F 0684
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, the licensed nursing staff failed to remove a pressure dressing (a
type of bandage applied to a hemodialysis access site after hemodialysis treatment [a medical procedure
that removes waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys are unable to do so] to stop
bleeding) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) and failed to document the condition of the
hemodialysis access site dressing and any part of report from the hemodialysis nurse post-hemodialysis,
every shift, for three of three sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3).These deficient practices placed
Resident 1 at risk for impaired circulation (disruption of the movement of blood through the body, preventing
delivery of oxygen and nutrients to tissues) and infection to the hemodialysis access site. These deficient
practices also placed Residents 1, 2, and 3 at risk of sustaining complications related to hemodialysis due
to undocumented assessments of their dialysis access sites and required care instructions.Findings: 1.
During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted
Resident 1 on 6/23/2025. Resident 1's diagnoses included end stage renal disease (ESRD, a persistent
decline in kidney function requiring long-term dialysis). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set
(MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 6/24/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had severely impaired
cognition (a significant decline in a person's mental abilities). The MDS indicated Resident 1 was
dependent on facility staff for all activities of daily living (activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a
person performs daily) and mobility while in and out of bed. During a review of Resident 1's physician
orders, dated 8/29/2025, the order indicated staff were to monitor Resident 1's hemodialysis access site
every shift for bruit (a whooshing orblowing sound heard through a stethoscope when listening to blood
vessels in the body) and thrill (a palpable, humming vibration felt on the skin). During a review of Resident
1's Dialysis Communication Record, dated 9/12/2025, the record indicated facility staff were to remove
Resident 1's pressure dressing on 9/12/2025 after 12:00 PM. The record indicated the instructions were
received by Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1. During an interview on 9/18/2025 at 2:45 PM, with LVN 1,
LVN 1 stated she was responsible for Resident 1's nursing care on 9/12/2025 from 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM.
LVN 1 stated she could not recall why Resident 1's dressing was not removed as ordered and stated she
likely forgot about the instruction to remove it. LVN 1 stated the purpose of removing the pressure dressing
was to prevent infection and to ensure that circulation was maintained. During a review of Resident 1's
Dialysis Communication Record, dated 9/17/2025, the record indicated facility staff were to remove
Resident 1's pressure dressing on 9/17/2025 after 12:00 PM. The record indicated the instructions were
received by LVN 2. During an observation on 9/18/2025 at 11:00 AM, Resident 1 was observed with
swelling to her right arm. During a concurrent observation and interview, on 9/18/2025 at 11:08 AM, with
LVN 2, Resident 2's right arm and hemodialysis access site were observed. LVN 2 stated Resident 1's arm
was swollen in comparison to her left arm. LVN 2 stated Resident 1's
Residents Affected - Few
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 3
Event ID:
056023
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
056023
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/19/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avalon Villa Care Center
12029 Avalon Blvd
Los Angeles, CA 90061
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
hemodialysis access site had a pressure dressing on it, and stated the dressing was from Resident 1's
hemodialysis treatment on 9/17/2025. LVN 2 stated the original pressure dressing was not removed or
changed. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 9/18/2025 at 2:56 PM, with LVN 2, Resident
1's Dialysis Communication Record, dated 9/17/2025, was reviewed. LVN 2 stated the record indicated
Resident 1's pressure dressing was to be removed after 12:00 PM. LVN 2 stated she overlooked the
instruction and should have carried out the instruction as written. LVN 2 stated the pressure dressing was to
be removed to prevent infection at the site and to allow for assessment of the site for complications. LVN 2
stated removal of the pressure dressing was also important to ensure blood circulation was maintained.
During a telephone interview, on 9/19/2025 at 10:36 AM, with Social Worker (SW) 1 from Resident 1's
hemodialysis center, SW 1 stated the hemodialysis technicians reported that Resident 1's pressure
dressing from her treatment on 9/17/2025 was still in place upon her arrival to the dialysis center on
9/19/2025. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 9/19/2025 at 11:01 AM, with Registered
Nurse (RN) 1, the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Hemodialysis Access Care, revised 9/2010,
was reviewed. RN 1 stated the P&P indicated nursing staff were to routinely assess for signs of infection
and adequate circulation at the hemodialysis access site. RN 1 stated these assessments required direct
visual observation and direct physical (touch) examination of the access site. RN 1 stated a pressure
dressing would obstruct the licensed nurse's ability to perform accurate assessments of the access site. RN
1 stated the pressure dressing should be removed as instructed on the Dialysis Communication Record.
