F 0686
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow the professional standards for the
care and management of pressure ulcers for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for wound care (Resident #1). The
findings included: According to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), avoidable pressure
ulcer injury means the resident developed a pressure ulcer/injury, and the staff failed to do one or more of
the following : Evaluate the resident's clinical condition and risk factors. Define and implement interventions
that are consistent with resident needs and goals and follow professional standards of practice. Monitor and
evaluate the impact of the interventions. Revise interventions as appropriate. A record review revealed
Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was transferred to a hospital on 9/26/25. The
admitting diagnoses included in part, Cerebral Aneurysm, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of Native
Coronary Artery without Angina Pectoris, Reflux Uropathy, Essential Hypertension and Spondylosis without
Myelopathy or Radiculopathy of the Lumbar region. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS)
assessment dated [DATE] under Section C for the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) revealed a score
of 14, indicating Resident #1 had no cognitive impairment. Section GG documented this resident was staff
dependent on eating, personal hygiene, toileting, and upper and lower body dressing. Section M
documented a no response to the presence of a pressure ulcer or injury, and pressure ulcer and injury
care. An additional review of electronic nursing care plan with focus on skin integrity related to history of
healed wound was initiated on 8/20/25. On 9/1/25, another focus indicating the old pressure ulcer was
reopened and treatment was initiated; and an additional focus was added on 9/10/25, with a note
documenting the wound worsened, reevaluated, and changed. An electronic nursing care plan review
documented the intervention for wound care consult was added on 9/8/25, approximately 4 weeks after
Resident #1's admission to the facility. Additional review of nursing interventions documented that the air
mattress was added on 9/10/25, and the wedge cushion to reposition and off load to be placed under the
back every shift was initiated on 9/25/25, indicating both air mattress and wedge cushions were added
approximately 5, and 7 weeks after Resident #1's admission to the facility. In an interview conducted with
Wound Care Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) on 10/7/25 at 11:20 AM, when she was asked the process of
skin assessment during admission, she responded, If no skin issues are found, but if there are risks. she
will initiate an air mattress order for preventative measure. She added that the resident might get the air
mattress in a couple of hours after admission. If admitted before 4:30 PM, the mattress will be issued within
the first 2 hours of admission to the facility. If admitted late at night, the mattress will be provided to the
resident on the following day. She added that the facility has uploaded wedges, pillows, donut and cushion
for wheelchairs. All the Inter Disciplinary Team (IDT) members, Central Supply personnel and Therapy staff
will coordinate the care of a resident who has skin risk assessment for pressure ulcer and they will decide
which preventative measures would be appropriate. She stated that within 2 days after
Residents Affected - Few
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 4
Event ID:
105237
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105237
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/08/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Broward Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation
7751 W Broward Blvd
Plantation, FL 33324
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0686
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
admission, a resident who is at risk for skin breakdown will have the necessary supplies to prevent the
development of pressure ulcer. She added that they have weekly skin check, where the Nurse will go in and
observe the body for any new areas forming and document the findings in the computer, on skin
observation under the assessment tab. When she was asked if it is possible to have stage 4 pressure ulcer
after a month of staying in the facility, she stated that it would first start with visible skin issues like redness,
excoriation, deteriorating, then stage 1, but usually not stage 4 right away. She had not witnessed a
resident who did not have any skin opening during admission and then a month later turned into stage 4
pressure ulcer. When she was asked if there was a facility acquired pressure ulcer in September 2025, she
responded, Resident #1, because this resident came in with scar tissue on the sacrum, which was closed,
and with no drainage. I did not take a picture of the sacrum during admission, and I wrote buttocks on her
nursing admission skin assessment which was electronically submitted on 8/20/25. I performed the skin
assessment on 8/20/25, but I corrected the word buttocks into sacrum later. She added that she initiated
preventive measures like barrier cream, offloading measures, wedges and air mattress, but wedges and air
mattress were not provided to Resident #1 because the resident had no open wound on admission. When
she was asked if there were risk for the development of pressure ulcer for this resident, she responded that
this resident had a risk of developing pressure ulcer. She ordered the air mattress and wedges on 09/09/25,
