F 0600
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment,
and neglect by anybody.
Based on interview, record review, and review of policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure the
residents were free from medical neglect by failing to implement the policies and procedures for neglect for
1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for insulin administration. On 10/6/2024 at 6:00 AM, Resident #1
had a blood sugar value of 552 and the on-call provider was notified of the value and the resident stated he
was refusing medications until he received the proper insulin. Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse, (LPN), did
not communicate to Staff B, LPN or transcribe the new orders into the medical record for the increase in
insulin and the addition of sliding scale insulin coverage. Staff B, LPN, assumed care of Resident #1 at 7:00
AM on 10/6/2024 and did not follow up with the provider. Staff B, LPN, did not reassess Resident #1's blood
glucose or address the need for any orders. Resident #1 called 911 at approximately 6:30 PM, Emergency
Medical Services (EMS) contacted the facility, spoke with Staff B, LPN, who instructed EMS the resident
did not need help. Again at 11:15 PM, Resident #1 called 911 and was subsequently transferred to the
hospital and was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit with a diagnosis of Diabetic Ketoacidosis.
Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) develops when the body can't make enough insulin, a hormone that helps
sugar enter cells for energy. Instead, fat is broken down for energy. This can cause acids called ketones to
build up in the blood and collect in the urine. The risk is highest in people who have type 1 diabetes and
those who often miss insulin doses. DKA symptoms often start quickly, sometimes within a day. A person
may get very thirsty, urinate often, vomit or have stomach pain. Symptoms also can include tiredness or
weakness, confusion, shortness of breath, or fruity breath. Treatment often involves going to a hospital to
receive fluids, insulin and electrolytes through a vein. Without treatment, diabetic ketoacidosis can lead to
loss of consciousness and death. (Mayo Clinic/Mayoclinic.org)
The facility's failure to implement the policy and procedure for medical neglect and failure to ensure
residents who required insulin administration received treatment in accordance with professional standards
of practice led to a determination of Immediate Jeopardy at a scope and severity of isolated (J).
The Nursing Home Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on November 18, 2024, at 2:50
PM.
The Immediate Jeopardy began on October 6, 2024, and was removed on site on November 18, 2024.
Findings include:
Review of the admission Record for Resident #1 documented an admission date of 10/3/2024 with
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 42
Event ID:
105460
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0600
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
diagnoses that include diabetes mellitus type 1, malignant neoplasm of oropharynx (cancer), unspecified
dysphagia (unable to swallow), oropharyngeal phase, type 1 diabetes mellitus without complications,
chronic pulmonary embolism (a blockage in a lung artery caused by a blood clot that has traveled from
elsewhere in the body), chronic kidney disease, unspecified, other acute osteomyelitis (bone infection),
unspecified site, acquired absence of left leg (below knee), essential primary hypertension (high blood
pressure), gastrostomy status (a flexible tube that's surgically inserted into the stomach through the
abdominal wall. It allows for the delivery of nutrition, fluids, and medication directly into the stomach),
hyperlipidemia, unspecified (an abnormally high concentration of fats or lipids in the blood), peripheral
vascular disease, unspecified (blood vessels narrow or become blocked, reducing blood flow to the limbs or
other parts of the body).
Review of the document titled Department of Internal Medicine Discharge Summary Heme/Onc
[Hematology/Oncology] Team dated 10/3/2024 read: (page 1) Instructions for PCP [Primary Care
Physician]: will need to keep an eye on his insulin regimen as these have been up and down since starting
bolus tube feeds; currently on 12 units long acting and seven units short acting before bolus feeds.
Consider endocrinology referral. (page 8) Discharge medication, mediation list documents Lantus Solostar
100/unit/ML [milliliter] Insulin glargine. Inject 10 units into the skin every 24 hours.
Review of Resident #1's physician order dated 10/4/2024 read, Lantus SoloStar Subcutaneous Solution
Pen-injector 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Glargine) Inject 10 units subcutaneously one time a day related to Type
1 Diabetes Mellitus Without Complications.
Review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed Staff A, LPN, documented a BS
(blood sugar) of 552 on 10/6/2024 at 6:00 AM. Staff A, LPN, documented 2, CM (chart code/follow up
codes 2 = drug refused).
Review of Resident #1's eMAR (electronic Medication Administration Record) note dated 10/6/2024 at 6:32
AM documented by Staff A, LPN, read, Patient stated, I'm refusing all medications until I get the proper
insulin.
Review of Resident #1's progress note dated 10/6/2024 at 7:00 AM documented by Staff A, LPN, read,
ARNP [Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner] notified of resident's refusal of all morning medications.
Per resident he is refusing all medications until he is receiving the proper insulin. Orders received to
increase current insulin twice daily with blood sugars checked twice daily. No other orders given at this
current time.
Review of text message communication from Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone to the On Call Medical
Doctor (OCMD) on 10/6/2024 at 7:33 AM read, Good Morning, [Resident #1's name] is refusing all of his
medications. He says he's not taking anything until he receives the proper insulin. Per his orders he's
receiving 10 Units of Lantus @ [at] 6 am. He did allow me to check his blood sugar 552.
Review of text message communication from the OCMD to Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone on
10/6/2024 at 8:19 AM read, No sliding scale ordered?
Review of text message communication from Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone to the OCMD on
10/6/2024 at 8:22 AM read, No, I didn't see any sliding scale he said his Lantus is supposed to be given @
night. And he has another type of insulin he gets. I didn't see anything other than the Lantus.
Review of text message communication from the OCMD to Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone on
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0600
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
10/6/2024 at 10:55 AM read, Based on his sugars, if they have been above 250 everyday, go up to 15 BID
[15 units two times a day] of long-acting insulin and make sure we cover with sliding scale for meals. Let's
also make sure he's getting accuchecks.
Review of text message communication from Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone to the OCMD on
10/6/2024 at 7:55 PM read, I'll change his orders & notify him of the changes & hopefully he complies.
Residents Affected - Few
Review of text message communication from Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone to the OCMD on
10/6/2024 at 11:25 PM read, [Resident #1's last name] has continued to call 911 since I arrived this
afternoon. They are loading him up & transporting him, [Resident #1's full name].
Review of Resident #1 medical record did not contain any documentation of the test message
communication between the facility and the OCMD.
Review of Resident #1's Interact SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendations)
Communication form documented by Staff A, LPN, dated 10/6/2024 at 11:25 PM read, Situation: the
change in condition (CIC) reported on this CIC evaluation are: other change in condition. At the time of
evaluation patient vital signs, weight and blood sugar were blood pressure 130/77, pulse 82, temperature
98.2, pulse oximetry 96% on room air, blood glucose of 552 obtained at 6:45 AM on 10/06/24. Outcomes of
physical assessment: positive findings reported were mental status evaluation with no change observed.
Functional status evaluation with no changes observed. Patient called 911 on his personal cell phone and
stated, I want out of this place. Primary Care Provider Feedback: Primary Care Provider responded with the
following feedback: Recommendations: No new orders given at this time.
Review of Resident #1's medical record did not contain any documentation of further blood glucose checks
after the glucose level of 552 was documented at approximately 6:00 AM.
Review of the hospital ED (Emergency Department) provider notes for Resident #1 dated 10/6/2024 at
11:51 PM read, Chief complaint: Patient presents with high blood sugar. Patient is an 81 y.o. [year old] M
[male] with a PMH [Past Medical History] of oropharyngeal SCC [squamous cell cancer of throat], DVT
[Deep Vein Thrombosis], PVD [Peripheral Vascular Disease], T1D [Type 1 Diabetes], HTN [Hypertension],
and osteomyelitis who presents from an outside rehab after having unreadable glucose levels on his
monitor. He states that at the outside rehab were not following his strict insulin regimen trying to give a
different type of insulin. Per EMS [Emergency Medical Services] he was declining the insulin the outside
rehab was trying to give him. He was recently admitted on 10/3 for pneumonia and was discharged to
rehab NPO [nothing by mouth] with swallow study pending (gastrostomy tube in place). BASIC
METABOLIC PANEL - Abnormal; Notable for the following components: Glucose 745, Anion Gap 34.
Medical Evaluation Initiated: Attestation: The patient is critical due to DKA [Diabetic Ketoacidosis]. admitted
to the ICU [Intensive Care Unit].
Review of the hospital history and physical for Resident #1 dated 10/7/2024 read, HPI [history of presenting
illness]: [Resident #1's name] is an 81 y.o. male presented with hyperglycemia at rehab admitted for DKA.
PMH relevant for T1DM (Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus), HTN, oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma,
peripheral vascular disease, DVT (04/2022) and below the knee amputation secondary to osteomyelitis.
Patient reports lack of compliance with his long-term insulin regimen for DM1 [Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus] at
his rehab facility. He reports they weren't giving me the right insulin and explains some of the doses of his
regimen were being missed.
During an interview on 11/13/2024 at 9:25 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, I was not here
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0600
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
for the incident, I found out after I returned that Tuesday. That was the 8th [10/8/2024]. With a blood sugar
that high the nurse should have notified the doctor that he [Resident #1] was refusing his insulin and why
he was refusing it. The nurse in charge of his care was not acting within the professional standards of
practice for treating hyperglycemia in a type 1 diabetic. He [Staff A, LPN] should have notified the doctor
immediately when he [Resident #1] refused his insulin. He [Staff A, LPN] did not transcribe the orders, and
he should have stayed and transcribed the orders he got. The nurse got the high blood sugar and spoke to
someone. I don't know who he spoke with, I don't know their name, you will have to ask [the Administrator's
name] and got new orders. I don't know if or what he told the nurse that came on in the day shift. I don't
know what the day shift nurse did after that. This shouldn't have happened; this should have been avoided.
The nurse that admitted him should have read everything when it comes to the discharge summary, and
they would have seen all the other orders instead of just the one piece of paper. The blood sugar should
have been rechecked. It was not rechecked the rest of the day. I would consider this neglect. I don't know
why the abuse and neglect policies were not followed. We should have completed a RCA [root cause
analysis] and we should have implemented the abuse policy and procedure back on the 7th [10/7/2024].
During a telephone interview on 11/13/2024 at 11:35 AM, the OCMD stated, I did receive a call related to
this resident [Resident #1]. The Nurse called me on the afterhours line, and I was told of the residents'
glucose and I actually decided to double the insulin, the Lantus, and increase it to 15 Units twice a day and
to add SSIC [Sliding Scale Insulin Coverage] with insulin coverage AC [before meals] and HS [at bedtime]. I
would say that the professional standard of practice would be to have the blood glucose rechecked after 30
minutes to one hour after high readings to accurately assess if the patient was stabilizing versus the patient
needing further emergency treatment. The staff did not adhere to a professional standard of practice when
they did not notify us that he was refusing treatment. I would expect staff to inform us that a patient had
refused insulin to determine the next steps we needed to do, either increase medications or we send to the
hospital. I would call this unintentional neglect. They did not treat this according to professional standards of
practice. I should have been notified that the patient was refusing his insulin. I was not called about this
again after I gave the orders to them.
