F 0689
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to
prevent accidents.
Level of Harm - Actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Note: The nursing home is
disputing this citation.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accidents for
one of five sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 was identified as being at risk for falls with a
history of seven falls in the facility and the care planned intervention of a 1:1 (continuous observation and
support provided by one qualified staff member to one resident) was not implemented and Resident fell on
7/18/25. This failure resulted in Resident 1 experiencing a witnessed fall, from the bed onto the floor on
7/18/25. After the fall Resident 1 experienced pain, discoloration and tenderness to the left shoulder and
was sent to the general acute care hospital (GACH) for evaluation. Resident 1 was diagnosed with a
non-displaced (a break where the broken pieces of bone remain in their proper alignment and position)
clavicle (collarbone) fracture (a break or discontinuity in a bone), and her left shoulder was bruised. As a
result of Resident 1's injury she now needs assistance with feeding and has limited mobility in her left arm.
During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (document containing resident demographic information
and medical diagnosis), dated 7/23/25, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the
facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnosis included but was not limited to .ALZHEIMER'S (progressive
disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions).DEMENTIA (a chronic or persistent
disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorders,
personality changes, and impaired reasoning).MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER (mental health disorder
characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment
in daily life). DELIRIUM (Serious disturbance in mental abilities that results in confused thinking and
reduced awareness of surroundings).MUSCLE WEAKNESS (age-related progressive loss of muscle mass
and strength).HISTORY OF FALLING.ANXIETY (a feeling of worry, nervousness) .During a review of
Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool used to identify resident cognitive (the
mental processes of perception, thinking, learning, memory, reasoning, and judgment) and physical
function) Assessment, dated 6/11/25, the MDS indicated Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status
(BIMS -an evaluation of attention, orientation and memory recall) score of 3 (0-7 severe cognitive
impairment, 8-12 moderate cognitive impairment, 13-15 no cognitive impairment), indicating Resident 1
had severe cognitive impairment (a significant decline in mental functions like memory, thinking, and
judgment, making it impossible for an individual to live independently and requiring significant assistance
with daily tasks and self-care). During a review of Resident 1's facility Incident by Incident log, dated
7/23/25, the Incident by Incident log indicated Resident 1 had seven falls in the facility from 3/5/25 to
7/18/25. The first fall was unwitnessed on 3/5/25, the second fall was unwitnessed on 3/11/25, the third fall
was unwitnessed on 4/15/25, the fourth fall was unwitnessed on 5/12/25, the fifth fall was witnessed on
7/5/25, the sixth fall was unwitnessed on 7/16/25 and the seventh fall on 7/18/25 was witnessed by staff.
During a record review of Resident 1's Fall Risk Evaluation
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 6
Event ID:
055955
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055955
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/19/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
California Home for the Aged
6720 E. Kings Canyon
Fresno, CA 93727
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Note: The nursing home is
disputing this citation.
(evaluation of residents history, current status and predisposing conditions - a factor that increases a
person's likelihood of developing a particular health condition, genetic trait, or other characteristic, but it is
not the direct or immediate cause) assessments, with date ranges from 2/28/25 to 7/19/25, the Fall Risk
Evaluation scores ranged from 17-22 points. The Fall Risk Evaluation of 10 points or higher indicated
Resident 1 was a high risk (involving or exposed to a high level of danger) for falls. During a concurrent
observation and interview on 8/19/25, at 1:30 p.m. with Resident 1 and her Granddaughter in Resident 1's
room, Resident 1 was lying in bed watching television with her granddaughter. Resident 1 had a shoulder
sling in place on her left shoulder. Resident 1 stated she wasn't doing too good and pointed in the direction
of her sling. Resident 1 stated she did have pain at the time of her fall. Resident 1's granddaughter stated
she now requires 1:1 (continuous observation and support by one qualified staff member to one resident) at
all times due to her most recent fall on 7/18/25.During an interview on 8/19/25 at 2 p.m., with the Certified
Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA 1 stated she is currently assigned to Resident 1 as a 1:1. CNA 1 stated
she re-started the 1:1 care after Resident 1's return from the hospital on 7/19/25. CNA 1 stated 1:1
assignment consists of having a CNA observe, monitor, assist, and help prevent future incidents that could
harm the resident. CNA 1 stated she has worked with Resident 1 multiple times prior to this 1:1 assignment
and has noticed a change since her last fall. Resident 1 is not as mobile as she used to be. CNA 1 stated it
is her responsibility to remain with the resident at all times, provide activities of daily living (ADL- routine
