
(ADM) confirmed patio gate was left open and tied onto a nearby bush with a gray wire. The ADM stated
the gate is kept unlocked from the patio for fire safety and remains locked from the outside so no one can
get in. The ADM stated she did not know who would tie a wire on the bush. The ADM stated the patio gate
should be kept closed because someone can come into the patio area. During an observation of the
facility's outdoor patio on 6/26/2025 at 11:36 AM, a family member (FM) 2 was observed trying to exit
through patio gate. Door alarm was heard as patio door was pushed. During an interview on 6/26/2025 at
11:39 AM, FM 2 stated she was trying to go through the patio gate exit to smoke. FM 2 stated the patio
gate never had an alarm before and now they are saying we cannot use this exit and must go around. FM 2
stated the alarm was never there before and would often use the patio gate as an exit gate. FM 2 stated
she has seen the patio gate held open before. During an interview on 6/26/2025 at 11:46 AM, FM 3 stated
the door alarm was new. FM 3 stated she has never used the patio gate as an exit before but had seen
nursing students use the exit gate through the patio. FM 3 stated she has seen the patio gate open a few
times and the gate was even held open by a wire. FM 3 stated she has seen the wire. During a review of
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055845
If continuation sheet
Page 12 of 24
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055845
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Leisure Glen Post Acute Care Center
330 Mission Road
Glendale, CA 91205
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
Resident 69's admission Record indicated Resident 69 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with
diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (change in how the brain works due to an underlying
condition), unspecified dementia (general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other
thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), and Alzheimer's disease (progressive
disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions). During a review of Resident 69's
History and Physical (H&P) dated 3/27/2025 indicated Resident 69 did not have the capacity to understand
and make decisions. During a review of Resident 69's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated
resident assessment tool), dated 6/19/2025, indicated the resident had severely impaired cognitive skills for
decision making. During a review of Resident 69's active care plans, had no documented evidence of a
care plan or interventions were created to prevent the resident from elopement for elopement risk. During a
review of Resident 69's Quarterly Risk assessment dated [DATE] indicated resident walked frequently with
no limitation. The assessment indicated an evaluation of resident elopement risk was not completed. During
a concurrent interview and record review of Resident 69's Quarterly Risk Assessments dated 6/19/2025 on
6/26/2025 at 1:24 PM, MDSN 1 stated the evaluation for elopement risk should have been filled out
correctly. MDSN 1 stated this was so you have a proper idea of where the residents are, functionally. MDSN
1 stated because of this, there was a discrepancy on the MDS, the MDS provides an overview of what kind
of care the resident needs. MDSN 1 stated the assessment needs to be accurate so the facility knows who
would need individualized care. b. During a review of Resident 102's admission Record indicated Resident
102 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia,
muscle wasting and atrophy and cognitive communication deficit. During a review of Resident 102's History
and Physical (H&P) dated 8/14/2024 indicated Resident 102 did not have the capacity to understand and
make decisions. During a review of Resident 102's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated the resident had severely
impaired cognition. During a review of Resident 102's active care plans, had no documented evidence of a
care plan or interventions created for elopement risk. During a review of Resident 102's Quarterly Risk
assessment dated [DATE] indicated resident walked occasionally with no limitation. The assessment
indicated an evaluation of resident elopement risk was not completed. During a review of Resident 102's
Quarterly Risk assessment dated [DATE] indicated resident walked occasionally with no limitation. The
assessment indicated an evaluation of resident elopement risk was not completed. During a review of
Resident 102's Quarterly Risk assessment dated [DATE] indicated resident walked occasionally with no
limitation. The assessment indicated an evaluation of resident elopement risk was not completed. During a
concurrent interview and record review of Resident 102's Quarterly Risk assessment dated [DATE] on
6/26/2025 at 12:43 PM, MDSN 2 confirmed Resident 102's elopement risk evaluation was not completed.
MDSN 2 stated when documenting Resident 102's elopement risk she did not think dementia could be a
risk for elopement and misinterpreted the question. During a concurrent interview and record review of
Resident 102's Quarterly Risk assessment dated [DATE] on 6/26/2025 at 1:46 PM, MDSN 1 confirmed
Resident 102's elopement risk was incorrect and should have been filled out correctly. MDSN 1 stated need
to make sure documentation was accurate to get a proper picture of the resident and what their activity
levels and needs are. During an interview on 6/27/2025 at 1:36 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated
the patio gate was not an exit and should not be used as an exit. The DON stated the patio gate should
only be used for fire safety. The DON stated if the patio gate is left open it becomes a safety issue for the
residents. During an interview on 6/27/2025 at 1:38 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the
elopement risk assessment should have been accurate and filled out completely. The DON stated this was
to provide an accurate intervention for resident. The
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055845
If continuation sheet
Page 13 of 24
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055845
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Leisure Glen Post Acute Care Center
330 Mission Road
Glendale, CA 91205
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
DON stated if a resident was a high risk for elopement they need to have appropriate placement. The DON
stated if there was a resident who tried to elope, the facility needs to provide intervention right away and
look for placement because the facility was not an appropriate place for resident who was at high risk for
elopement. A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Safety and Supervision of Residents
dated 7/2017 indicated the facility strives to make the environment free from accident hazards as possible,
resident safety and supervision and assistance to prevent accidents are facility-wide priorities. 3a. During a
review of Resident 79's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility originally admitted the resident
on 12/10/2024 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included muscle weakness (a reduced ability
of one or more muscles to exert force), Acute pulmonary edema (APE- A condition caused by excess fluid
in the lungs). During a review of Resident 79's History and Physical [H&P] dated 12/11/2024, the H&P
indicated Resident 79 does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of
Resident 79's care plan for Potential for bleeding/bruising due to anticoagulant therapy for DVT prophylaxis,
initiated on 1/25/25, the care plan interventions included a goal to monitor the resident for signs of bleeding.