During an interview on 11/13/2024 at 3:18 PM, the Administrator stated, I found out about the situation
when I returned to work. I was finally able to speak with the daughter on 10/20/2024. I didn't file a report on
10/7/2024 because we saw on the chart that they only had orders for Lantus, we didn't think it was an issue
until he started refusing the medication. The report should have been done, that is the best practice. [Staff
A, LPN's name] got the order. It was not placed in [name of the electronic medical record software]. We
investigated and did a QAPI [Quality Assurance and Process Improvement] Ad hoc [from Latin meaning for
this] meeting on 10/7/2024. I talked to [Staff B's name], she said that the resident refused medications and
[Staff A's name] spoke to the nurse practitioner and got orders. The nurse forgot to transcribe the orders
into [name of the electronic medical record software]. There was no documentation in [name of the
electronic medical record software].
During an interview on 11/13/2024 at 3:43 PM, Staff B, LPN, stated, I did take care of this resident
[Resident #1]. He did not refuse care when I took care of him. I was told by the night nurse [Staff A, LPN]
that his blood sugar was high. I don't remember him telling me what the blood sugar was, he just said it was
high. He did not refuse care that day. I did not try to get another accucheck, he didn't have orders to
recheck his blood sugar. I didn't have orders to recheck the blood sugar. I wasn't told how high the blood
sugar was. I did not ask how high it was. I was in the front [area of building] charting and apparently, he
called 911. I was called and asked if he needed
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0600
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
help, I told them [EMS] no, I would check on him. I went to the room, and he said, You are trying to kill me. I
asked him why and he told me that 'his blood sugar, his insulin was wrong, and he needed to get short
acting insulin, and we weren't ordering it for him. I told him that he had orders for long-acting insulin and
that he refused to take it. He told me Yes, I do, but because I need short acting insulin I need to get out of
here and you all are trying to kill me. This could have been avoided, I should have rechecked his blood
sugar, I don't know why I didn't.
Residents Affected - Few
During a telephone interview on 11/14/2024 at 9:18 AM, the Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN)
stated, I believe that situation happened over the weekend. I wasn't the on-call provider, but it was
discussed Monday. The protocol they follow is normally blood sugar greater than 400 they notify their
provider and then we give standard orders. We give them extra orders. Like I said, I wasn't on call that
weekend but when it was reviewed come Monday, that night the nurse didn't notify the on-call provider, and
they documented that they did. They did come back with orders on that and then they had hand off [change
of] shift. I would have expected potentially that since it was a night shift going into day shift, because this
was a morning blood sugar, if I do recall correctly. As well, that morning at breakfast time the patients now
eating so that sugar should probably be rechecked 90 minutes after they eat to see how they process that
meal and what their new sugar is going to be if they weren't getting that coverage and then reaching back
out to the provider and letting them know, 'hey this person's blood sugar is still reading this number' and just
keep reaching out to the provider until they get what they need. A resident has the risk of going into
Diabetic Ketoacidosis if not properly monitored and treated for high blood sugar.
During a telephone interview on 11/14/2024 at 11:20 AM, the Medical Director stated, I remember a few
things because I know the facility felt bad about the whole thing, you know while this was all happening. So,
they had called me about it I think this happened over the weekend to my understanding. I know that there
was also some frustration on the patient end I think they refused some glucose checks or refused insulin
and then at that point I think they called 911. My expectations would be to 100% ensure that there's glucose
monitoring, accuchecks, and of course a sliding scale. I mean every single diabetic in the building should
be on a sliding scale. I think it was [the OCMD's name] that was notified. I think they went up on the long
acting and they were just assuming that the patient was on a sliding scale. 100% if you're in the five
hundreds [blood glucose level] and they're on long acting they need to be on a sliding scale, likely in the
highest level of the sliding scale you know from there we could go up on the long acting and ensure there's
proper glucose monitoring. I would probably give a onetime dose of a short acting and have them recheck
sugars in an hour so I'm not sure what took place in this case or how long after that reading the patient
called 911. I would want to be notified that they [resident] were refusing [medications]. I don't know if that
call was ever made, after the fact, to let the doctor know that he's refusing it. If any doctor's increasing
long-acting insulin, they're already assuming that the short acting is on the MAR.
During an interview on 11/14/2024 at 7:10 AM, the DON stated, I was not here the day that this was found,
that they spoke with his daughter, the Unit Manager spoke to her. They did know the concerns with not
providing insulin or ADL [Activities of Daily Living] care. We were still investigating it; I can't tell you why we
didn't investigate more. I knew his blood sugar was 552. I was given that information, but I thought it was
that [Staff A's name] didn't transcribe orders. I guess we did not do a thorough investigation, I can't find any
more than what was done initially and in the town hall meeting. I see that there were more than 12 hours
that the resident was still here after that blood sugar of 552. There are no other accuchecks done after that.
It is my expectation that staff provide a detailed report when going off their shift. The nurse [Staff A, LPN]
should
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0600
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
have told [Staff B's name] what the blood sugar was, and he [Staff A, LPN] should have documented his
information in the notes. [Staff A's name] should have asked what high meant if that is what he told her. She
should have followed up on that. I would expect that she called the doctor again and get further orders. She
[Staff B] had the opportunity to call the doctor when he called 911 to get further orders. All the information
should have been put in a progress note from both nurses. I would consider this neglect for both nurses. I
don't know why the staff weren't suspended; I can't give you a reason.
Residents Affected - Few
During an interview on 11/14/2024 at 4:10 PM, the Administrator stated, I can't say that I thought I needed
to complete a federal report. I was told by [Staff D's name] that she [Resident #1's daughter] was upset and
wanted to talk to us, but I wasn't able to connect with her. We attempted multiple times, but we couldn't
reach her and left messages. When we got [in touch with] her is when I found out about her concerns with
care related to the insulin and with being on the bedpan too long. We did do a QAPI on 10/7 related to the
insulin. I just thought it was because he refused to take his insulin. I guess we did not investigate fully until
after I spoke to his daughter. We thought the problem was that the nurse on admission got the right orders
and there weren't accuchecks ordered. He refused this medication, and I spoke to [Staff B's name], LPN,
and she told me that he [Resident #1] didn't talk to her at all about his insulin during the day before he
called 911. Then they realized that he had orders that were not transcribed from the night nurse when he
came on shift. I did not talk to him [Staff A, LPN] the DON did. I did not implement the abuse and neglect
policies because he refused his medication. I didn't think to. I can't tell you why. We should have done more
investigation. We should have done a QAPI when we realized that his blood sugar was so high, I wasn't
aware of everything. We only did the initial QAPI, we didn't do any others, I think we should have done it, I
can't tell you why we didn't. We did not suspend the nurses; it is our policy to suspend staff pending the
results of an investigation. We initially thought it happened because the resident refused his insulin, not for
neglect. We should follow our abuse and neglect policies and procedures. I didn't think to. I can't tell you
why.
Review of the policy and procedure titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation & Misappropriation last revision date
of 11/16/2022, last approval date of 4/23/2024 read, Policy: It is inherent in the nature and dignity of each
resident at the center that he/she be afforded basic human rights, including the right to be free from abuse,
neglect, mistreatment, exploitation and/or misappropriation of property. The management of the facility
recognizes these rights and hereby establishes the following statements, policies and procedures to protect
these rights to establish a disciplinary policy which results in a fair and timely treatment of occurrences of
resident abuse. Employees at the center are charged with a continuing obligation to treat residents so they
are free from abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and/or misappropriation of property. No employee may at any
time commit an act of physical, psychological, or emotional abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and or
misappropriation of property against any resident. Violation of this standard will subject employees to
disciplinary action including dismissal provided herein. Definitions: Neglect is the failure of the center, its
employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid
physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. Procedure: 4. Identification: All reported events
(bruises, skin tears, falls, inappropriate or abusive behaviors) will be investigated by the Director of
Nursing/designee. Patterns or trends will be identified that might constitute abuse. This information will be
forwarded to the Executive Director, who will serve as the facility's Abuse Coordinator, and an abuse
investigation will be conducted in the absence of the Executive Director, the Director of Nursing will serve
as the Abuse Coordinator. 5. Investigation: The Abuse Coordinator or his/her designee shall investigate all
reports or allegations
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 6 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0600
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
of abuse, neglect, misappropriation and exploitation. A Social Service representative may be offered in the
role of resident advocate during a questioning of or interviewing of residents. Investigations will be
accomplished in the following manner. Preliminary Investigation: Immediately upon an allegation of abuse
or neglect, the suspect(s) should be segregated from residents pending the investigation of the resident
allegation. The nurse or Director of Nursing/designee shall perform and document a thorough nursing
evaluation and notify the attending physician. An incident report shall be filed by the individual in charge
who received the report in conjunction with the person who reported the abuse. This report shall be filed as
soon as possible in order to provide the most accurate information in a timely fashion and submitted to the
Abuse Coordinator. Investigation: The Abuse Coordinator and/or Director of Nursing shall take statements
from the victim, the suspect(s) and all possible witnesses including all other employees in the vicinity of the
alleged abuse. He/she shall also secure all physical evidence. Upon completion of the investigation, a
detailed report shall be prepared. 6. Protection: Any suspect(s), who is employed or contract service
provider, once he/she has(have) been identified, will be suspended pending the investigation. 7. Reporting/
Response: Any employee or contracted service provider who witnesses or has knowledge of an act of
abuse or alleged allegation of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment including injuries of unknown
source and misappropriation of resident property, to a resident is obligated to report such information
immediately but no later than two hours after the allegation is made if the events that caused the allegation
involve abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury for not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the
allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator and to other
officials in accordance with state law. In the absence of the executive director, the director of nursing is
designated abuse coordinator. Once an allegation of abuse is reported, the executive director, as the abuse
coordinator, is responsible for ensuring that reporting is completed timely and appropriately to appropriate
officials in accordance with federal and state regulations, including notification of law enforcement if a
reasonable suspicion of crime has occurred. Facility staff should be aware of and comply with their
individual requirements and responsibilities for reporting as required by law. Staff should be aware of, and
comply with, individual requirements and responsibilities for reporting as may be required by law. In all
cases, the executive director or director of nursing will ensure notification to the residents' legal guardian,
family member, responsible party, or significant other of the alleged, suspected or observed abuse, neglect
or mistreatment, and the resident's attending physician. Coordination with QAPI: The center will review
allegations of abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of resident property and exploitation during QAPI
meetings. QAPI committee will review information including but not limited to: The thoroughness of the
investigation, Protection of the resident(s), Risk factors identified, Root- cause analysis of the investigation,
Systemic changes that may be required.