tasks such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily to care for themselves) care including
continent care (support for individuals who have difficulty controlling bladder or bowel functions), transfers
to and from bed and chair, feeding assistance, dressing assistance, pretty much all ADL care needs. CNA 1
stated Resident 1 is dependent on staff for care. During an interview on 8/19/25 at 2:30 p.m., with CNA 1,
CNA 1 stated Resident 1 has had multiple falls throughout her stay in the facility and Resident 1's
interventions included bed in low position, call light within reach, pad and chair alarm, and floor mats on
both sides of the bed. CNA 1 stated she does not recall any new or different interventions put in place after
each of Resident 1's falls. CNA 1 stated nursing staff should let CNAs know what new interventions are
supposed to be implemented. CNA 1 does recall Resident 1 having a 1:1 during the months of April
through June of 2025. CNA 1 stated Resident 1most recent falls in July 2025 would not have happened if
Resident 1 had 1:1 supervision. CNA 1 stated during the time in the facility when Resident 1 did not have a
1:1 assignment all staff tried their best to keep Resident 1 in view. CNA 1 stated Resident 1 was not always
in view of staff and that's when she had her falls. CNA 1 stated the only way to keep Resident 1 safe from
falls was to continue 1:1 care. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set Section GG- Functional
Abilities Assessment dated 6/1/25, the MDS indicated, .Resident 1 required Supervision or touching
assistance for eating abilities indicating staff would provide verbal cues and/or touching/steadying
assistance for resident to complete activity.During an interview on 8/19/25 at 2:51 p.m., with Licensed
Vocational Nurse (LVN 1), LVN 1 stated Resident 1 had a total of seven falls, witnessed and unwitnessed,
since she was admitted to the facility. LVN 1 stated since Resident 1last fall on 7/18/25 she is no longer as
active as she used to be, she used to be ambulatory and ambulating throughout the hallways and now she
is either in bed or in her wheelchair. LVN 1 stated Resident 1used to be able to feed herself and now she
needs feeding assistance. LVN 1 stated Resident 1 had a change of condition since her last fall. LVN 1
stated the 1:1 assigned CNAs are now required to be with the resident at all times and every shift, 1:1 staff
assignment for Resident 1 started on 7/21/25. LVN 1 stated 1:1's are responsible for day-to-day care of the
resident and maintaining the safety of the
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055955
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 6
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055955
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/19/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
California Home for the Aged
6720 E. Kings Canyon
Fresno, CA 93727
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Note: The nursing home is
disputing this citation.
resident, any issues have to be communicated to licensed nursing staff to notify the nurse to address the
issue. LVN 1 stated Resident 1 is currently on acetaminophen (a drug used to relieve mild or chronic pain)
pain medication routinely for pain management and as needed for breakthrough pain.During an interview
with LVN 1 on 8/19/25 at 3:17 pm, LVN 1 stated one of Residents 1's care plan interventions was to keep
closer observation of the resident after her fall on 3/5/25. LVN 1 stated she interpreted that to mean having
increased eyes on the resident and communicating between staff if one staff was not available for someone
else to watch Resident 1. LVN 1 stated, .in reality utilizing an intervention of ‘closer observations' is vague
and not really measurable. LVN 1 stated the lack of oversight by nursing staff failed to provide Resident 1
with an adequate safe environment to prevent further accidents and falls. LVN 1 stated she does not recall
interventions being re-evaluated or communicated that they were re-evaluated. LVN 1 stated they failed to
ensure Resident 1's safety. LVN 1 stated it is the facility's expectation all staff follow the plan of care for the
residents.During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/19/25, at 3:53 p.m., with the Director of
Nurses (DON), Resident 1's Care Plan (CP), dated 3/1/25, was reviewed. The CP indicated, Resident 1
was .At high risk for falls related to confusion (lack of understanding), deconditioning (the decline in
physical function), gait/balance problems (difficulty with walking and maintaining stability), hypotension (low
blood pressure), repeated falls, weakness, poor cognitive level (problems with a person's ability to think,
learn, remember, make judgments, and make decisions), poor safety awareness (inability or failure to
recognize, understand, and act on potential hazards and risks) with contributing factors including
Alzheimer's , Dementia, and Anxiety Disorder (mental health condition characterized by excessive and
persistent worry, fear, and nervousness). The DON stated the interventions associated with the
unwitnessed falls on 3/5/25, 3/11/25, 4/15/25, 5/12/25, 7/16/25 and witnessed falls on 7/5/25 and 7/18/25
included 1:1 observation as needed based on the behaviors and needs of the resident. The DON stated
Resident 1's bed was in the lowest position to prevent injury and floor mats were placed on both sides of
the bed. The DON stated since the 1:1 was as needed a pressure alarm for Resident 1's bed and
wheelchair were implemented. The DON stated Resident 1 was placed in a room near the nurse's station,
to respond quickly if Resident 1 set off an alarm and to increase observations from nursing staff passing by.
