F 0645
PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a Level II screening for 3 of 6 residents reviewed for
Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR). (Residents #25, #37, and #96)
Residents Affected - Few
The findings include:
Resident #96
A review of the PASARR form for Resident #96 (admitted on [DATE]) noted an identified diagnosis of
Anxiety Disorder and a diagnosis of dementia. Per the PASARR form, the combination of a Serious Mental
Disorder (SMI) diagnosis and Dementia or neurocognitive disorder would trigger the requirement for a Level
II review.
A review of the admission Diagnosis in the medical record noted a diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder
and Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity with Psychotic Disturbance.
A review of the Care Plan for Resident #96 noted that the resident was care planned for antipsychotic
therapy for diagnosis of dementia with psychotic features, auditory and visual hallucinations, and
antidepressant usage.
A review of the physician's progress note dated 6/13/2023 noted a medical history of dementia and
depression with a hospital admission related to auditory and visual hallucinations. Past medical histories
noted diagnoses of Unspecified dementia of unspecified severity with psychotic disturbance and Major
Depressive Disorder. Medications prescribed included Sertraline HCL and Donepezil, both psychotropic
medications.
A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] noted that section A1500 did not
acknowledge a Serious Mental Illness and Section A1550 did not acknowledge the submission of a Level II
PASARR screening. A review of the complete medical record could not locate a Level II PASARR for
resident #96.
On 06/15/23 at approximately 11:54 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked what the PASARR
process is for completion and validation. She stated they all residents should come with a PASARR prior to
admission. In some cases, the facility will get them done. The DON was advised that a Level II PASARR
could not be located on Resident #96 even though the her PASARR form triggered for a Level II. The DON
acknowledged that a Level II PASARR was not done.
Resident #25
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 4
Event ID:
105445
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105445
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/15/2023
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at University Hills
10040 Hillview Road
Pensacola, FL 32514
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0645
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
A review of the record for Resident #25 noted that he was admitted on [DATE]. The initial PASARR dated
9/22/2017 noted no SMI Diagnosis or Intellectual Disability (ID)
A record review of diagnosis for Resident #25 noted a diagnosis of Dementia with onset of 6/8/2019,
Bipolar Disorder wit onset of 2/5/2020, Major Depressive Disorder with onset of 9/22/2017
Residents Affected - Few
A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Section A1500 and 1510 indicated no SMI or ID or
Level II PASARR was necessary. A review of Section I noted no Mental Illness diagnosis.
A review of the Annual MDS dated [DATE] and the Significant Change MDS dated [DATE] noted Section
A1500 and 1510 with no SMI. A review of Section I for both MDS noted active diagnosis of Non-Alzheimer's
Dementia and Psychiatric /Mood Disorders of Anxiety Disorder, Depression, Bipolar Disorder, and
Psychotic Disorder (other than schizophrenia).
A review of the Psychiatric Progress Note dated 6/8/2023 referenced a stable psychiatric history of bipolar
disorder and anxiety. Current psychiatric medications listed included Fluoxetine 10 mg by mouth daily.
A review of the Nurse Practitioners noted dated 6/8/2023 referenced a history of bipolar disorder, dementia,
Major Depressive Disorder, and Anxiety.
A review of the care plans noted that Resident #25 was care planned for dementia, mood disorder,
antidepressant medications, and diagnoses of bipolar disorder, mood disorder and anxiety disorder.
On 06/15/23 at approximately 11:54 AM, the Director of Nursing was asked what the PASARR process is
for completion and validation. She was asked what they do if there is a change in diagnosis that may trigger
a necessary Level II. She stated that she wasn't sure of the process for that. The DON was informed where
Resident #25 had a diagnosis change that would have warranted an updated. She acknowledged this was
an oversight.
Resident # 37
A review of Resident #37's electronic medical record revealed that the resident was admitted with a Level I
PASARR dated 3/19/21. There was no level II PASARR noted in the residents record, even though she had
documented diagnoses of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, and Anxiety
Disorder.
