F 0557
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal
possessions.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents' rights to be treated with respect and
dignity were followed for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 7), when Resident 7 did not receive
scheduled showers on 7/18/25, 7/25/25, and 7/29/25 while in the facility.This failure placed Resident 7 at
risk for an undignified existence that could have resulted in poor hygiene and cleanliness.During a review of
Resident 7's admission Record (AR- a summary of information regarding a resident which includes patient
identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other
pertinent information), the AR indicated, Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis for
Diabetes Mellitus (DM- increased sugar in the blood), bacterial infections, kidney failure, obesity, muscle
weakness, hypertension (high blood pressure), heart failure, bradycardia (slow heart rate).During a review
of Resident 7's Minimum Data Set [MDS a resident assessment tool used to identify cognitive (mental
processes) and physical functional level assessment] dated 5/20/2025, the MDS indicated, Resident 7's
Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS screening tool used to assess resident cognitive level) score was 15
out of 15 (0 - 7 indicated severe cognitive impairment [memory loss, poor decision making skills] 8-12
moderate cognitive impairment, (13 -15) cognitively intact) which indicated Resident 7 was cognitively
intact.During a telephone interview on 8/21/25 at 10:40 a.m. with family member (FM), the FM stated that
while Resident 7 resided in the facility, she had only three showers during her stay. FM stated the facility
staff was unaware that Resident 7 had not been receiving her weekly showers. During a review of Resident
7's, Shower Schedule, dated 6/25/25, the shower schedule indicated that Resident 7 should have received
scheduled weekly showers on Tuesdays and Fridays.During a review of Resident 7's, Certified Nursing
Assistant (CNA) Shower Review Forms, dated 7/15/25 and 7/22/25, were reviewed. The forms indicated
Resident 7 received a total of two showers for the month of July. The forms indicated Resident 7 had not
received a scheduled shower on 7/18/25, 7/25/25, 7/29/25.During an interview on 8/21/25 at 12:54 p.m.
with licensed vocational nurse (LVN) 3, LVN 3 stated it was the facility expectations that all showers and
baths be completed for all residents on their scheduled date, any deviation from the schedule should have
been communicated to the nurse. LVN 3 stated if a resident refused a shower, the expectation was for the
CNA to attempt and offer a shower or bed bath throughout the shift in case the resident changed their
mind. LVN 3 stated the expectation was to inform the nurse if the resident continued to refuse and for the
CNA to document the refusal to alert staff that the resident had not received their shower. LVN 3 stated that
the CNAs would document a shower or refusal on the residents' Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and
Shower Review Form should have been written, completed and signed by the CNAs and the nurse. LVN 3
stated if the resident requested a different day or time to have a shower, the expectation was for the CNA to
document the refusal and request from the resident. LVN 3 stated all residents have the right to a dignified
existence that included dressing,
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 9
Event ID:
056301
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
056301
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/21/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Golden Modesto Care Center
1900 Coffee Road
Modesto, CA 95355
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0557
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
grooming and showering.During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/21/25 at 1:12 p.m. with CNA
3, Resident 7's, Point of Care (POC)-Showers, dated 7/1/25-7/31/25, was reviewed. The POC indicated
there were no documented refusals or changes in Resident 7's schedule to move showers to a different
date, shift or time. CNA 3 stated the facility process was to give all resident showers on the scheduled date,
document the shower, refusal to shower or any changes in the schedule on the residents POC. CNA 3
validated Resident 7 had not received a scheduled shower on 7/18/25, 7/25/25 and 7/29/25. CNA 3 stated
all residents have the right to shower and live with dignity and respect.During a concurrent interview and
record review on 8/21/25 at 1:40 p.m. with the director of staff development (DSD), Resident 7's, CNA
Shower Review Forms, dated 7/15/25 and 7/22/25, were reviewed. The forms indicated Resident 7 received
a total of two showers for the month of July. The forms indicated Resident 7 had not received a scheduled
shower on 7/18/25, 7/25/25, and 7/29/25. The DSD stated the facility expectation was for the CNAs to follow
the shower schedule for each resident and to document the showers, baths or refusals on the POC and
notify the nurse. The DSD stated it was not acceptable to have a resident refuse a shower and not
document it to alert the nurse and other staff. The DSD stated Resident 7 had not received a shower on
7/18/25, 7/25/25 and 7/29/25 after review of all CNA documentation.During an interview on 8/21/25 at 2:12
p.m. with the director of nursing (DON), the DON stated the facility expectation was for all residents to
receive their scheduled showers on the scheduled dates. The DON stated if the resident was refusing the
showers, the CNA should have alerted the nurse and completed documentation in the POC and on the
shower forms. The DON stated, the facility did not have a policy and procedure (P&P) on showers or
Activity of Daily Living (ADL).During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Notice of
Resident Rights, dated 7/2015, the P&P indicated, . Each resident of a skilled nursing facility has the rights.
