F 0561
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through
support of resident choice.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to honor the resident representative's request to
ensure, 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for Choices, Resident #71, received a shower on the scheduled
shower days.
The findings included:
Record review documented Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the quarterly
Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment done on 12/27/24 documented Resident #71 had a Brief Interview
for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 indicating severe cognitive impairment and the resident is dependent
for all care needs.
During an observation in the room of Resident # 71, there was a white sheet of paper posted on the bulletin
board with the following handwritten message: please see that she (Resident #71) get a shower on her
shower days.
Review of the orders shows the resident's shower schedule is every Monday and Thursday on the 3 PM 11 PM shift.
Review of the documentation on the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) task list from 02/27/25 to 03/24/25
showed Resident #71 received 4 bed baths and 3 tub baths on the scheduled shower days.
An interview was conducted on 03/26/25 at 4:39 PM, Staff C, CNA, who stated she provided a bed bath to
Resident #71.
An interview and observation were conducted with Staff D, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) in the room of
Resident # 71. The LPN stated that the note on the bulletin board was written by the resident's sister who is
involved in her care.
A side-by-side review of the record and interview on 03/27/25 at 10:54 AM with the Director Of Nursing
(DON), who confirmed the lack of shower documentation on the task list for Resident #71. She also
confirmed the facility does not have a tub.
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 8
Event ID:
105039
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105039
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Rehabilitation Center of the Palm Beaches, The
301 Northpointe Parkway
West Palm Beach, FL 33407
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0641
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document the discharge status of 1 of 3 sampled
residents reviewed as closed records, Resident #100.
Residents Affected - Few
The findings included:
Record review documented Resident #100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged home on
[DATE]. Resident #100's diagnoses upon admission included: Anemia, Hypertension, Hip fracture,
Spondylopathy in lumbar region, Muscle wasting and atrophy, Abnormalities of gait and mobility, Obesity,
and Chronic pain syndrome.
Review of Resident #100's care plan for discharge, dated 01/14/25, documented, The resident wishes / or
Responsible Party wishes to: return home.
The goal of the care plan was documented as, Safely discharge to a lower level of care (Home, Home with
Home Health Aide, Assisted Living Facility, Independent Living Facility, other) when rehab goals are met.
Reivew of a progress note, dated 01/24/25, documented, Resident discharge from [name of facility] to
home at 300 pm, VIA PRIVATE CAR accompanied, 2-persons food / medication administered as ordered
before leaving the facility one of the staff accompanied resident to the lobby skin warm / intact / dry, lung
sound clear no SOB [shortness of breath] or distress noted, vs WNL [vital signs within normal limits].
Discharge instruction reviewed with resident voice understood the explanation; med list / medication
provided, follow-up with MD [medical doctor] within 3-5 days post discharge.
Review of a Social Services progress note, dated 01/24/25, documented, Discharge Summary note. Res
[resident] is A&Ox3 [alert and oriented times three], independent with decision making, requested to speak
with this writer yesterday as she would like to d/c [discharge] home today. Res informed this writer
yesterday that the hospital was planning to d/c her spouse home today thus she wanted to be at home, plus
res feels she can manage safely at home and prefers being at home. DME [durable medical equipment]
ordered thru [through] [name of company] DME yesterday.
Review of Resident #100's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/24/25, documented
Resident #100's discharge status as 'Short-Term General Hospital.
An interview was conducted on 03/26/25 at 9:59 AM with the MDS Coordinator, who when asked about
Resident #1's discharge status, confirmed that the resident was discharged home. The MDS Coordinator
stated that she would update and resubmit the assessment.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105039
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 8
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105039
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Rehabilitation Center of the Palm Beaches, The
301 Northpointe Parkway
West Palm Beach, FL 33407
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders for 2 of 6 sampled
residents, as evidenced by the topical cream for Resident #5 was not applied as ordered, and the blood
pressure medication was not given as needed for Resident #58; and failed to follow physician orders to
obtain a urology consultation as ordered for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for catheters, Resident #63.
Residents Affected - Few
The findings included:
1. Record review revealed Resident #5 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the current
Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for
Mental Status (BIMS) score of 05, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating severe cognitive impairment.
Review of a physician order dated [DATE] instructed the staff to apply an antifungal cream to the areas
affected with a rash (skin condition) on the day (7 AM to 3 PM) and evening (3 PM-11 PM) shifts.
Review of the care plan dated [DATE], documented Resident #5 was at risk for potential or actual
impairment of the skin related to itching, rash with a goal that the resident's skin impairment will be healed
with an intervention that the nurse will administer medication as ordered.
An observation on [DATE] at 10:08 AM revealed Resident #5 was scratching her arms and shoulders
profusely. Further observation revealed Resident#5 had scattered bumpy and reddened areas on her arms,
shoulders and chest.
An observation on [DATE] at 3:23 PM in Resident #5's room revealed Resident #5 had her eyes closed,
scratching her arms and shoulders.
