Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

Mission Park Healthcare CenterCMS #0559912 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 2 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0553 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident ' s representative (RR) was invited and included in the formulation of a person-centered baseline care plan (CP -implementation of care plan goals and interventions) that was to be done within 48 hours of resident ' s admission when the facility discussed the initial plan of care to one of two cognitively impaired (problems with ability to think, learn and remember) sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in RR being uninformed and was not given at the opportunity to participate in making decisions for Resident 1 ' s initial plan of care, treatment, and healthcare goals that could affect Resident 1 ' s care and quality of life. Findings: During a review of the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P), titled, Care Planning, dated 10/2023, the P&P indicated, in part, I. The facility will develop a person-centered Baseline Care Plan for each resident within 48 hours of admission .A. The facility will invite the resident, if capable, and their family to the care planning meetings and use its best effort to schedule care planning meetings at times convenient for the resident and family .B. IDT meetings may be conducted via teleconference. During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission packet (AP), titled, Health & Safety Code 1599, undated, the AP indicated, Written policies regarding the rights of patients shall be established and shall be available to patient, to any guardian, next of kin, sponsoring agency or representative payee, and to the public.in part .Any rights under this chapter of a patient judicially determined to be incompetent, or who is found by his physician to be medically incapable of understanding such information, or who exhibits a communication barrier, shall devolve to such patient ' s guardian, conservator, next of kin, sponsoring agency or representative payer, except when the facility itself is the representative of the payer. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Nursing admission Assessment (NAA),dated 8/2/24, the NAA neurological assessment (assessing mental status and level of consciousness) indicated, Resident 1 was alert, oriented to person, had difficulty in new situations. Further review of NAA, dehydration screening functional signs indicated, that Resident 1 had cognitive impairment. During a review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical (H&P),dated 8/3/24, the H&P indicated, Resident 1 can make needs known but cannot make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 1 ' s MDS section C for mental status, dated 8/5/24, Resident 1 ' s had (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 3 Event ID: 055991 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 055991 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 09/25/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Mission Park Healthcare Center 623 West Junipero Street Santa Barbara, CA 93105 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0553 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 08, score between 13-15, cognitively intact, score 8-12, moderate impairment, and a score of 0-7, severe impairment. During a review of Resident 1 ' s CP for cognitive functioning(mental status), dated 8/4/24, the CP indicated, that Resident 1 had impaired cognitive functioning and thought processes (ability to use, analyze and understand information) related to short term memory (ability to store information for short period of time) loss. Resident 1 ' s CP interventions include, to communicate with resident/family/caregivers regarding resident ' s capabilities and needs, to cue (hint) resident and supervise as needed and to present just one thought, idea, question, or command at a time. During a review of the document titled, Baseline Care Plan Summary (BCPS), dated 8/2/24, the BCPS indicated, the initial plan of care was discussed with Resident 1 on 8/3/24. Further review of the BCPS, the BCPS had missing RR signature. and no documentation if the RR was invited for the initiation of Resident 1 ' s baseline CP or if the initial plan of care was discussed with the RR via phone. During an interview on 9/11/24, at 11:01 a.m. with the treatment nurse (TXN), TXN verbalized, that Resident 1 had cognitive impairment but was able to make her needs known such as pain or likes and dislike. LN 1 further verbalized, that Resident 1 had two representatives that were very involved with resident ' s care, one being more involved than the other. During a review of Resident 1 ' s clinical record from 8/2/24 to 8/7/24, six days after Resident 1 ' s admission, no documentation of the RR ' s attendance when the baseline care plan was discussed with Resident 1. Further review of Resident 1 ' s clinical record indicated, it was during the care conference on 8/8/24 when the RR attended the meeting. During a concurrent record review and interview on 9/25/24, at 3:42 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), and LN 1, the Resident 1 ' s cognitive status on NAA, H&P, CP, and the BCPS were reviewed, indicating Resident 1 ' s cognitively impairment. LN 1 claimed that the RR was present on 8/3/24 when baseline care plan summary was discussed with Resident 1, LN 1 was unable to prove the claim of RR ' s attendance. The DON acknowledged the RR ' s missing signature on the BCPS. The DON further acknowledged, that signature should have been obtained at the time of the meeting to prove RR ' s attendance but it was missed. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 055991 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 3 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 055991 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 09/25/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Mission Park Healthcare Center 623 West Junipero Street Santa Barbara, CA 93105 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0655 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide resident or the resident ' s representative (RR) a summary of the baseline care plan (initial plan of care) for one of two sampled residents ' (Resident 1). This failure resulted in RR to have no knowledge of the initial care plan goals and interventions being provided to Resident 1. Findings: During a review of the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Care Planning, dated 10/2023, the P&P indicated, in part . I. The facility will develop a person-centered Baseline Care Plan for each resident within 48 hours of admission .Once the Baseline Care Plan is completed, the Facility must provide the resident and /or the resident ' s representative with a written summary of the Baseline Care Plan that includes: A. Initial goals based on admission orders. B. Physician ' s orders. C. Dietary orders. D. Therapy Services. E. Social services. F. PASARR recommendations, if applicable .The medical record must contain evidence that the summary was given to the resident and/or resident ' s representative. During a review of the document titled, Baseline Care Plan Summary (BCPS), dated 8/2/24, the BCPS indicated, the Care Plan was discussed with Resident 1 on 8/3/24 during the initial care plan meeting. Further review of the BCPS, the BCPS had missing RR signature and no documentation if the Care Plan was discussed with the RR present during the meeting. During an interview on 9/12/24, at 11:45 a.m. with the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LN 1), LN 1 stated, details of Resident 1 ' s plan of care was discussed with the RR. LN 1 was unsure if RR was provided with BCPS at the time of the meeting. During an interview on 9/23/24, at 10:52 a.m. with the Assistant Administrator (AADM), the AADM was unable to provide proof of RR receiving the Baseline Care Plan Summary. AADM acknowledged, that the BCPS was missed. Further interview on 9/23/24 at 1:04 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON confirmed that the BCPS was not provided to the RR. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 055991 If continuation sheet Page 3 of 3

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

2 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0655GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F655 - Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning

    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted

  • 0553GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F553 - The right to participate in the development and implementation of his or her

    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 25, 2024 survey of Mission Park Healthcare Center?

This was a inspection survey of Mission Park Healthcare Center on September 25, 2024. The surveyor cited 2 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at Mission Park Healthcare Center on September 25, 2024?

Yes, 2 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted"

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.