Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

HARVEST CROSSING POST ACUTECMS #0559171 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency, 1 of them serious (actual harm or immediate jeopardy). The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

055917 12/29/2025 Harvest Crossing Post Acute 469 East North Street Manteca, CA 95336
F 0600 Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody. Level of Harm - Actual harm Residents Affected - Few Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one of five sampled residents (Resident 4) from physical abuse when, Resident 3 with a history of aggressive behavior, hit Resident 4 in the face with a water pitcher on 10/9/25.This deficient practice resulted in Resident 4 being sent to the emergency room with a facial contusion (bruise), facial lacerations (a torn, ragged wound or cut through the skin, typically caused by blunt force trauma or a sharp object) to the upper lip and right eyebrow which required stitches (threads used to sew up wounds to hold the skin together for healing), and pain. This deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident 4's psychosocial well-being. Findings:A review of Resident 3's admission Record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses which included dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life) with other behavioral disturbances and anxiety disorder (more than occasional worry or fear).A review of Resident 4's admission Record indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses which included dementia and anxiety disorder.During an interview on 11/10/25 at 1:10 p.m., Licensed Nurse (LN) 3 stated, on 10/9/25 around 2:30 p.m. she heard a sound and went inside Resident 4's room. LN 3 stated, upon entering the room she saw Resident 3 leaning over Resident 4's bed. LN 3 stated Resident 4 was lying in her bed and crying. LN 3 stated Resident 4 stated, Why would [Resident 3] do that.why did [Resident 3] hit me with that thing? LN 3 further stated Resident 4 had a cut and was bleeding a lot from her upper lip and right side of the face near the temple area. LN 3 stated Resident 4 was sent to the hospital and Resident 4 returned from the hospital with stitches (a medical device used to hold body tissues together) on her right eyebrow and upper lip.During an interview on 11/10/25 at 1:34 p.m., LN 4 stated, before the incident on 10/9/25, Resident 3 had yelled and had aggressive behavior towards staff and other residents. LN 4 stated on 10/9/25 when LN 4 went inside Resident 4's room, she saw Resident 3 leaning next to Resident 4 and yelling at Resident 4. LN 4 stated she saw a water pitcher was on the floor inside Resident 4's room. LN 4 further stated Resident 4 looked scared and Resident 4's facial grimacing made LN 4 think that Resident 4 was in pain. LN 4 stated Resident 4 was bleeding from her upper lip and above her right eyebrow.During an interview on 11/10/25 at 2:02 p.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3 stated Resident 3 had yelled at staff in the past.During an interview on 11/10/25 at 2:05 p.m., with Resident 4, Resident 4 stated Resident 3 hit her. Resident 4 stated her lips hurt and she was scared when Resident 3 hit her.During an interview on 11/10/25 at 4:15 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated Resident 3 had a behavioral history of being aggressive. The DON stated, Resident 4 received stitches to the laceration (cut) on her lip and eyebrow. The DON stated the incident may have caused Resident 4 emotional distress.During an interview and concurrent record review, on 12/29/25 at 3:26 p.m., Resident 3's MAR (Medication Administration Record, it serves as a central communication tool among various healthcare providers, ensuring continuity of care, especially during shift changes Page 1 of 4 055917 055917 12/29/2025 Harvest Crossing Post Acute 469 East North Street Manteca, CA 95336
F 0600 Level of Harm - Actual harm Residents Affected - Few in place), dated 7/25 through 10/25, and Resident 3's MD [Medical Doctor]/NP [Nurse Practitioner] Progress Note, dated 8/4/25, was reviewed with LN 5. LN 5 stated Resident 3 had a history of behavioral disturbance (when someone acts out in ways that disrupt their own life and relationships, like having frequent angry outbursts, defying rules, being impulsive, or having trouble focusing). LN 5 confirmed Resident 3's MAR, dated 7/25 through 10/25, did not contain behavior monitoring (the behavior monitoring process involves thorough assessment, identifying specific triggers (antecedents), tracking behavior and responses, developing an individualized care plan, implementing person-centered interventions, and continuous evaluation). LN 5 confirmed Resident 