During a review of Resident 79's Order Summary Report, dated 6/1/25, the Order Summary Report
indicated the following orders: a. Lovenox (an anticoagulant, or blood thinner, meaning it helps prevent the
formation of blood clots) injection solution prefilled syringe 40 milligrams (a unit of measure), inject
subcutaneously in the morning for Deep vein thrombosis (DVT- is a condition where a blood clot forms in a
deep vein) prophylaxis. b. Monitor for signs and symptoms of bleeding for anticoagulant use: blood in urine,
blood in stool, coffee ground emesis, bleeding gums, confusion, cols clammy skin and notify primary care
practitioner if present, document Y= with symptoms and N=no symptoms every shift. During a review of
Resident 79's previously developed care plan initiated on 6/01/25 for Skin: left lower extremity redness
related to recent hospitalization ., the care plan indicated as an intervention to use caution during transfer
and bed mobility to prevent striking arms, legs, and hands against any sharp or hard surface. During a
review of Resident 79's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool),
dated 6/12/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 79 had severely impaired memory and cognition (ability to
think and reasonably). The MDS indicated Resident 79 is dependent (helper does all of the effort) on staff
with toileting, shower and putting on and taking off footwear. The MDS indicated Resident 79 required
partial/moderate assistance with upper body dressing, The MDS indicated Resident 79 required
supervision (helper provided verbal cues) when eating in addition the MDS indicated Resident 79 required
set up (helper sets up or cleans up) for oral hygiene. During a review of the SBAR communication form
authored by Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 6), dated 6/13/2025 for Resident 79, the SBAR indicated
Resident [79] is alert and oriented X 4, no change in level of consciousness noted. During rounding noted
resident with open ecchymosis (a discoloration of the skin resulting from bleeding underneath, typically
caused by bruising) on right dorsal (relating to the upper side) forearm, 2.5 centimeters. No bleeding noted.
No sign and symptoms of infection noted. Asked resident what happened, the resident stated that I
accidently hit on the side rail when reaching to my side table, it wasn't that hard, but I still got this. Resident
[79] denied pain and discomfort. Resident [79] is on Lovenox daily which predispose the resident for easy
bruising. Good skin care provided, and first aid done.Called Nurse Practitioner and made aware with no
new orders at this time. Resident [79]'s representative made aware. During a review of Resident 79's care
plan for Open ecchymosis on right dorsal forearm initiated in 6/13/2025, the care plan did not include
resident specific interventions to use caution during transfers and bed mobility to prevent striking arms,
legs, and hands against any sharp or hard surfaces, in accordance with Resident 79's
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055845
If continuation sheet
Page 14 of 24
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055845
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Leisure Glen Post Acute Care Center
330 Mission Road
Glendale, CA 91205
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
previous history of accidents/injuries incurred during bed mobility. During an interview on 6/24/25 at 10:05
AM with Resident 79, and in the presence of Resident 79's Resident Representative (RP 1), Resident 79
stated a few weeks ago, two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs), Whammed me [Resident 79] against the
bed rail, it happened last week at night. Resident 79 stated she was banged against the bed and the wall.
Resident 79 further stated After we (Resident 79 and the two CNAs) saw blood dripping [from Resident
79's arm], the CNAs called the charge nurse (LVN 6) to come in. Resident 79 stated LVN 6 came inside her
room and wiped off the blood from her arm (right arm) and put a band aid on top of it. During the same
interview, RP 1 stated the incident happened a couple weeks ago. RP 1 stated he was not notified by any
facility staff of Resident 79 having a skin tear due to hitting her arm against the bed side rails, that night. RP
1 stated he found out about the incident, the following day (6/13/25 AM shift) when he came to visit
Resident 79 at the facility, on 6/13/25 and was informed by Resident 79 about the incident. During a review
of a facility provided document signed and dated 6/27/2025, the document indicated This letter is a follow
up letter regarding an allegation incident that occurred on 6/13/2025, approximately at 1:10 AM. Resident
79 reported on 6/27/25 at 3 pm to the Social Worker and Assistant Director of Nursing that at approximately
1:10 AM, on 6/13/25, two female Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) came into her [Resident 79] room and
while changing her [Resident 79], they turned her to the right side and her right forearm accidently hit the
side rail causing an open ecchymosis During an interview on 6/27/25 at 11:22 AM with LVN 6, LVN 6 stated
that on 6/13/25, she was asked by CNA 3 to go look at Resident 79 and stated that the resident's skin was
open like a skin tear. LVN 6 stated, she went to Resident 79's room to do an assessment and cleaned the
bleeding wound (skin tear) with saline solution then put antiseptic and covered the wound. LVN 4 stated she
could not recall if it was Resident 79 or CNA 3, who explained to her how the incident (skin tear) occurred.
