Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

RIVER VALLEY HEALTHCARE & WELLNESS CENTRE, LPCMS #0562582 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 2 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

056258 02/14/2025 River Valley Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LP 2490 Court Street Redding, CA 96001
F 0580 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform one of three sampled resident's (Resident 1) representative (RP), of a change in Resident 1's condition which required the resident to have oxygen administered. This failure violated Resident 1 and her RP's right to be fully informed of a need to alter treatment before the treatment was initiated, and make choices that were consistent with Resident 1's wishes. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Change of Condition Notification dated April 1, 2015, Change of Condition Notification indicated, The Licensed Nurse will notify the family/surrogate decision-makers of any changes in the resident's condition as soon as possible. A review of Resident 1's medical record indicated that Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Metabolic Encephalopathy (a problem in the brain caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood due to illness or organs not working adequately), Urinary Tract Infection, and Severe Protein Calorie Malnutrition (poor nutritional intake). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 10/23/24, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment of memory and decision making abilities), was 2 out of 15, which indicated Resident 1 had poor decision making skills and memory recall. During a record review of Resident 1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for December 2024, the MAR indicated that on 12/28/24 Resident 1 was given oxygen (O2) at 2 liters (2L, a unit of measure) by nasal cannula (a tube in the nose). During an interview on 1/2/25 at 11:30 am, with Resident Representative (RP) on the phone, RP stated, The facility put oxygen on [Resident 1] without notifying me. I went in to visit and discovered [Resident 1] was wearing oxygen around her nose. [Resident 1] had never used oxygen before. I talked to [Licensed Nurse (LN 2] who apologized for not notifying me. I have asked to be notified about anything and everything. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/2/25 at 12:00 pm, with LN 2 at the nurse's station, LN 2 reviewed Resident 1's MAR for December 2024 and confirmed Resident 1 was given O2 on 12/28/24, due to an O2 sat (reading of low oxygen in the blood by a device placed on a finger) of 88 Page 1 of 3 056258 056258 02/14/2025 River Valley Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LP 2490 Court Street Redding, CA 96001
F 0580 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few percent (normal is between 92 to 100 percent). LN 2 confirmed that Resident 1's RP was not notified and indicated that LN 2 was responsible to notify Resident 1's RP as the desk nurse on duty. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/23/25 at 3:00 pm, with Director of Nurses (DON) in the conference room, DON acknowledged there was no documentation to indicate Resident 1's RP had been notified when Resident 1's condition changed and she required oxygen use. 056258 Page 2 of 3 056258 02/14/2025 River Valley Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LP 2490 Court Street Redding, CA 96001
F 0695 Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility administered oxygen (02) without a physician's order to one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). Residents Affected - Few This failure had the potential to lead to negative resident clinical outcomes when nurses choose to administer medications without an order to do so by a physician. Findings: During a review of the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medication Administration, dated January 1, 2012, Medication Administration indicated, Medication will be administered directly by a licensed nurse and upon the order of a physician or licensed independent practitioner. A review of Resident 1 ' s medical record indicated that Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Metabolic Encephalopathy (a problem in the brain caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood due to illness or organs not working adequately), Urinary Tract Infection, and Severe Protein Calorie Malnutrition (poor nutritional intake). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment), Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, Section C an assessment of memory and decision making ability) score dated 10/23/2024, indicated Resident 1 rated 2 of 15, which indicated a severe impairment in memory and ability to make decisions. During a record review of Resident 1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for December 2024, the MAR indicated that on 12/28/24 oxygen was administered to Resident 1 at a rate of 2 liters (L, a unit of measurement) by nasal cannula (nose applicators) for an oxygen saturation (O2 sat, a measurement of the amount of oxygen in the blood by placing a device on a finger) of 88 percent (%, normal O2 sat is considered between 92 to 100%). During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/2/25 at 12:00 pm, with Licensed Nurse (LN) 2 at the nurse ' s station, LN 2 reviewed Resident 1's MAR and Physician's Orders for December 2024, LN 2 confirmed that he applied O2 to Resident 1 on 12/28/24 and confirmed he did not get a physician's order to do so. LN 2 stated, Applying oxygen was an acceptable nursing intervention for immediate treatment. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/23/25 at 3:00 pm, with Director of Nurses (DON) in the conference room while reviewing Resident 1's MAR and Physician's Orders for December 2024, DON confirmed that O2 is considered a medication and requires a physician's order for a nurse to administer. 056258 Page 3 of 3

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

2 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0580GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F580 - Notification of Changes

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • 0695GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F695 - Respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning

    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 14, 2025 survey of RIVER VALLEY HEALTHCARE & WELLNESS CENTRE, LP?

This was a inspection survey of RIVER VALLEY HEALTHCARE & WELLNESS CENTRE, LP on February 14, 2025. The surveyor cited 2 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at RIVER VALLEY HEALTHCARE & WELLNESS CENTRE, LP on February 14, 2025?

Yes, 2 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) tha..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.