3's MAR, dated 10/25, indicated behavior monitoring was not started until 10/9/25. LN 5 further stated Resident 3's behavior monitoring was not done daily after Resident 3 had an altercation with staff on 7/25/25. Resident 3's MD/NP Progress Note, dated 8/4/25, indicated, .continue to provide supportive care.Diagnosis.Unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with agitation.Restlessness and agitation.Agitation and violent behavior: [Resident 3] gets agitated at times, continue with supportive care and close monitoring.Monitor neuro [Neurological; the overall condition and function of your brain, spinal cord, and nerves, assessed through tests checking alertness, memory, movement, sensation, reflexes, and coordination to identify any issues affecting how you think, feel, and move]/mental status [how someone was thinking, feeling, and behaving]. LN 5 stated a behavior monitoring log on Resident 3's MAR should have been implemented following the doctors progress note which indicated to monitor Resident 3's mental status on 8/3/25 in order to track Resident 3's behavior changes daily.During an interview on 12/29/25 at 3:40 p.m., LN 6 stated that when a doctor ordered behavior monitoring, a tracking log should have been implemented on the residents MAR to monitor the resident's behavior and mental status. LN 6 stated behavior monitoring documentation on the MAR would have helped facility staff track a resident's behavior to note if it was getting worse which could lead to more altercations.During an interview and concurrent record review on 12/29/25 at 4:05 p.m., Resident 3's MAR's, dated 7/25 through 10/25, and Resident 3's untitled Medical Doctor's (MD) History and Physical (H&P) note, dated 8/3/25, were reviewed with the DON. The DON confirmed there was no behavioral monitoring log implemented after the first incident on 7/25/25 when Resident 3 was aggressive towards staff. The DON stated there should have been behavior monitoring on Resident 3's MAR according to Resident 3's MD H&P note, dated 8/3/25. Resident 3's H&P note, dated 8/3/25, indicated, .[Resident 3] has multiple medical issues, [Resident 3] tends to get agitated at times but her mentation [the ability, activity, or result of using your mind to think] is around baseline.ASSESSMENT AND PLAN.Agitation and violent behavior: [Resident 3] gets agitated at times, continue with supportive care and close monitoring. The DON confirmed there was no behavior monitoring listed on Resident 3's MAR until 10/9/25. The DON stated the purpose for the behavior monitoring on the MAR was to monitor a resident's behavior during the shift, notify the MD and address any noted behaviors in an IDT meeting (Interdisciplinary Team, a collaborative group of healthcare professionals including doctors, nurses, therapists, and social workers, responsible for residents plans of care and coordination of medical care) for further interventions if appropriate.Review of Resident 3's behavior care plan, initiated on 4/26/21, indicated, .Focus.The resident has a behavioral symptom [related to] anxiety, dementia by resistive care, refusing [treatments], makes false accusation towards staff, standing in front of her room to prevent staff from entering to care for her roommates, followed by agitation, verbal outbursts, and striking at staff during redirection. Resident 3's behavior care plan included the following intervention, initiated on 7/25/25, indicated, .monitor for aggressive behaviors such as striking at staff and notify MD for any [change of condition] or escalation.Review of Resident 3's Care Plan, initiated on 7/25/25 and resolved 055917 Page 2 of 4 055917 12/29/2025 Harvest Crossing Post Acute 469 East North Street Manteca, CA 95336
F 0600 Level of Harm - Actual harm Residents Affected - Few date of 9/24/25, indicated, Focus.Sustained issues during episode of aggression/striking out at staff. Did not want room mate [sic] to have care.Interventions.Alleviate stressors that causes the problem, Assess the physical and mental status of the resident, Monitor any behavioral changes among resident, Notify MD if any change in condition occurs, Provide comfortable environment to the resident.Review of Resident 3's Progress Notes, dated 7/25/25, indicated, .It was reported that [Resident 3] exhibited aggressive behavior toward staff who were providing care to her roommate. [Resident 3] was observed swinging at staff members.CNAs attempted to redirect and explain the situation, however [Resident 3] was not receptive at the time.Review of Resident 3's SBAR [Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation; a verbal or written communication tool that helps provide essential, concise resident information] Communication Form, dated 