The Center will seek to ensure that those rights are not violated. The Center will establish and implement
written policies and procedures that include these rights and will make a copy of these policies available to
the Resident, Resident's Representatives, or the public upon request. General rights. To be encouraged
and assisted throughout the period of stay to exercise rights as a resident. To be treated with consideration,
respect and full recognition of dignity and individuality, including privacy in treatment and in care of personal
needs.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
056301
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 9
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
056301
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/21/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Golden Modesto Care Center
1900 Coffee Road
Modesto, CA 95355
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0655
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being
admitted
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan (included initial
goals based on admission orders, physician orders, summary of residents medication, services and
treatments to be administered by the facility, and conditions and risks affecting the residents health and
safety) within 48 hours of residents admission according to the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled,
Baseline Care Plan, for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 7) when Resident 7 did not have a
baseline care plan for diagnosis and treatment for Chronic Kidney failure (a condition where the kidneys
gradually lose their ability to filter waste products and excess fluid from the blood), heart failure (condition
where the heart muscle cannot pump blood effectively enough to meet the body's needs) and hypertension
(condition characterized by persistently elevated blood pressure readings).This failure placed Resident 7 at
risk of delay in care and needs going unmet upon admission and during her stay in the facility.During a
review of Resident 7's admission Record (AR- a summary of information regarding a resident which
includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact
information and other pertinent information), the AR indicated, Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on
[DATE] with diagnosis for Diabetes Mellitus (DM- increased sugar in the blood), bacterial infections, kidney
failure, obesity, muscle weakness, hypertension (high blood pressure), heart failure, bradycardia (slow
heart rate).During a review of Resident 7's Minimum Data Set [MDS a resident assessment tool used to
identify cognitive (mental processes) and physical functional level assessment] dated 5/20/2025, the MDS
indicated, Resident 7's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS screening tool used to assess resident
cognitive level) score was 15 out of 15 (0 - 7 indicated severe cognitive impairment [memory loss, poor
decision making skills] 8-12 moderate cognitive impairment, (13 -15) cognitively intact) which indicated
Resident 7 was cognitively intact.During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/21/25 at 11:05 a.m.
