Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

COUNTRYSIDE CARE CENTERCMS #0562811 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0689 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who was assessed as being a fall risk, with a history of falls in the facility, and a known behavior of placing herself on the floor when tired, received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent falls when Resident 1 ambulated (walked) to an area of the facility unattended and was found on the floor by staff. This failure resulted in Resident 1's unwitnessed fall to the floor sustaining a skin tear (traumatic wound caused by direct contact of the skin to another object) to the back side of her right elbow on 9/25/24. Findings: During a review of the facility ' s document titled Fall Incident Tracking/Trend Log, dated 7/2024-9/2024, the fall log indicated Resident 1 had unwitnessed falls on 7/17/24, 8/4/24, 9/4/24 and 9/25/24. Resident 1 ' s SBAR Post Fall (SBAR-situation, background, assessment, recommendation, a communication tool used by healthcare workers when there is a change of condition among the residents), dated 9/25/24, was reviewed. The post fall SBAR indicated, . Fall Risk Factors . history of falls . Impaired Safety awareness/judgement . Lost Balance . Disoriented X 3 at all times . 3 or more falls in past 3 months . Balance problem while walking . During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (AR- contains a summary of basic information about the resident), undated, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Alzheimer ' s Disease ( a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), muscle weakness and Dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Residents 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool used to identify resident cognitive and physical function) assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident 1 ' s Brief Interview of Mental status assessment (BIMS – assessment of cognitive status for memory and judgement) scored 01 of 15 (a score of 13-15 indicates cognitively intact, 08-12 indicates moderately impaired, and 00-07 indicates severe impairment). The BIMS assessment indicated Resident 1 had a severe cognitive impairment. (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 3 Event ID: 056281 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 056281 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 10/01/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Countryside Care Center 925 North Cornelia Fresno, CA 93706 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few During an observation on 10/1/24 at 12:25 p.m. in the hallway, Resident 1 walked down the main hallway while holding Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 ' s hand. Resident 1 would not engage in conversation. A closed skin tear and abrasion were observed on the back of her right elbow. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/1/24 at 12:26 p.m. with CNA 1, in Resident 1 ' s room, CNA 1 helped Resident 1 sit down on the edge of her bed. CNA 1 stated Resident 1 was able to walk unassisted unless she was tired. CNA 1 stated she was the CNA caring for Resident 1 on the day of the fall. CNA 1 stated she and Resident 1 were in the dining room during breakfast on 9/25/24. CNA 1 stated she was assisting another resident and when Resident 1 finished breakfast, she walked out of the dining room by herself. CNA 1 stated Resident 1 should have supervision when she walked because she tended to go into unsafe areas of the building such as other resident ' s rooms or unsupervised areas. CNA 1 stated if Resident 1 was sleepy, she would stop where she was and put herself on the floor which increased the risk of her being injured. CNA 1 stated Resident 1 was not supervised after she left the dining room and was found on the floor by a staff member. During an interview on 10/1/24 at 1:17 p.m. with CNA 2, CNA 2 stated she was the hallway safety monitor. CNA 2 stated Resident 1 frequently walked alone, unsupervised. CNA 2 stated if Resident 1 was tired she needed supervision because she had a history of putting herself on the ground. CNA 2 stated, we keep an eye on her when she is tired. CNA 2 stated Resident 1 was a high fall risk and was on the Red Sneaker Program. During a review of the facility ' s Red Sneaker Program, undated, the program indicated, . High Risk for Falls . [Resident 1 ' s name] . Criteria for Inclusion in the Red Sneaker Program . Resident has had a fall in the last 90 days . Resident has a Fall Risk Assessment Score of above 10 . Focus on residents who are High Risk for Falls that may be attempting to ambulate independently . During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/1/24 at 1:37 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, Resident 1 ' s General Note, dated 9/25/24, at 2:40 p.m., written by LVN 1, the note indicated, . informed that resident is on the floor, resident was noted to by [be] lying on her right side with both hands under her head . eye closed . Head to toe assessment completed . skin tear noted to the right elbow . LVN 1 stated she was the charge nurse at the time of Resident 1 ' s fall. LVN 1 stated she was told Resident 1 was found on the floor in front of the business office and the fall