7/25/25, indicated, .Resident was aggressive and swinging at staff and holding on tight to her shirt because [Resident 3] didn't want her roommate to be cared for. [Resident 3] had h/o aggressive behavior and striking to staff.Review of Resident 3's Progress Notes, dated 7/26/25, indicated, . [Resident 3] noted with yelling and accusations to staff for turning off tv.Review of Resident 4's hospital Patient Education & Visit Summary, dated 10/9/25, indicated, .Presenting Complaint: .a laceration to the right side of eye and mid upper lip after an altercation with roommate.Patient Diagnosis: Facial contusion, Facial Laceration, Lip laceration.Review of Resident 3's Interdisciplinary Notes, dated 10/9/25, indicated, .[Resident 3] was observed by staff standing next to [Resident 4's] bed and appeared agitated when staff inquired about the incident. Roommate [Resident 4] was noted to have injuries to her upper lip and right temple area above eyebrow .the roommate [Resident 4] stated that [Resident 3] hit her two times with an item, possibly a water pitcher as a puddle of water was found on the floor next to [Resident 4's] bedside with the water pitcher.Review of Resident 3's Change in Condition Evaluation, dated 10/9/25, indicated, .staff responded to loud verbal aggression from [Resident 3's room], .upon arrival, [Resident 4] noted with bleeding from upper lip and slight bleeding from right temple area above the eyebrow due to a small cut. Water pitcher was observed on the floor at bedside with water spilled on the floor. [Resident 3] hit [Resident 4] with water pitcher.loud verbal aggression.Review of Resident 3's MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION RECORD, order start date 10/9/25, indicated, .monitor for aggressive behaviors (i.e. throwing items, striking) [every shift] notify MD when escalation in behavior is noted.Review of Resident 4's Health Status Note, dated 10/10/25, indicated, .mild swelling to lip area. [Resident 4] complained of mild pain to head.Review of Resident 4's Interdisciplinary Notes, dated 10/10/25, indicated, . on 10/9/25 at approx. 1415H [2:15 p.m.], [Resident 4] was noted with a bleeding/cut to the upper lip and a small cut with slight bleeding to the right temple above the eyebrow. Writer interviewed the resident who stated, [Resident 3] hit me with that thing two times. Why did she do that? Upon observation, a water pitcher was found on the floor with a puddle of water next to it. Per staff report [Resident 3] was standing next to [Resident 4's bed] when they responded to [Resident 4] yelling for help. [Resident 4] was transferred to acute care for further evaluation and treatment due to continued bleeding from the lip cut. [Resident 4] returned from the acute after a couple hours at 1800H [6 p.m.], and noted with 5 stitches [are the threads or strands used to sew up wounds to hold the skin together for healing] to upper lip and 2 stitches to her right temple area above the eyebrow.Review of Resident 4's Health Status Note, dated 10/11/25, indicated, .On monitoring for resident-to-resident altercation S/P [status post] ER [emergency room] visit following evaluation and treatment for lacerations to upper lip and right temple. [Resident 4] complained of mild pain to head.Review of Resident 3's Social Service Progress Note, dated 10/15/25, indicated, .SSA [Social Services Assistant] spoke with [Resident 3] regarding the recent resident-to-resident altercation in which 055917 Page 3 of 4 055917 12/29/2025 Harvest Crossing Post Acute 469 East North Street Manteca, CA 95336
F 0600 Level of Harm - Actual harm Residents Affected - Few [Resident 3] was identified as the aggressor.SSA inquired about [Resident 3's] prior roommates, and [Resident 3] stated that she did not like them because they wouldn't shut up. During a review of a facility P&P titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, revised 4/21, the document indicated, .Residents have the right to be free from abuse.This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment.verbal, mental.or physical abuse.During a review of a facility P&P titled Unmanageable Residents, revised 4/10, the document indicated, Each resident will be provided with a safe place of residence. 055917 Page 4 of 4

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0600SeriousS&S Gactual harm

    F600 - Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 29, 2025 survey of HARVEST CROSSING POST ACUTE?

This was a inspection survey of HARVEST CROSSING POST ACUTE on December 29, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at HARVEST CROSSING POST ACUTE on December 29, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect b..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.