Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

VALE HEALTHCARE CENTERCMS #0563891 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

056389 01/07/2026 Vale Healthcare Center 13484 San Pablo Avenue San Pablo, CA 94806
F 0627 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge. Based on interview and record review, Facility 2 failed to document Resident 1's needs that could not be met by Facility 2 and the reasons why Resident 1's transfer or discharge was necessary. Facility 2 failed to appropriately communicate information concerning Resident 1's condition to Facility 1 prior to sending Resident 1 back to Facility 1. Facility 2 staff failed to properly admit Resident 1 to Facility 2 and then had Resident 1 transported back to Facility 1 from Facility 2, without properly discharging Resident 1 (from Facility 2) or having his medical needs assessed. This failure had the potential to result in a lapse in care when Resident 1 was sent back to Facility 1 from Facility 2 within a seven hour period on the same day.During a record review of Facility 1's document titled, Inpatient Medicine Discharge Summary, dated 7/11/25, the Inpatient Medicine Discharge Summary indicated Resident 1 had been admitted at Facility 1 from 6/12/2024 to 7/11/2025 with multiple diagnoses including dementia (a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life) and altered mental status (a change in mental function). The Inpatient Medicine Discharge Summary also indicated Resident 1 was discharged on 7/11/25 at 10:30 a.m. from Facility 1. During an interview on 9/23/25 at 4:10 p.m. at Facility 2 with Registered Nurse 2 (RN2), RN2 stated when a new resident was going to be admitted , there will be a group text thread started on facility-issued phones so that they know when to expect the resident and can assign staff to care for them. During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/23/25 at 4:12 p.m. at Facility 2, text messages on RN2's facility-issued phone were reviewed. RN2 stated two text messages dated 7/10/25 sent from Registered Nurse 1 (RN1) indicated that Resident 1 was expected to arrive at Facility 2 around 10 a.m. on 7/11/25. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/7/26 at 2:25 p.m. at Facility 2 with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), an Interfacility Transport Company's document titled, Receiving Facility Signature, dated 7/11/25 at 11:57 a.m., was reviewed. ADON stated the Receiving Facility Signature indicated that Resident 1 arrived at Facility 2 on 7/11/25 at 11:57 a.m. ADON also stated she signed the Receiving Facility Signature document because Resident 1 was unable to sign the document.During a concurrent phone interview and record review on 1/7/26 at 2:43 p.m. at Facility 2 with the Director of Nursing (DON), an email with the subject line, Male HMO Admission, dated 7/10/25 was reviewed. DON stated the Male HMO Admission email indicated Resident 1 was an expected admission and had approved insurance authorization. The Male HMO Admission email was sent on 7/10/25 at 4:29 p.m.During a follow-up phone interview on 1/7/26 at 2:45 p.m. at Facility 2 with DON, DON stated when Resident 1 arrived at Facility 2, it was determined that Resident 1 was not an appropriate fit for Facility 2. DON stated they offered Resident 1 food and then Resident 1 was sent back to Facility 1. DON stated there was no medical record created for Resident 1. DON stated Facility 2 did not document why Resident 1 was not appropriate for their facility [Facility 2]. DON also stated there was no nursing assessment done upon Resident 1's arrival to Facility 2. During a review of Facility 1's document titled, Medicine History and Physical, dated 7/11/25, the Medicine History Page 1 of 2 056389 056389 01/07/2026 Vale Healthcare Center 13484 San Pablo Avenue San Pablo, CA 94806
F 0627 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few and Physical indicated Resident 1 returned to Facility 1 on 7/11/25 at 5:22 p.m., after being gone approximately 7 hours. During a review of Facility 2's policy titled admission to the Facility, dated OP2 0203.00, the policy indicated, .The Medical Record Department logs the resident into the Admission/Discharge Register. The policy also indicated, .Nursing initiates clinical care. A. Take and record the resident's vital signs.During a review of Facility 2's policy titled Transfer and Discharge, dated OP 0209.00, the policy indicated, .the notices of transfer/discharge shall contain the following information: a. The reason for the transfer/discharge; b. The effective date of the transfer/discharge; c. The location to which the resident is being transferred or discharged . d. A statement of the resident's rights to appeal the transfer/discharge,. 056389 Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0627GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F627 - Transfer and discharge-

    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 7, 2026 survey of VALE HEALTHCARE CENTER?

This was a inspection survey of VALE HEALTHCARE CENTER on January 7, 2026. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at VALE HEALTHCARE CENTER on January 7, 2026?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transf..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.