Review of the policy and procedure titled Notification of Change of Condition last revision date of
12/16/2020 and last approval date of 4/23/2024 read, Policy: The Center to promptly notify the Patient/
Resident, the attending physician and the Resident Representative when there is a change in the status or
condition. Procedure: The nurse to notify the attending physician and resident representative when there is
an accident, significant change in the patient residence physical, mental or psychosocial status, need to
alter treatment significantly new treatment, discontinuation of current treatment due to but not limited to
adverse consequences acute condition exacerbation of a chronic condition, a transfer or discharge of the
patient resident from the center, patient/ resident consecutively refuses medication and or treatment (IE two
or more times), patient/ resident is discharged without proper medical authority.
Review of the
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 7 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0600
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
policy and procedure titled Physician orders last revision date of 3/3/2021 and last approval date of
4/23/2024 read, Policy: The center will ensure that physician orders are appropriately and timely
documented in the medical record. Procedure: admission Orders: Information received from the referring
facility or agency to be reviewed, verified with the physician and transcribed to the electronic medical
record. The attending physician will review and confirm orders. Confirmation of admission orders requires
that the physician sign and date the order during or as soon as practicable after it is provided, to maintain
an accurate medical record. Routine orders: A nurse may accept a telephone order from a Physician,
Physician Assistant or Nurse Practitioner (as permitted by state law) The order will be repeated back to the
physician, PA or ARNP for his/her verbal confirmation. The order is transcribed to all appropriate areas of
the electronic health record (eMAR/eTAR [electronic Treatment Administration Record]). For pharmacy
orders, the nurse will notify the pharmacy per pharmacy policy by telephoning, faxing or completing the
order electronically.
The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was removed onsite on 11/18/2024 after the receipt of an acceptable IJ
removal plan. The facility has completed the following steps to remove the immediate jeopardy. On
11/18/2024, the Executive Director completed a 30-day look back at all reportables to ensure proper
investigation was conducted. On 11/18/2024, the Director of Nursing completed all hospital transfers,
conducted a facility wide audit of change in conditions in the last 30 days pertaining to insulin with no
additional concerns related to blood sugars. On 11/14/2024, education was provided to the Executive
Director by the Regional [NAME] President on Abuse/Neglect policy and procedure to include
investigations. The Regional Nurse Consultant provided abuse/ neglect education, as well as investigation
to the nurse management staff on 11/13/2024. Education included: abuse/ neglect policy and procedure
related to neglect for failure to reassess, notify the physician, not documenting physician's orders, not
documenting communication to the physician, not documenting the transfer of the resident to the hospital,
not following physician orders, and lack of shift-to-shift report. All incidents to be called to the Regional
[NAME] President, Regional Director of Clinical Services, and Risk Manager with a timeline of events on
any incident to determine if reportable. Investigations to be started immediately on any complaints or
incidents. On 11/18/2024, the grievance log was reviewed for the last 30 days by Regional Director of
Social Services with no concerns noted related to change of condition, insulin, abuse or neglect. On
11/18/2024, the Director of Nursing conducted a facility wide audit of all hospital transfers and change of
condition in the last 30 days pertaining to insulin with no additional concerns related to blood sugars. On
11/13/2024, education was provided for all staff by the Director of Nursing/designee on the abuse neglect
policy. Facility personnel received education beginning on 11/13/2024 and completed on 11/15/2024 related
to the abuse/neglect policy to include preventing abuse, identification, protection, investigating and
reporting inappropriate resident behaviors to the nurse. Neglect is the failure of the center, its employees or
service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm,
pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Key staff were educated on reporting process of a potential
deficient practice or suspected abuse/neglect to the Quality Assurance performance Improvement (QA/PI)
by notifying the Executive Director and/or the Director of Nursing. On 11/13/2024, an Ad Hoc that included
the Executive Director, Medical Director, Director of Nursing the root cause analysis was the facility failed to
initiate/implement the abuse/neglect policy including a complete investigation. The facility failed to identify
areas not in compliance regarding the nurse failing to reassess the resident, failed to document the change
in condition, lack of shift-to-shift report, insulin administration, Abuse/neglect identification and process,
failed to follow policies and procedures when transferring resident to the hospital,
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 8 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0600
and lack of communication[TRUNCATED]
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 9 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0607
Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Based on record review, interview, and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to implement
policies and procedures and fully investigate allegations of medical neglect for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for
abuse and neglect, Resident #1.
Residents Affected - Few
Findings include:
Review of the admission Record for Resident #1 documented an admission date of 10/3/2024 with
diagnoses that include diabetes mellitus type 1, malignant neoplasm of oropharynx (cancer), unspecified
dysphagia (unable to swallow), oropharyngeal phase, type 1 diabetes mellitus without complications,
chronic pulmonary embolism (a blockage in a lung artery caused by a blood clot that has traveled from
elsewhere in the body), chronic kidney disease, unspecified, other acute osteomyelitis (bone infection),
unspecified site, acquired absence of left leg (below knee), essential primary hypertension (high blood
pressure), gastrostomy status (a flexible tube that's surgically inserted into the stomach through the
abdominal wall. It allows for the delivery of nutrition, fluids, and medication directly into the stomach),
hyperlipidemia, unspecified (an abnormally high concentration of fats or lipids in the blood), peripheral
vascular disease, unspecified (blood vessels narrow or become blocked, reducing blood flow to the limbs or
other parts of the body).
Review of Resident #1's physician order dated 10/4/2024 read, Lantus SoloStar Subcutaneous Solution
Pen-injector 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Glargine) Inject 10 units subcutaneously one time a day related to Type
1 Diabetes Mellitus Without Complications.
Review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed Staff A, Licensed Practical
Nurse (LPN) documented a bs (blood sugar) of 552 on 10/6/2024 at 6:00 AM. Staff A documented 2, CM
(chart code/follow up codes 2=drug refused).
Review of Resident #1's eMAR (electronic MAR) note dated 10/6/2024 at 6:32 AM showed Staff A, LPN,
documented, Patient stated, I'm refusing all medications until I get the proper insulin.
Review of Resident #1's progress note dated 10/6/2024 at 7:00 AM documented by Staff A, LPN, read,
ARNP [Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner] notified of resident's refusal of all morning medications.
Per resident he is refusing all medications until he is receiving the proper insulin. Orders received to
increase current insulin twice daily with blood sugars checked twice daily. No other orders given at this
current time.
Review of text message communication from Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone to the On Call Medical
Doctor (OCMD) on 10/6/2024 at 7:33 AM read, Good Morning, [Resident #1's name] is refusing all of his
medications. He says he's not taking anything until he receives the proper insulin. Per his orders he's
receiving 10 Units of Lantus @ [at] 6 am. He did allow me to check his blood sugar 552.
Review of text message communication from the OCMD to Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone on
10/6/2024 at 8:19 AM read, No sliding scale ordered?
Review of text message communication from Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone to the OCMD on
10/6/2024 at 8:22 AM read, No, I didn't see any sliding scale he said his Lantus is supposed to be given @
night. And he has another type of insulin he gets. I didn't see anything other than the Lantus.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 10 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0607
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Review of text message communication from the OCMD to Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone on
10/6/2024 at 10:55 AM read, Based on his sugars, if they have been above 250 everyday, go up to 15 BID
[15 units two times a day] of long-acting insulin and make sure we cover with sliding scale for meals. Let's
also make sure he's getting accuchecks.
Review of text message communication from Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone to the OCMD on
10/6/2024 at 7:55 PM read, I'll change his orders & notify him of the changes & hopefully he complies.
Review of text message communication from Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone to the OCMD on
10/6/2024 at 11:25 PM read, [Resident #1's last name] has continued to call 911 since I arrived this
afternoon. They are loading him up & transporting him, [Resident #1's full name].
Review of Resident #1's Interact SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendations)
Communication form documented by Staff A, LPN, dated 10/6/2024 at 11:25 PM read, Situation: the
change in condition (CIC) reported on this CIC evaluation are: other change in condition. At the time of
evaluation patient vital signs, weight and blood sugar were blood pressure 130/77, pulse 82, temperature
98.2, pulse oximetry 96% on room air, blood glucose of 552 obtained at 6:45 AM on 10/06/24. Outcomes of
physical assessment: positive findings reported were mental status evaluation with no change observed.
Functional status evaluation with no changes observed. Patient called 911 on his personal cell phone and
stated, I want out of this place. Primary Care Provider Feedback: Primary Care Provider responded with the
following feedback: Recommendations: No new orders given at this time.
Review of Resident #1's medical record did not contain any documentation of the text message
communication between the facility and the OCMD.
Review of Resident #1's medical record showed no further blood glucose checks after the 552 documented
at approximately 6:00 AM.
Review of the hospital ED (Emergency Department) provider notes for Resident #1 dated 10/6/2024 at
11:51 PM read, Chief complaint: Patient presents with high blood sugar. Patient is an 81 y.o. [year old] M
[male] with a PMH [Past Medical History] of oropharyngeal SCC [squamous cell cancer of throat], DVT
[Deep Vein Thrombosis], PVD [Peripheral Vascular Disease], T1D [Type 1 Diabetes], HTN [Hypertension],
and osteomyelitis who presents from an outside rehab after having unreadable glucose levels on his
monitor. He states that at the outside rehab were not following his strict insulin regimen trying to give a
different type of insulin. Per EMS [Emergency Medical Services] he was declining the insulin the outside
rehab was trying to give him. He was recently admitted on 10/3 for pneumonia and was discharged to
rehab NPO [nothing by mouth] with swallow study pending (gastrostomy tube in place). BASIC
METABOLIC PANEL - Abnormal; Notable for the following components: Glucose 745, Anion Gap 34.
Medical Evaluation Initiated: Attestation: The patient is critical due to DKA [Diabetic Ketoacidosis]. admitted
to the ICU [Intensive Care Unit].
Review of the hospital history and physical for Resident #1 dated 10/7/2024 read, HPI [history of presenting
illness]: [Resident #1's name] is an 81 y.o. male presented with hyperglycemia at rehab admitted for DKA.
PMH relevant for T1DM (Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus), HTN, oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma,
peripheral vascular disease, DVT (04/2022) and below the knee amputation secondary to osteomyelitis.