with the minimum data set (MDS) nurse, Resident 7's electronic medical record (EMR) for care plans was
reviewed. The EMR indicated the baseline care plan was not completed for Resident 7. The MDS stated the
process was to initiate the baseline care plans on admission to the facility by the admitting nurse. The MDS
stated the importance of the baseline care plans was to establish a plan of care based on Resident 7's
needs upon admission. The MDS stated it was important to have a plan of care established to ensure all
staff were meeting Resident 7's needs.During an interview on 8/21/25 at 12:58 p.m. with licensed
vocational nurse (LVN) 4, LVN 4 stated it was the facility process to ensure all care plans were complete
and accurate according to the residents' needs. LVN 4 stated it was important to complete a baseline care
plan upon admission to ensure all residents' needs were met and to know how to properly care for each
individual resident.During an interview on 8/21/25 at 1:40 p.m. with the director of staff development (DSD),
the DSD stated the facility process was for the admitting nurse to initiate the baseline care plan upon
resident admission. The DSD stated the baseline care should have been completed within 48 hours from
admission for Resident 7. The DSD stated that there should have been a care plan initiated for every
diagnosis Resident 7 was being admitted to the facility with. The DSD stated it was important to establish a
baseline care plan to ensure residents were being treated with the appropriate interventions. The DSD
stated every resident was different and had different needs therefore the care plan was used to ensure all
resident needs and preferences were met. The DSD stated if there was no baseline care plan created upon
admission, there was a risk that the residents needs would not be met and staff would not be aware of the
appropriate interventions to assist them.During an interview on 8/21/25 at 2:12 p.m. with the director of
nursing
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
056301
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 9
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
056301
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/21/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Golden Modesto Care Center
1900 Coffee Road
Modesto, CA 95355
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0655
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
(DON), the DON stated there was no expectation for the facility staff to initiate a baseline care plan. The
DON stated the baseline care plan should not have included every diagnosis residents had upon admission
if the diagnosis was being treated with medications or other services. The DON stated the baseline care
plan should have consisted of new diagnosis or changes in condition while in the facility.During a review of
the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Baseline Care Plan, dated 7/2025, the P&P indicated, .A
baseline plan of care (BPOC) is developed and provided to each resident and/or his/her Representative,
following admission. The facility develops the baseline plan of care for each resident, within 48 hours of
admission. The baseline plan of care includes information regarding care and services sufficient to promote
safe delivery of care. The baseline plan of care consists of the following, Physician Orders, Dietary Orders,
Therapy Services, Applicable Social Services Intervention, Applicable PASARR Recommendations, Initial
Goals.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
056301
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 9
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
056301
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/21/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Golden Modesto Care Center
1900 Coffee Road
Modesto, CA 95355
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0692
Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Level of Harm - Actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive systemic
approach to ensure effective monitoring and systems to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional
status for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 had one documented weight on
6/6/25 since being admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Staff did not complete a weight on admission and
weekly as ordered by the physician, Resident 1 was not consuming meals to its entirety or refused meals,
the facility was aware of Resident 1's refusal to be weighed and the Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA)
did not follow up with the licensed nurses.This failure resulted in a 16% weight loss of 21.2 pounds (lbs.) in
two (2) months placing Resident 1 at risk for unmonitored significant weight loss that could have worsened
Resident 1's diagnosed heart condition and placed her at risk for inadequate nutritional intake.During a
review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a summary of information regarding a resident which
includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact
information and other pertinent information), the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on
[DATE] with diagnosis of congestive heart failure (condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as it
should), Dementia (loss of memory, language and other thinking abilities), osteomyelitis (inflammation of a
bone caused by infection), Diabetes Mellitus (DM- increased sugar in the blood).During a review of
Resident 1's Minimum Data Set [MDS a resident assessment tool used to identify cognitive (mental
processes) and physical functional level assessment] dated 5/20/2025, the MDS indicated, Resident 1's
Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS screening tool used to assess resident cognitive level) score was 15
out of 15 (0 - 7 indicated severe cognitive impairment [memory loss, poor decision making skills] 8-12
