Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

PALMS AT SEBRING NURSING AND REHABILITATION THECMS #1050371 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

105037 01/09/2025 Palms at Sebring Nursing and Rehabilitation The 725 S Pine St Sebring, FL 33870
F 0622 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the protection of a resident's right to remain at the facility by issuing an inaccurate reason on a thirty-day Nursing Home Transfer and Discharge Notice for one resident (#4) out of one resident reviewed for admission, transfer, and discharge. Findings included: On 01/09/2025 at 10:30 a.m., Resident #4 was observed in his room, in bed, working on his laptop. Resident #4 stated the facility was discharging him for non-payment. He stated he did not want to talk about it. On 01/09/2025 at 11:15 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) stated, one resident, Resident #4 had been provided a 30-day discharge notice on 12/05/2024. He stated the reason for the 30-day notice was that the resident was combative. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], showed Resident #4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which meant he was cognitively intact. A review of the medical record showed Resident #4's medical diagnoses included: Cerebral Infarction, unspecified, bed confinement status, and need for assistance with personal care. An interview was conducted on 01/09/2025 at 12:15 p.m. with the Business Office Manager (BOM). The BOM stated Resident #4 did not receive any money at the facility. She stated the resident did not owe any money to the facility. An interview was conducted on 01/09/2025 at 12:25 p.m. with the Social Worker (SW). The SW presented the 30-day notice which had been provided to Resident #4 for review. A review of the notice, dated 12/05/2024 with an effective date of 01/04/2025, revealed the following: -The reason for the notice was check marked, Your bill for services at this facility has not been paid after reasonable and appropriate notice to pay, and Your health has improved sufficiently so that you no longer need the services provided by his facility. -The brief explanation written was, Patient to be discharged to another long-term care facility. Page 1 of 2 105037 105037 01/09/2025 Palms at Sebring Nursing and Rehabilitation The 725 S Pine St Sebring, FL 33870
F 0622 -The transfer location was documented to be another nursing facility. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm -The signature space for the physician to sign the form, reflected the name of a physician with the words telephone order. Residents Affected - Few The SW stated Resident #4 did not want to be transferred to the listed nursing facility, The SW stated the resident wanted to go to a different local nursing facility. The SW stated he did not know what monies Resident #4 owed the facility, what a bill was for, or the amount owed. The SW stated, the other reason for the discharge was that the resident was a little combative with the nurses. The SW stated he had put the name of the physician in the box, and the IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) talked to the physician, but the physician did not sign the form. The SW said, Resident #4 is alert and oriented, we talked to him, he refused to sign the form. An interview was conducted with the NHA on 01/09/2025 at 12:40 p.m. He confirmed the Nursing Home Transfer and Discharge notice was not accurate. He stated the reason Resident #4 was going to be discharged was due to being combative. A review of the comprehensive care plan, review start date 1/2/2025, revealed the following: Focus area: Resident needs discharge planning R/T (related to) : Adjustment to LTC (Long Term Care) placement. Goals: Resident will develop and participate in day-to-day facility routine that includes social out of room activities and daily care preferences. Interventions/Tasks: Resident's discharge plan is to remain in the facility LTC. An interview was conducted on 01/09/2025 at 1:50 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON)The DON stated Resident #4 could be combative. She stated, He refuses care a lot of the time. He refuses his medication, he chooses what he wants when he wants it. He is bedbound because he wants to be. She stated, When he refuses care, he will threaten to hit you. She stated she could not say if he actually ever made contact with anyone. The DON stated, He is a very angry man. I do not think they have put anything under behaviors. I was aware he was being given a 30-day notice, but I did not know why. The DON stated Resident #4 was a long-term resident, he required nursing care, and his health had not improved enough for discharge. She stated, He is bedbound and cannot care for himself. 105037 Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0622GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F622 - Transfer and discharge-

    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 9, 2025 survey of PALMS AT SEBRING NURSING AND REHABILITATION THE?

This was a inspection survey of PALMS AT SEBRING NURSING AND REHABILITATION THE on January 9, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at PALMS AT SEBRING NURSING AND REHABILITATION THE on January 9, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific info..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.