Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

AVIATA AT SAINT LUCIECMS #1052572 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 2 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0806 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options. Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to honor the resident's right for food preference for portion sizes for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #1 and #4). Residents Affected - Few The findings include: 1) An interview was conducted with Resident # 1 on 06/25/24 at approximately 10:45 AM. He expressed that the facility no longer provides him with large portions after the new company took over. He further stated that he was a big guy, and this little protein portion of meat is not good. The resident then became emotional and stated, they don't listen to me, I've tried to tell them; this little bit of food is not enough. I will sometime order something from somewhere that will deliver. An observation of the resident's lunch tray on 06/25/24 revealed that the resident was served a small portion of chicken thigh on his plate. The resident's vegetables were in a separate container. The resident again expressed that the serving was insufficient. An interview with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) and the resident was conducted on 06/25/24 at approximately 12:30 PM. The resident expressed that his tray was incorrect and that the serving was too small. The CDM informed the resident that the dietitian would have to assess the resident because they could only provide large or double portions when medically necessary. Another interview was conducted with the CDM on 06/26/24 at approximately 12:50 PM, who reported that since the change in ownership, they cannot provide large portions or double portions unless when medically necessary. She then contacted her District Manager, who confirmed this policy. The surveyor further questioned her regarding resident's preferences being honored. She again repeated that this is what she was informed. She further confirmed that the resident previously had large portions but that is no longer honored. An interview was conducted on 06/26/24 at 1:40 PM with the Dietitian. She stated she is new to the facility, but it was her understanding that she must complete a nutritional assessment and the resident has to meet the criteria of medically necessary, to be offered the option of double portions and/or large portions. Residents with wounds, increased BMI, or who have increased caloric needs then we can order but not based on the resident's preferences. We can then put it in as a therapeutic diet and get reimbursed for it. 2) An interview was conducted on 06/26/24 at approximately 2:00 PM with Resident #4. The resident said that he used to get large portions, but he doesn't receive that anymore. He said he was told that with the new owners, they can't get their preferred large portions. It must be a medical reason (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 3 Event ID: 105257 Printed: 05/28/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 105257 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 06/26/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Aviata at Saint Lucie 611 S 13th St Fort Pierce, FL 34950 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0806 for the resident to get this now. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 105257 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 3 Printed: 05/28/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 105257 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 06/26/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Aviata at Saint Lucie 611 S 13th St Fort Pierce, FL 34950 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0812 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards. Based on observation, administrative record review and interviews, the facility failed to store, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This is evidence by the facility serving and storing milk beyond the manufacturer's expiration date. This failure affected 1 of 4 sampled residents who have a preference for chocolate milk for three or more days (Resident #5). The findings included: The surveyor also conducted an observation of the kitchen refrigerator on 06/26/24 at approximately 9:00 AM accompanied by the Certified Dietary Manager. Observed in the refrigerator was a red crate full of approximately 30 plus individual chocolate milk cartons dated 6/23/24. Also noted were 2 cartons of chocolate milk dated June 23 on another tray which contained lunch items such as salad. An interview was conducted with the CDM at the time of the observation, who confirmed that the milk was out of date. She further stated that the milk was delivered on Monday, June 24. The surveyor then stated so, your staff accepted out of date milk when delivered and failed to check expiration dates on items served to the residents to ensure food safety. An interview was conducted on 06/25/24 beginning at approximately 10:00 AM with Resident #5, who expressed that he has been served milk that is expired. The resident continued to tell the surveyor that he received outdated milk on multiple occasions and proceeded to show the surveyor pictures of dates the milk had expired. The resident had been served milk with an use by date of June 23, 2024, this morning, 06/25/24. The resident also showed the surveyor of picture of milk expiring on 06/23/24 with a tray ticket dated 06/24/25. The resident further showed the surveyor a picture of tray ticket dated May 13, 2024, with chocolate milk carton that had a date of May 9, 2024. An observation of the breakfast meal on 06/26/24 beginning at 8:15 AM on all units. An observation with Resident #5 breakfast meal delivery on 06/26/24 at approximately 8:50 AM confirmed another instance when Resident # 5 was again served milk dated June 23. Further review of the Resident Council Minutes revealed that during the 04/12/24 meeting, the issue of expired milk being served was brought up. Despite being made aware of the issue of expired milk, the facility failed to develop a plan to ensure this does not occur again. An interview was conducted on 06/26/24 at 11:30 AM with the Resident Council President, who stated she recalls a previous problem of the residents expressing that the milk was expired but the facility was able to get the company to deliver more milk. However, she wasn't aware that this continues to be a problem. She stated they have a meeting coming up later this week and she will follow up. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 105257 If continuation sheet Page 3 of 3

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

2 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0806GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F806 - Food and drink

    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.

  • 0812GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F812 - Food safety requirements

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the June 26, 2024 survey of AVIATA AT SAINT LUCIE?

This was a inspection survey of AVIATA AT SAINT LUCIE on June 26, 2024. The surveyor cited 2 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at AVIATA AT SAINT LUCIE on June 26, 2024?

Yes, 2 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and pre..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.