Patient reports lack of compliance with his long-term insulin regimen for DM1 [Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus] at
his rehab facility. He reports they weren't giving me the right insulin and explains some of the doses of his
regimen were being missed.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 11 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0607
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
During an interview on 11/13/2024 at 9:25 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, I was not here for the
incident, I found out after I returned that Tuesday. That was the 8th [10/8/2024]. With a blood sugar that high
the nurse should have notified the doctor that he [Resident #1] was refusing his insulin and why he was
refusing it. The nurse in charge of his care was not acting within the professional standards of practice for
treating hyperglycemia in a type 1 diabetic. He [Staff A, LPN] should have notified the doctor immediately
when he [Resident #1] refused his insulin. He [Staff A, LPN] did not transcribe the orders, and he should
have stayed and transcribed the orders he got. The nurse got the high blood sugar and spoke to someone. I
don't know who he spoke with, I don't know their name, you will have to ask [the Administrator's name] and
got new orders. I don't know if or what he told the nurse that came on in the day shift. I don't know what the
day shift nurse did after that. This shouldn't have happened; this should have been avoided. The nurse that
admitted him should have read everything when it comes to the discharge summary, and they would have
seen all the other orders instead of just the one piece of paper. The blood sugar should have been
rechecked. It was not rechecked the rest of the day. I would consider this neglect. I don't know why the
abuse and neglect policies were not followed. We should have completed a RCA [root cause analysis] and
we should have implemented the abuse policy and procedure back on the 7th [10/7/2024].
During a telephone interview on 11/13/2024 at 11:35 AM, the OCMD stated, I did receive a call related to
this resident [Resident #1]. The Nurse called me on the afterhours line, and I was told of the residents'
glucose and I actually decided to double the insulin, the Lantus, and increase it to 15 Units twice a day and
to add SSIC [Sliding Scale Insulin Coverage] with insulin coverage AC [before meals] and HS [at bedtime]. I
would say that the professional standard of practice would be to have the blood glucose rechecked after 30
minutes to one hour after high readings to accurately assess if the patient was stabilizing versus the patient
needing further emergency treatment. The staff did not adhere to a professional standard of practice when
they did not notify us that he was refusing treatment. I would expect staff to inform us that a patient had
refused insulin to determine the next steps we needed to do, either increase medications or we send to the
hospital. I would call this unintentional neglect. They did not treat this according to professional standards of
practice. I should have been notified that the patient was refusing his insulin. I was not called about this
again after I gave the orders to them.
During an interview on 11/13/2024 at 2:49 PM, Staff D, LPN, Unit Manager, stated, I found out when his
daughter called me, she called on that Monday (October 7th). She was upset about him not getting his
insulin and about what happened. This was after he left. She said she was a nurse and couldn't understand
how we could make a mistake like this. She was very upset about it. She was upset that he was not given
his proper insulin and that he was now in Diabetic ketoacidosis. I told [the Administrator's name].
During an interview on 11/13/2024 at 3:18 PM, the Administrator stated, I found out about the situation
when I returned to work. I was finally able to speak with the daughter on 10/20/2024. I didn't file a report on
10/7/2024 because we saw on the chart that they only had orders for Lantus, we didn't think it was an issue
until he started refusing the medication. The report should have been done, that is the best practice. [Staff
A, LPN's name] got the order. It was not placed in [name of the electronic medical record software]. We
investigated and did a QAPI [Quality Assurance and Process Improvement] Ad hoc [from Latin meaning for
this] meeting on 10/7/2024. I talked to [Staff B's name], she said that the resident refused medications and
[Staff A's name] spoke to the nurse practitioner and got orders. The nurse forgot to transcribe the orders
into [name of the electronic medical record software]. There was no documentation in [name of the
electronic medical record software].
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 12 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0607
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
During an interview on 11/13/2024 at 3:43 PM, Staff B, LPN, stated, I did take care of this resident
[Resident #1]. He did not refuse care when I took care of him. I was told by the night nurse [Staff A, LPN]
that his blood sugar was high. I don't remember him telling me what the blood sugar was, he just said it was
high. He did not refuse care that day. I did not try to get another accucheck, he didn't have orders to
recheck his blood sugar. I didn't have orders to recheck the blood sugar. I wasn't told how high the blood
sugar was. I did not ask how high it was. I was in the front [area of building] charting and apparently, he
called 911. I was called and asked if he needed help, I told them [EMS] no, I would check on him. I went to
the room, and he said, You are trying to kill me. I asked him why and he told me that 'his blood sugar, his
insulin was wrong, and he needed to get short acting insulin, and we weren't ordering it for him. I told him
that he had orders for long-acting insulin and that he refused to take it. He told me Yes, I do, but because I
need short acting insulin I need to get out of here and you all are trying to kill me. This could have been
avoided, I should have rechecked his blood sugar, I don't know why I didn't.
During an interview on 11/14/2024 at 7:10 AM, the DON stated, I was not here the day that this was found,
that they spoke with his daughter, the Unit Manager spoke to her. They did know the concerns with not
providing insulin or ADL [Activities of Daily Living] care. We were still investigating it; I can't tell you why we
didn't investigate more. I knew his blood sugar was 552. I was given that information, but I thought it was
that [Staff A's Name] didn't transcribe orders. I guess we did not do a thorough investigation, I can't find any
more than what was done initially and in the town hall meeting. I see that there were more than 12 hours
that the resident was still here after that blood sugar of 552. No, there are no other accuchecks done after
that. It is my expectation that staff provide a detailed report when going off their shift. The nurse [Staff A,
LPN] should have told [Staff B's name] what the blood sugar was, and he [Staff A, LPN] should have
documented his information in the notes. [Staff A's name] should have asked what high meant if that is
what he told her. She should have followed up on that. I would expect that she called the doctor again and
get further orders. She [Staff B] had the opportunity to call the doctor when he called 911 to get further
orders. All the information should have been put in a progress note from both nurses. I would consider this
neglect for both nurses. I don't know why the staff weren't suspended; I can't give you a reason. We should
have followed our policies on abuse.
During an interview on 11/14/2024 at 4:10 PM, the Administrator stated, I can't say that I thought I needed
to complete a federal report. I was told by [Staff D's name] that she [Resident #1's daughter] was upset and
wanted to talk to us, but I wasn't able to connect with her. We attempted multiple times, but we couldn't
reach her and left messages. When we got [in touch with] her is when I found out about her concerns with
care related to the insulin and with being on the bedpan too long. We did do a QAPI on 10/7 related to the
insulin. I just thought it was because he refused to take his insulin. I guess we did not investigate fully until
after I spoke to his daughter. We thought the problem was that the nurse on admission got the right orders
and there weren't accuchecks ordered. He refused this medication, and I spoke to [Staff B's name] and she
told me that he [Resident #1] didn't talk to her at all about his insulin during the day before he called 911.
Then they realized that he had orders that were not transcribed from the night nurse when he came on
shift. I did not talk to him [Staff A, LPN], the DON did. I did not implement the abuse and neglect policies
because he refused his medication. I didn't think to. I can't tell you why. We should have done more
investigation. We should have done a QAPI when we realized that his blood sugar was so high, I wasn't
aware of everything. We only did the initial QAPI, we didn't do any others, I think we should have done it, I
can't tell you why we didn't. We did not suspend the nurses; it is our policy to suspend staff
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 13 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0607
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
pending the results of an investigation. We initially thought it happened because the resident refused his
insulin, not for neglect. We should follow our abuse and neglect policies and procedures.
Review of Staff A's employee file showed no disciplinary action or suspension in place during the
investigation.
Residents Affected - Few
Review of the schedule for October and November 2024 documented that Staff A, LPN, worked on
10/7/2024, 10/10/2024, 10/11/2024, 10/12/2024, 10/14/2024, 10/15/2024, 10/19/2024, 10/20/2024,
10/21/2024, 10/24/2024, 10/25/2024, 10/26/2024, 10/28/2024, 10/29/2024, 10/31/2024, 11/01/2024,
11/02/2024, 11/03/2024, 11/04/2024, 11/07/2024, 11/08/2024, 11/09/2024, 11/11/2024, and on
11/12/2024.
Review of the document titled Bull horn Time & Expense Payroll Company Staff A's timesheet clock in and
clock out activity verified Staff A, LPN, clocked in for work on 10/7/2024, 10/10/2024, 10/11/2024,
10/12/2024, 10/14/2024, 10/15/2024, 10/19/2024, 10/20/2024, 10/21/2024, 10/24/2024, 10/25/2024,
10/26/2024, 10/28/2024, 10/29/2024, 10/31/2024, 11/01/2024, 11/02/2024, 11/03/2024, 11/04/2024,
11/07/2024, 11/08/2024, 11/09/2024, 11/11/2024, and on 11/12/2024.
Review of Staff B's employee file showed no disciplinary action or suspension in place during the
investigation.
Review of the schedule for October and November 2024 documented that Staff B, LPN, worked on
10/07/2024, 10/09/2024, 10/11/2024, 10/12/2024, 10/16/2024, 10/18/2024, 10/22/2024, 10/23/2024,
10/24/2024, 10/25/2024, 10/26/2024, 11/03/2024, 11/04/2024, 11/06/2024, 11/07/2024, 11/08/2024,
11/09/2024, 11/13/2024, 11/1420/24, and 11/15/2024.
Review of the document titled Bull horn Time & Expense Payroll Company Staff B's timesheet clock in and
clock out activity documented that Staff B, LPN, clocked in for work on 10/07/2024, 10/09/2024,
10/11/2024, 10/12/2024, 10/16/2024, 10/18/2024, 10/22/2024, 10/23/2024, 10/24/2024, 10/25/2024,
10/26/2024, 11/03/2024, 11/04/2024, 11/06/2024, 11/07/2024, 11/08/2024, 11/09/2024, 11/13/2024,
11/1420/24, and 11/15/2024.
