F 0842
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in
accordance with accepted professional standards.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure documentation was available to show whether
dialysis treatment was started timely; the facility failed to ensure bathing preference was documented; and
the facility failed to ensure physician order for self-administration of peritoneal dialysis was timely recorded,
for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1).
The findings included:
Record review revealed, Resident #1, was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis which included:
End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). Review of the admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS),
reference date 01/09/24, revealed, Resident #1 had brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14,
which indicated Resident #1 was cognitively intact.
Review of the self-administration evaluation record, dated 01/03/24, recorded, Resident #1 requested to
continue to complete her peritoneal dialysis (PD), while at the facility. Resident #1 was completing her PD
at home and desired to continue to complete her PD at the facility, and she was evaluated to be safe.
Additional review of Resident #1's record, evidenced a physician order dated 01/15/24 for Peritoneal
Dialysis (PD).
Review of laboratory test dated 01/04/24 for complete blood count (CBC), and basic metabolic panel
(BMP), showed high potassium level of 6.4, and low sodium level of 131. 01/09/24 CBC, BMP showed low
sodium level of 127 and high potassium level of 5.7.
A subsequent review of Resident #1's record was conducted, in search of documented evidence to show
when the PD was started, a nursing progress note dated 01/08/2024 at 8:01 PM, indicated Resident (#1)
attended dialysis today. There were no progress notes prior to this date regarding the PD treatment.
Further review of Resident #1's record in search of bathing preference, there was no documented evidence
of her bathing preference. Under task in the computer record, it simply indicated bathing. There was no
specific bathing type recorded, no shower scheduled was recorded. It was revealed that Resident #1 had
received a bed bath from 01/02/24 through 01/16/24. No documented evidence of providing showers was
recorded.
On 02/14/24 at 1:53 PM during an interview with a family member, who visited regularly, she had voiced
concern regarding showers. She revealed that, the facility did not have scheduled showers, the
residents/families had to request showers.
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 2
Event ID:
105067
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105067
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/15/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Boulevard Rehabilitation Center
2839 S Seacrest Blvd
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0842
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
On 02/15/24 at 10:26 AM, an interview was held with Staff A, a certified nursing assistant/restorative aide,
an inquiry was made regarding how do they document for showers. Staff A proceeded to retrieve a tablet,
she viewed the [NAME] for a random resident, she did not find shower schedule for that resident. Staff A
revealed that the facility doesn't schedule showers anymore.
On 02/15/24 at 10:35 AM, an interview was held with Staff B, a registered nurse (RN), she voiced the
facility doesn't schedule showers anymore, they leave it up to the resident and their families to ask for
shower. When asked what about the residents who can't ask for shower, how do they ensure that they
receive showers? Staff B voiced that the staff knows the residents and if they look unclean, they would
have showered them.
On 02/15/24 at 10:48 AM, an interview was held with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON voiced
Resident #1 wanted to do her own PD, the facility assessed her, and she was determined safe. The DON
added, dialysis should have been started the next day of admission. When asked for evidence of when
Resident #1 started PD, the DON proceeded to review the records. She agreed that the progress note for
starting the PD treatment was dated as of 01/08/24. The DON voiced there was no documentation for
dialysis treatment prior to that date. The DON acknowledged the physician order for PD was late, the order
date was 01/15/24.
During the interview process an inquiry was made regarding bathing preference for Resident #1, the DON
acknowledged there was no documented evidence for showers, and there was no bathing preference
recorded for Resident #1. The DON further revealed the facility have changed the bathing preference
process because there was an issue before, where residents/families had concern of the staff forcing
residents to take showers, hence, the facility wanted to make it individualized and changed the process.
During the interview, a request was made regarding the facility's policy regarding bathing and preferences.
The policy was not provided.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105067
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 2