The DON stated the falls documented in the medical record for Resident 1, included the Interdisciplinary
Team (IDT-which consists of the DON, Assistant Director of Nurses, and the charge nurse) who meet and
review each fall, the potential reason for the fall and the current interventions in place. The DON stated this
was done after every fall for Resident 1 to ensure the interventions were sufficient for Resident 1. The DON
stated when a resident falls the IDT will evaluate the interventions to see what else can be done to prevent
future falls and communicate the interventions or updates to staff to implement. The DON stated
interventions for residents would have been initiated by the charge nurse at the time of the fall. The DON
stated all interventions should be communicated to staff.During a concurrent interview and record review on
8/19/25 at 4:01 p.m., with the DON, Resident 1's Post Fall Evaluation, dated 3/5/25, was reviewed. The Post
Fall Evaluation indicated, Resident 1 had her first unwitnessed fall on 3/5/25 with no injuries while in the
bathroom alone. During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/19/25 at 4:07 p.m., with the DON,
Resident 1's Post Fall Evaluation, dated 3/11/25, was reviewed. The Post Fall Evaluation indicated,
Resident 1 had a second unwitnessed fall, in her room on 3/11/25.During a concurrent interview and record
review on 8/19/25 at 4:11 p.m., with the DON, Resident 1's Behavior and Unwitnessed Fall Care plan dated
4/3/25 and 4/17/25, were reviewed. The clinical records indicated on 4/3/25 the facility initiated 1:1 care for
Resident 1 due to her increased aggressive behaviors and care planned 1:1
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055955
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 6
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055955
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/19/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
California Home for the Aged
6720 E. Kings Canyon
Fresno, CA 93727
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Note: The nursing home is
disputing this citation.
care for unwitnessed fall on 4/15/25.During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/19/25 at 4:15
p.m., with the DON, Resident 1's Post Fall Evaluation dated 4/15/25, was reviewed. The Post Fall
Evaluation indicated, Resident 1 had her third unwitnessed fall on 4/15/25 while in her room. The DON
stated, when Resident 1 fell on 4/15/25 Resident 1 should have had a 1:1 staff assigned. The DON stated
staff were not present at the time of the fall, the CNA was outside the room and the fall was unwitnessed.