On 6/15/23 at approximately 1:05 PM, an interview was conducted with the Social Worker. She stated that
Nursing does the level II PASARR submissions.
On 6/15/23 at approximately 1:25 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON), who
stated that she is reponsible for submitting for Level II PASARRs. She agreed that a Level II review should
have been submitted for Resident #37. The DON further stated that they will be conducting an audit for all
residents for Level II submissions.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105445
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 4
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105445
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/15/2023
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at University Hills
10040 Hillview Road
Pensacola, FL 32514
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and
actions that can be measured.
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to implement the care plan for
behavior monitoring for psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 residents sampled for unnecessary medication
review. (Resident #86)
The findings include:
A record review was conducted of Resident #86's medical record, which revealed an order for Clonazepam
0.5mg (a medication used to treat anxiety). Further review of the medical record revealed a care plan dated
4/23/23 for monitoring of behavioral symptoms and side effects related to anti-anxiety medication. Review
of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed no monitoring for behaviors.
On 6/13/23 at approximately 3:26 PM, an interview was conducted with Nurse D, a Registered Nurse (RN),
concerning behavior monitoring for resident #86. Nurse D stated that the behavior monitoring is normally
located on the MAR, but confirmed there was no behavior monitoring for Resident #86.
On 6/13/23 at approximately 3:28 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON)
concerning behavior monitoring for residents on psychotropic medications. The DON stated that the
behavior monitoring is located on the MAR and confirmed that there was no behavior monitoring for
Resident #86.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105445
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 4
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105445
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/15/2023
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at University Hills
10040 Hillview Road
Pensacola, FL 32514
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0803
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be
updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide dietary services to meet
the needs for 1 of 1 resident selected for food services. (Resident #22)
Residents Affected - Few
The findings include:
On 6/12/23 at approximately 8:30 AM, an observation was conducted of Resident #22's breakfast tray,
which revealed one slice of French toast, 2 slices of bacon, a bowl of grits, 4 oz of apple juice, and a carton
of milk. However, the accompanying dietary slip revealed the resident's diet to be regular, no added salt,
with large portions. A further review of the dietary slip indicated the resident should have received 3 slices
of French toast, 2 sausage patties, 6 oz of hot cereal, 4 oz of orange juice, and 8 oz of milk.
On 6/14/23 at approximately 12:47 PM, an observation was made of Resident #22's lunch tray which
revealed a ham sandwich, 1 scoop of potato salad, 1 plate of lettuce and tomato, and a glass of tea. A
review of Resident #22's dietary slip indicated the resident should have received 1.5 ham sandwiches, 2/3
cup of potato salad, lettuce and tomato plate, and 1.5 cups of Caesar salad.
(Photographic evidence obtained).
A review of Resident #22's medical record confirmed his diet order for Regular diet with No Added Salt diet,
regular texture, thin liquids consistency, with large portions dated 1/23/23.
On 6/14/23 at approximately 2:15 PM, an interview was conducted with the Certified Dietary Manager
(CDM) concerning the breakfast and lunch trays for Resident #22. When shown the photographs of
Resident #22's breakfast and lunch trays, the CDM verified that the trays and the dietary tickets did not
match. The CDM stated that Resident #22 should have received 3 slices of French toast for breakfast and
should have received 1.5 ham sandwiches and a Caesar salad at lunch. The CDM went on to state that
they should be following the diet order.
On 6/14/23 at approximately 2:31 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON),
concerning verification of the dietary tickets for the residents. The DON stated that it was her expectation
that that the nursing staff should check the tray on the carts to verify that it is correct, if it is not correct, they
should return the tray to the kitchen to be corrected. The DON further stated that the resident should never
see that the tray was not correct. The DON verified the breakfast and lunch trays for Resident #22 did not
match the dietary tickets.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105445
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 4