During an interview, on 9/19/2025 at 11:14 AM, with RN 1, RN 1 stated Resident 1 did not have
documentation every shift of the condition of her hemodialysis access site, or the report and applicable
special instructions provided following hemodialysis. 2a. During an interview on 9/19/2025 at 11:06 AM,
with RN 1, RN 1 stated nursing staff were to document a progress note every shift that included any special
instructions and report from the hemodialysis nurse, and the condition of the resident and their
hemodialysis access site. RN 1 stated it was important to document this information every shift to ensure all
staff were aware of any pertinent clinical information and to ensure that any special instructions were
carried out. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility
admitted Resident 2 on 7/21/2025. Resident 2's diagnoses included ESRD and dependence on
hemodialysis. During a review of Resident 2's MDS, dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 2 had
moderately impaired cognition. The MDS indicated Resident 2 required substantial to maximal assistance
from staff for all mobility while in and out of bed. During an interview on 9/19/2025 at 11:16 AM, with RN 1,
RN 1 stated from 9/1/2025 to 9/19/2025 there was no documentation of the condition of Resident 2's
hemodialysis access site or the report provided by the hemodialysis nurse post-dialysis. 2b. During a review
of Resident 3's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 3 on
7/10/2025. Resident 3's diagnoses included ESRD and dependence on hemodialysis. During a review of
Resident 3's MDS, dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 3 had moderately impaired cognition. The
MDS indicated Resident 3 required substantial to maximal assistance for all mobility while in and out of
bed. During an interview on 9/19/2025 at 11:18 AM, with RN 1, RN 1 stated from 9/1/2025 to 9/19/2025
there was no documentation of the condition of Resident 3's hemodialysis access site or the report
provided by the hemodialysis nurse post-dialysis. During a review of the facility P&P titled Hemodialysis
Access Care, revised 9/2010, the P&P indicated nursing staff were to document, every shift, the condition
of the dressing and interventions if needed, and any part of report being given from the dialysis nurse
post-dialysis.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
056023
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 3
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
056023
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/19/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avalon Villa Care Center
12029 Avalon Blvd
Los Angeles, CA 90061
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0805
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual
needs.
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled
residents (Resident 4) received a soft and bite-sized texture diet as ordered. This deficient practice placed
Resident 4 at risk of choking, aspiration (accidental inhalation of foreign substances, such as food, liquids,
or mucus, into the lungs), and possible infection within the lungs and/or death.Findings: During a review of
Resident 4's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 4
on 10/18/2021, and most recently re-admitted him on 2/25/2013. Resident 4's diagnoses included
dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident
assessment tool), dated 7/2/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 4 did not have impaired cognition (decline in
a person's mental abilities). The MDS indicated Resident 4 could eat independently. During a review of
Resident 4's care plan, titled Oral/dental health problems, edentulous (having no teeth)., dated 4/4/2025,
the care plan indicated staff were to provide Resident 4 his diet as ordered. During a review of Resident 4's
physician order, dated 9/4/2025, the order indicated Resident 4 was to receive a soft and bite sized texture
diet. During an observation on 9/19/2025 at 12:30 PM, in the dining room, Resident 4 was observed eating
lunch. Resident 4 was edentulous (having no teeth) and was not wearing upper or lower dentures. Resident
4's tray ticket (a detailed printout used in healthcare to guide food service staff in assembling trays for
residents or patients) indicated Resident 4 was to have soft and bite-sized texture food on his lunch tray. On
Resident 4's plate, Resident 4 had a square slice of cornbread, approximately two inches thick. The
cornbread was not cut or broken into pieces and was served whole. During a concurrent observation and
interview, on 9/19/2025 at 12:36 PM, with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), Resident 4's lunch tray was
observed. The DS stated Resident 4's tray ticket indicated Resident 4 was to receive a tray with soft and
bite-sized texture food. The DS stated the slice of cornbread did not meet the soft and bite-sized
requirement. The DS stated the cornbread was a safety risk for Resident 4. During an interview on
9/19/2025 at 2:07 PM, with the Speech Therapist (ST), the ST stated it was important to serve a soft and
bite-sized texture as ordered for resident safety. The ST stated serving a diet as ordered was to ensure the
resident could safely chew and eat the food and helped to prevent choking and aspiration of food. The ST
stated aspiration of food could lead to pneumonia (infection of the lungs) and possibly death. During a
review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Soft and Bite Sized Diet, undated, the P&P
indicated a soft and bite-sized diet was used for residents with dysphagia. The P&P indicated the food was
to be no larger than 1/2 inch by 1/2 inch sized pieces. The P&P indicated any bread components were to be
pureed (a very smooth, crushed or blended food), and no regular, dry bread was permitted. During a review
of the facility document titled Fall Menus, dated 9/19/2025, the menu indicated that cornbread for residents
on a soft and bite-sized texture diet was to be pureed.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
056023
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 3