During an interview on [DATE] at 10:08 AM, when asked how she was doing, Resident #5 stated, I have all
these bites. When asked how long she has had the rash, Resident #5 stated, I just came from the hospital,
but I had the rash before. When Resident #5 was asked if the nurse was aware of the rash, she stated I
think so, I will let them know. When asked if any cream had been applied to the rash, Resident #5 stated,
No.
During an Interview on [DATE] at 3:25PM, when asked if any treatment was provided to Resident #5, Staff
D, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), reviewed Resident #5's orders in the computer and stated
Triamcinolone (corticosteroid ointment for the skin). Staff D went into the clean utility room, where the
treatment cart was stored. Staff D looked throughout the treatment cart and did not find the triamcinolone
ointment. Staff D stated, I used the last of the cream this morning on the resident and I threw the tube away.
I will have to order a new one. She was in the hospital, and she came back. When asked if that was the only
treatment that was to be provided to Resident #5, Staff D stated Yes.
During an interview on [DATE] at 9:15AM, when asked if an antifungal cream was ordered for a resident
what medication is used, the Unit Manager stated, It's a stock medication that comes in a tube. When
asked to show the antifungal cream that was ordered for Resident #5, the Unit Manager looked in the
treatment cart and she picked up a jar of triamcinolone ointment and stated, This is for that resident. When
asked if the triamcinolone ointment is the medication that would be used if the order
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105039
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 8
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105039
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Rehabilitation Center of the Palm Beaches, The
301 Northpointe Parkway
West Palm Beach, FL 33407
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
was for an antifungal cream the Unit Manager stated, No. Sometimes the antifungal cream comes in small
packets. I will go get some from the supply room.
During an interview on [DATE] at 9:40 AM, when asked if there was any antifungal cream in stock, Staff F,
Central Supply staff, stated, We are out of it. I'm in the process of ordering it now. When asked how long
they had been out of the antifungal cream, Staff F stated, We've been out since Tuesday. When asked if she
meant yesterday on Tuesday, Staff F stated, No, last week I had two tubes of the cream on the shelf that
were expired on Friday, so I threw them out, but I forgot to reorder it at that time. If I order it today, it will
come tomorrow.
During an interview on [DATE] at 10:06 AM, the Unit Manger stated, I'm trying to figure out which nurse
used the last of the antifungal cream for the resident and did not reorder it. I called central supply to see if
there was any cream and she said the ones she had were thrown out on Friday because they were expired.
During an interview on [DATE] at 10:50 AM, when asked how long Resident #5 had the rash, Staff D, LPN)
stated, She has a rash off and on. She has seen a dermatologist in the past. I think a few months ago.
During an interview on [DATE] at 10:56 AM, when ask how Resident #5's skin looked when she provided
care, Staff G, Certified Nursing Assistant, stated, She has a rash that she has had for a while.
Review of [DATE] Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for Resident #5 documented that the nurses had
signed off on the order for the administration of the antifungal cream, but the medication had not been
available.
3. Record review documented Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A comprehensive
assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had mild cognitive impairment and was dependent on
staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). The assessment further documented the resident had an indwelling
catheter (urinary catheter).
Resident #63 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] after a hospitalization.
Resident #63's had care plan for using a urinary catheter with a documented risk for an infection and/or
complications.
Review of Resident #63's physician orders revealed an order dated [DATE] to follow up with urology for
hemorrhagic cystitis (an inflammation of the bladder lining that leads to bleeding). Further record review
revealed the resident had not followed up with urology, and there was no documentation of the resident
refusing follow up with urology.
An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on [DATE] at 10:00 AM, who acknowledged
the above finding.
2. Record review revealed Resident #58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include
essential primary Hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of the current MDS assessment dated
[DATE] documented Resident #58 had a BIMS score of 15, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating the resident was
cognitively intact. This MDS also documented a current diagnosis of Hypertension. Review of the current
care plan initiated on [DATE] documented the resident had hypertension and staff were to
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105039
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 8
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105039
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Rehabilitation Center of the Palm Beaches, The
301 Northpointe Parkway
West Palm Beach, FL 33407
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684
administer medications as ordered and monitor vital signs as ordered.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Review of the current orders revealed Resident #58 was receiving three routine blood pressure
medications. These medications included Metoprolol which was originally ordered at 50 milligrams (mg)
daily and increased to 100 mg twice daily on [DATE], Hydralazine 10 mg three times daily, and Amlodipine
5 mg twice daily was added to the regimen as of [DATE]. The orders also included for staff to administer
Catapres 0.1 mg every eight hours as needed for a systolic blood pressure reading greater than 150. This
order did not include any time frame in which staff were to measure the resident's blood pressure. The only
active order for the monitoring of vital signs was to complete a set once during the night shift (11 PM to 7
AM). There was one discontinued order to monitor vital signs every shift for three days only upon return
from a brief hospitalization.
Residents Affected - Few
During an interview on [DATE] at 9:56 AM, Resident #58 stated his only concern was that his blood
pressure was running high.
