Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Code of Federal Regulations: Code of Federal Regulations, Title 42, Section 483.24(a)(3) Quality of Life (a) Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, the facility must provide the necessary care and services to ensure that a resident's abilities in activities of daily living do not diminish unless circumstances of the individual's clinical condition demonstrate that such diminution was unavoidable. This includes the facility ensuring that: (3) Personnel provide basic life support, including CPR, to a resident requiring such emergency care prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel and subject to related physician orders and the resident's advance directives. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 42, Section 483.25 Quality of care Quality of care is a fundamental principle that applies to all treatment and care provided to facility residents. Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 42, Section 483.10(c)(6) Planning and Implementing care (c) The resident has the right to be informed of, and participate in, his or her treatment, including: (6) The right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Section 72527. Patients' Rights. (a)Patients have the rights enumerated in this section and the facility shall ensure that these rights are not violated. The facility shall establish and implement written policies and procedures which include these rights and shall make a copy of these policies available to the patient and to any representative of the patient. The policies shall be accessible to the public upon request. Patients shall have the right: (4) To consent to or to refuse any treatment or procedure or participation in experimental research. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Section 72311. Nursing Service--General. (a) Nursing service shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Planning of patient care, which shall include at least the following: (A) Identification of care needs based upon an initial written and continuing assessment of the patient's needs with input, as necessary, from health professionals involved in the care of the patient. Initial assessments shall commence at the time of admission of the patient and be completed within seven days after admission. (B) Development of an individual, written patient care plan which indicates the care to be given, the objectives to be accomplished and the professional discipline responsible for each element of care. Objectives shall be measurable and time limited. (2) Implementing of each patient's care plan according to the methods indicated. Each patient's care shall be based on this plan. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Section 72523. Patient Care Policies and Procedures. (a)Written patient care policies and procedures shall be established and implemented to ensure that patient-related goals and facility objectives are achieved. On 11/7/25 at 12:51 PM, the Department made an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate a complaint related to resident care. The facility failed to ensure quality of care and services were provided to Resident 1 when cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR- an emergency lifesaving procedure performed when the heart stops beating) was not attempted by licensed staff when Resident 1 was found unresponsive on 7/9/25. This failure resulted in the wishes of Resident 1's Representative/Decisionmaker (RR) not being honored, and also potentially contributed to the death of Resident 1. A review of Resident 1's "ADMISSION RECORD," dated 7/9/25, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on 7/8/25 with multiple diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a group of lung diseases that cause persistent airflow obstruction and breathing problems that can significantly impact quality of life and life expectancy), encounter for palliative care (medical services where a patient receives care and support related to a serious or life-limiting illness), dementia (a group of conditions that cause a decline in cognitive abilities, such as memory, thinking, reasoning, and problem solving), and hypertensive heart disease with heart failure (a condition where prolonged high blood pressure damages the heart muscle leading to the heart not pumping blood as well as it should). A review of Resident 1's medical record titled, "[Hospice Company Name] [City Name] PHYSICIANS'S ORDER SHEET," dated 7/8/25, indicated, "...Admitted to [Hospice Company Name] under routine level of care...Code status: Full code [if a patient's heart and/or breathing stops, medical staff will perform all possible life-saving interventions, including CPR]..." A review of Resident 1's medical record document provided by the Hospice Company titled, "Narrative Note," dated 7/8/25, indicated, "...Code status: Full code...Primary Hospice [specialized care that provides physical comfort and emotional, social and spiritual support for people nearing the end of life] Diagnosis: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease...Reviewed Hospice philosophy, care and goals, coverage, medications... and...plan of care with family and facility staff. They Verbalized understanding of all instructions given. Consents were signed and reviewed with [RR/Decisionmaker's Name]...in person. Provided Bill of Rights, patient's handbook with the review of emergency preparedness...to [RR/Decisionmaker's Name]..." A review of Resident 1's Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST- portable medical orders communicating a patient's end-of-life wishes, ensuring they are known and honored by providers) dated 7/8/25, indicated, "...First follow these orders, then contact Physician/NP [nurse practitioner]/PA [physician assistant]. A copy of the signed POLST form is a legally valid physician order...A...CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION (CPR): If patient has no pulse and is not breathing...Attempt Resuscitation/CPR...B...MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS...Full Treatment - primary goal of prolonging life by all medically effective means..." Further review of Resident 1's POLST indicated that it was signed by the Resident 1's representative/decision maker (RR); the POLST form did not contain a physician's signature. A Review of Resident 1's Progress Notes titled, "Nurses Note," dated 7/9/25, at 6:28 AM, indicated, "...Resident was found unresponsive, unable to obtain v/s [vital signs: body temperature, pulse rate, respiration rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation], writer and another nurse assess resident @ [at] 0545 [5:45 AM]. [Hospice Company Name] notified and arrived @ 06:15 [6:15 AM]. Resident pronounced time of death 0618 [6:18 AM]..." Further review of the Nurses Note failed to show CPR was attempted for Resident 1 when he was found unresponsive. During an interview on 11/12/25, at 11:12 AM, the Director of Staff Development (DSD) confirmed Resident 1's POLST indicated he was Full Code. The DSD further confirmed that CPR was not performed on Resident 1 when he was found unresponsive on 7/9/25. The DSD stated that she was assigned to Resident 1 and worked the night shift on 7/8/25 from 11 PM through 11 AM on 7/9/25. The DSD explained she was working alongside LN 1 during that shift and was training her on the floor. The DSD stated LN 1 notified her upon finding Resident 1 unresponsive in Resident 1's room. The DSD further stated that she accompanied LN 1 to Resident 1's room to assess him and acknowledged that nursing staff failed to initiate CPR. The DSD stated that in her mind, Resident 1 was unresponsive, had no heartbeat, she was unable to obtain vital signs, and was a hospice patient. The DSD further stated that she should have considered Resident 1 as Full Code; regardless of the POLST not being signed by the physician. The DSD stated LN 1 should have initiated CPR when she found Resident 1 unresponsive and not breathing to honor the RR's wishes and possibly save Resident 1's life. During a phone interview on 11/12/25, at 12:51 PM, LN 1 stated she worked alongside the DSD on the night shift for 7/8/25 through the morning of 7/9/25, and she was shadowing (involves observing a professional's work, interactions, and procedures) the DSD during the shift. LN 1 further stated that Resident 1 was found unresponsive and she was unable to obtain vital signs; stating she was "...Unable to find respirations, heartbeat, not breathing..." LN 1 stated she left Resident 1 unattended and left the room to locate the DSD for assistance. LN 1 confirmed she did not initiate CPR when she found Resident 1 unresponsive. LN 1 stated she did not know the facility's protocol and added that she had "...Concerns to revive him..." LN 1 further stated that CPR should have been initiated immediately when a resident with a Full code status was found not breathing and unresponsive. LN 1 stated Resident 1's POLST specified that Resident 1's RR wished for Resident 1 to be Full Code and that those wishes should have been followed by the nursing staff. LN 1 further stated nursing staff failed to honor the RR's wishes regarding CPR for Resident 1. During a phone interview on 11/12/25, at 1:18 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 stated he worked the night shift on 7/8/25 and Resident 1 was included in his assigned group. CNA 1 further stated that he made rounds in the residents' rooms to ensure safety and that residents' needs were met. CNA 1 stated that between 3 AM and 4 AM, he observed Resident 1 asleep but was breathing. CNA 1 further stated he did not hear or observe that a Code Blue (a call for an immediate medical emergency response for a patient who is in cardiac or respiratory arrest) was called, nor did he observe CPR being performed on Resident 1 during that shift. During a phone interview of 11/12/25, at 2:21 PM, CNA 2 stated that she also worked the night shift on 7/8/25 and assisted CNA 1 with providing post-mortem care (the respectful, hygienic preparation of a deceased person's body for burial, cremation, or viewing by family) for Resident 1. CNA 2 explained that in a Code Blue situation, nursing staff who were CPR-certified were expected to initiate CPR when a Full Code resident was found unresponsive. CNA 2 stated she did not note that a Code Blue was called or that CPR was initiated by licensed staff when Resident 1 was found unresponsive on 7/9/25. During a phone interview on 11/12/25, at 3:32 PM, the (Hospice Company Name) Director of Patient Care Services (DOPCS) stated that the hospice nurse had discussed Resident 1's code status with Resident 1's