Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Inspection

MESA VERDE POST ACUTE CARE CENTERCMS #0563621 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0627 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure to coordinate the effective discharge planning process when the SSD failed to communicate to the IDT the development of the discharge plan and failed to document in the resident's medical record regarding the evaluation of the ALF waiver process. Additionally, the facility failed to notify the resident's family member about the ALF waiver was denied for one of six sampled residents (Resident 4). These failures had the potential to affect the resident's well-being after discharge. Findings: On 7/11/25 at 1702 hours, prior to the onsite investigation, a telephone interview was conducted with Family Member 2. Family Member 2 stated the facility's SSD had informed her Resident 4 will have the ALF waiver for continued care in the ALF after discharge from the SNF. However, the resident needed to pay in the ALF because the waiver was not approved. Closed medical record review for Resident 4 was initiated on 7/15/25. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was discharged on 6/6/25. Review of Resident 4's H&P examination dated 4/5/25, showed the resident was unable to make medical decisions. Review of Resident 4's MDS assessment dated [DATE], showed the resident's BIMS score was 5 which meant the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident 4's overall goal for discharge was to discharge to the community. Review of Resident 4's medical record showed a Multidisciplinary Care Conference was held on 4/15/25. However, the medical record failed to show a discharge planning was discussed with Resident 4 or the resident's family member. Review of Resident 4's Social Services Progress Note dated 6/3/25 at 1555 hours, showed Resident 4 would be moving to the ALF pending the ALF waiver and get it expedited. Review of Resident 4's Order Summary Report showed a physician's order dated 6/6/25, to discharge the resident to the ALF with home health, physical therapy, occupational therapy, and RN services. Review of Resident 4's Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage showed the Medicare coverage of resident's skilled nursing services will end on 6/4/25. The Confirmation of Notice by telephone showed Resident 4's Family Member 2 was contacted on 6/5/25 (the time of the notification was not documented) signed by the SSD in SNF representative on 6/5/25. A mail confirmation of the follow-up notice was sent on 6/5/25. Review of Resident 4's Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage showed beginning on 6/5/25, the resident may have to pay out of pocket for the care received during the in patient for the skilled nursing services care including physical therapy, occupational therapy, and daily skilled nursing care due to resident's/family choice to discharge on [DATE]. The Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage form failed to show for a signature of the resident or resident's authorized representative. On 7/15/25 at 1353 hours, an interview and concurrent closed medical record review for Resident 4 was conducted with the SSD. The SSD stated the previous SSD was not working in the facility any longer. The SSD stated she started as the facility's SSD last week. The SSD stated the IDT should have met periodically regarding resident's discharge process and updated the team with regards to the discharge planning, (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 056362 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 056362 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 07/16/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Mesa Verde Post Acute Care Center 661 Center Street Costa Mesa, CA 92627 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0627 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete funding and any referral to agencies such as for the ALF waiver. The SSD further stated the meeting discussion should have been reflected in the Multidisciplinary Care Conference. The SSD stated the resident or resident's family member should have been informed of the cost of the ALF. The SSD verified Resident 4's medical record failed to show the ALF waiver was approved prior to the discharge of the resident, and the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage showed Medicare coverage of the resident's skilled nursing services would end on 6/4/25. The SSD verified the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage form failed to show signature of the resident or authorized representative. The SSD further stated the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage and The Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage form should have been provided to the resident or family member within 48 hours prior to the end of coverage. In addition, the SSD stated the ALF waiver should have been processed earlier and the family member should have been informed of the ALF waiver coverage in the program prior to discharge. On 7/15/25 at 1431 hours, an interview and concurrent closed medical record review for Resident 4 was conducted with the BOM. The BOM verified Resident 4's end of coverage was 6/4/25. The BOM acknowledged the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage and The Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage form showed Family Member 2 was informed through phone on 6/5/25, and the forms were sent through certified mail on 6/5/25. The BOM further stated she prepared the form and gave it to the SSD within 48 hours. The BOM stated she did not have any information regarding the ALF waiver for Resident 4 because the SSD was responsible for the resident's medical benefits. On 7/15/25 at 1535 hours, an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated the resident's discharge plan was to be discharged to the ALF and the MDS nurse was part of the IDT for discharge planning. On 7/15/25 at 1604 hours, an interview was conducted with the MDS nurse. The MDS nurse stated the SSD did not discuss during the IDT meeting regarding Resident 4's ALF waiver. The MDS nurse stated the SSD informed her the resident's family member had requested to be discharged to the ALF a day prior to the resident's discharge. On 7/16/25 at 1044 hours, a telephone interview was conducted with the ALF Administrator where Resident 4 was discharged to. The ALF Administrator stated Resident 4's ALF waiver was denied and verified Resident 4 needed to privately pay for the services and care in ALF. On 7/16/25 at 1321 hours, an interview was conducted with the Administrator. The Administrator stated the SSD should have applied for the assisted living facility (ALF) waiver once resident's goal was to discharge. The Administrator was informed and acknowledged the above findings. Event ID: Facility ID: 056362 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0627GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F627 - Transfer and discharge-

    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 16, 2025 survey of MESA VERDE POST ACUTE CARE CENTER?

This was a inspection survey of MESA VERDE POST ACUTE CARE CENTER on July 16, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at MESA VERDE POST ACUTE CARE CENTER on July 16, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transf..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.