Review of the policy and procedure titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation & Misappropriation last revision date
of 11/16/2022, last approval date of 4/23/2024 read, Policy: It is inherent in the nature and dignity of each
resident at the center that he/she be afforded basic human rights, including the right to be free from abuse,
neglect, mistreatment, exploitation and/or misappropriation of property. The management of the facility
recognizes these rights and hereby establishes the following statements, policies and procedures to protect
these rights to establish a disciplinary policy which results in a fair and timely treatment of occurrences of
resident abuse. Employees at the center are charged with a continuing obligation to treat residents so they
are free from abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and/or misappropriation of property. No employee may at any
time commit an act of physical, psychological, or emotional abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and or
misappropriation of property against any resident. Violation of this standard will subject employees to
disciplinary action including dismissal provided herein. Definitions: Neglect is the failure of the center, its
employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid
physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. Procedure: 4. Identification: All reported events
(bruises, skin tears, falls, inappropriate or abusive behaviors) will be investigated by the Director of
Nursing/designee. Patterns or trends will be identified that might constitute abuse. This information will be
forwarded to the Executive Director, who will serve as the facility's Abuse Coordinator, and an abuse
investigation will be conducted in the absence of the Executive Director, the Director of
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 14 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0607
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Nursing will serve as the Abuse Coordinator. 5. Investigation: The Abuse Coordinator or his/her designee
shall investigate all reports or allegations of abuse, neglect, misappropriation and exploitation. A Social
Service representative may be offered in the role of resident advocate during a questioning of or
interviewing of residents. Investigations will be accomplished in the following manner. Preliminary
Investigation: Immediately upon an allegation of abuse or neglect, the suspect(s) should be segregated
from residents pending the investigation of the resident allegation. The nurse or Director of
Nursing/designee shall perform and document a thorough nursing evaluation and notify the attending
physician. An incident report shall be filed by the individual in charge who received the report in conjunction
with the person who reported the abuse. This report shall be filed as soon as possible in order to provide
the most accurate information in a timely fashion and submitted to the Abuse Coordinator. Investigation:
The Abuse Coordinator and/or Director of Nursing shall take statements from the victim, the suspect(s) and
all possible witnesses including all other employees in the vicinity of the alleged abuse. He/she shall also
secure all physical evidence. Upon completion of the investigation, a detailed report shall be prepared. 6.
Protection: Any suspect(s), who is employed or contract service provider, once he/she has(have) been
identified, will be suspended pending the investigation. 7. Reporting/ Response: Any employee or
contracted service provider who witnesses or has knowledge of an act of abuse or alleged allegation of
abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of
resident property, to a resident is obligated to report such information immediately but no later than two
hours after the allegation is made if the events that caused the allegation involve abuse or resulted in
serious bodily injury for not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation do not involve abuse
and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator and to other officials in accordance with state
law. In the absence of the executive director, the director of nursing is designated abuse coordinator. Once
an allegation of abuse is reported, the executive director, as the abuse coordinator, is responsible for
ensuring that reporting is completed timely and appropriately to appropriate officials in accordance with
federal and state regulations, including notification of law enforcement if a reasonable suspicion of crime
has occurred. Facility staff should be aware of and comply with their individual requirements and
responsibilities for reporting as required by law. Staff should be aware of, and comply with, individual
requirements and responsibilities for reporting as may be required by law. In all cases, the executive
director or director of nursing will ensure notification to the residents' legal guardian, family member,
responsible party, or significant other of the alleged, suspected or observed abuse, neglect or mistreatment,
and the resident's attending physician. Coordination with QAPI: The center will review allegations of abuse,
neglect, and misappropriation of resident property and exploitation during QAPI meetings. QAPI committee
will review information including but not limited to: The thoroughness of the investigation, Protection of the
resident(s), Risk factors identified, Root- cause analysis of the investigation, Systemic changes that may be
required.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 15 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Based on interview, record review, and review of policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure
residents who required insulin administration received treatment in accordance with professional standards
of practice by failing to notify and immediately consult with the resident's physician when a resident suffered
elevated blood glucose levels. On 10/6/2024 at 6:00 AM, Resident #1 had a blood sugar value of 552 and
the on-call provider was notified of the value and the resident stated he was refusing medications until he
received the proper insulin. Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse, (LPN), did not communicate to Staff B, LPN
or transcribe the new orders into the medical record for the increase in insulin and the addition of sliding
scale insulin coverage. Staff B, LPN, assumed care of Resident #1 at 7:00 AM on 10/6/2024 and did not
follow up with the provider. Staff B, LPN, did not reassess Resident #1's blood glucose or address the need
for any orders. Resident #1 called 911 at approximately 6:30 PM, Emergency Medical Services (EMS)
contacted the facility, spoke with Staff B, LPN, who instructed EMS the resident did not need help. Again at
11:15 PM, Resident #1 called 911 and was subsequently transferred to the hospital and was admitted to
the Intensive Care Unit with a diagnosis of Diabetic Ketoacidosis.
Residents Affected - Few
Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) develops when the body can't make enough insulin, a hormone that helps
sugar enter cells for energy. Instead, fat is broken down for energy. This can cause acids called ketones to
build up in the blood and collect in the urine. The risk is highest in people who have type 1 diabetes and
those who often miss insulin doses. DKA symptoms often start quickly, sometimes within a day. A person
may get very thirsty, urinate often, vomit or have stomach pain. Symptoms also can include tiredness or
weakness, confusion, shortness of breath, or fruity breath. Treatment often involves going to a hospital to
receive fluids, insulin and electrolytes through a vein. Without treatment, diabetic ketoacidosis can lead to
loss of consciousness and death. (Mayo Clinic/Mayoclinic.org)
The facility's failure to implement the policy and procedure for change of condition and physician notification
and failure to ensure residents who required insulin administration received treatment in accordance with
professional standards of practice led to a determination of Immediate Jeopardy at a scope and severity of
isolated (J).
The Nursing Home Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on November 18, 2024, at 2:50
PM.
The Immediate Jeopardy began on October 6, 2024, and was removed on site on November 18, 2024.
Findings include:
Review of the admission Record for Resident #1 documented an admission date of 10/3/2024 with
diagnoses that include diabetes mellitus type 1, malignant neoplasm of oropharynx (cancer), unspecified
dysphagia (unable to swallow), oropharyngeal phase, type 1 diabetes mellitus without complications,
chronic pulmonary embolism (a blockage in a lung artery caused by a blood clot that has traveled from
elsewhere in the body), chronic kidney disease, unspecified, other acute osteomyelitis (bone infection),
unspecified site, acquired absence of left leg (below knee), essential primary hypertension (high blood
pressure), gastrostomy status (a flexible tube that's surgically inserted into the stomach through the
abdominal wall. It allows for the delivery of nutrition, fluids, and medication directly into the stomach),
hyperlipidemia, unspecified (an abnormally high concentration of fats or lipids in the blood), peripheral
vascular disease, unspecified (blood vessels narrow or become blocked,
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 16 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684
reducing blood flow to the limbs or other parts of the body).
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Review of Resident #1's physician order dated 10/4/2024 read, Lantus SoloStar Subcutaneous Solution
Pen-injector 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Glargine) Inject 10 units subcutaneously one time a day related to Type
1 Diabetes Mellitus Without Complications.
Residents Affected - Few
Review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed Staff A, LPN, documented a BS
(blood sugar) of 552 on 10/6/2024 at 6:00 AM. Staff A, LPN, documented 2, CM (chart code/follow up
codes 2 = drug refused).
Review of Resident #1's eMAR (electronic Medication Administration Record) note dated 10/6/2024 at 6:32
AM documented by Staff A, LPN, read, Patient stated, I'm refusing all medications until I get the proper
insulin.
Review of Resident #1's progress note dated 10/6/2024 at 7:00 AM documented by Staff A, LPN, read,
ARNP [Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner] notified of resident's refusal of all morning medications.
Per resident he is refusing all medications until he is receiving the proper insulin. Orders received to
increase current insulin twice daily with blood sugars checked twice daily. No other orders given at this
current time.
Review of text message communication from Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone to the On Call Medical
Doctor (OCMD) on 10/6/2024 at 7:33 AM read, Good Morning, [Resident #1's name] is refusing all of his
medications. He says he's not taking anything until he receives the proper insulin. Per his orders he's
receiving 10 Units of Lantus @ [at] 6 am. He did allow me to check his blood sugar 552.
Review of text message communication from the OCMD to Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone on
10/6/2024 at 8:19 AM read, No sliding scale ordered?
Review of text message communication from Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone to the OCMD on
10/6/2024 at 8:22 AM read, No, I didn't see any sliding scale he said his Lantus is supposed to be given @
night. And he has another type of insulin he gets. I didn't see anything other than the Lantus.
Review of text message communication from the OCMD to Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone on
10/6/2024 at 10:55 AM read, Based on his sugars, if they have been above 250 everyday, go up to 15 BID
[15 units two times a day] of long-acting insulin and make sure we cover with sliding scale for meals. Let's
also make sure he's getting accuchecks.
Review of text message communication from Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone to the OCMD on
10/6/2024 at 7:55 PM read, I'll change his orders & notify him of the changes & hopefully he complies.
Review of text message communication from Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone to the OCMD on
10/6/2024 at 11:25 PM read, [Resident #1's last name] has continued to call 911 since I arrived this
afternoon. They are loading him up & transporting him, [Resident #1's full name].
Review of Resident #1 medical record did not contain any documentation of the test message
communication between the facility and the OCMD.
Review of Resident #1's Interact SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendations)
Communication form documented by Staff A, LPN, dated 10/6/2024 at 11:25 PM read, Situation: the
change in
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 17 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
condition (CIC) reported on this CIC evaluation are: other change in condition. At the time of evaluation
patient vital signs, weight and blood sugar were blood pressure 130/77, pulse 82, temperature 98.2, pulse
oximetry 96% on room air, blood glucose of 552 obtained at 6:45 AM on 10/06/24. Outcomes of physical
assessment: positive findings reported were mental status evaluation with no change observed. Functional
status evaluation with no changes observed. Patient called 911 on his personal cell phone and stated, I
want out of this place. Primary Care Provider Feedback: Primary Care Provider responded with the
following feedback: Recommendations: No new orders given at this time.
Review of Resident #1's medical record did not contain any documentation of further blood glucose checks
after the glucose level of 552 was documented at approximately 6:00 AM.
Review of the hospital ED (Emergency Department) provider notes for Resident #1 dated 10/6/2024 at
11:51 PM read, Chief complaint: Patient presents with high blood sugar. Patient is an 81 y.o. [year old] M
[male] with a PMH [Past Medical History] of oropharyngeal SCC [squamous cell cancer of throat], DVT
[Deep Vein Thrombosis], PVD [Peripheral Vascular Disease], T1D [Type 1 Diabetes], HTN [Hypertension],
and osteomyelitis who presents from an outside rehab after having unreadable glucose levels on his
monitor. He states that at the outside rehab were not following his strict insulin regimen trying to give a
different type of insulin. Per EMS [Emergency Medical Services] he was declining the insulin the outside
rehab was trying to give him. He was recently admitted on 10/3 for pneumonia and was discharged to
rehab NPO [nothing by mouth] with swallow study pending (gastrostomy tube in place). BASIC
METABOLIC PANEL - Abnormal; Notable for the following components: Glucose 745, Anion Gap 34.
