Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

CHARLOTTE BAY REHAB AND CARE CENTERCMS #1053631 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0689 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement procedures to identify risk for elopement and adequately monitor 1 (Resident #1) of 1 cognitively impaired resident reviewed who left the facility without staff knowledge. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Nursing - missing resident/elopement with a revision date of 2/20/23 indicated: 1. Residents of the facility shall be maintained in a safe and secure environment. Residents may be considered missing and or to have eloped if they: d. leave the facility without authorization. 3. Locating the resident. D. Documentation regarding the elopement should be done in the interdisciplinary progress notes. E. An accident/incident form should be completed by a nurse including statements from all involved staff. F. At the next scheduled morning report, safety committee meeting, and QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) meeting the incident should be discussed and root cause analysis of elopement should be identified. 4. An event report should be completed and available for review by the facility Risk Manager. 5. The facility Risk Manager should determine if the event qualifies (according to state guidelines) as an adverse incident then appropriate reporting should be carried out. On 2/25/25 at 9:12 a.m., an entrance conference was held with the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON). The Administrator said there had been no elopements as far as they knew. Review of the clinical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 10/28/24. Diagnoses included Major Depressive Disorder, Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with a target date of 10/31/24 revealed the resident's cognition was severely impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score of 07. Resident #1 used a manual wheelchair and was dependent on staff to wheel 50 feet. Review of the elopement risk evaluation dated 10/28/24 revealed Resident #1 had no cognitive impairment and was not at risk for elopement. The care plan initiated on 10/28/24 and revised on 1/21/25 specified Resident #1 could go on leave (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 4 Event ID: 105363 Printed: 05/28/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 105363 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 02/25/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Charlotte Bay Rehab and Care Center 4033 Beaver Lane Port Charlotte, FL 33952 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689 of absence with responsible party. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Review of the Rehab Speech Screen dated 10/29/24 revealed documentation Resident #1 presented with, baseline speech, language and cognitive deficits. Poor participation during eval . Pt (patient) also stated, I want out of here. Residents Affected - Few On 11/3/24 the Social Worker initiated a care plan indicating Resident #1 had impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes related to short term memory loss. Interventions included to cue, reorient and supervise the resident as needed. The elopement evaluation dated 1/24/25 noted Resident #1 was cognitively impaired and had poor decision-making skills. Resident #1 did not have the ability to leave the facility. The evaluation noted the resident had no exit seeking behaviors and was not at risk of elopement. Review of the progress notes revealed an entry dated 2/19/25 that read, Elopement Risk- Wander guard in place. (Alerts staff when a resident leaves a designated safe area). The progress note did not explain the reason for the wander alert bracelet. On 2/19/25 Resident #1's care plan was updated and noted the resident was an elopement risk/wanderer related to impaired safety awareness. The goal was to maintain the resident's safety. The interventions included checking the placement and function of the wander alert bracelet. On 2/25/25 at 9:53 a.m., in an interview the Maintenance Director said on 2/19/25 Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) Staff B found Resident #1 outside, on the sidewalk near C wing. ADON Staff B notified the Director of Nursing (DON) and followed the resident in her car. He drove the DON in his car and dropped her off a few streets away from where Resident #1 was. The Maintenance Director said the front door opens at 8:00 a.m., and Resident #1 probably went out that door and then around the building. On 2/25/25 at 9:55 a.m., in an interview ADON Staff B said on 2/19/25 she arrived in the parking lot of the facility at approximately 8:30 a.m. She saw Resident #1 coming out the door located on the side of building by the C wing. The door was open, but she did not hear an alarm going off. When she pulled into the parking space, she realized Resident #1 was leaving the parking lot in his electric scooter. He did not stop and began crossing the road. ADON Staff B said physically she was not able to get to the resident on foot. She got back in her car, called the DON and followed Resident #1 in her car. Resident #1 had crossed the road and was on the sidewalk. He went down the street to the curve by a restaurant, turned right on a street, then left on another street. She said she followed Resident #1 to keep him safe while talking on the phone to the DON. ADON Staff B said she finally got him to stop. She asked him where he was going, and if he had signed out. Resident #1 responded he just wanted to get out for a little while. The DON arrived by car with the Maintenance Director. The DON walked with Resident #1 back to the facility. ADON Staff B said she has had training in elopement. To her understanding, an elopement was when a resident is outside the building without staff knowledge. ADON Staff B said Resident #1 exited the facility through a door equipped with a wander alert alarm. Resident #1 did not have a wander alarm bracelet; therefore, the door would not have alarmed. On 2/25/25 at 10:53 a.m., in an interview the Maintenance Director said he didn't know if Resident #1 exited the building through the side door. He said the side door has an alarm which he checks the function every day. He said once the alarm is activated, a pass key is needed to turn off the (continued on next page) FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 105363 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 4 Printed: 05/28/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 105363 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 02/25/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Charlotte Bay Rehab and Care Center 4033 Beaver Lane Port Charlotte, FL 33952 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689 alarm. He said no one told him there was a problem with the alarm of the side door. