F 0559
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice
before a change is made.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its Resident Rights policy for two (2) of 2
sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2) when they did not accommodate their request to be roomed
together as a married couple. This failure had the potential to negatively affect Residents 1 and 2's
psychosocial wellbeing. 1. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record
indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses
of atherosclerosis (the buildup of fats, cholesterol and other substances in and on the artery [a blood vessel
that carries oxygen-rich blood from the heart to the rest of the body] walls) of aorta (the largest artery in the
body) and cardiomegaly (an enlarged heart). During a review of Resident 1'S Minimum Data Set (MDS - a
resident assessment tool), dated 8/9/2025, the MDS indicated the resident had an intact cognitive (ability to
think, remember, and reason) skills for daily decision making. Resident 1 needed setup or clean-up
assistance (helper sets up or cleans up; resident completes activity) with personal hygiene and eating and
was independent with upper and lower body dressing (the ability to dress and undress above and below the
waist), putting on/taking off footwear, transfers (how resident moves to and from bed, chair, wheelchair,
standing position) and walking 150 feet. 2. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the
admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted
[DATE] with diagnoses of dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), without behavioral
disturbance (a problematic pattern of behavior that interferes with a person's ability to function in daily life),
psychotic disturbance (a state of losing touch with reality, characterized by symptoms of delusions [false
beliefs] and hallucinations [seeing or hearing things that are not there]), mood disturbance (a significant,
disruptive change in a person's emotional state that goes beyond everyday fluctuations and impacts their
mood, thoughts and behavior) and anxiety (a state of intense fear, worry, and unease) and hearing loss (a
partial or total inability to hear sounds). Resident 2's admission Record also indicated that her responsible
party was Resident 1. During a review of Resident 2'S MDS, dated [DATE], the MDS indicated the resident
was moderately impaired with cognitive skills for daily decision making. Resident 2 needed supervision or
touching assistance (helper provides verbal cues and/or touching/steadying and/or contact guard
assistance as resident completes activity) with personal hygiene, upper and lower body dressing, and
putting on/taking off footwear. Resident 2 needed setup or clean-up assistance with eating and walking 150
feet and was independent with transfers. During a review of Resident 1's Situation, Background,
Assessment and Recommendation (SBAR; a communication framework for providing essential patient
information in a structured way) Documentation, dated 8/15/2025, Resident 1's SBAR Documentation
indicated Resident 1 was in the room with his spouse (Resident 2) when Resident 2 yelled and threw paper
at him and Resident 1 stated, Can you guys get her out of the room? The residents were immediately
separated. During an interview on
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 3
Event ID:
056063
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
056063
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/28/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Infinity Care of East Los Angeles
101 S Fickett Street
Los Angeles, CA 90033
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0559
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
8/28/2025 at 9:48 AM with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated on 8/15/2025, while he was in his room sitting
down coloring and doing crossword puzzles, his spouse (Resident 2) who also shares the same room, got
mad at him due to frustration and started screaming for not paying attention to her. Resident 1 stated his
wife (Resident 2) had been together for 80 years and are normally always happy and like all couples, have
their arguments. Resident 1 stated he spoke briefly to Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) but does not
believe that he asked her to remove Resident 2 from their room. Resident 1 also stated that when they
removed Resident 2 from their room, he only thought they were separating them for a short time like a
time-out. During the same interview on 8/28/2025 at 9:48 AM with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated that he
had been separated from Resident 2 for about 2 or three (3) weeks now. Resident 1 stated the facility staff
never explained to him that he would be separated from Resident 2 for this long and only thought the
separation would be brief. Resident 1 stated that if he had known they were going to move Resident 2 out
of their room, he would have begged them to leave Resident 2 in their room. Resident 1 also stated that he
has told multiple staff members, including LVN 1, that he would like Resident 2 to come back to their room.
Resident 1 further stated he felt bad that Resident 2 was in another room and felt lonely and abandoned
and just wanted her to be back in the same room with him. During an interview on 8/28/2025 at 10:01 AM
with LVN 1, LVN 1 stated on 8/15/2025 she was sitting at the nurses' station when Resident 1 came up to
her to ask to remove Resident 2 from their room. LVN 1 stated Resident 1 told her Resident 2 was
screaming and throwing paper at him. LVN 1 stated she felt Resident 1 and Resident 2 were just having an
argument between spouses and did not feel like it was verbal abuse (the harmful use of words to control,
intimidate, threaten, or hurt someone, causing emotional distress and undermining their self-worth and can
include insults, name-calling, excessive yelling, blaming and humiliation). LVN 1 also stated that Resident 2
was very upset when she was told she had to be separated from Resident 1. LVN 1 further stated that
Resident 1 has asked her multiple times as well as witnessing Resident 1 ask Restorative Nursing
Assistant 1 (RNA 1), the Director of Staff Development (DSD) and the Psychiatrist (a medical doctor who
specializes in the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of mental health disorders) to bring Resident 2 back
to their room. During an interview on 8/28/2025 at 10:15 AM with Resident 2, Resident 2 stated on
8/15/202, she did not remember what she and Resident 1 were disagreeing on but stated it was just a
disagreement. Resident 2 stated that both she and Resident 1 had been together for 80 years and married
for 40 years. Resident 2 stated this is the first time they had been separated, and she misses Resident 1
and feels sad. Resident 2 further stated that she wishes to be in the same room as Resident 1 because she
loves him and she takes care of him, and he does the same. During a concurrent observation and interview
on 8/28/2025 at 10:20 AM with Resident 2 in the dining room, Resident 2 was observed crying. Resident 2
stated she did not realize it had already been 2 to 3 weeks since she has been separated from Resident 1.