The DON stated being assigned 1:1 care included 24-hour supervision and observation by staff seven days
a week on each shift. During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/19/25 at 4:23 p.m., with the
DON, Resident 1's Post Fall Evaluation dated 5/12/25, was reviewed. The Post Fall Evaluation indicated,
Resident 1 had her fourth unwitnessed fall on 5/12/25. The DON stated, the .nurse assumed [Resident 1]
slid off her wheelchair. The DON stated the CNA staff failed to follow their job assignment as 1:1 staff. The
DON stated it was the expectation for all staff to maintain visual observation of the resident at all times and
not to leave the residents alone.During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/19/25 at 4:35 p.m.,
with the DON, Resident 1's Post Fall Evaluation dated 7/5/25, was reviewed. The Post Fall Evaluation
indicated, Resident 1 had a witnessed fifth fall on 7/5/25 from her bed to the floor. The DON stated there
were no injuries documented. The DON stated Resident 1's 1:1 care was removed on 6/30/25. The DON
stated after the fall on 7/5/25, the IDT determined a 1-hour documentation for observation checks would
benefit Resident 1. The DON stated the 1-hour documentation was focused on her behaviors and not just
her falls. The DON stated due to cost the facility did not provide 1:1 care for Resident 1. The DON stated
the facility had implemented fall interventions, but Resident 1 continued to fall so they were not effective
enough. During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/19/25 at 4:45 p.m., with the DON, Resident
1's Post Fall Evaluation dated 7/16/25, was reviewed. The Post Fall Evaluation indicated, Resident 1 had an
unwitnessed sixth fall on 7/16/25 while in her room. The DON stated the new interventions after her sixth
fall included pharmacist review of Resident 1's medications. The DON stated the facility did not place
Resident 1 on 1:1 supervision after fall number six. During a concurrent interview and record review on
8/19/25 at 4:55 p.m., with the DON, Resident 1's Post Fall Evaluation dated 7/18/25, was reviewed. The
Post Fall Evaluation indicated, on 7/18/25 Resident 1 had a seventh fall. The DON stated Resident 1's
record indicated staff heard Resident 1's bed alarm and did not get to Resident 1 in time before she fell to
the floor. The DON stated a full body assessment was conducted with no signs of injury, pain or discomfort
present. The DON stated if Resident 1's 1:1 care had been re-initiated after the fifth fall on 7/5/25,
potentially the resident would not have had the sixth and seventh fall and potentially preventing her injury.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/19/25 at 5:05 p.m., with the DON, Resident 1's
Progress Notes dated 7/19/25 at 6:24 p.m., was reviewed. The Progress Notes indicated, Resident 1 was
found with discoloration on her left shoulder during resident care. The DON stated the CNA reported to the
charge nurse who completed a full body assessment and documented, that Resident 1 had an area that
appeared purplish, tender and painful to touch to left shoulder. Resident 1 was given pain medication, and
the primary physician was notified. The DON stated she did not know if the fall on 7/16/25 or 7/18/25
caused Resident 1's bruise. The DON stated documentation indicated new telephone orders were obtained
for an in-house x-ray. The DON stated Resident 1's results confirmed a left clavicle fracture. Resident 1's
primary physician was notified and provided orders to send the resident out to the general acute care
hospital (GACH). Resident 1 was transported on 7/20/25 to the GACH where she was diagnosed with a
nondisplaced fracture involving clavicle head of the left shoulder with bruising, limited range of motion due
to pain and tenderness to touch. The DON stated Resident 1 returned back to facility on the same day with
orders
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055955
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 6
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055955
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/19/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
California Home for the Aged
6720 E. Kings Canyon
Fresno, CA 93727
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Note: The nursing home is
disputing this citation.
for left shoulder sling and follow up with orthopedist (a medical doctor who specializes in the
musculoskeletal system including bones, joints, ligaments, tendons, and muscles and treats injuries).
During a review of Resident 1's Emergency Department (ED) Provider Note, dated 7/20/25, the ED
Provider Note indicated, .[Resident 1] arrived via ambulance with complaint of left shoulder pain and
bruising post fall days prior. limited range of motion left shoulder secondary to pain. Tenderness to
touch.X-Ray (picture through the body to see bones) of the left shoulder. nondisplaced fracture involving
the left clavicle head.recommended left shoulder/arm sling and follow up with Orthopedic in 1-2
week.During an interview with the DON on 8/19/25, at 5:15 p.m., the DON stated at the time of the seventh
fall on 7/18/25, the interventions in place failed to maintain the safety of the resident and the facility's lack of
action to place Resident 1 back on 1:1 care after the fifth fall on 7/5/25 could have prevented Resident 1's
fracture. The DON stated 1:1 care was effective for Resident 1 from 5/13/25 to 6/30/25 because she did not
fall during that time, but financially it is difficult to maintain residents on 1:1. During a review of the facility's
document titled, Job Description: Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN), undated, the Job Description for LVN's
indicated, . Performing nursing care using sound judgment. Implements physician's orders in a safe and
accurate manner.Performs assessment on all changes of conditions and develops appropriate care plans.
maintains a safe and clean environment for residents.monitors certified Nursing assistants (CNA's) for
proper care, timeliness and quality of care. During a review of the facility's document titled, Job Description:
Registered Nurse (RN), undated, the Job Description for RN's indicated, . Performing nursing care using
sound judgment. Implements physician's orders in a safe and accurate manner.Performs assessment on all
changes of conditions and develops appropriate care plans. Maintains a safe and clean environment for
residents.monitors certified Nursing assistants (CNA's) for proper care, timeliness and quality of care.
