Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

Golden EmpireCMS #0563911 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0684 Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of nursing were provided for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when the facility did not develop care plan interventions, monitor, and notify the physician regarding Resident 1's known history of THC (tetrahydrocannabinol, the ingredient in cannabis [marijuana] that can alter mood, perception, and reduce pain) substance abuse.This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1's unmet medical needs, delayed treatment, and injury.Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted in summer 2025 with diagnoses which included right knee fracture, major depressive disorder, anxiety, and difficulty walking. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment), dated 6/27/25, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status-used to screen and identify cognitive condition) score of 15, which indicated Resident 1 had no memory impairment. During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated June 2025, the H&P indicated Resident 1 had a social history of THC use. During a review of Resident 1's Social Services Notes (SSN), dated 11/14/25, the SSN indicated, SS [Social Services] found THC edible in her [Resident 1's] top drawer. There was no documented evidence of a care plan addressing substance use or physician notification. During a review of Resident 1's SSN, dated 9/26/25, the SSN indicated, SS was informed by nursing staff that [Resident 1] might have a vapor pen.a THC vaporizer was found. There was no documented evidence that a related care plan was developed and implemented or that a physician was notified of findings. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/19/25 at 11:30 a.m. in Resident 1's room, no behavioral health interventions or monitoring were observed in Resident 1's room. Resident 1 confirmed a history of THC substance abuse and stated there was no individualized substance abuse care plan provided upon admission or after the finding of THC in her room in September and November 2025. Resident 1 stated tearfully, If they had talked to me, I think it [care plan] would have helped. During an interview on 11/19/25 at 12:40 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 1, LN 1 stated that physician notification and a substance abuse care plan would have been expected for safety and to determine the need for reversal [medications to reverse adverse effects of an overdose]. During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/19 at 12:15 with LN 2, Resident 1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) was reviewed. The EMR indicated there was no substance abuse care plan or monitoring documented for Resident 1. LN 2 confirmed she was aware of Resident 1's substance abuse and that Resident 1 had a THC product in her room on two occasions. LN 2 confirmed there was no documentation of a substance abuse care plan and that there was no physician notified of Resident 1's change of condition. LN 2 further stated she expected Resident 1 to have had a care plan to safely monitor Resident 1's care. LN 2 further stated she expected the physician to have been notified of any change of condition including incidents involving possible substance abuse. During an interview on 11/19/25 at 1:20 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), the CNA stated if THC was found in a resident's room, Residents Affected - Few (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 056391 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 056391 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 12/10/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Golden Empire 121 Dorsey Drive Grass Valley, CA 95945 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete the nurse would have been notified by the CNA and safety charting would have been expected for the safety of the residents. During an interview on 11/19/25 at 1:35 p.m. with the Social Service Director (SSD), the SSD confirmed that no care plan was developed, and the physician was not notified after THC was found on two occasions for Resident 1. The SSD stated she would have expected the care plan to be updated and the physician to be notified to provide Resident 1 with proper care. During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/19/25 at 1:45 p.m. with the Social Services Assistant (SSA), the SSN dated 9/26/25 was reviewed. The SSA confirmed there was no care plan for substance abuse for Resident 1 and a physician was not notified after finding THC in September and November 2025. The SSA stated he expected the physician to be notified and Resident 1's substance abuse to be care planned so the facility could safely provide the same to the resident. During an interview on 11/19/25 at 3 p.m. with the DON, the DON stated that substance abuse history should have been identified through diagnoses and H&P, and that care planning and physician notification were expected for any change in condition, including suspected substance abuse, to provide the best care for residents. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team Care Planning Conference, dated 2024, the P&P indicated, The IDT shall complete a comprehensive care plan withing seven (7) days of completion of the resident's assessment (MDS).Care planning may include review of clinical issues.coordination of care. During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Change of Condition, dated 2024, the P&P indicated, It is the policy of the facility to notify the physicians and family and IDT when the resident has a change in condition. During a review of the facility's admission packet, Nursing Home Residents' Rights, undated, the admission packet indicated, Right to Self Determination.Participated in developing and implementing a person-centered plan of care. During a review of the undated document titled, Nursing Practice Act Rules and Regulations, the document indicated, Article 2. Scope of Regulation 2725 (b). The practice of nursing within the meaning of this chapter means those functions, including basic health care, that help people cope with difficulties in daily living that are associated with their actual or potential health or illness problems or the treatment thereof, and that require substantial amount of specific knowledge of the following: (2) Direct and indirect patient care services, including, but not limited to, the administration of medications and therapeutic agents, necessary to implement treatment, disease prevention, or rehabilitative regiment . ordered by and within the scope of licensure of a physician .as defined by Section 1316.5 of the Health and Safety Code. (Nursing Practice Act Rules and Regulations Issued by Board of Registered Nursing 1997 State of California Department of Consumer Affairs. pp. Event ID: Facility ID: 056391 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0684GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F684 - Quality of care

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 10, 2025 survey of Golden Empire?

This was a inspection survey of Golden Empire on December 10, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at Golden Empire on December 10, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.