LVN 4 stated she documented in Resident 79's record that she notified Resident 79's RP (RP 1) but she
actually did not notify RP 1. LVN 6 stated she actually endorsed the RP notification to another Licensed
Vocational Nurse (LVN 3) and Treatment Nurse 1. During an interview on 6/27/25 at 1:36 PM with CNA 4,
CNA 4 stated, she was asked by CNA 3 for assistance in changing Resident 79 on 6/13/25. CNA 4 stated
she observed CNA 3 changed Resident 79 while lying in bed and when they turned Resident 79, she heard
Resident 79 yell out Ouch. CNA 4 stated she asked Resident 79 What happened Mama and Resident 79
proceeded to show her arm, which was bleeding. CNA 4 stated CNA 3 immediately left the room to call
LVN 6. CNA 4 stated when CNA 3 returned to the room with LVN 6, CNA 3 left as she had her assigned
residents to care for. CNA 4 stated she did not report the actual cause of Resident 79's skin tear to LVN 6,
because she assumed CNA 3 informed LVN 6 what had occurred and no one from the facility had called
her to ask how or what had occurred to Resident 79. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure
(P&P) titled, Safety and Supervision of Residents, with a revision date of July 2017, the P&P indicated Our
facility strives to make the environment as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident safety and
supervision and assistance to prevent accidents are facility-wide priorities. The policy further indicated 4.
Employees shall be trained on potential accident hazards and demonstrate knowledge on how to identify
and report accident hazards and try to prevent avoidable accidents.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055845
If continuation sheet
Page 15 of 24
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055845
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Leisure Glen Post Acute Care Center
330 Mission Road
Glendale, CA 91205
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0695
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, the facility to failed to provide respiratory care to ensure four of 4
sampled residents (Resident 15, 99, 75, and 213) who were receiving oxygen therapy were provided care
in accordance with the professional standard of practice and facility's policy and procedure by failing to:
1.Ensure Resident 99 was monitored to ensure the resident wears the nasal cannula (a tube inserted into
the nostril used to deliver oxygen into the lungs) to received continuous oxygen as ordered by the physician
ordered for oxygen administration. 2.Ensure Resident 15's oxygen tubing (flexible plastic tubing used to
deliver oxygen through nostrils and the tubing is fitted over the patient's ears) was placed in designated
plastic bag when not in use. 3. Facility failed to provide a working/ functioning BIPAP (a type of non-invasive
ventilation that helps people breathe by providing two different levels of air pressure through a mask)
machine for one of one sampled resident (Resident 213) with a diagnoses of sleep apnea upon admission
and for 7 days after (7/17/2025-7/24/2025). 4.Ensure the nasal cannula (NC-a flexible tube used to deliver
supplemental oxygen to people through the nostrils) was changed every seven (7) days for Resident 75
and to ensure to label the oxygen humidifier bottle (a device used to add moisture to oxygen gas, making it
more comfortable and less drying for patients who require supplemental oxygen therapy) with the date it
was opened and used for Resident 75. These deficient practices placed Residents 15, 99, 75, and 213 at
risk for shortness of breath and/or hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in the body tissues), respiratory infection (a
process when a microorganism, such as bacteria, fungi, or a virus, enters a person's body and causes
harm) and a widespread infection in the facility which can lead into serious injury or death. Findings: 1.