moderate cognitive impairment, (13 -15) cognitively intact) which indicated Resident 1 was cognitively
intact.During a telephone interview on 8/12/25 at 12:00 p.m. with family member (FM) 1, FM 1 stated, there
were concerns regarding Resident 1 refusing meals and possible weight loss. FM 1 stated, Resident 1 had
expressed that the facility food did not taste good and therefore Resident 1 did not consume her meals. FM
1 stated Resident 1 appeared to have lost weight since admission to the facility but was unaware how much
weight she had lost.During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/12/25 at 1:01 p.m. with Resident 1,
in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 was observed lying in bed appearing thin and frail. Resident 1 stated she
had resided in the facility for a few months. Resident 1 stated she disliked the food in the facility and would
consume a small portion or none of the food served during mealtimes. Resident 1 stated she was unaware
if the facility staff had noticed weight loss or weight gain since admission and stated she was unaware if
she had experienced weight loss during her stay.During a review of Resident 1's, Nutrition Evaluation,
dated 5/18/25, the evaluation indicated, . At risk for weight fluctuations r/t PO [related to by mouth] intake,
DM, and diuretic (medication used to eliminate excess fluid buildup in the body) therapy. Resident with
obesity which can have a negative effect on their health, including but not limited to altered cardiac output,
fluid retention, altered blood sugars, ineffective breathing patterns. estimated total daily 1544-1930 calories,
protein intake daily 77-93 gram (g). The evaluation indicated the nutritional evaluation was completed by the
Registered Dietitian (RD) and documented risks for weight fluctuations after review of Resident 1's
evaluation.During a record review of Resident 1's, Order Summary, dated 8/19/2025, the order summary
indicated, . Weekly Weights one time a day every Fri (Friday) for Admission.During a review of Resident 1's
Electronic Medical Record (EMR) titled, Weights, the EMR indicated, Resident 1 had a documented weight
of 130 pounds on 6/6/2025. The document indicated there were no other weights documented on the EMR
since admission on [DATE].During a review of the
Residents Affected - Few
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
056301
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 9
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
056301
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/21/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Golden Modesto Care Center
1900 Coffee Road
Modesto, CA 95355
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0692
Level of Harm - Actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
facility's handwritten document titled, Daily weights, dated 5/15/25 for Resident 1, the document indicated,
Resident 1 had refused weights from 5/15/25 to 6/3/25, 6/5/25, 6/26/25 to 7/7/25. The document did not
indicate any further attempts for weight check after 7/7/25. The document did not indicate if the nurse or
physician was made aware of Resident 1's refusals. Concurrent review of the document and Resident 1's
EMR indicated there was no documentation or evidence indicating the nurse and the physician were made
aware of Resident 1's refusals and multiple attempts to re weigh.During a concurrent interview and record
review on 8/12/25 at 1:40 p.m. with licensed vocational nurse (LVN) 1, Resident 1's electronic medical
record (EMR) was reviewed, including document titled Weights. The document indicated Resident 1 was
only weighed on 6/6/2025 since the admission to the facility and there were no other weights documented
in the EMR. The EMR indicated there was no documentation indicating Resident 1 had refused to be
weighed by the restorative nursing assistant (RNA). LVN 1 stated Resident 1 should have documented
weight checks monthly. LVN 1 stated if Resident 1 had refused to be weighed, the RNA who was assigned
to weigh all residents, should have notified the nurse. LVN 1 stated the facility process included
documentation of missed weights, physician and resident representative notification.During an interview on
8/12/25 at 2:43 p.m. with RNA 1, RNA 1 stated, part of the RNA duties was to complete weekly and
monthly weights for every resident in the facility. RNA 1 stated the RNAs' would receive a list of all residents
who needed to be weighed monthly and weekly from the MDS nurse. RNA 1 stated, once the weights were
completed and recorded on the list provided by the MDS nurse, the completed list was given back to the
MDS nurse who would document the weights obtained in the residents EMR. RNA 1 stated there had been
no resident refusals for the month of August 2025 and all residents including Resident 1, should have been
weighed. RNA 1 stated, if a resident refused to be weighed, it should have been documented on the list and
notified the MDS nurse. RNA 1 stated the facility process was for every resident to be weighed on
admission, 24 hours after admission, weekly for four weeks after admission, then monthly unless the
physician orders otherwise.During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/12/25 at 2:51 p.m. with the
director of staff development (DSD), Resident 1's document titled, Weights, dated 6/6/25 and Resident 1's
electronic medical record (EMR) were reviewed. The document indicated Resident had a documented
weight of 130 pounds on 6/6/2025 and no other documented weights since admission. The EMR indicated
there was no documentation indicating Resident 1 had refused to be weighed by the RNA. The DSD stated
all residents should have been weighed in the facility on admission, 24 hours after admission, weekly for
four weeks after admission, then monthly unless the physician orders otherwise. The DSD stated if
Resident 1 had refused to be weighed by staff, the nurse should have documented the refusal in the EMR.
