Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

ROSEVILLE POINT HEALTH & WELLNESS CENTERCMS #0561393 citations on this visit
3 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 3 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

056139 09/02/2025 Roseville Point Health & Wellness Center 600 Sunrise Avenue Roseville, CA 95661
F 0600 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 2) was free from abuse, when Resident 3 touched Resident 2's groin area. This failure decreased the facility's potential to maintain Resident 2's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Findings:A review of an admission record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in July 2024 with diagnoses including cognitive communication deficit (difficulty communicating) and dementia (a progressive decline in memory, thinking, reasoning, executive function). A review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 8/21/25, indicated a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) score of five out of 15 with memory problems and severe cognitive impairment. A review of an admission record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in October 2024 with diagnoses including aphasia (a disorder that makes it difficult to speak) and hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body).A review of Resident 3's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated a BIMS score of 14 out of 15 with intact cognition.During an interview on 9/2/25 at 2:20 p.m. with Activity Assistant (AA), AA stated while she was conducting facility activities in the activity room on 9/1/25 around 10 a.m., she observed Resident 3 touching with his left hand Resident 2's lap near the groin area. AA immediately gestured Resident 3 to stop and separated him from Resident 2. During an interview on 9/2/25 at 3:30 p.m. with the Administrator (ADM), ADM confirmed Resident 3 touched Resident 2's lap near the groin area and stated the incident was witnessed by AA. A review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention and Management, dated 6/12/24, indicated, The Facility does not condone any form of resident abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, exploitation, and/or mistreatment. Page 1 of 3 056139 056139 09/02/2025 Roseville Point Health & Wellness Center 600 Sunrise Avenue Roseville, CA 95661
F 0609 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report immediately to the Department an alleged incident of sexual abuse for one of six sampled residents (Resident 2), when the Department received the facility's report of alleged sexual abuse after two hours of occurrence. This failure had the potential to cause a delayed response by enforcement agencies to ensure Resident 2's safety.Findings:A review of an admission record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in July 2024 with diagnoses including cognitive communication deficit (difficulty communicating) and dementia (a progressive decline in memory, thinking, reasoning, executive function). A review of an admission record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in October 2024 with diagnoses including aphasia (a disorder that makes it difficult to speak) and hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body). During an interview on 9/2/25 at 2:20 p.m. with Activity Assistant (AA), AA stated while she was conducting facility activities in the activity room on 9/1/25 around 10 a.m., she observed Resident 3 touching with his left hand Resident 2's lap near the groin area. AA immediately gestured Resident 3 to stop and separated him from Resident 2. AA further stated she did not report the incident to proper agencies or notify her supervisor. A review of a document titled, Report of Suspected Dependent Adult/Elder Abuse (SOC 341), dated 9/2/25, indicated on 9/1/25 around 10 a.m. Resident 3 was seen sitting next to Resident 2 and moving his hand up and down touching Resident 2's private area. The report further indicated staff told Resident 3 to stop and escorted him out of the room. A review of a document titled, Fax Log, dated 9/2/25, indicated the facility faxed the SOC 341 to the Department on 9/2/25 at 9:59 a.m. During an interview on 9/2/25 at 3:30 p.m. with the Administrator (ADM), ADM stated the expectation was to report the alleged sexual abuse incident immediately within two hours. A review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention and Management, dated 6/12/24, indicated, The facility will report all allegations of abuse and criminal activity as required by law and regulations to the appropriate agencies . Reports of resident abuse, mistreatment, neglect, exploitation, injuries of an unknown source, and any suspicion of crimes are promptly reported and thoroughly investigated. 056139 Page 2 of 3 056139 09/02/2025 Roseville Point Health & Wellness Center 600 Sunrise Avenue Roseville, CA 95661
F 0880 Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices for one of six sampled residents (Resident 6), when the Housekeeper did not apply the required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE, gloves, gown, and/or goggles/face shield if risk of splash and spray) while cleaning Resident 6's room. This failure had the potential to spread infection among vulnerable residents.Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the facility in June 2022 with a diagnosis of stage 4 pressure ulcer (a severe deep open wound that extends through the skin and into the muscle, bone or tendons) to the sacrum (triangular shaped bone located at the base of the spine). During an observation on 9/2/25 at 10:31 a.m. inside Resident 6's room, the Housekeeper was observed not wearing the proper PPE while cleaning the room. Housekeeper stated he was aware that Resident 6 was on Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP, infection control intervention to reduce transmission of resistant organisms). During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/2/25 at 10:40 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1) inside Resident 6's room, LN 1 confirmed there was a sign outside Resident 6's room indicating he was placed on EBP and the Housekeeper was not wearing a gown while cleaning Resident 6's room. LN 1 stated staff should follow the EBP when providing care to Resident 6. During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/2/25 at 12:35 p.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), Resident 6's Physician Order was reviewed. DSD confirmed Resident 6 was placed on EBP due to his pressure ulcer. DSD stated the Housekeeper should have followed infection prevention and control practices by donning gloves and gown while cleaning Resident 6's room to prevent the spread of infection and decrease putting other residents at risk. A review of the facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised in October 2024, indicated, . Enhanced Barrier Precautions . will be used in the facility . EBP is employed for resident care . at risk of transmission . include residents with chronic wound . Use of EBP by Environmental Services . EVS personnel should use gown and gloves while cleaning and disinfecting the environment around residents on EBP . cleaning and disinfecting high touch surfaces such as bed rails . bed side tables or stands on or near the resident's space. Residents Affected - Few 056139 Page 3 of 3

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

3 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0600GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F600 - Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • 0609GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F609 - The facility must develop and implement written policies and procedures that:

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • 0880GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F880 - Infection Control

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 2, 2025 survey of ROSEVILLE POINT HEALTH & WELLNESS CENTER?

This was a inspection survey of ROSEVILLE POINT HEALTH & WELLNESS CENTER on September 2, 2025. The surveyor cited 3 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at ROSEVILLE POINT HEALTH & WELLNESS CENTER on September 2, 2025?

Yes, 3 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect b..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.