During a review of Resident 99's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on
[DATE] with diagnoses that included fusion of spine lumbar region (surgical procedure that joins two or
more vertebrae in the lower back, aiming to stabilize the spine and reduce pain), acute respiratory failure,
and muscle wasting and atrophy (partial or complete wasting away of a part of the body). During a review of
Resident 99's History and Physical (H&P), dated 6/20/2025, indicated the resident had the capacity to
understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 99's Order Summary Report dated 6/13/2025,
indicated a physician order to administer Oxygen at 2 to 3 LPM (liters per minute) via nasal cannula
continuously for acute respiratory failure (ARF-failure of the lungs to meet the body's oxygen demand), may
titrate up to 5 LPM via nasal cannula and if oxygen saturation still < 95% may titrate up to 6-10 LPM via
non-rebreather mask (a mask used to deliver high flow and concentrated oxygen)to keep oxygen saturation
> 95% with humidifier for 2 to 3 L per resident and responsible party request every shift. During an
observation in Resident 99's room on 6/24/2025 at 8:56 AM, Resident 99's was talking on the phone and
not wearing nasal cannula with the oxygen concentrator on. Resident 99 stated the nasal cannula was
behind her head. During a concurrent observation and interview in Resident 99's room on 6/24/2025 at
9:09 AM, verified with RN 1 of Resident 99 was not wearing the nasal cannula. RN 1 reminded Resident 99
to wear oxygen via nasal cannula. During an interview with the DON on 6/27/2025 at 1:35 PM, the DON
stated if resident does not wear oxygen nasal cannula as ordered it should be documented, and care plan
should be revised. The DON stated the nurse should notify the physician. The DON stated if the resident
does not wear oxygen, there could be a decrease in oxygen saturation. 2. During a review of Resident 15's
admission record indicated the resident was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute
respiratory failure with hypoxia (a state in which oxygen is not available in sufficient amounts at the tissue
level to maintain adequate homeostasis), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, lung disease
causing restricted airflow and
Residents Affected - Some
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055845
If continuation sheet
Page 16 of 24
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055845
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Leisure Glen Post Acute Care Center
330 Mission Road
Glendale, CA 91205
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0695
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
breathing problems) with (acute) exacerbation (worsening of a disease or an increase in its symptoms), and
intervertebral disc degeneration lumbar region (breakdown of the discs between the vertebrae [back bones]
in the lower back) with discogenic back pain (type of low back pain that originates from a damaged or
degenerated intervertebral disc). During a review of Resident 15's History and Physical (H&P), dated
6/10/2025, indicated the resident did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a
review of Resident 15's Order Summary Report dated 4/11/2025, indicated a physician order to administer
Oxygen at 2 to 3 liters (L, unit of measure) per minute (PM) via nasal cannula continuous for COPD, may
titrate up to 5 LPM via nasal cannula and if oxygen saturation still < 95 may titrate up to 6-10 LPM via
non-rebreather mask to keep oxygen saturation > 95% every shift. During an observation in Resident
15's room on 6/24/2025 at 9:01 AM, Resident 15's oxygen tubing and nasal cannula was observed on
resident's soiled bed and oxygen machine still on. Resident 15 was not in the room. During a concurrent
observation and interview in Resident 15's room on 6/24/2025 at 9:09 AM, verified with registered nurse
(RN) 1 of Resident 15's oxygen tubing and nasal cannula on the resident bed, not in use. RN 1 stated the
oxygen tubing and nasal cannula should be in the plastic bag and not on the bed because of infection
control. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 6/27/2025 at 1:34 PM, the DON stated
when oxygen was not in use, the oxygen tubing and nasal cannula should be placed in the designated bag
due to infection control. DON stated resident would be at risk for respiratory infection. A review of the
facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Oxygen Administration dated 2001 indicated to provide
guidelines for safe oxygen administration. 3. During a review of Resident 213's admission Record (AR), the
AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 6/17/2025 with diagnoses that included acute respiratory
failure (failure of the lungs to meet the body's oxygen demand) with hypercapnia (a condition where the
lungs cannot adequately remove carbon dioxide (CO2) from the blood), obstructive sleep apnea (sleep
disorder where breathing repeatedly stops and starts during sleep due to a blockage in the upper airway).
During a review of Resident 213's History and Physical [H&P] dated 6/18/2025, the H&P indicated the
resident has the capacity to understand and make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 213's
Order Summary Report, indicated the physician ordered on 6/17/2025 for BIPAP for obstructive sleep
apnea at least 12 hours at bedtime. During a review of Resident 213's Progress notes dated 6/18/2025
timed at 11PM, indicated BIPAP not used due to missing parts, applied oxygen inhalation at 3 liters (unit of
measurement) via nasal canula (a device that delivers extra oxygen through a tube and into your nose)
authored by Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 4). During a review of Resident 213's Progress notes dated
6/19/2025. timed at 12:20 AM indicated, CPAP noted missing parts no strap, hose doesn't fit mask. Staff to
follow up on missing parts at appropriate time. authored by LVN 4. During a review of Resident 213's
Progress notes dated 6/23/2025 timed at 9:30 PM indicated awaiting mask strap, will apply when available
authored by LVN 4. During a review of Facility provided document titled delivery receipt that included billed
to Resident 213, dated 6/18/2024, indicated the following items were delivered to the facility: 1.Full face
mask quantity 1.2. Headgear for CPAP/BiPAP quantity 1.3. Tubing 6 feet quantity 1,4. Enrichment FOR
CPAP quantity 1 ,5. BIPAP G3 [NAME] quantity 1,6. BIPAP Humidifier G3 [NAME] quantity 1. During a
review of Facility provided document titled delivery receipt that included billed to Resident 213, dated
6/24/2024, indicated the following items were delivered to the facility: 1.Full face mask quantity 1, 2.