The DSD stated, based on the lack of documentation indicating Resident 1 had refused to be weighed by
the RNA in Resident 1's EMR, there was no way to definitively say if Resident 1 had weight loss or weight
gain since admission.During a concurrent telephone interview and record review on 8/12/25 at 2:58 p.m.
with the Registered Dietitian (RD), Resident 1's document titled, Weights, dated 6/6/25, and Resident 1's,
Nutrition Evaluation, dated 5/18/25 were reviewed. The document weights indicated Resident 1 had a
documented weight of 130 pounds on 6/6/2025. The document Weights indicated there were no other
documented weights since admission. The evaluation indicated, . At risk for weight fluctuations r/t PO
intake, DM, and diuretic therapy. Resident with obesity which can have a negative effect on their health,
including but not limited to altered cardiac output, fluid retention, altered blood sugars, ineffective breathing
patterns. The RD stated Resident 1's nutrition evaluation was completed on admission and resident was
weighed to reflect the current weight status at the time of assessment. The RD stated nutrition
assessments were completed every three months and as needed if there were
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
056301
If continuation sheet
Page 6 of 9
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
056301
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/21/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Golden Modesto Care Center
1900 Coffee Road
Modesto, CA 95355
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0692
Level of Harm - Actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
changes. The RD stated the facility process was for the nursing staff to identify any weight loss, meal
preference changes or refusal of meals. The RD stated if there was a concern, the nursing staff would notify
the dietary supervisor. The RD stated the facility process was for the staff to offer resident alternatives and
communicate with the dietary supervisor of the changes in meal consumption. The RD stated if Resident 1
was refusing meals and weight checks, the nursing staff should have documented the occurrences and
attempted to trigger an alert for all staff to be made aware that there was a potential problem. The RD
stated there was no documentation reflecting refusals of weight checks and meals from the record review at
this time. The RD stated the facility process was to identify residents who were experiencing weight loss
and include them in the weekly weight committee where residents would be monitored closely to avoid
weight changes if possible.During an interview on 8/12/25 at 3:14 p.m. with the dietary services manager
(DSM), the DSM stated the facility process was for the nursing staff to monitor Resident 1's meal intake and
weight checks. The DSM stated if there was a change in food preferences or changes in meal consumption,
it was the nursing department's responsibility to inform the DSM of the changes. The DSM stated she had
not received any complaints or reports indicating Resident 1 was refusing meals and losing weight. The
DSM stated she was part of the weight loss committee that met on a weekly basis to discuss residents who
were at risk for weight fluctuations. The DSM stated Resident 1 was not part of the group of Residents that
were being monitored for weight and nutrition concerns. The DSM stated Resident 1 should have been
monitored and staff should have documented the refusal of weight checks and meals to incorporate
Resident 1 into the weight loss committee to monitor her weight loss closely.During a review of Resident
1's, Nutrition Care Plan, dated 5/16/25, the care plan indicated, . [Resident 1] has a diet order. Controlled
Carbohydrate Diet (CCD) Soft and Bite sized texture, Thin Liquid consistency, Goal: The resident will
maintain adequate nutritional status as evidenced by maintaining weight, no signs and symptoms of
malnutrition. Interventions: Provide, serve diet as ordered. Monitor intake and record q meal.During a
review of Resident 1's, Noncompliance Care Plan, dated 5/16/25, the care plan indicated, . [Resident 1] is
resistive to care noncompliant. being weighed r/t adjustment to nursing home. Goal: [Resident 1] needs will
be met by staff daily.During an interview on 8/12/25 at 3:37 p.m. with the director of nursing (DON), the
DON stated the facility process was for all residents to have been weighed on admission and then monthly,
unless the physician ordered residents to be weighed more often. The DON stated Resident 1 should have
been weighed as ordered and if Resident 1 had refused to be weighed by staff, the nurse should have