During a review of the facility's document titled, Job Description: Director of Nursing Services (DON),
undated, the Job Description for DON indicated, . Essential Functions:. Plans and facilitates meetings and
committees to address resident care issues. Manages the Nursing Department with goal of achieving and
maintaining the highest quality of care possible.Develops and manages systems to assure clinical
competencies.investigate and resolves resident/family/employee concerns.Plans and develops the
professional development of nursing staff. Assures that all clinical protocols and nursing policies and
procedures are followed. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Care
Planning-Interdisciplinary Team, dated March 2022, the P&P indicated, . The interdisciplinary team is
responsible for the development of resident care plans. Comprehensive, person-centered care plans are
based on resident assessments and developed by an interdisciplinary team (IDT).physician.registered
nurse.nursing assistant.food and nutrition services staff.resident or representative.other staff as appropriate
or necessary to meet the needs of the resident.are encouraged to participate in the development of and the
revisions of the residents care plan.During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive
Person-Centered, dated March 2022, the P&P indicated, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that
includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional
needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The interdisciplinary team (IDT), in conjunction with
the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive,
person-centered care plan for each resident. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan: a. includes
measurable objectives and timeframes; b. describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or
maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, including.Care
plan interventions are chosen only after data gathering, proper sequencing of events, careful consideration
of the relationship
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055955
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 6
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
055955
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/19/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
California Home for the Aged
6720 E. Kings Canyon
Fresno, CA 93727
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Note: The nursing home is
disputing this citation.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
between the resident's problem areas and their causes, and relevant clinical decision making. The
interdisciplinary team reviews and updates the care plan: a. when there has been a significant change in
the resident's condition; b. when the desired outcome is not met.During a review of the facility's P&P titled,
Falls-Clinical Protocol, dated March 2018, the P&P indicated, .Based on the preceding assessment, the
staff and physician will identify pertinent interventions to try to prevent subsequent falls and to address the
risks of clinically significant consequences of falling.If underlying causes cannot be readily identified or
corrected, staff will try various relevant interventions.The staff and physician will monitor and document the
individual's response to interventions intended to reduce falling or the consequences of falling.During a
review of the facility's P&P titled, Fall Risk Assessment, dated March 2018, the P&P indicated, .The nursing
staff, in conjunction with the attending physician, consultant pharmacist, therapy staff and others, will seek
to identify and document resident risk factors for falls and establish a resident-centered falls prevention plan
based on relevant assessment information. The staff and attending physician will collaborate to identify and
address modifiable fall risk factors and interventions to try to minimize the consequences of risk factors that
are not modifiable.During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Fall and Fall Risk , Managing dated March
2018, the P&P indicated, .Staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes
to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling. Managing Falls
and Fall Risk. Staff, with the input of the attending physician, will implement a resident-centered fall
prevention plan to reduce the specific risk factor(s) of falls for each resident at risk or with a history of falls.
If falling recurs despite initial interventions, staff will implement additional or different interventions, or
indicate why the current approach remains relevant. Staff will monitor and document each resident's
response to interventions intended to reduce falling or the risks of falling.If the resident continues to fall,
staff will re-evaluate the situation and whether it is appropriate to continue or change current
interventions.The attending physician will help the staff reconsider possible causes that may not previously
have been identified.During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Assessing Falls and Their Causes dated
March 2018, the P&P indicated, .Provide guidelines for assessing a resident after a fall and to assist staff in
identifying causes of the fall. Performing a Post Fall-Fall Evaluation. The IDT will conduct a root cause
analysis and initiate interventions accordingly. When a resident fall. Information should be recorded in the
resident's medical record regarding incident. Appropriate interventions taken to prevent falls.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
055955
If continuation sheet
Page 6 of 6