Review of the [DATE] Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #58 revealed the following high
blood pressures with no 'as needed' Catapres administered:
a) On [DATE] on the night shift, the resident's blood pressure was 161/96.
b) On [DATE] on the night shift, the resident's blood pressure was 155/87.
c) On [DATE] on the night shift, the resident's blood pressure was 166/91.
Further review of the record revealed staff were not documenting the blood pressure for Resident #58 every
eight hours, or with each shift, in order to know when the 'as needed' Catapres was needed. Review of the
blood pressure readings from [DATE] through [DATE] revealed a lack of three daily blood pressure readings
every day except on [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE].
During an interview on [DATE] at 3:32 PM, when asked the process for blood pressure monitoring, Staff A,
Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated she takes the blood pressure of her residents on blood pressure
medications every morning upon arrival and documents them in the electronic medical record (EMR) at the
end of her shift. The LPN provided a handwritten paper with documented blood pressures for several
residents and stated she was getting ready to document the readings from this morning at the time of the
interview.
Further review of the [DATE] MAR and blood pressure readings for Resident #58 on [DATE], revealed Staff
A, LPN had cared for the resident on [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE], but only documented his
blood pressure on [DATE] and [DATE].
During an interview on [DATE] at approximately 4:15 PM, when asked the process for blood pressure
monitoring, Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN), stated she takes the blood pressure for her residents who are
on blood pressure medications at the beginning of the shift. When asked about documentation, the RN
stated she might document them in the vital sign section of the EMR, or she may just document, OK to give
in the electronic MAR. When asked specifically about Resident #58, the RN stated she had just taken his
blood pressure, and it was 177/96. The RN volunteered, I told him to hang loose for a bit and I'd bring back
his meds.
Further review of the [DATE] MAR and blood pressure readings lacked any documented blood pressure
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105039
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 8
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105039
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Rehabilitation Center of the Palm Beaches, The
301 Northpointe Parkway
West Palm Beach, FL 33407
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684
reading of 177/96 for Resident #58 on [DATE].
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
During an interview on [DATE] at 9:51 AM, when asked the process for blood pressure monitoring for
Resident #58 who had an 'as needed' order for Catapres, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she would
expect staff to check the resident's blood pressure at least once a shift and document the reading. During a
side-by-side review of the record, the DON agreed with the concern of the lack of blood pressure
monitoring and provision of Catapres for Resident #58. The DON confirmed the physician recently
increased his routine blood pressure medications.
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105039
If continuation sheet
Page 6 of 8
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105039
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Rehabilitation Center of the Palm Beaches, The
301 Northpointe Parkway
West Palm Beach, FL 33407
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0692
Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate hydration for 1 of 1
sampled resident, as evidenced by not ensuring that Resident #16 was able to have the fluids she was
allowed.
Residents Affected - Few
The findings included:
Record review revealed Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of current Minimum
Data Sheet (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental
Status (BIMS) score of 05, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating severe cognitive impairment.
Review of the physician order dated 02/27/25 instructed the staff that Resident #16 was on a 1200 milliliters
per day fluid restriction with 900 milliliters to be given by dietary daily and 300 milliliters to be given by
nursing daily.
During an interview on 03/24/25 at 10:42 AM, Resident #16 stated, I was put on liquid restriction. I get 2
juices, 4 ounces at lunch and dinner. I leave it on my table to sip on it throughout the day and the aides
always take it away. They have been asked not to, but they still dump it. When asked if she had fluids this
morning, Resident #16 stated, Yes, but they dumped it. They aren't supposed to just take my food. It's so
depressing to me, because I like to sip on it. My lips are so dry.
An observation on 03/26/25 at 10:44 AM in the hallway, revealed Resident #16 was in the hallway
complaining to the MDS coordinator about her juice being taken away from her room. She stated [Name],
Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) poured one 4 ounce cup of juice in my ice and they took it away. I did not
even have coffee. My mouth is so dry. Why do they keep doing this. Staff D stated, I will go get you another
4-ounces of juice since they took it away. Resident #16 asked Why can't we put up a sign or something, so
they know not to take it. Staff D stated, I will just inform the aides not to take your juice.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105039
If continuation sheet
Page 7 of 8
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105039
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Rehabilitation Center of the Palm Beaches, The
301 Northpointe Parkway
West Palm Beach, FL 33407
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0712
Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician visits in a timely manner for 1 of 2
sampled residents reviewed for catheters, Resident #63.
Residents Affected - Few
The findings included:
Record review revealed Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A comprehensive assessment
dated [DATE] documented the resident had mild cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for
activities of daily living (ADLs).
The record revealed Resident #63 was hospitalized on [DATE], and readmitted to the facility on [DATE].
Review of Resident #63's physician progress notes revealed a progress note dated 11/07/24. There was no
further evidence the resident was seen or evaluated by a physician between 08/24/24 through 11/07/24.
An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 03/27/25 at 10:00 AM, who
acknowledged the above finding.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105039
If continuation sheet
Page 8 of 8