Headgear for CPAP/BiPAP quantity 1 , 3. Tubing 6 feet quantity 1, 4. Enrichment FOR CPAP quantity 1
During an interview on 6/24/2025 at 9:11 AM with Resident 213, Resident 213 stated he has sleep apnea
and needs a CPAP in order to sleep at night. Resident 213 stated the day he was admitted to the facility
they ordered a CPAP machine on admission but it
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055845
If continuation sheet
Page 17 of 24
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055845
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Leisure Glen Post Acute Care Center
330 Mission Road
Glendale, CA 91205
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0695
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
wasn't working. Resident 213 stated the nurse who was helping me put it on said it was missing pieces and
it was leaking, she said they would order a new one. Resident 213 stated with out his CPAP machine he
can't sleep at night. Resident 213 stated a few days ago I woke up and I couldn't breathe it felt like I couldn't
catch my breath. Resident 213 stated he asked his nurse again few days after admission but she told him
they are still waiting for the missing parts. Resident 213 stated he is very tired during the day because he is
not able to get quality sleep and wakes up feeling like he's choking at night. Resident 213 stated last night
another nurse came and tried putting the same machine back on him and also said it wasn't working and
that the facility would re- order a new one. During a telephone interview on 6/27/2025 at 9:37 AM with
License Vocational Nurse (LVN 4), LVN 4 stated she was Resident 213's on admission [DATE]) when
Resident 213 informed them he uses a CPAP to sleep at night. LVN 4 stated RN supervisor that evening
ordered the machine. When the machine came in that same evening LVN 4 stated she put the machine
together and fitted the mask to the resident at bedtime but the straps were not the correct ones as they did
not fit Resident 213 and the machine would leak when it was on from the hose part, it sounded like air was
leaking. LVN 4 stated she informed the charge nurse that night of the issue. LVN 4 stated on 3/23/25
Resident 213 told her he needed to use his CPAP machine at bedtime. LVN 4 stated she called the RN
supervisor to fit the mask on Resident 213 and it still didn't fit correctly then RN supervisor told Resident
213 they were going to order a new machine. LVN 4 stated she forgot to follow up with anyone up after
6/18/25 until 6/23/225 when Resident 213 asked for the machine again at bedtime. During an interview and
record review on 6/27/2025 at 2:04 PM with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated there was no record
that the facility followed up on Resident 213's BIPAP machine after 6/18/2025 when it was initially found
defective by LVN 4. DON stated it is important to follow up and make sure the Resident's have the correct
equipment available to prevent any respiratory distress. DON stated facility should have had the equipment
available in functioning matter for the resident. 4. During a review of Resident 75's admission Record (AR),
the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 75 on 3/26/2024 with diagnoses that included chronic
pulmonary edema (a condition where fluid builds up in the lungs, making it difficult to breathe) and
congestive heart failure (a condition where the heart doesn't pump blood as efficiently as it should, leading
to a buildup of fluid in the body). During a review of Resident 75's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident
assessment tool), dated 6/16/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 75 had intact memory and cognitive
(ability to think and reasonably). The MDS indicated Resident 75 required partial/moderate assistance with
eating, shower/bathe self, and chair/bed-to-chair transfer. During a review of Resident 75's Order Summary
Report, dated 6/24/2025, the Report indicated a physician's order for oxygen at two (2) to three LPM [liters
(unit of volume) per minute (unit of time)] via NC at bedtime for comfort, may titrate up to five (5) LPM via
NC. The Report indicated, if oxygen saturation (O2 sat, a measure of how much oxygen is carried in your
blood) is still less than 95 %, may titrate up to six (6) to 10 LPM via non re-breather mask (a medical device
used to deliver high concentrations of oxygen to patients) to keep O2 sat greater than 95 %, starting on
3/12/2025. The Report also indicated to change NC/mask every 7 days on Thursday 7 AM- 3 PM shift and
as needed when soiled, starting on 3/13/2025. During a review of Resident 75's Care Plan dated
3/13/2025, the Care plan indicated interventions for Resident 75's use of oxygen was to change the
resident's NC/mask every 7 days on Thursday. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/24/2025
at 10:21 AM with Resident 75 in Resident 75's room, Resident 75's NC tubing, which was connected to the
oxygen concentrator (a medical device that provide oxygen supplement), was labeled and dated 6/12/2025.