documented the refusal in the EMR. The DON stated the problem was the staff were writing the weights on
a list provided by the MDS nurse, but the refusals were not being documented in the EMR to reflect the
attempts. The DON stated as a result, staff were not aware if Resident 1 had gained or lost weight. The
DON stated there should have been progress notes or a documented refusal to alert the staff to monitor
Resident 1 closely. The DON stated, moving forward, the facility will be implementing a new system to
assist with documenting all weights and refusals by the residents.During a telephone interview on 8/12/25
at 3:43 p.m. with the MDS nurse, the MDS nurse stated the list of residents to be weighed was provided to
the RNAs. The MDS nurse stated once the RNA completed the weights, the list would be given back to the
MDS nurse to be reviewed. The MDS nurse stated it was the RNA's responsibility to document and inform
the nurse of residents' weights and refusals. The MDS nurse stated, once the list of completed weights was
reviewed, the list would be discarded, and there were no other paper records for the weights that were
completed. The MDS nurse stated it was the nurse's responsibility to ensure weights were documented in
the EMR and all refusals were addressed. The MDS nurse stated it was also the nurse's responsibility to
document the
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
056301
If continuation sheet
Page 7 of 9
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
056301
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/21/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Golden Modesto Care Center
1900 Coffee Road
Modesto, CA 95355
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0692
Level of Harm - Actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
refusal and attempts to re-weigh the resident. The MDS nurse stated that the monthly weights were
reviewed for the month of August 2025, but there were no refusals to be weighed by any resident. The MDS
nurse stated she was not aware of Resident 1's refusal to be weighed every month.During a telephone
interview on 8/22/25 at 3:30 p.m. with the DON, the DON stated the facility obtained a current weight for
Resident 1 on 8/21/25. The DON stated Resident 1's current weight was 108.8 lbs. The DON stated
Resident 1 had a physician order for weekly weight checks that was initiated on admission but was not
completed. The DON stated Resident 1 had a significant weight loss of 16% from the previous weight
checked on 6/6/25 of 21.2 lbs.During a review of the Resident 1's, Diet Order, dated 5/23/25, the order
indicated, . Consistent Carbohydrate (CCD) diet soft and bite sized texture, thin liquid consistency.During a
review of the document titled, Diet Average Detail Report- Averages for days 1-28), dated 4/18/25, the
document indicated, . CCD diet. Protein 91.175 g (gram- unit of measure), and Energy kCal (calories) 2,
066.76 kCal . The document indicated that Resident 1 should have consumed the amount of nutrition listed
on a daily average, when Resident 1 consumed 75-100% of all meals.During a review of Resident 1's
document titled, Documentation Survey Report-Nutrition- Meal intake, dated 5/2025, 6/2025, 7/2025 and
8/2025. The report indicated the meal intake percentage (0%- Refused meals completely or consumed one
or two bites, 25%-a small amount was consumed, 50% approximately half of food is consumed, 75%Majority of the food is consumed but one or more items are left, 100%- all meal is consumed) for breakfast,
lunch and dinner. The document indicated Resident 1 consumed: May 16th-31st 2025: Resident 1 ate 25%
or less, approximately 258 calories and 11 grams of protein for 10 meals out of 45 with four of those meals'
resident refused. Resident 1 ate 25 to 50% and approximately 775 calories and 34 grams of protein for 17
meals (38% of the time). Resident 1 ate 51 to 75%, approximately 1300 calories and 56 grams of protein
for 18 meals (40% of the time). June 1st- 30th 2025: Resident 1 ate 26 to 50% and approximately 775
calories and 34 grams of protein for 48 meals (53% of the month). Resident ate 0 to 25% and
approximately 258 calories and 11 grams protein for 9 meals. Resident 1 refused meals 18 times and ate 0
to 25% for 9 meals. Resident 1 ate between 51 to 75%, approximately 1300 calories and 56 grams of
protein for 12 meals out of 90 in the month. July 1st- 31st 2025: Resident 1 ate 0 to 25%, approximately
258 calories and 11 grams of protein for 28 meals in the month or 30% of the time. Resident 1 ate 26 to
50%, approximately 775 calories and 34 grams of protein for 31 meals in the month or 33% of the time and