Medical Evaluation Initiated: Attestation: The patient is critical due to DKA [Diabetic Ketoacidosis]. admitted
to the ICU [Intensive Care Unit].
Review of the hospital history and physical for Resident #1 dated 10/7/2024 read, HPI [history of presenting
illness]: [Resident #1's name] is an 81 y.o. male presented with hyperglycemia at rehab admitted for DKA.
PMH relevant for T1DM (Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus), HTN, oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma,
peripheral vascular disease, DVT (04/2022) and below the knee amputation secondary to osteomyelitis.
Patient reports lack of compliance with his long-term insulin regimen for DM1 [Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus] at
his rehab facility. He reports they weren't giving me the right insulin and explains some of the doses of his
regimen were being missed.
During an interview on 11/13/2024 at 9:25 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, I was not here for the
incident, I found out after I returned that Tuesday. That was the 8th [10/8/2024]. With a blood sugar that high
the nurse should have notified the doctor that he [Resident #1] was refusing his insulin and why he was
refusing it. The nurse in charge of his care was not acting within the professional standards of practice for
treating hyperglycemia in a type 1 diabetic. He [Staff A, LPN] should have notified the doctor immediately
when he [Resident #1] refused his insulin. He [Staff A, LPN] did not transcribe the orders, and he should
have stayed and transcribed the orders he got. The nurse got the high blood sugar and spoke to someone. I
don't know who he spoke with, I don't know their name, you will have to ask [the Administrator's name] and
got new orders. I don't know if or what he told the nurse that came on in the day shift. I don't know what the
day shift nurse did after that. This shouldn't have happened; this should have been avoided. The nurse that
admitted him should have read everything when it comes to the discharge summary, and they would have
seen all the other orders instead of just the one piece of paper. The blood sugar should have been
rechecked. It was not rechecked the rest of the day. I would consider this neglect. I don't know why the
abuse and neglect policies were not followed. We should have completed a RCA [root cause analysis] and
we should have implemented the abuse policy and procedure back on the 7th [10/7/2024].
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 18 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
During a telephone interview on 11/13/2024 at 11:35 AM, the OCMD stated, I did receive a call related to
this resident [Resident #1]. The Nurse called me on the afterhours line, and I was told of the residents'
glucose and I actually decided to double the insulin, the Lantus, and increase it to 15 Units twice a day and
to add SSIC [Sliding Scale Insulin Coverage] with insulin coverage AC [before meals] and HS [at bedtime]. I
would say that the professional standard of practice would be to have the blood glucose rechecked after 30
minutes to one hour after high readings to accurately assess if the patient was stabilizing versus the patient
needing further emergency treatment. The staff did not adhere to a professional standard of practice when
they did not notify us that he was refusing treatment. I would expect staff to inform us that a patient had
refused insulin to determine the next steps we needed to do, either increase medications or we send to the
hospital. I would call this unintentional neglect. They did not treat this according to professional standards of
practice. I should have been notified that the patient was refusing his insulin. I was not called about this
again after I gave the orders to them.
During an interview on 11/13/2024 at 2:28 PM, Staff E, LPN, Wound Care Nurse, stated, The nurse that
admitted this resident did not identify it, that more than Lantus should have been ordered for him. The night
nurse did get the high blood sugar and called the nurse practitioner and got orders. I don't know if he told
the day nurse, I don't know. The hospital MAR conflicts with the discharge summary. He [Staff A, LPN] didn't
transcribe the orders he got. He should have.
During an interview on 11/13/2024 at 2:49 PM, Staff D, LPN, Unit Manager, stated, I found out [about
incident] when his daughter called me, she called on that Monday [10/7/2024]. She was upset about him
not getting his insulin and about what happened, this was after he went to the hospital. She said she was a
nurse and couldn't understand how we could make a mistake like this. She was very upset about it. She
was upset that he was not given his proper insulin and that he was now in Diabetic ketoacidosis. I told [the
Administrator's name].
During an interview on 11/13/2024 at 3:18 PM, the Administrator stated, I found out about the situation
when I returned to work. I was finally able to speak with the daughter on 10/20/2024. I didn't file a report on
10/7/2024 because we saw on the chart that they only had orders for Lantus, we didn't think it was an issue
until he started refusing the medication. The report should have been done, that is the best practice. [Staff
A, LPN's name] got the order. It was not placed in [name of the electronic medical record software]. We
investigated and did a QAPI [Quality Assurance and Process Improvement] Ad hoc [from Latin meaning for
this] meeting on 10/7/2024. I talked to [Staff B's name], she said that the resident refused medications and
[Staff A's name] spoke to the nurse practitioner and got orders. The nurse forgot to transcribe the orders
into [name of the electronic medical record software]. There was no documentation in [name of the
electronic medical record software].
During an interview on 11/13/2024 at 3:43 PM, Staff B, LPN, stated, I did take care of this resident
[Resident #1]. He did not refuse care when I took care of him. I was told by the night nurse [Staff A, LPN]
that his blood sugar was high. I don't remember him telling me what the blood sugar was, he just said it was
high. He did not refuse care that day. I did not try to get another accucheck, he didn't have orders to
recheck his blood sugar. I didn't have orders to recheck the blood sugar. I wasn't told how high the blood
sugar was. I did not ask how high it was. I was in the front [area of building] charting and apparently, he
called 911. I was called and asked if he needed help, I told them [EMS] no, I would check on him. I went to
the room, and he said, You are trying to kill me. I asked him why and he told me that 'his blood sugar, his
insulin was wrong, and he needed to get short acting insulin, and we weren't ordering it for him. I told him
that he had orders for long-acting insulin and that he refused to take it. He told me Yes, I do, but because I
need short acting insulin
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 19 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
I need to get out of here and you all are trying to kill me. This could have been avoided, I should have
rechecked his blood sugar, I don't know why I didn't.
During a telephone interview on 11/14/2024 at 9:18 AM, the Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN)
stated, I believe that situation happened over the weekend. I wasn't the on-call provider, but it was
discussed Monday. The protocol they follow is normally blood sugar greater than 400 they notify their
provider and then we give standard orders. We give them extra orders. Like I said, I wasn't on call that
weekend but when it was reviewed come Monday, that night the nurse didn't notify the on-call provider, and
they documented that they did. They did come back with orders on that and then they had hand off [change
of] shift. I would have expected potentially that since it was a night shift going into day shift, because this
was a morning blood sugar, if I do recall correctly. As well, that morning at breakfast time the patients now
eating so that sugar should probably be rechecked 90 minutes after they eat to see how they process that
meal and what their new sugar is going to be if they weren't getting that coverage and then reaching back
out to the provider and letting them know, 'hey this person's blood sugar is still reading this number' and just
keep reaching out to the provider until they get what they need. A resident has the risk of going into
Diabetic Ketoacidosis if not properly monitored and treated for high blood sugar.
During a telephone interview on 11/14/2024 at 11:20 AM, the Medical Director stated, I remember a few
things because I know the facility felt bad about the whole thing, you know while this was all happening. So,
they had called me about it I think this happened over the weekend to my understanding. I know that there
was also some frustration on the patient end I think they refused some glucose checks or refused insulin
and then at that point I think they called 911. My expectations would be to 100% ensure that there's glucose
monitoring, accuchecks, and of course a sliding scale. I mean every single diabetic in the building should
be on a sliding scale. I think it was [the OCMD's name] that was notified. I think they went up on the long
acting and they were just assuming that the patient was on a sliding scale. 100% if you're in the five
hundreds [blood glucose level] and they're on long acting they need to be on a sliding scale, likely in the
highest level of the sliding scale you know from there we could go up on the long acting and ensure there's
proper glucose monitoring. I would probably give a onetime dose of a short acting and have them recheck
sugars in an hour so I'm not sure what took place in this case or how long after that reading the patient
called 911. I would want to be notified that they [resident] were refusing [medications]. I don't know if that
call was ever made, after the fact, to let the doctor know that he's refusing it. If any doctor's increasing
long-acting insulin, they're already assuming that the short acting is on the MAR.
During an interview on 11/14/2024 at 7:10 AM, the DON stated, I was not here the day that this was found,
that they spoke with his daughter, the Unit Manager spoke to her. They did know the concerns with not
providing insulin or ADL [Activities of Daily Living] care. We were still investigating it; I can't tell you why we
didn't investigate more. I knew his blood sugar was 552. I was given that information, but I thought it was
that [Staff A's name] didn't transcribe orders. I guess we did not do a thorough investigation, I can't find any
more than what was done initially and in the town hall meeting. I see that there were more than 12 hours
that the resident was still here after that blood sugar of 552. There are no other accuchecks done after that.
It is my expectation that staff provide a detailed report when going off their shift. The nurse [Staff A, LPN]
should have told [Staff B's name] what the blood sugar was, and he [Staff A, LPN] should have documented
his information in the notes. [Staff A's name] should have asked what high meant if that is what he told her.
She should have followed up on that. I would expect that she called the doctor again and get further orders.
She [Staff B] had the opportunity to call the doctor when he called 911 to get further orders. All
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 20 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
the information should have been put in a progress note from both nurses. I would consider this neglect for
both nurses. I don't know why the staff weren't suspended; I can't give you a reason.
Review of the policy and procedure titled Notification of Change of Condition last revision date of
12/16/2020 and last approval date of 4/23/2024 read, Policy: The Center to promptly notify the Patient/
Resident, the attending physician and the Resident Representative when there is a change in the status or
condition. Procedure: The nurse to notify the attending physician and resident representative when there is
an accident, significant change in the patient residence physical, mental or psychosocial status, need to
alter treatment significantly new treatment, discontinuation of current treatment due to but not limited to
adverse consequences acute condition exacerbation of a chronic condition, a transfer or discharge of the
patient resident from the center, patient/ resident consecutively refuses medication and or treatment (IE two
or more times), patient/ resident is discharged without proper medical authority.
Review of the policy and procedure titled Physician orders last revision date of 3/3/2021 and last approval
date of 4/23/2024 read, Policy: The center will ensure that physician orders are appropriately and timely
documented in the medical record. Procedure: admission Orders: Information received from the referring
facility or agency to be reviewed, verified with the physician and transcribed to the electronic medical
record. The attending physician will review and confirm orders. Confirmation of admission orders requires
that the physician sign and date the order during or as soon as practicable after it is provided, to maintain
an accurate medical record. Routine orders: A nurse may accept a telephone order from a Physician,
Physician Assistant or Nurse Practitioner (as permitted by state law) The order will be repeated back to the
physician, PA or ARNP for his/her verbal confirmation. The order is transcribed to all appropriate areas of
the electronic health record (eMAR/eTAR [electronic Treatment Administration Record]). For pharmacy
orders, the nurse will notify the pharmacy per pharmacy policy by telephoning, faxing or completing the
order electronically.
