F 0641
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to reassess a resident for the use of grab bars
(Bedrails to provide support and secure handhold) after being readmitted to the facility, for one out of four
residents (Resident 1) reviewed for bed rail use. This failure resulted in the Resident 1's inability to use grab
bars for repositioning assistance and bed mobility.Findings: On December 8, 2025, an unannounced visit
was made to the facility to investigate a Quality-of-Care complaint. On December 8, 2025, at 9:28 a.m., an
observation with a concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 1. Resident 1 was observed sitting in
a wheelchair at her bedside. There were no side rails or grab bars observed attached on residents' bed. On
December 8, 2025, at 10:32 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The
DON stated it was the facilities policy to assess a resident for the use of bedrails upon admission,
re-admission, and at the request of the resident/representative, or nursing staff. The DON stated
bedrail/grab bars were used as an enabler for mobility, to grab and assist with repositioning. The DON
further stated the use of a bedrail was not appropriate for all residents, as it could pose as a restraint or an
entrapment risk. A review of Resident 1's, Patient Information, indicated, resident was admitted to the
facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease (A neurological disorder that affects movement,
balance and coordination). A review of Resident 1's, Brief Interview for Mental Status Evaluation (A
cognitive assessment), dated, November 17, 2025, indicated Resident 1 had mild cognitive impairment. A
review of Resident 1's, Bed Rails, assessment, dated, June 11, 2025, indicated, resident has bed mobility
issues due to her cognitive losses, and demonstrates difficulty with bed mobility or moving to a sitting
position from the bed, and difficulty with standing/sitting balance. The assessment further indicated, . per
(Resident 1's Representative) (resident) fell at home . (representative) requests for grab bar at this time .
Recommendations: (Left & Right) Assist . grab bar. A review of Resident 1's, Progress Notes, dated,
November 16, 2025, at 7:55 p.m., indicated, resident was transferred to the General Acute Care Hospital
(GACH) on November 12, 2025, and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. There was no documented
evidence that Resident 1 was reassessed for the use of bed rails or grab bars following her readmission to
the facility on November 16, 2025. On December 10, 2025, at 3:50 p.m., an interview with a concurrent
record review was conducted with the DON. The DON stated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on
[DATE], and was assessed for the use of grab bars in bed on June 11, 2025. The DON stated on June 11,
2025, Resident 1's bedrail assessment indicated left, and right grab bars were recommended at the request
of resident's representative for Resident 1. The DON stated Resident 1 did not currently have grab bars on
her bed. The DON stated resident was transferred out to GACH on November 12, 2025, and was
readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The DON stated Resident 1 was not reassessed for the use of grab
bars after her readmission to the facility on November 16, 2025. The DON stated, Resident 1 should have
been reassessed for the use of bedrails or grab bars, upon her readmission, as it is the facilities policy to
Residents Affected - Few
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 5
Event ID:
056185
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
056185
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/07/2026
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Menifee Lakes Post Acute
27600 Encanto Drive
Sun City, CA 92586
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0641
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
reassess for bedrails. The facilities Policy and Procedure titled, Proper Use of Bed Rails, revised, December
19, 2022, indicated, . Policy: It is the policy of this facility to utilize a person-centered approach when
determining the use of bed rails . Ongoing Monitoring and Supervision: . b. A nurse assigned to the resident
will complete reassessments in accordance with the facility's assessment schedule, but not less than
quarterly, upon a significant change in status .