Resident 2 further stated that she only had a disagreement with Resident 1 and does not understand why
or think that they should have been separated over it. During an interview on 8/28/2025 at 10:26 AM with
DSD, DSD stated that Residents 1 and 2 do argue but have never heard them screaming. DSD also stated
Resident 2 is hard of hearing and tends to speak loudly. DSD stated that Resident 1 has asked her about 3
times if they could bring Resident 2 back to his room so they could be back together and stated that
Resident 2 has also expressed the same, asking to be back with her spouse. During an interview on
8/28/2025 at 10:53 AM with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated the facility staff did not ask him if he wanted
Resident 2 to be moved to another room and when they did move Resident 2's things out of their shared
room, they did not let him know what room she was moving to and reiterated that it made him feel sad and
abandoned. During an interview on
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
056063
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 3
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
056063
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/28/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Infinity Care of East Los Angeles
101 S Fickett Street
Los Angeles, CA 90033
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0559
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
8/28/2025 at 11:47 AM with SSD, SSD stated Residents 1 and 2 constantly argue and they were told on
8/13/2025 that they needed to stop or they would be separated. SSD stated both Residents 1 and 2 had
another argument on 8/15/2025 and because Resident 1 had asked LVN 1 to remove Resident 2 from their
room, it was reported to the Administrator (ADM), and they were separated. SSD also stated that Resident
2 has expressed that she would like to be back with her spouse, Resident 1. During a review of Resident
1's Psychosocial Note, dated 8/15/2025, timed at 3:32 PM, Resident 1's Psychosocial Note indicated the
Interdisciplinary Team (IDT; a group of diverse professionals from different disciplines who collaborate to
achieve a common goal, typically by addressing complex issues for a patient) spoke with Resident 1
regarding the incident where Resident 2 was yelling and throwing papers at him. The note indicated
Resident 1 had stated that he and Resident 2 should not be separated and that the argument was not a big
deal. Resident 1 stated he felt safe with Resident 2 together in their room.During an interview on 8/28/2025
at 12:23 PM with ADM, ADM stated on 8/15/2025 Residents 1 and 2 were verbally notified of the room
change and that he did unsubstantiate the allegation of verbal abuse between Residents 1 and 2. ADM
stated that both Residents 1 and 2 have been expressing that they wanted to be back together and that
they had both told the psychiatrist. ADM further stated that he understood that keeping the residents apart
is a resident rights issue but decided to keep them apart as a safety precaution. During a review of
Resident 2's Psychosocial Note dated 8/18/2025, Resident 2's Psychosocial Note indicated SSD and
Social Services Assistant (SSA) spoke with Resident 2 and Resident 2 had asked them when she would be
able to go back into her previous room with her spouse, Resident 1. SSD had told Resident 2 that the
transfer back was still in question due to her tendency to argue with Resident 1. During a review of
Resident 1's Initial Psychiatric Evaluation dated 8/18/2025, Resident 1's Initial Psychiatric Evaluation
indicated Resident 1 stated he would like Resident 2 to return to their room as they were separated and
also stated that he is sad Resident 2 is in another room and that he feels safe in the facility and would feel
safe if Resident 2 would return.During a review of Resident 2's Initial Psychiatric Evaluation dated
8/18/2025, Resident 2's Initial Psychiatric Evaluation indicated Resident 2 stated she was upset and the
incident of her yelling at him would not happen again and that she would like to return to the room with
Resident 1. During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/28/2025 at 1 PM with the Director of
Nursing (DON), Resident 1's Psychosocial Note, dated 8/15/2025, and timed at 3:32 PM and the facility's
Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Resident Rights, revised December 2016 were reviewed. The Facility's
P&P indicated, Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These
rights include the resident's right to: share a room with a spouse, if that is mutually agreeable. The DON
stated if both Residents 1 and 2 had expressed that they wanted to be back together, then they should
have been put back together. The DON further stated that since Resident 1 is Resident 2's responsible
party, if they wanted to be back together, per policy it is their right.During an interview on 8/28/2025 at 1:21
PM with RNA 1, RNA 1 stated that since Residents 1 and 2 were first separated on 8/15/2025, Resident 1
had expressed to her multiple times that he would like to be back with Resident 2 in their room. During a
review of the facility's P&P titled, Resident Rights, revised December 2016, the P&P indicated, Federal and
state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's
right to: share a room with a spouse, if that is mutually agreeable.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
056063
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 3