An oxygen humidifier (a device used to add moisture to oxygen gas before it is inhaled by a patient) bottle,
which
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055845
If continuation sheet
Page 18 of 24
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055845
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Leisure Glen Post Acute Care Center
330 Mission Road
Glendale, CA 91205
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0695
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
was attached to the oxygen concentrator (a medical device that provides supplemental oxygen) did not
have a label to indicate when the oxygen concentrator was changed. During a concurrent observation and
interview on 6/24/2025 at 10:26 AM with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 in Resident 75's room, LVN 1
stated Resident 75's NC tubing was dated 6/12/2025 and there was no label on the oxygen humidifier with
the date the humidifier was started. on the oxygen humidifier. LVN 1 stated, the staff did not change
Resident 75's NC tubing on the seventh day, which was supposed to be on 6/19/2025, per policy. LVN 1
stated, the staff did not label the oxygen humidifier with the date when it was opened and used, so facility
staff would not know for how long the oxygen humidifier had been used. LVN 1 stated, the humidifier bottle
should be replaced every 7 days. LVN 1 stated, Resident 75 would be at risk of infection when the NC
tubing or the oxygen humidifier was not changed every 7 days. During an interview on 6/24/2025 at 10:36
AM with the Central Supply (CS), the CS stated he was responsible to change the residents' NC tubing and
oxygen humidifier every Thursday. The CS stated, he did not change Resident 75's NC tubing on 6/19/2025
when it was due to change. The CS stated, he did not label the oxygen humidifier with the date when it was
opened and used for Resident 75. The CS stated as a result, Resident 75 was at risk for respiratory illness
and infection. During an interview on 6/27/25 at 9:23 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON
stated according to the facility's policy, NC tubing and oxygen humidifier bottles should be labeled with the
date started to prevent infection to the residents. During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Cleaning and
Disinfecting Non-Critical Resident-Care Items, dated 6/2011, the P&P indicated Single used items such as
nebulizer tubing, oxygen tubing's, humidifiers, suction tubing. These tubing are replaced every 7 days,
labeled with the date started.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055845
If continuation sheet
Page 19 of 24
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055845
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Leisure Glen Post Acute Care Center
330 Mission Road
Glendale, CA 91205
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0726
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way
that maximizes each resident's well being.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two licensed nurses (Minimum Data Set
Nurse [MDSN] 1 and 2) were trained and with sufficient competency to conduct and coordinate the
development and completion the residents MDS assessment by failing to: Ensure MDSN 1 and MDSN 2
conducted an accurate MDS assessment of Resident 69 and 102's elopement risk. Ensure MDSN 2 had an
updated competency skills to conduct annual evaluation used for MDS assessment. This deficient practice
placed residents at risk for not receiving appropriate services, treatments, and unsafe level and type of care
necessary for the resident population. Cross Referenced to F641 Findings: 1. A review of Resident 69's
admission Record indicated Resident 69 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that
included metabolic encephalopathy (change in how the brain works due to an underlying condition),
unspecified dementia (general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking
abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), and Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease
that destroys memory and other important mental functions). During a review of Resident 69's
Admission/readmission Initial assessment dated [DATE] indicated resident walked frequently (walks outside
room at least twice a day and inside room at least once every two hours during waking hours) with no
limitation. The assessment indicated an evaluation of resident elopement risk was not completed. The
evaluation of resident elopement risk indicated resident was not independently mobile. During a review of
Resident 69's History and Physical (H&P) dated 3/27/2025 indicated Resident 69 did not have the capacity
to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 69's MDS dated [DATE], indicated Resident
69 was independent with indoor mobility (walking from room to room [with or without a device such as a
cane, crutch, or walker]). During a review of Resident 69's Quarterly Risk assessment dated [DATE]
indicated resident walked frequently with no limitation. The assessment indicated an evaluation of resident
elopement risk was not completed. The evaluation of resident elopement risk indicated resident was not
independently mobile. During a review of Resident 69'S MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident 69 required
partial/moderate assistance to walk 10 feet and walk 50 feet with two turns. During a concurrent interview
and record review of Resident 69's Admission/readmission Initial assessment dated [DATE] on 6/26/2025 at
12:03 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) 2 stated she should have documented Resident 69 walked occasionally
instead of frequently because resident was only walking inside the room. RN 2 stated the level of activity
should have been documented accurately because the admission assessment is the baseline assessment