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
056185
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 5
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
056185
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/07/2026
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Menifee Lakes Post Acute
27600 Encanto Drive
Sun City, CA 92586
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0880
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview and record review the facility failed to initiate and maintain infection prevention
precautions (measures intended to prevent transmission of infectious microorganisms) for a resident with
repeated Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) with the presence of the microorganism Pseudomonas aeruginosa
(Pseudomonas - a Multi Drug Resistant Organism [MDRO]) in their urine for one out of three residents
reviewed for infection control precautions (Resident 2). This failure had the potential to spread infection to
other residents in the facility. Findings: On December 8 & 9, 2025, unannounced visits were made to the
facility for infection prevention issues. On December 8, 2025, at 9:02 a.m., an observation and concurrent
interview were conducted with Resident 2, who stated she was receiving antibiotics for a UTI and is feeling
better. No signage indicating infection prevention precautions was observed outside Resident 2's room. On
December 8, 2025, at 3:32 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Infection Prevention Nurse (IPN) who
stated the facility's process was to monitor and discuss residents on antibiotics during morning clinical
review meetings with the Director of Nursing (DON) and licensed nurses (charge nurse), Monday through
Friday. The IPN stated, if a resident's urine Culture & Sensitivity ({C&S}-isolation of microbes in the urine to
test for drug resistance and sensitivity) indicated the UTI is caused by a MDRO (Pseudomonas), infection
control interventions should be initiated to prevent the spread of the MDRO to other residents. The IPN
stated these interventions include placing the resident on either Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP infection control measures used to reduce the spread of MDROs) or Contact Isolation Precautions (CIP infection control measures used to prevent the spread of infectious organisms transmitted by direct or
indirect contact with a resident or their environment). The IPN stated when a resident was placed on CIP,
the resident was either moved to a private room, or cohorted (roommates) with the same MDRO until
asymptomatic. The IPN stated, when a resident was placed on CIP, the staff must don PPE (personal
protective equipment - a specialized clothing or equipment worn by healthcare personnel to protect
themselves and others from exposure to infectious agents, body fluids, or other hazards) outside of the
resident's room, prior to contact with the resident or their environment. The IPN stated, with both EBP or
CIP, a sign will be placed outside of the resident's bedroom door, indicating the type of precaution and the
PPE required to enter the resident's bedroom. The IPN further stated, a physician order was needed for
these precautions, and she was responsible for ensuring physician orders are received and implemented.
The IPN stated implementing infection prevention precautions was important to help prevent the spread of
infection to other residents within the facility. A review of Resident 2's, Patient Information, indicated,
resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis including UTI. A review of Resident 2's,
Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) dated indicated the resident was cognitively intact (normal
cognitive functioning). The following Resident 2's records were reviewed: -The Progress Notes, dated,
October 1, 2025, at 10:32 p.m., indicated a Change of Condition (COC) was reported when Resident 2
complained of pain in urination and the physician ordered to obtain urine for test with C&S. -The Progress
Notes dated, October 2, 2025, at 3:43 p.m., indicated the result of the urinalysis was referred to the
physician with orders to start on antibiotics for UTI; -Resident 2's urine test result with C&S dated October
2, 2025, and reported October 4, 2025, indicated the presence of MDRO pseudomonas in Resident 2's
urine. -The Progress Notes, dated October 4, 2025, at 10:56 a.m., indicated the urine test with C&S result
was referred to Resident 2's physician with orders to discontinue the current antibiotic order and change to
a new antibiotic that is susceptible (expected to be effective in treating the infection) to MDRO. There was
no documented evidence indicating that physician's
Residents Affected - Few
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
056185
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 5
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
056185
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/07/2026
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Menifee Lakes Post Acute
27600 Encanto Drive
Sun City, CA 92586
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0880
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
orders were received to start CIP for Resident 1's pseudomonas urine infection. -The Progress Notes,
dated November 7, 2025, at 12:30 p.m., indicated Resident 2 was seen and evaluated by her physician and