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm On 2/25/25 at 10:11 a.m., the C wing door was observed with the Administrator. The Administrator explained the first door can be opened by pushing a green button. The second door can only be opened by punching a code or pressing on the egress bar for 15 seconds. However, when the egress bar releases, it will activate an alarm. Residents Affected - Few On 2/25/25 at 10:40 a.m., in an interview the DON said on 2/19/25 at around 8:20 a.m., ADON Staff B called her and said she was watching Resident #1 going down the road. The ADON told her where Resident #1 was. She stayed on the phone with the ADON until she got to where the resident was. The ADON got the resident to stop. She walked him back to the facility. The DON said she was not familiar with Resident #1. He said he was getting air. The DON said she verified Resident #1 did not sign out before leaving the facility. She said Resident #1's scored a 07 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (a score of 07 or below indicated severe cognitive impairment). She said Resident #1 had no prior attempt to leave the facility. After the incident, they updated the resident's care plan and initiated a wander alarm. She said they really did not know through which door the resident exited the building. She spoke to a few staff members at the time of the incident but did not do a formal investigation. She reported the incident to the Regional Nurse since the Administrator was on vacation. She said she did not consider the incident an elopement since ADON Staff B followed the resident in her car the entire time. On 2/25/25 at approximately 10:45 a.m., the side door by the C wing was observed with the DON. The DON pushed the green button and opened the first door. She pushed the egress bar on the second door for approximately 15 seconds. The door opened and the alarm went off. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) nurse responded to the alarm and said the door will continue to alarm until it is turned off with a key. On 2/25/25 at 10:58 a.m., in an interview the Regional Nurse verified the DON notified her when Resident #1 left the faciity on 2/19/25. She said no investigation had been done. She did not consider the incident to be an elopement. She said ADON Staff B followed Resident #1 in the car and would have been able to stop him from getting hit by a car or involved in any type of accident. On 2/25/25 at 12:00 p.m., observation of the route taken by Resident #1 on 2/19/25 showed the resident crossed two streets and traveled approximately 0.3 miles from the facility when ADON Staff B was able to get him to stop. On 2/25/25 at 2:25 p.m., in an interview the Speech Therapist said during the first assessment on 10/29/25 Resident #1 scored 07 on the BIMS. She said it indicated severe cognitive deficit, but the resident was not participatory, and it was not a true picture of his cognition. She said he got the electric scooter on 2/5/25. Occupational Therapy evaluated him and determined he was safe to use the scooter. Review of the Occupational Therapist progress note dated 2/12/25 revealed documentation the resident needed distant supervision with use of personal power wheelchair in facility and outside of facility on sidewalk and sitting areas. The resident has been instructed each session on safety rules and facility protocols with resident knowing he is not allowed in parking lot or off facility grounds. Overall it is recommended resident be distant supervision with use of personal power chair in order to provide the resident with as much independence during the day as possible. (continued on next page) FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 105363 If continuation sheet Page 3 of 4 Printed: 05/28/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 105363 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 02/25/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Charlotte Bay Rehab and Care Center 4033 Beaver Lane Port Charlotte, FL 33952 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete On 2/25/25 at 3:50 p.m., in a telephone interview the Psychiatric Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) said she had seen and assessed Resident #1. She said Resident #1's cognition was not that great, and he was child-like. He was not able to be on his own and leave the facility on his own. On 2/25/25 at 4:40 p.m., a meeting was held with the Administrator, the DON and the Regional Nurse. The DON verified Resident #1's cognition was severely impaired and verified an elopement evaluation was not done when the resident started using the electric scooter. The Administrator said Resident #1 could have left through the front door and proceeded around the building, but they did not know and did not investigate. He said they would look into the incident and develop a plan to prevent further occurrences. Event ID: Facility ID: 105363 If continuation sheet Page 4 of 4

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0689GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F689 - Accidents

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 25, 2025 survey of CHARLOTTE BAY REHAB AND CARE CENTER?

This was a inspection survey of CHARLOTTE BAY REHAB AND CARE CENTER on February 25, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at CHARLOTTE BAY REHAB AND CARE CENTER on February 25, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.