of the resident. During an interview on 6/26/2025 at 12:28 PM, Minimum Data Set Nurse (MDSN) 2 stated
she has seen Resident 69 walk and exercise around the facility. MDSN 2 stated Resident 69 was able to
walk around to activities room, facility patio, and resident rooms to speak with other residents. During a
concurrent interview and record review of Resident 69's Quarterly Risk Assessments dated 6/19/2025 on
6/26/2025 at 12:37 PM, MDSN 2 confirmed she did not complete the evaluation for elopement risk. MDSN
2 stated she used her own judgment that Resident 69 was not a wanderer (going to one place to another
aimlessly) and selected no for the first question is the resident independently mobile. MDSN 2 stated she
misinterpreted the question and chose no because from her understanding, Resident 69 was not an
elopement risk. MDSN 2 stated she knew Resident 69 was independently mobile and she was just focusing
on the elopement risk. MDSN 2 stated she decided Resident 69 was not an elopement risk. MDSN 2 stated
it was important for documentation to be accurate so the whole facility knows that Resident 69 had the
potential to wander or elope. During the same interview on 6/26/2025 at 12:43 PM, MDSN 2 stated when
documenting the quarterly evaluation of Elopement Risk,
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055845
If continuation sheet
Page 20 of 24
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055845
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Leisure Glen Post Acute Care Center
330 Mission Road
Glendale, CA 91205
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0726
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
she always thinks about elopement, I didn't really think dementia could be a risk factor for elopement and
misinterpreted the questions. MDSN 2 stated residents with dementia repeat themselves, are agitated and
irritable, only remember certain things and are forgetful. MDSN 2 stated when she was doing the quarterly
assessment, she would see the residents and assess them from head to toe, ask other staff like certified
nursing assistants, charge nurses about the resident. MDSN 2 stated she should be answering questions
for the quarterly risk assessment as a cumulative of the resident's current status. During an interview on
6/26/2025 at 1:18 PM, MDSN 1 stated she focuses on resident admission when they are admitted to facility
and oversees MDSN 2 who focuses on quarterly assessments when residents are in long term care. MDSN
1 stated she has to review and sign off MDSN 2's quarterly risk assessments. During a concurrent interview
and record review of Resident 69's Quarterly Risk Assessments dated 6/19/2025 on 6/26/2025 at 1:24 PM,
MDSN 1 confirmed the evaluation for elopement risk should have been filled out correctly. MDSN 1 stated
this was so you have a proper idea of where the residents are, functionally. MDSN 1 stated because of this,
there was a discrepancy on the MDS, the MDS provides an overview of what kind of care the resident
needs. MDSN 1 stated the assessment needs to be accurate so the facility knows who would need
individualized care. During the same interview on 6/26/2025 at 1:30 PM, MDSN 1 stated MDSN 2
documents residents quarterly risk assessment and quarterly MDS. MDSN 1 stated she reviews MDSN 2's
documentation. MDSN 1 stated I was not focusing on elopement because we know our patients here.
MDSN 2 misinterpreted the question, I trust her, and I didn't check. MDSN 1 stated she reassessed all the
residents of the facility yesterday. MDSN 1 stated she should be reviewing for accuracy so that it would be a
correct reflection of the resident and to show that MDSN 2 was competent in assessing. MDSN 1 stated
this showed MDSN 2's failure to accurately assess residents. During an interview on 6/27/2025 at 1:38 PM,
the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the elopement risk assessment should have been accurate and filled
out completely. The DON stated this was to provide an accurate intervention for resident. The DON stated if
a resident was high risk for elopement they need to have appropriate placement. The DON stated if there
was a resident who tried to elope, the facility needs to provide intervention right away and look for
placement because the facility was not an appropriate place for resident who was at high risk for
elopement. 2. A review of Resident 102's admission Record indicated Resident 102 was initially admitted to
the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia, muscle wasting and atrophy and
cognitive communication deficit. During a review of Resident 102's History and Physical (H&P) dated
8/14/2024 indicated Resident 102 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a
review of Resident 102's MDS dated [DATE], indicated Resident 102 was independent with indoor mobility
(walking from room to room [with or without a device such as a cane, crutch, or walker]). During a review of
Resident 102's Quarterly Risk Assessments dated 11/14/2024, 2/13/2025 and 5/15/2025 indicated resident
walked occasionally with no limitation and the evaluation of resident elopement risk was not completed. The
evaluation of resident elopement risk indicated resident was not independently mobile. During a review of
Resident 102's MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident 102 required partial/moderate assistance to walk 10
feet and walk 50 feet with two turns. During a concurrent interview and record review of Resident 102's
Quarterly Risk assessment dated [DATE] on 6/26/2025 at 12:43 PM, MDSN 2 confirmed Resident 102's
elopement risk evaluation was not completed. MDSN 2 stated when documenting Resident 102's
elopement risk she did not think dementia could be a risk for elopement and misinterpreted the question.