which was approximately 3 weeks after Resident #1's admission to the facility. She ordered them because
the resident was not thriving. The resident was refusing to eat, drink, refusing clean up, and frequently with
closed mouth. The resident had sacral excoriation only on 9/9/25, then stage 1 within the same week,
according to Wound Care LPN. On 9/18/25, staff stated Resident #1's sacral wound was Stage 4. Staff
added that the exacerbation of sacral wound was related to generalized decline of resident, and it was
according to the wound physician. The doctor did not stage the wound of Resident #1 according to the
Wound Care LPN. She admitted that she did not intervene immediately at admission. She added that
according to the wound physician, no amount of intervention can prevent the occurrence of Stage 4
pressure ulcer, a few weeks after admission to the facility. On 8/20/25, she wrote the admission skin
assessment, but she did not see the resident again until 9/2/25. She admitted that she wrote 3 late entries
in the nursing progress notes. She added that she saw the resident after a nurse called her that Resident
#1's skin on the sacral area was starting to break down. When she was asked why there were 3 late entries
in the nursing progress notes regarding her skin assessment, she responded, Because I was not doing my
weekly skin notes. When she was asked why she was not doing the weekly skin notes, she responded, I do
not know. In an interview conducted with Staff B, an LPN on 10/7/25 at 12:42 PM, when she was asked
regarding Resident #1's pressure ulcer, she stated she did not remember, but she remembered this
resident was refusing care frequently, although she did not remember when Resident #1 started to refuse
care. When she was asked if she monitored the skin weekly, she responded, Yes. When she was asked how
she prevents pressure ulcer development, she responded, I follow the facility's policy, use barrier cream,
wash and dry the sacral area, and perform incontinent change often. I will ask the staff CNAs to turn and
reposition the resident. She added that she will use pillows to take pressure off the sacral area and any
bony prominences. When she was asked if she monitors the CNAs when they were doing the turning and
repositioning tasks, she responded, Sometimes.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105237
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 4
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105237
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/08/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Broward Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation
7751 W Broward Blvd
Plantation, FL 33324
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0690
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate
catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow the professional standards of
practice for the care and management of an indwelling urinary catheter and failed to follow their own policy
for catheter care for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary care (Resident #1 and Resident #3). The findings
included:According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in the non-acute care setting.
Properly secure indwelling catheters after insertion to prevent movement and urethral traction. (p.12).
Education and performance feedback regarding appropriate use, hand hygiene, and catheter care (p.15).
https://www.cdc.gov/infection-control/media/pdfs/Guideline-CAUTI-H.pdf According to the facility's policy
titled, Catheter Care, implemented on 12/17/17, it documented that it is the policy of this facility to ensure
that residents with indwelling catheter receive appropriate care and maintain their dignity and privacy when
indwelling catheters are in use. Catheter care will be performed every shift and as needed by nursing
personnel. 1) A record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was
transferred to a hospital on 9/26/25. The admitting diagnoses included in part, Cerebral Aneurysm,
Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of Native Coronary Artery without Angina Pectoris, Reflux Uropathy,
Essential Hypertension and Spondylosis without Myelopathy or Radiculopathy of the Lumbar region. A
review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] under Section C for the Brief
Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) revealed a score of 14, indicating Resident #1 had no cognitive
impairment. Section GG documented this resident was staff dependent on eating, personal hygiene,
toileting, and upper and lower body dressing. Section H revealed a yes response to indwelling catheter. An
additional review of physician order dated 8/4/25, documented to provide (Foley) indwelling catheter care,
every shift, and secure catheter with a holder to prevent migration, every shift. A further review of orders did
not include Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP), when the urinary catheter care was ordered. A record
review of facility's EBP policy with implementation date of 11/20/21 revealed an order for EBP will be
obtained for residents with wounds and or indwelling medical devices (e.g. urinary catheter) regardless of
Multiple Drug-Resistant Organism (MDRO) colonization status. In an interview conducted with the Infection
Control Licensed Practical Nurse on 10/07/25 at 1:35 PM, when she was asked if a resident with a urinary
catheter should be under EBP guidelines, she responded, Yes. When she was asked when the resident will
be under EBP guidelines, she responded, as soon as the resident was ordered to have a urinary catheter.