The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was removed onsite on 11/18/2024 after the receipt of an acceptable IJ
removal plan. The facility has completed the following steps to remove the immediate jeopardy. On
11/13/2024, an Ad Hoc was completed in the presence of the Executive Director, Medical Director and the
Director of Nursing, to identify the root cause analysis was that the facility failed to ensure residents were
free from complications of a change in condition due to not reassessing residents, not transcribing and
administering ordered medication, not properly notifying the physician and not properly identifying the
change in condition. On 11/13/2024, 40 of 40 licensed staff were educated on the change of condition
process notifying the provider of abnormal blood glucose levels, notification of change, refusal of
medications, assessment and reassessments for abnormal glucose levels and other change in condition,
and transcribing and administration of physician orders. On 11/18/2024, The Director of Nursing completed
a full house audit of 18 hospital transfers and 16 changes in conditions over the last 30 days with no
deficient practice noted related to blood sugars, insulin, and transcribing/administering.
Review of the facility records documented that there were 18 transfers to the hospital with the last 30 days
and none were a result of blood sugars or hyperglycemia. Review of the facility records documented that
there were 16 changes in condition within the last 30 days and none were a result of blood sugars or
hyperglycemia. Review of the facility records documented an in-service dated 11/13/2024 on the topic of
abuse/neglect presented by the Regional Director of Clinical Services was provided to the nursing
management staff, the Director of Clinical Services, Assistant Director of Clinical services, and two Unit
Managers. Review of the education in-service attendance record dated 11/14/2024 documented that the
Executive Director received education on abuse and neglect training
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 21 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
(reporting requirements) from the Regional [NAME] President of Operations. Review of the facility records
beginning 11/13/2024 and completed on 11/17/2024 documented that 40 out of 40 licensed staff received
training on Abuse and Neglect, 68 out of 68 Certified Nursing Assistants and 64 out of 64 ancillary staff
received training on abuse and neglect, assessment and reassessment of residents, change-in-condition
process, hospital transfer process, communication during shift-to-shift report, insulin administration,
abuse/neglect identification and process and communication between staff and providers
Residents Affected - Few
During staff interviews conducted 11/13/2024 through 11/19/2024, 19 Licensed Practical Nurses, 2
Registered Nurses, the Executive Director, Director of Clinical Services, Assistant Director of Clinical
Services, Wound Care Nurse, Staffing Coordinator, Business Office manager and Social Service Manager
verified receiving the training and verbalized understanding of the abuse and neglect, changes in condition
policies and procedures, resident reassessment after changes in condition.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 22 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0835
Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Based on interview, record review, and review of policies and procedures, the facility administration failed to
administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain and
maintain the highest practicable physical wellbeing of each resident by failing to implement policy and
procedures for medical neglect and resident change of condition. On 10/6/2024 at 6:00 AM, Resident #1
had a blood sugar value of 552 and the on-call provider was notified of the value and the resident stated he
was refusing medications until he received the proper insulin. Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse, (LPN), did
not communicate to Staff B, LPN or transcribe the new orders into the medical record for the increase in
insulin and the addition of sliding scale insulin coverage. Staff B, LPN, assumed care of Resident #1 at 7:00
AM on 10/6/2024 and did not follow up with the provider. Staff B, LPN, did not reassess Resident #1's blood
glucose or address the need for any orders. Resident #1 called 911 at approximately 6:30 PM, Emergency
Medical Services (EMS) contacted the facility, spoke with Staff B, LPN, who instructed EMS the resident
did not need help. Again at 11:15 PM, Resident #1 called 911 and was subsequently transferred to the
hospital and was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit with a diagnosis of Diabetic Ketoacidosis.
Residents Affected - Few
The facility's failure to implement the policy and procedure for medical neglect and failure to ensure
residents who required insulin administration received treatment in accordance with professional standards
of practice led to a determination of Immediate Jeopardy at a scope and severity of isolated (J).
The Nursing Home Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on November 18, 2024, at 2:50
PM.
The Immediate Jeopardy began on October 6, 2024, and was removed on site on November 18, 2024.
Findings include:
Review of the job description titled Executive Director I read, Purpose of Your Job Position: The Executive
Director I is responsible for management of the facility in a manner which exemplifies the company's
standard of operational excellence. The primary purpose of the executive director is to direct the day-to-day
functions of the facility in accordance with current federal, state, their local standards, guidelines, and
regulations that govern nursing facilities to ensure the highest degree of quality care can be provided to our
residents at all times. You are entrusted to provide innovative, responsible healthcare with the creation and
implementation of new ideas and concepts that continually improve systems and processes to achieve
superior results. Job Functions: As Executive Director 1, you are delegated the administrative authority,
responsibility, and accountability necessary for carrying out your assigned duties. Responsible for
day-to-day clinical and administrative activities of the facility, including profit and loss responsibility and
ensures compliance with all state and federal regulations. Duties and Responsibilities: 6. Interpret and
ensure implementation of governing board policies and procedures. 9. Maintain and guide the
implementation of facility policies and procedures in compliance with corporate, state, federal, and other
regulatory guidelines. 11. Support and guide the facility's quality improvement process. 13. Ensure a safe,
clean and comfortable environment for residents, visitors and staff. Maintain a file for and monitor incident
reports.14. Attend and or conduct facility meetings, as required to carry out responsibilities. 23. Adhere to
facility policies and procedures and participates in facility quality improvement and safety programs. 24.
Attend to overall operation of the facility.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 23 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0835
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
Review of the job description titled Director of Nursing I read, Purpose of Your Job Position: As the
company Director of Nursing, you are entrusted with the responsibility of caring for our residents, families,
coworkers, visitors, and all others. The primary purpose of your job position is to plan, organize, develop
and direct the overall operation of our nursing service department in accordance with current federal, state,
and local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern our facility, and as may be directed by the
Executive Director to ensure that the highest degree of quality care is maintained at all times. You are
entrusted to provide innovative, responsible health care with the creation and implementation of new ideas
and concepts that continually improve systems and processes to achieve superior results. Job Functions:
As Director of Nursing I, you are delegated the administrative authority responsibility and accountability
necessary for carrying out your assigned duties. Responsible for planning, organizing and directing the
functions for the nursing department. You will assume the primary role in ensuring the delivery of high
quality, efficient nursing care. Supervises Nurse Practitioner, Assistant Director of Nursing, Clinical Nurses,
and Nurse techs. In the absence of the Executive Director, you are in charge of carrying out the resident
care policies established by the facility. Duties and responsibilities: 4. Set and monitor achievement of goals
and objectives for the nursing department consistent with established philosophy and standards of practice.
6. Establish, implement, and continually update competency/skills checklists for nursing staff. 8. Maintain
and guide the implementation of current policies and procedures, which reflect adherence to corporate and
external regulatory guidelines. 9. Assure compliance with resident rights policies and work to resolve
resident grievances. 10. Establish and monitor compliance with an effective medical record documentation
system. 13. Actively participate in quality improvement process for the facility.
Review of the job description titled Assistant Director of Clinical Services (ADON) read, Purpose of Your
Job Position. As an Assistant Director of Clinical Services, you are entrusted with the responsibility of
caring for our residents, families, coworkers, visitors and all others. The primary purpose of your position is
to monitor clinical compliance with state and federal regulations. You are entrusted to provide innovative,
responsible health care with the creation and implementation of new ideas and concepts that continually
improve systems and processes to achieve superior results. Job functions as assistant director of clinical
services, you are delegated the administrative authority, responsibility and accountability necessary for
carrying out your assigned duties. Responsible for the functions of the corporate clinical and clinical
reimbursement services department. Duties and responsibilities: 1. access to liaison between the director of
nursing and the nursing staff. 2. participates in the development and achievement of nursing department
goals and objectives. 4. assist in the implementation of and monitor compliance with policies, procedures,
and standards of practice consistent with corporate and external regulatory guidelines. 6. Assist in the
development, implementation, and monitoring of an accurate and effective documentation system. 10.
Actively participate in the quality improvement process for the facility. 12. Attend and participate in
department facility meetings as required. 15. Adheres to facility policies and procedures and participates in
facility quality improvement and safety programs. 21. Perform other duties, as assigned.
Review of the Medical Director Administrative Service Agreement read, 2. Responsibilities: a. OF GROUP:
Group agrees that medical director shall generally be responsible for the administrative oversight of medical
services at the care center, including, without limitation, the duties described in Exhibit A (the Administrative
Services). Review of Exhibit A, Medical Director Services, read, The responsibilities of the Medical Director
shall be, without limitation, to perform the following duties to be solely administrative in nature and not
including any clinical or other direct medical
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 24 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0835
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
services: (A) Make good faith efforts to ensure adequate medical care for patients. (B) Provide clinical
leadership through active participation in the care centers quality assurance committee, and participate in
all other activities which may be designated by the Executive Director of the Care Center from time to time
to facilitate the cost-effective delivery of quality services at the care center. (D) Participate in such case
management and risk management activities and programs as the executive director of the care center
may request from time to time. (E) Maintain a current knowledge of all federal, state, and local laws, and
rules and regulations regarding the medical directors practice and medical staff requirements. (I) The
Medical Director will be responsible for monitoring and managing quality improvement goals. a. The Medical
Director shall participate in monthly medical director's call. c. The Medical Director must address any
concerning trends with regard to quality improvement. (L) Assist in the implementation and further
development of care center programs, protocols, and quality assurance initiatives. (O). Participate in the
development of written policies, rules and regulations to govern the nursing care and related medical and
other health services provided. The medical director is responsible for seeing that these policies reflect an
awareness of, and provisions for, meeting the total needs of Care Centers patients.
Review of the admission Record for Resident #1 documented an admission date of 10/3/2024 with
diagnoses that include diabetes mellitus type 1, malignant neoplasm of oropharynx (cancer), unspecified
dysphagia (unable to swallow), oropharyngeal phase, type 1 diabetes mellitus without complications,
chronic pulmonary embolism (a blockage in a lung artery caused by a blood clot that has traveled from
elsewhere in the body), chronic kidney disease, unspecified, other acute osteomyelitis (bone infection),
unspecified site, acquired absence of left leg (below knee), essential primary hypertension (high blood
pressure), gastrostomy status (a flexible tube that's surgically inserted into the stomach through the
abdominal wall. It allows for the delivery of nutrition, fluids, and medication directly into the stomach),
hyperlipidemia, unspecified (an abnormally high concentration of fats or lipids in the blood), peripheral
vascular disease, unspecified (blood vessels narrow or become blocked, reducing blood flow to the limbs or
other parts of the body).