refused meals 20 times. Resident 1 ate 51 to 75% for 9 meals (9.7% of the time) in the month. August 1st31st 2025: Resident 1 refused meals 43 times (46% of the time). Resident 1 ate 0 to 25%, approximately
258 calories and 11 grams of protein for 20 meals (21.5% of the time). Resident 1 ate 26 to 50%,
approximately 775 calories and 34 grams of protein for 20 meals in the month of August. Resident 1 ate 51
to 75 % for 5 meals. The document indicated there was no documented meal intake recorded for breakfast
on 5/29/25 & 6/4/25, lunch on 5/25/25, 5/29/25, 6/4/25, & 8/9/25, dinner on 7/9/25 & 7/31/25, therefore
there was no indication of the nutritional intake Resident 1 received for the undocumented dates. During a
record review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Weights, dated 8/28/2020, the P&P
indicated, . The Center uses weights as one component of data collection needed to evaluate resident's
nutritional status, fluid retention, or diuresis. Weighing Criteria, New Admits, weigh the day of admission
then weekly for one month, if weights and nutritional status are stable after one month, weigh the resident
monthly. Weekly Weights, the following are guidelines for residents who may need to be weighed weekly
(not all inclusive): Food intake has declined and persisted, Slow trending of weight loss/gain. New or altered
diuretic schedule (unless physician orders more frequently). Multiple Stage II and any Stage III or IV
pressure ulcers. Significant change of condition. Re-weigh. When the
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
056301
If continuation sheet
Page 8 of 9
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
056301
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/21/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Golden Modesto Care Center
1900 Coffee Road
Modesto, CA 95355
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0692
Level of Harm - Actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Nutrition Hydration Skin Committee or designee reviews the weights, the Committee determines which
residents are evaluated. The team or designee reviews the resident's status and makes recommendations.
Obtaining and Recording Weights: Weights are obtained by nursing personnel designated by the Director of
Nursing Services. The staff member weighing the resident records the weight on the Weight Worksheet.
The nurse reviews the current weight and compares it to prior weight on Weight Worksheet. The nurse
requests a re-weigh in accordance with the re-weigh definition outlined above. The nurse records validated
weights on the Weight Record in the resident's medical record. Licensed nurses will notify physician,
resident/responsible party of significant change in weight and document notification in progress notes.
Progress note to include responses.During a professional reference review retrieved from
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2892745/pdf/nihms156446.pdf, Patterns of Weight Change
Preceding Hospitalization for Heart, dated October 2007, indicated, . Increases in body weight are
associated with hospitalization for heart failure and begin at least [one] week before admission. Daily
information about patients' body weight identifies a high-risk period during which interventions to avert
decompensated heart failure that necessitate hospitalization for Heart Failure . Frequent monitoring of heart
failure patients' clinical status, specifically their body weights, can alert clinicians to the early stages of
heart failure decompensation. By focusing on weight changes, clinicians would be well positioned to
implement interventions that could prevent decompensation of heart failure that necessitates hospitalization
.During a review of professional reference titled, Practice Paper of the American Dietetic Association, dated
2010, indicated, . In older adults, a 5% or more unplanned weight loss in 30 days often results in
protein-energy undernutrition as critical lean body mass is lost . that may trigger sarcopenia [a condition
characterized by loss of skeletal muscle mass and function] and functional decline [a loss of independence
in self-care capabilities and deterioration in mobility and in activities of daily living]. (Practice Paper of the
American Dietetic Association: Individualized Nutrition Approaches for Older Adults in Health Care
Communities, October 2010 Journal of the American Dietetic Association). During a review of a
professional reference publication titled, Nutrition Care of the Older Adult from the Academy of Nutrition
and Dietetics, dated 2016, indicated, . The goal of Medical Nutrition Therapy is to maintain or restore the
individual's usual body weight .
Event ID:
Facility ID:
056301
If continuation sheet
Page 9 of 9