A further review of nursing care plan revealed that the EBP focus related to urinary catheter was not
initiated until 9/26/25, indicating it was added approximately 7 weeks after Resident #1's admission to the
facility. 2) A record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that
included Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Non-Traumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage affecting the Left
Nondominant Side, Obstructive and Reflux Uropathy, Hypertensive Chronic Kidney Disease and Cognitive
Social and Emotional Deficit following Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage. A review of the quarterly
MDS assessment dated [DATE], under Section C, revealed a BIMS score of 12, indicating Resident #3 had
moderate cognitive impairment. Section H revealed a yes response to indwelling catheter. An electronic
record review of physician orders dated 8/12/25, documented indwelling urinary catheter of size 16, with
inflation balloon of 10 ml (milliliter) sterile water for the diagnosis of Obstructive Uropathy. An additional
review of physician order dated 8/4/25, documented to provide (Foley) indwelling catheter care, every shift,
and secure catheter with a holder to prevent migration, every shift. During a urinary care observation and
interview conducted on 10/7/25 at 2:58 PM, with Staff G, a
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105237
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 4
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105237
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/08/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Broward Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation
7751 W Broward Blvd
Plantation, FL 33324
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0690
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Restorative Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), and Staff I, another CNA, who when asked about the color
and the urine consistency, both stated the color was pinkish, cloudy and with sediments noted in the urinary
tubing. Additional observation revealed Resident #3's catheter was not secured on the thigh but freely
moving when the resident moved. Both staff CNAs stated that the secure lock was not secured and not
dated. When Staff I, a CNA was asked if she frequently provides urinary catheter care to Resident #3, she
responded, Yes, every time I am assigned to him. When she was asked if the secure system is always
attached to the resident's, she responded, Sometimes. When she was asked if she reattaches the secure
system (anchor)when it becomes detached, she responded, Nurses do that. When she was asked if she
will tell the staff Nurse regarding the detachment of the secure system, she responded, I always tell the
Nurse. During the same urinary care observation, Staff I, CNA did not change her gloves from beginning
until the end. When she was asked why she kept the same gloves for cleaning the resident's urinary
meatus, penis, inner thighs, catheter tubing, bed cover, bed remote control, call light and gown, she did not
respond. During another observation on 10/08/25 at 1:30 PM, with Staff F, a Restorative CNA, the same
urinary secure system was still detached and not secured to resident's thigh. When the resident was asked
if Nurses attached it to him, he responded, No. When the resident was asked if staff perform hand washing
before providing him urinary care, he responded, No. A review of September 2025 Medication
Administration Record and Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed that on 9/24/25 and 9/26/25
during the day shifts, securement of catheter was not done by staff per physician order. A review of
physician order dated 10/7/25 at 3:08 PM revealed Cefdinir Capsule 300 milligram (MG), give 1 capsule by
mouth every 12 hours for Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) for 7 Days. In an interview conducted with Staff J, a
Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) on 10/08/25 at 2:45 PM, when she was asked if she provides urinary
catheter care to Resident #3, she responded, Yes. When she was asked when the last time urinary care
was provided for this resident, she responded, I work from 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM, and I still have not provided
urinary care for this resident since the beginning of my shift. When she was asked what time she will
provide urinary catheter care, she responded, A few minutes before I go home. When she was asked if she
had assessed the color and consistency of urine for Resident #3, she responded, 'I have not done it yet. An
electronic record review of nursing care plan revealed that catheter care was not initiated until 8/11/25,
indicating it was done 7 days later after the physician ordered a urinary catheter for Resident #3, on 8/4/25.
An additional review of nursing care plan did not include an EBP intervention for urinary catheter. A further
review of September 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Treatment Administration Record
(TAR) revealed that on 9/24/25 and 9/26/25 during day shifts, securement of catheter was not done by staff
per physician order. A review of physician order dated 10/7/25 (first day of survey) at 3:08 PM, it revealed
Cefdinir Capsule 300 milligram (MG), to give 1 capsule by mouth every 12 hours, for Urinary Tract Infection
(UTI) for 7 Days. In an interview conducted with Staff B, an LPN on 10/7/25 at 12:41 PM, when she was
asked regarding urinary catheter care and management for residents, she responded, The catheter will be
flushed as ordered, and I made sure I follow the facility's policy for catheter care. The urinary catheter care
is done by staff, and I must perform them for my assigned residents. She added that she monitors the
resident for possible UTI by monitoring symptoms like confusion and complaining of burning in the area.
She added that the facility does not wait for fever to occur to indicate infection. She monitors the urine
output color, and consistency and encourages resident to drink or make sure to have adequate fluid intake.
She added she monitors the catheter frequently during her shift.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105237
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 4