Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

INFINITY CARE OF EAST LOS ANGELESCMS #0560631 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0559 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Some Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its Resident Rights policy for two (2) of 2 sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2) when they did not accommodate their request to be roomed together as a married couple. This failure had the potential to negatively affect Residents 1 and 2's psychosocial wellbeing. 1. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses of atherosclerosis (the buildup of fats, cholesterol and other substances in and on the artery [a blood vessel that carries oxygen-rich blood from the heart to the rest of the body] walls) of aorta (the largest artery in the body) and cardiomegaly (an enlarged heart). During a review of Resident 1'S Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 8/9/2025, the MDS indicated the resident had an intact cognitive (ability to think, remember, and reason) skills for daily decision making. Resident 1 needed setup or clean-up assistance (helper sets up or cleans up; resident completes activity) with personal hygiene and eating and was independent with upper and lower body dressing (the ability to dress and undress above and below the waist), putting on/taking off footwear, transfers (how resident moves to and from bed, chair, wheelchair, standing position) and walking 150 feet. 2. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), without behavioral disturbance (a problematic pattern of behavior that interferes with a person's ability to function in daily life), psychotic disturbance (a state of losing touch with reality, characterized by symptoms of delusions [false beliefs] and hallucinations [seeing or hearing things that are not there]), mood disturbance (a significant, disruptive change in a person's emotional state that goes beyond everyday fluctuations and impacts their mood, thoughts and behavior) and anxiety (a state of intense fear, worry, and unease) and hearing loss (a partial or total inability to hear sounds). Resident 2's admission Record also indicated that her responsible party was Resident 1. During a review of Resident 2'S MDS, dated [DATE], the MDS indicated the resident was moderately impaired with cognitive skills for daily decision making. Resident 2 needed supervision or touching assistance (helper provides verbal cues and/or touching/steadying and/or contact guard assistance as resident completes activity) with personal hygiene, upper and lower body dressing, and putting on/taking off footwear. Resident 2 needed setup or clean-up assistance with eating and walking 150 feet and was independent with transfers. During a review of Resident 1's Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation (SBAR; a communication framework for providing essential patient information in a structured way) Documentation, dated 8/15/2025, Resident 1's SBAR Documentation indicated Resident 1 was in the room with his spouse (Resident 2) when Resident 2 yelled and threw paper at him and Resident 1 stated, Can you guys get her out of the room? The residents were immediately separated. During an interview on (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 3 Event ID: 056063 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 056063 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 08/28/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Infinity Care of East Los Angeles 101 S Fickett Street Los Angeles, CA 90033 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0559 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Some 8/28/2025 at 9:48 AM with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated on 8/15/2025, while he was in his room sitting down coloring and doing crossword puzzles, his spouse (Resident 2) who also shares the same room, got mad at him due to frustration and started screaming for not paying attention to her. Resident 1 stated his wife (Resident 2) had been together for 80 years and are normally always happy and like all couples, have their arguments. Resident 1 stated he spoke briefly to Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) but does not believe that he asked her to remove Resident 2 from their room. Resident 1 also stated that when they removed Resident 2 from their room, he only thought they were separating them for a short time like a time-out. During the same interview on 8/28/2025 at 9:48 AM with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated that he had been separated from Resident 2 for about 2 or three (3) weeks now. Resident 1 stated the facility staff never explained to him that he would be separated from Resident 2 for this long and only thought the separation would be brief. Resident 1 stated that if he had known they were going to move Resident 2 out of their room, he would have begged them to leave Resident 2 in their room. Resident 1 also stated that he has told multiple staff members, including LVN 1, that he would like Resident 2 to come back to their room. Resident 1 further stated he felt bad that Resident 2 was in another room and felt lonely and abandoned and just wanted her to be back in the same room with him. During an interview on 8/28/2025 at 10:01 AM with LVN 1, LVN 1 stated on 8/15/2025 she was sitting at the nurses' station when Resident 1 came up to her to ask to remove Resident 2 from their room. LVN 1 stated Resident 1 told her Resident 2 was screaming and throwing paper at him. LVN 1 stated she felt Resident 1 and Resident 2 were just having an argument between spouses and did not feel like it was verbal abuse (the harmful use of words to control, intimidate, threaten, or hurt someone, causing emotional distress and undermining their self-worth and can include insults, name-calling, excessive yelling, blaming and humiliation). LVN 1 also stated that Resident 2 was very upset when she was told she had to be separated from Resident 1. LVN 1 further stated that Resident 1 has asked her multiple times as well as witnessing Resident 1 ask Restorative Nursing Assistant 1 (RNA 1), the Director of Staff Development (DSD) and the Psychiatrist (a medical doctor who specializes in the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of mental health disorders) to bring Resident 2 back to their room. During an interview on 8/28/2025 at 10:15 AM with Resident 2, Resident 2 stated on 8/15/202, she did not remember what she and Resident 1 were disagreeing on but stated it was just a disagreement. Resident 2 stated that both she and Resident 1 had been together for 80 years and married for 40 years. Resident 2 stated this is the first time they had been separated, and she misses Resident 1 and feels sad. Resident 2 further stated that she wishes to be in the same room as Resident 1 because she loves him and she takes care of him, and he does the same. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/28/2025 at 10:20 AM with Resident 2 in the dining room, Resident 2 was observed crying. Resident 2 stated she did not realize it had already been 2 to 3 weeks since she has been separated from Resident 1. Resident 2 further stated that she only had a disagreement with Resident 1 and does not understand why or think that they should have been separated over it. During an interview on 8/28/2025 at 10:26 AM with DSD, DSD stated that Residents 1 and 2 do argue but have never heard them screaming. DSD also stated Resident 2 is hard of hearing and tends to speak loudly. DSD stated that Resident 1 has asked her about 3 times if they could bring Resident 2 back to his room so they could be back together and stated that Resident 2 has also expressed the same, asking to be back with her spouse. During an interview on 8/28/2025 at 10:53 AM with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated the facility staff did not ask him if he wanted Resident 2 to be moved to another room and when they did move Resident 2's things out of their shared room, they did not let him know what room she was moving to and reiterated that it made him feel sad and abandoned. During an interview on (continued on next page) FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 056063 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 3 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 056063 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 08/28/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Infinity Care of East Los Angeles 101 S Fickett Street Los Angeles, CA 90033 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0559 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Some FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete 8/28/2025 at 11:47 AM with SSD, SSD stated Residents 1 and 2 constantly argue and they were told on 8/13/2025 that they needed to stop or they would be separated. SSD stated both Residents 1 and 2 had another argument on 8/15/2025 and because Resident 1 had asked LVN 1 to remove Resident 2 from their room, it was reported to the Administrator (ADM), and they were separated. SSD also stated that Resident 2 has expressed that she would like to be back with her spouse, Resident 1. During a review of Resident 1's Psychosocial Note, dated 8/15/2025, timed at 3:32 PM, Resident 1's Psychosocial Note indicated the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT; a group of diverse professionals from different disciplines who collaborate to achieve a common goal, typically by addressing complex issues for a patient) spoke with Resident 1 regarding the incident where Resident 2 was yelling and throwing papers at him. The note indicated Resident 1 had stated that he and Resident 2 should not be separated and that the argument was not a big deal. Resident 1 stated he felt safe with Resident 2 together in their room.During an interview on 8/28/2025 at 12:23 PM with ADM, ADM stated on 8/15/2025 Residents 1 and 2 were verbally notified of the room change and that he did unsubstantiate the allegation of verbal abuse between Residents 1 and 2. ADM stated that both Residents 1 and 2 have been expressing that they wanted to be back together and that they had both told the psychiatrist. ADM further stated that he understood that keeping the residents apart is a resident rights issue but decided to keep them apart as a safety precaution. During a review of Resident 2's Psychosocial Note dated 8/18/2025, Resident 2's Psychosocial Note indicated SSD and Social Services Assistant (SSA) spoke with Resident 2 and Resident 2 had asked them when she would be able to go back into her previous room with her spouse, Resident 1. SSD had told Resident 2 that the transfer back was still in question due to her tendency to argue with Resident 1. During a review of Resident 1's Initial Psychiatric Evaluation dated 8/18/2025, Resident 1's Initial Psychiatric Evaluation indicated Resident 1 stated he would like Resident 2 to return to their room as they were separated and also stated that he is sad Resident 2 is in another room and that he feels safe in the facility and would feel safe if Resident 2 would return.During a review of Resident 2's Initial Psychiatric Evaluation dated 8/18/2025, Resident 2's Initial Psychiatric Evaluation indicated Resident 2 stated she was upset and the incident of her yelling at him would not happen again and that she would like to return to the room with Resident 1. During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/28/2025 at 1 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 1's Psychosocial Note, dated 8/15/2025, and timed at 3:32 PM and the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Resident Rights, revised December 2016 were reviewed. The Facility's P&P indicated, Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: share a room with a spouse, if that is mutually agreeable. The DON stated if both Residents 1 and 2 had expressed that they wanted to be back together, then they should have been put back together. The DON further stated that since Resident 1 is Resident 2's responsible party, if they wanted to be back together, per policy it is their right.During an interview on 8/28/2025 at 1:21 PM with RNA 1, RNA 1 stated that since Residents 1 and 2 were first separated on 8/15/2025, Resident 1 had expressed to her multiple times that he would like to be back with Resident 2 in their room. During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Resident Rights, revised December 2016, the P&P indicated, Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: share a room with a spouse, if that is mutually agreeable. Event ID: Facility ID: 056063 If continuation sheet Page 3 of 3

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0559GeneralS&S Epotential for harm

    F559 - The right to share a room with his or her spouse when married residents live

    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 28, 2025 survey of INFINITY CARE OF EAST LOS ANGELES?

This was a inspection survey of INFINITY CARE OF EAST LOS ANGELES on August 28, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at INFINITY CARE OF EAST LOS ANGELES on August 28, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change ..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.