was given an order to be transferred to the acute hospital for evaluation due to recurrent UTI.-The acute
hospital document dated November 8, 2025, indicated Resident 2 was brought to the acute hospital to be
evaluated for UTI. The document further indicated a urine test was done on November 8, 2025, and the
C&S results reported November 10, 2025, indicated the presence of pseudomonas in Resident 2's urine;
and-The facility progress notes, dated November 11, 2025, at 5 p.m., indicated Resident 2 was re-admitted
back to the facility from the acute hospital with new orders for antibiotics for UTI. There was no documented
evidence indicating that physician's orders were received to initiate an EBP or CIP for Resident 2's
pseudomonas urine infection identified in November 10, 2025. On December 8, 2025, at 3:32 p.m., an
interview with concurrent record review was conducted with the IPN. The IPN stated: -Resident 2's urine
test with C&S result reported on October 4, 2025, indicated Resident 2 was diagnosed with UTI and the
C&S result indicated the MDRO pseudomonas was present in her urine. -CIP physician orders should have
been obtained and implemented following the C&S result and this was not done; and -Placing Resident 2
on CIP due to UTI with MDRO pseudomonas in the urine was important because the resident was
considered infectious and the CIP will help avoid the spread of infection. On December 9, 2025, at 1001
a.m., a follow up interview with a concurrent record review was conducted with the IPN. The IPN stated:
-Resident 2 was re-admitted to the facility from the acute hospital on November 11, 2025, with the
diagnosis of UTI. -The acute hospital urine C&S result, reported on November10, 2025, indicated MDRO
pseudomonas in Resident 2's urine. -The facility should have started infection prevention intervention like
EBP when Resident 2 was readmitted on [DATE]; and -The facility did not receive physician orders to place
Resident 2 on EBP upon re-admission on [DATE]. On December 10, 2025, at 3:30 p.m., an interview with a
concurrent record review was conducted with the DON. the DON stated: -The facility monitored residents
for infections and initiated precautions by reviewing admission orders, COC, and urine C&S results with the
IPN during clinical review meetings; -The clinical review meeting information will be reported to the
physician, and infection prevention orders will be received and initiated. -A resident identified with an MDRO
UTI will be placed on EBP if a symptomatic or CIP if symptomatic. -On October 4, 2025, Resident was
diagnosed with a symptomatic UTI caused by pseudomonas, CIP was not implemented, and a physician's
order was not obtained to initiate it. -On November 11, 2025, Resident 2 was readmitted to the facility from
the acute hospital for continued treatment of an asymptomatic UTI. On December 8, 2025, Resident 2 was
diagnosed with UTI with the presence of pseudomonas in the urine (reported November 10, 2025). An EBP
should have been initiated upon admission, and it was not done. In addition, a physician's order was not
obtained to implement an EBP upon re-admission to the facility; and -On December 9, 2025, a physician's
order was received to begin EBP interventions for Resident 2 to prevent the spread of infection. -On
December 9, 2025, at 3:03 p.m., an interview was conducted with the DON, who stated the process to
place a resident on infection prevention precautions such as EBP and CIP includes receiving a Drs order.
The DON further stated if a Drs order is not received to place a resident on infection prevention
precautions, then it cannot be verified the precautions were initiated. A review of the facilities Policy and
Procedure (P&P), titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions,, revised, June 17, 2024, indicated, . Policy: It is the
policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of
multidrug-resistant organisms . 8. Important MDROs may include . d. Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas
aeruginosa . 9. Enhanced barrier precautions should be used for the duration of the affected resident's stay
in the facility . A review of the facilities, P&P,
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
056185
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 5
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
056185
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/07/2026
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Menifee Lakes Post Acute
27600 Encanto Drive
Sun City, CA 92586
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0880
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
titled, Transmission-Based (Isolation) Precautions, revised, July 18, 2023, indicated, . Policy: It is our policy
to take appropriate precautions to prevent transmission of pathogens, based on the pathogens modes of
transmission . Contact precautions . measures . intended to prevent transmission of infectious agents which
are spread by direct or indirect contact with the resident or the resident's environment . 1. Facility staff will
apply Transmission-Based Precautions, in addition to standard precautions, to residents who are known or
suspected to be infected or colonized with certain infectious agents requiring additional controls to prevent
transmission .
Event ID:
Facility ID:
056185
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 5