was not witnessed. LVN 1 stated the fall was not witnessed by staff. LVN 1 stated Resident 1 would normally ambulate around the facility without supervision or assistance but was known to be a high fall risk and was on the Red Sneaker Program. LVN 1 stated when Resident 1 was tired, her gait was less steady, so she needed supervision for safety. LVN 1 stated Resident 1 was normally sleepy in the morning around breakfast time, so she should have had supervision at the time of the fall. Resident 1 ' s SBAR dated 9/25/24, written by LVN 1, the SBAR indicated, . Resident fell in Hallway . Fall Risk Factors: History of falls Impaired safety awareness/judgement . Injury Skin Tear . Unwitnessed Fall . Resident 1 ' s MDS Section GG (functional abilities) was reviewed. The Section GG indicated, . I. Walk 10 feet [code 04-Supervision or touching assistance] . J. Walk 50 feet with two turns [code 04-Supervision or touching assistance] . K. Walk 150 feet [code 04-Supervision or touching assistance] . LVN 1 stated the MDS indicated Resident 1 required supervision or touch assistance to ambulate safely. LVN 1 reviewed Resident 1 ' s fall risk scores of 16 on 9/4/24 and 13 on 9/25/24. LVN 1 stated the scores indicated Resident 1 was at high risk for falls. LVN 1 stated Resident 1 ' s falls were because she ambulated unsupervised when she was tired. During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/1/24 at 2:43 p.m. with the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC), Resident 1 ' s MDS section GG was reviewed. The MDSC stated Resident 1 ' s fall (continued on next page) FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 056281 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 3 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 056281 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 10/01/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Countryside Care Center 925 North Cornelia Fresno, CA 93706 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few on 9/25/24 was unwitnessed. The MDSC stated the MDS indicated Resident 1 needed supervision or touch assistance when ambulating. The MDSC stated Resident 1 required redirection when ambulating for safety. The MDSC stated Resident 1 had a history of lowering herself onto the floor when she was tired. During an interview on 10/1/24 at 3:12 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated Resident 1 required supervision when ambulating. The DON stated supervision meant watching the resident to make sure she was not going into unsafe areas such as other resident ' s rooms. The DON stated Resident 1 ' s fall on 9/25/24 was unwitnessed. The DON stated Resident 1 ' s fall would have been witnessed if she had been supervised. The DON reviewed Resident 1 ' s fall risk score and stated Resident 1 was at high risk for falls. The DON stated Resident 1 had poor safety awareness and had behaviors of putting herself on the floor when tired. The DON stated it was her expectation for staff to supervise Resident 1 when walking. During an interview on 10/1/24 at 3:38 p.m. with the Administrator (ADM), the ADM stated Resident 1 ' s needs for supervision would vary. The ADM stated Resident 1 had a history of falling and putting herself on the floor when tired. The ADM declined to answer if Resident 1 was supervised when she had the unwitnessed fall on 9/25/24. During a review of Resident 1 ' s fall risk care plan dated 8/17/24, the care plan indicated, At risk for injury or fall related injury due to resident has impaired safety awareness . Redirect as indicated . Safety cueing as indicated . Staff to anticipated needs in timely manner . Staff to frequently check resident?s [sic] whereabouts for safety . During a review of Resident 1 ' s care plan for fall dated 9/25/24, the care plan indicated, . At risk for delayed injury related to actual fall on 9/25/24 . Encourage rest period . Manage resident fall risk through facility Red Sneaker Program . During a review of the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Safety and Supervision of Residents, undated, the P&P indicated, . Our facility strives to make the environment as free from accident hazards as possible . Our individualized, resident-centered approach to safety addresses safety and accident hazards for individual residents . The care team shall target interventions to reduce individual risks related to hazards in the environment, including adequate supervision and assistive devices . Implementing interventions to reduce accident risks . Ensuring that interventions are implemented . Resident supervision is a core component of the systems approach to safety. The type and frequency of resident supervision is determined by the individual resident ' s assessed needs . FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 056281 If continuation sheet Page 3 of 3

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0689GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F689 - Accidents

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 1, 2024 survey of COUNTRYSIDE CARE CENTER?

This was a inspection survey of COUNTRYSIDE CARE CENTER on October 1, 2024. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at COUNTRYSIDE CARE CENTER on October 1, 2024?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.