During a concurrent interview and record review of Resident 102's Quarterly Risk assessment dated
[DATE] on 6/26/2025 at 1:46 PM, MDSN 1 confirmed Resident 102's elopement risk was incorrect and
should have been filled out correctly. MDSN 1 stated need to make sure
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055845
If continuation sheet
Page 21 of 24
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055845
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Leisure Glen Post Acute Care Center
330 Mission Road
Glendale, CA 91205
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0726
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
documentation was accurate to get a proper picture of the resident and what their activity levels and needs
are. A review of MDSN 1's Competency Skills Checklist dated 5/12/2025 indicated MDSN 1 was
satisfactory in following established protocols for completing and submitting MDS Assessments ensuring
accuracy and compliance in regulatory requirements. A review of MDSN 2's Competency Skills Checklist
dated 11/24/2023 indicated MDSN 2 was satisfactory in accurate documentation. A review of the facility's
job description for Resident Care Coordinator (MDSN 1) dated 8/2006 indicated major duties and
responsibilities included: to conduct and coordinate the development and completion of the resident
assessment (MDS) in accordance with current rules, regulations, and guidelines that govern the resident
assessment; ensure that quarterly and annual assessments and care plans reviews are made in a timely
basis; inform all team members of the requirements for accuracy and completion of the resident
assessment (MDS). The job description indicated the MDSN 1 was supervised by the DON. A review of the
facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Competency of Nursing Staff dated 3/2025 indicated licensed
nurses employed by the facility will demonstrate specific competencies and skills sets deemed necessary to
care for the needs of residents, as identified through resident assessments and described in the plans of
care.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055845
If continuation sheet
Page 22 of 24
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055845
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Leisure Glen Post Acute Care Center
330 Mission Road
Glendale, CA 91205
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0732
Post nurse staffing information every day.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to post the nurse staffing information of the number
of Registered Nurses (RN), License Vocational Nurse (LVN)/ License Practical Nurse (LPN) and Certified
Nursing Assistant (CNA)/Nursing Assistant (NA) per shift in a prominent location in accordance with the
facility's policy and procedure titled Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers.? This deficient practice had
the potential to not inform and cause misleading information to the residents and the visitors of the nursing
care provided to the residents.? Findings: During an observation on 6/24/2025 at 8:30 AM, one page of the
Census and Direct Care Service Hours per Patient Day (DHPPD), dated 6/24/2025, was posted on the wall
by the facility entrance near Nursing Station 2. There was no other nursing staff information posted. During
an observation on 6/25/2025 at 2:40 PM, only the DHPPD, dated 6/25/2025 was posted on the wall by each
nursing stations. there was no information posted indicating how many RN ' s, LVN ' s and CNA ' s were on
shift for 6/25/25. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/25/2025 at 2:44 PM with the Staffer,
the Staffer removed the DHPPD from the wall sign holder and revealed a second page of paper behind the
DHPPD. The Staffer stated the nursing staffing information of the number of RNs, LVNs, and CNAs was on
the second page behind the DHPPD, which was not visible to the residents and visitors. The Staffer stated
she had worked as the Staffer for three months and had always placed the posting that way. The Staffer
stated the nursing staffing information should be posted in clear view and visible to all residents and the
visitors. During an interview on 6/27/25 at 9:25 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated
facility staff did not post the entire nursing staffing information for the RNs, LVNs, and CNAs per shift which
could result in the residents and the visitor did not know the actual number of nursing staff working to
provide care to the residents and cause misleading information of nursing care that the residents received.
During a review of the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing
Numbers, dated 8/2022, the P&P indicated; a)the facility will post on a daily basis for each shift nurse
staffing data, including the number of nursing personnel responsible for providing direct care to resident, b)
within two hours of the beginning of each shift the number of licensed nurses (RNs, LPNs, and LVNs)
directly responsible for resident care is posted in a prominent location (accessible to residents and visitors)
and in clear and readable format.
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055845
If continuation sheet
Page 23 of 24
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055845
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Leisure Glen Post Acute Care Center
330 Mission Road
Glendale, CA 91205
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0880
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to enforce the facility's policy and
procedure to ensure a visitor was monitored and instructed not obtain the cups, spoons, juice and water
pitchers from medication cart for 1 of 3 sampled resident (Resident 15). This deficiency has the potential to
result in cross contamination (the process by which bacteria or other microorganism unintentionally transfer
from one object to another with harmful effect) and spread of infection in the facility. Findings: During a
medication pass observation on 6/25/2025 at 12:51 PM with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 5), LVN 5 was
preparing to dispense medication from medication cart - when a facility visitor (Visitor 1) grabbed multiple
cups and pulled out a cup from the middle of the cup stack on top of the medication cart and then
proceeded to pour juice and water in the presence of LVN 5. LVN 5 did not inform the visitor that she could
not get cups, pour juice and water from the cart then take to the resident's room. During a concurrent
medication pass observation on 6/25/2025 at 12:52 PM with LVN 5 facility Visitor 1 was observed exiting a
Resident 15's room approach the medication cart again to grab spoons. During a review of Resident 15's
admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 15 on 4/11/2025 with that included
acute respiratory failure (failure of the lungs to meet the body's oxygen demand) with hypoxia, type 2
diabetes mellitus (DM2 - a condition that results in too much sugar circulating in the blood). During an
interview on 6/27/2025 at 7:39 AM with Infection Prevention Nurse (IPN), IPN stated the facility does not
allow for visitors or residents to grab cups, spoons, juice or water from the medication carts because it can
cause contamination as we do not know if they did hand hygiene. Standard Precautions, Enhanced Barrier
Precautions and Transmission Based precautions indicated, purpose of the policy: to provide guidelines for
infection control practices to reduce the potential for transmission of pathogens including Covid-19 and
multi-drug-resistant organisms and viruses. Furthermore, the policy indicated J. Residents, visitor,
volunteers shall be educated and instructed in hand hygiene protocols, PE use, and other infection control
practices.
Residents Affected - Some
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055845
If continuation sheet
Page 24 of 24