F 0624
Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review, the facility failed to provide safe discharge to one of three residents (1) when
the physician indicated that Resident 1 could not be discharged home for self-care, but Resident 1 was
discharged home without a caregiver readily available for her upon her discharge to home. This failure had
the potential to jeopardize the resident's health, safety and well-being.
Residents Affected - Few
Findings:
Review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and
discharged from the facility on 2/26/24.
Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a clinical assessment tool), dated 2/1/24, indicated her
cognition was moderately impaired.
Review of Resident 1's Encounter Notes, dated 2/22/24, at 5:45 p.m., the physician indicated that Resident
1 needed a safe placement and could not be discharged home for self-care.
Review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated Resident 1 was discharged to home and was given the
pamphlets on caregiving services. However, there was no indication that the facility confirmed the
caregiving services had already been set up or available before Resident 1 was discharged home.
During an interview with the social service director (SSD) on 2/29/24 at 4 p.m., she confirmed that she gave
the pamphlets on caregiving services to Resident 1, but she did not confirm that the caregiving services
had already been set up before Resident 1 was discharged . The SSD stated she should have confirmed
that the caregiving services had already been set up before the facility discharged Resident 1 home.
Review of the facility's policy, Discharge Summary and Plan, dated 11/2014, indicated The post-discharge
plan will contain, as a minimum: . d. The identify of specific resident needs after discharge .
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 3
Event ID:
056437
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
056437
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
05/21/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Cypress Ridge Care Center
1501 Skyline Drive
Monterey, CA 93940
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents received the necessary care and
services for four of six residents (2, 3, 4, and 5) when their wounds did not receive weekly assessment. This
failure resulted in undetermined wound status and could negatively affect the progress of their wound
healing.
Residents Affected - Some
Findings:
Review of Resident 2's admission Record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and
discharged on 1/30/24.
Review of Resident 2's 1/2024 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) indicated Resident 2 had a
sacrococcygeal (the region at the base of the spine) wound during his stay at the facility.
Review of Resident 2's clinical record indicated Resident 2 had only one Comprehensive Skin
Evaluation/Assessment done on 1/24/24 and one Skin and Wound Evaluation done on 1/29/24.
Review of Resident 3's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and
discharged on 2/14/24.
Review of Resident 3's 1/2024 and 2/2024 TARs indicated Resident 3 had a pressure injury (the breakdown
of the skin due to pressure) on her left buttock during her stay at the facility.
Review of Resident 3's clinical record indicated Resident 3 had no Comprehensive Skin
Evaluation/Assessment and no Skin and Wound Evaluation done.
Review of Resident 4's admission Record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and
discharged on 1/19/24.
Review of Resident 4's 12/2023 and 1/2024 TARs indicated Resident 4 had a pressure injury on his coccyx
(the area at the small bone at the bottom of the spine) during his stay at the facility.
Review of Resident 4's clinical record indicated Resident 4 had only one Comprehensive Skin
Evaluation/Assessment done on 12/22/23 and no Skin and Wound Evaluation done.
Review of Resident 5's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and
discharged on 5/10/24.
Review of Resident 5's TARs, from 2/2024 to 5/2024, indicated Resident 5 had a wound on her right coccyx
buttocks during her stay at the facility.
Review of Resident 5's clinical record indicated Resident 5 had no Comprehensive Skin
Evaluation/Assessment done and had only one Skin and Wound Evaluation done on 4/15/24.
During an interview with the director of nursing (DON), on 5/21/24, at 4:50 p.m., he confirmed that Resident
2 had only one Comprehensive Skin Evaluation/Assessment done on 1/24/24 and one Skin and Wound
Evaluation done on 1/29/24; Resident 3 had no Comprehensive Skin Evaluation/Assessment and no
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
056437
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 3
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
056437
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
05/21/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Cypress Ridge Care Center
1501 Skyline Drive
Monterey, CA 93940
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Skin and Wound Evaluation done; Resident 4 had only one Comprehensive Skin Evaluation/Assessment
done on 12/22/23 and no Skin and Wound Evaluation done; and Resident 5 had no Comprehensive Skin
Evaluation/Assessment done and had only one Skin and Wound Evaluation done on 4/15/24. The DON
stated the wound assessment/evaluation should be done every week.
Review of the facility's policy, Skin Assessment: Best Practice, dated 9/8/22, indicated A weekly skin
assessment is completed one a week and describes the current condition of the patient's skin.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
056437
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 3