representative (RR), and that the hospice agency had received the representative's consent for Resident 1 to be Full Code. The DOPCS further stated the RR wanted Resident 1 to be Full Code but preferred to avoid any hospitalization. The DOPCS stated that when a resident was considered Full Code, the facility was responsible for following its own policies and procedures related to the code status. The DOPCS confirmed the facility was aware of Resident 1's code status as it was the wish and direction of Resident 1's representative. During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/12/25, at 4:20 PM, with the Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 1's POLST dated 7/8/25, Resident 1's Nurses Note dated 7/9/25, at 6:28 AM, and the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, "Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR)," dated 4/15/25, were reviewed. The DON confirmed Resident 1 was considered Full Code. The DON further confirmed that CPR had not been initiated for Resident 1. The DON explained the process for initiating a Code Blue, stating it was the nurse's responsibility to call a Code Blue in an emergency situation when Resident 1's code status was not Do Not Resuscitate (DNR- not to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation if a person's heart stops or they stop breathing. It is a legal document signed by a patient or their representatives). The DON stated the process began with calling "Code Blue," taking the crash cart (a wheeled container carrying medicine and equipment for use in emergency resuscitations) immediately to the resident's location, initiating CPR, while additional staff document and called emergency medical services. The DON further stated that upon admission, the nurse would explain the code status and would review the POLST form with the resident or resident representative to provide education, after which the resident or representative would make the decision and sign the POLST form which was a legal document. The DON explained that when a resident was admitted to hospice, the hospice nurse would review the POLST with the resident or representative to inform them about their rights. The DON stated there were risks involved, explaining that CPR was a life-saving intervention and outcomes depended on the down time, which could result in the resident not receiving life-saving care or receiving care that might lead to a condition the resident would not be comfortable with. The DON further stated that the time of discovery and the amount of down time were critical factors. Review of the facility P&P indicated, "...Policy...Properly trained personnel will be available to provide basic life support, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), to those requiring emergency care, prior to arrival of emergency medical personnel, and subject to accepted professional guidelines, advance directives, and physician orders...facility staff will provide basic life support, including CPR...if...absence of a valid, Do Not Resuscitate/DNR order...In a cardiopulmonary emergency, immediately initiate, "code blue" emergency response to facilitate additional assistance in obtaining, implementing, and activating emergency services. Facility staff should engage in concurrent/coordinated emergency response activities, to include assessing individual (i,e. quickly evaluating responsiveness, breathlessness, pulselessness, etc.), activating 911, positioning individual for CPR, initiating chest compressions and performing rescue efforts as indicated, retrieving crash cart, verifying code status, and preparing records for emergency transfer as indicated...Initiate chest compression when pulse is absent and continue until EMS arrives, patient begins moving, or consciousness is regained..." The DON acknowledged that the facility's P&P was not followed by nursing staff. The DON stated her expectation was that because Resident 1 was Full Code, CPR should have been initiated immediately. The DON further stated that the decision to perform CPR was not up to the nursing staff, as Resident 1's representative had already signed the POLST indicating that Resident 1 was Full Code. Therefore, the Department determined the facility failed to ensure quality of care and services were provided to Resident 1 when cardiopulmonary resuscitation was not attempted by licensed staff when Resident 1 was found unresponsive on 7/9/25. This failure resulted in the wishes of Resident 1's Representative/Decisionmaker (RR) not being honored, and also potentially contributed to the death of Resident 1. This violation presented either imminent danger that death or serious harm would result or a substantial probability that death or serous physical harm would result.

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The surveyor cited no deficiencies during this survey.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 8, 2026 survey of Tracy Nursing and Rehabilitation Center?

This was a other survey of Tracy Nursing and Rehabilitation Center on January 8, 2026. The surveyor cited no deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at Tracy Nursing and Rehabilitation Center on January 8, 2026?

No deficiencies were cited during this survey.

What type of survey was this?

This was a other survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.