Review of the document titled Department of Internal Medicine Discharge Summary Heme/Onc
[Hematology/Oncology] Team dated 10/3/2024 read: (page 1) Instructions for PCP [Primary Care
Physician]: will need to keep an eye on his insulin regimen as these have been up and down since starting
bolus tube feeds; currently on 12 units long acting and seven units short acting before bolus feeds.
Consider endocrinology referral. (page 8) Discharge medication, mediation list documents Lantus Solostar
100/unit/ML [milliliter] Insulin glargine. Inject 10 units into the skin every 24 hours.
Review of Resident #1's physician order dated 10/4/2024 read, Lantus SoloStar Subcutaneous Solution
Pen-injector 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Glargine) Inject 10 units subcutaneously one time a day related to Type
1 Diabetes Mellitus Without Complications.
Review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed Staff A, LPN, documented a BS
(blood sugar) of 552 on 10/6/2024 at 6:00 AM. Staff A, LPN, documented 2, CM (chart code/follow up
codes 2 = drug refused).
Review of Resident #1's eMAR (electronic Medication Administration Record) note dated 10/6/2024 at 6:32
AM documented by Staff A, LPN, read, Patient stated, I'm refusing all medications until I get the proper
insulin.
Review of Resident #1's progress note dated 10/6/2024 at 7:00 AM documented by Staff A, LPN, read,
ARNP [Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner] notified of resident's refusal of all morning
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 25 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0835
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
medications. Per resident he is refusing all medications until he is receiving the proper insulin. Orders
received to increase current insulin twice daily with blood sugars checked twice daily. No other orders given
at this current time.
Review of text message communication from Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone to the On Call Medical
Doctor (OCMD) on 10/6/2024 at 7:33 AM read, Good Morning, [Resident #1's name] is refusing all of his
medications. He says he's not taking anything until he receives the proper insulin. Per his orders he's
receiving 10 Units of Lantus @ [at] 6 am. He did allow me to check his blood sugar 552.
Review of text message communication from the OCMD to Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone on
10/6/2024 at 8:19 AM read, No sliding scale ordered?
Review of text message communication from Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone to the OCMD on
10/6/2024 at 8:22 AM read, No, I didn't see any sliding scale he said his Lantus is supposed to be given @
night. And he has another type of insulin he gets. I didn't see anything other than the Lantus.
Review of text message communication from the OCMD to Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone on
10/6/2024 at 10:55 AM read, Based on his sugars, if they have been above 250 everyday, go up to 15 BID
[15 units two times a day] of long-acting insulin and make sure we cover with sliding scale for meals. Let's
also make sure he's getting accuchecks.
Review of text message communication from Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone to the OCMD on
10/6/2024 at 7:55 PM read, I'll change his orders & notify him of the changes & hopefully he complies.
Review of text message communication from Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone to the OCMD on
10/6/2024 at 11:25 PM read, [Resident #1's last name] has continued to call 911 since I arrived this
afternoon. They are loading him up & transporting him, [Resident #1's full name].
Review of Resident #1 medical record did not contain any documentation of the test message
communication between the facility and the OCMD.
Review of Resident #1's Interact SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendations)
Communication form documented by Staff A, LPN, dated 10/6/2024 at 11:25 PM read, Situation: the
change in condition (CIC) reported on this CIC evaluation are: other change in condition. At the time of
evaluation patient vital signs, weight and blood sugar were blood pressure 130/77, pulse 82, temperature
98.2, pulse oximetry 96% on room air, blood glucose of 552 obtained at 6:45 AM on 10/06/24. Outcomes of
physical assessment: positive findings reported were mental status evaluation with no change observed.
Functional status evaluation with no changes observed. Patient called 911 on his personal cell phone and
stated, I want out of this place. Primary Care Provider Feedback: Primary Care Provider responded with the
following feedback: Recommendations: No new orders given at this time.
Review of Resident #1's medical record did not contain any documentation of further blood glucose checks
after the glucose level of 552 was documented at approximately 6:00 AM.
Review of the hospital ED (Emergency Department) provider notes for Resident #1 dated 10/6/2024 at
11:51 PM read, Chief complaint: Patient presents with high blood sugar. Patient is an 81 y.o. [year old] M
[male] with a PMH [Past Medical History] of oropharyngeal SCC [squamous cell cancer of throat], DVT
[Deep Vein Thrombosis], PVD [Peripheral Vascular Disease], T1D [Type 1 Diabetes], HTN [Hypertension],
and osteomyelitis who presents from an outside rehab after having unreadable glucose levels
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 26 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0835
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
on his monitor. He states that at the outside rehab were not following his strict insulin regimen trying to give
a different type of insulin. Per EMS [Emergency Medical Services] he was declining the insulin the outside
rehab was trying to give him. He was recently admitted on 10/3 for pneumonia and was discharged to
rehab NPO [nothing by mouth] with swallow study pending (gastrostomy tube in place). BASIC
METABOLIC PANEL - Abnormal; Notable for the following components: Glucose 745, Anion Gap 34.
Medical Evaluation Initiated: Attestation: The patient is critical due to DKA [Diabetic Ketoacidosis]. admitted
to the ICU [Intensive Care Unit].
Review of the hospital history and physical for Resident #1 dated 10/7/2024 read, HPI [history of presenting
illness]: [Resident #1's name] is an 81 y.o. male presented with hyperglycemia at rehab admitted for DKA.
PMH relevant for T1DM (Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus), HTN, oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma,
peripheral vascular disease, DVT (04/2022) and below the knee amputation secondary to osteomyelitis.
Patient reports lack of compliance with his long-term insulin regimen for DM1 [Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus] at
his rehab facility. He reports they weren't giving me the right insulin and explains some of the doses of his
regimen were being missed.
During an interview on 11/13/2024 at 9:25 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, I was not here for the
incident, I found out after I returned that Tuesday. That was the 8th [10/8/2024]. With a blood sugar that high
the nurse should have notified the doctor that he [Resident #1] was refusing his insulin and why he was
refusing it. The nurse in charge of his care was not acting within the professional standards of practice for
treating hyperglycemia in a type 1 diabetic. He [Staff A, LPN] should have notified the doctor immediately
when he [Resident #1] refused his insulin. He [Staff A, LPN] did not transcribe the orders, and he should
have stayed and transcribed the orders he got. The nurse got the high blood sugar and spoke to someone. I
don't know who he spoke with, I don't know their name, you will have to ask [the Administrator's name] and
got new orders. I don't know if or what he told the nurse that came on in the day shift. I don't know what the
day shift nurse did after that. This shouldn't have happened; this should have been avoided. The nurse that
admitted him should have read everything when it comes to the discharge summary, and they would have
seen all the other orders instead of just the one piece of paper. The blood sugar should have been
rechecked. It was not rechecked the rest of the day. I would consider this neglect. I don't know why the
abuse and neglect policies were not followed. We should have completed a RCA [root cause analysis] and
we should have implemented the abuse policy and procedure back on the 7th [10/7/2024].
During an interview on 11/13/2024 at 2:49 PM, Staff D, LPN, Unit Manager, stated, I found out [about
incident] when his daughter called me, she called on that Monday [10/7/2024]. She was upset about him
not getting his insulin and about what happened, this was after he went to the hospital. She said she was a
nurse and couldn't understand how we could make a mistake like this. She was very upset about it. She
was upset that he was not given his proper insulin and that he was now in Diabetic ketoacidosis. I told [The
Administrator's name].
During an interview on 11/13/2024 at 3:18 PM, the Administrator stated, I found out about the situation
when I returned to work. I was finally able to speak with the daughter on 10/20/2024. I didn't file a report on
10/7/2024 because we saw on the chart that they only had orders for Lantus, we didn't think it was an issue
until he started refusing the medication. The report should have been done, that is the best practice. [Staff
A, LPN's name] got the order. It was not placed in [name of the electronic medical record software]. We
investigated and did a QAPI [Quality Assurance and Process Improvement] Ad hoc [from Latin meaning for
this] meeting on 10/7/2024. I talked to [Staff B's name], she said that the resident refused medications and
[Staff A's name] spoke to the nurse practitioner and got orders. The nurse forgot to transcribe the orders
into [name of the electronic medical
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 27 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0835
record software]. There was no documentation in [name of the electronic medical record software].
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
During an interview on 11/13/2024 at 3:43 PM, Staff B, LPN, stated, I did take care of this resident
[Resident #1]. He did not refuse care when I took care of him. I was told by the night nurse [Staff A, LPN]
that his blood sugar was high. I don't remember him telling me what the blood sugar was, he just said it was
high. He did not refuse care that day. I did not try to get another accucheck, he didn't have orders to
recheck his blood sugar. I didn't have orders to recheck the blood sugar. I wasn't told how high the blood
sugar was. I did not ask how high it was. I was in the front [area of building] charting and apparently, he
called 911. I was called and asked if he needed help, I told them [EMS] no, I would check on him. I went to
the room, and he said, You are trying to kill me. I asked him why and he told me that 'his blood sugar, his
insulin was wrong, and he needed to get short acting insulin, and we weren't ordering it for him. I told him
that he had orders for long-acting insulin and that he refused to take it. He told me Yes, I do, but because I
need short acting insulin I need to get out of here and you all are trying to kill me. This could have been
avoided, I should have rechecked his blood sugar, I don't know why I didn't.
Residents Affected - Few
During a telephone interview on 11/14/2024 at 11:20 AM, the Medical Director stated, I remember a few
things because I know the facility felt bad about the whole thing, you know while this was all happening. So,
they had called me about it I think this happened over the weekend to my understanding. I know that there
was also some frustration on the patient end I think they refused some glucose checks or refused insulin
and then at that point I think they called 911. My expectations would be to 100% ensure that there's glucose
monitoring, accuchecks, and of course a sliding scale. I mean every single diabetic in the building should
be on a sliding scale. I think it was [the OCMD's name] that was notified. I think they went up on the long
acting and they were just assuming that the patient was on a sliding scale. 100% if you're in the five
hundreds [blood glucose level] and they're on long acting they need to be on a sliding scale, likely in the
highest level of the sliding scale you know from there we could go up on the long acting and ensure there's
proper glucose monitoring. I would probably give a onetime dose of a short acting and have them recheck
sugars in an hour so I'm not sure what took place in this case or how long after that reading the patient
called 911. I would want to be notified that they [resident] were refusing [medications]. I don't know if that
call was ever made, after the fact, to let the doctor know that he's refusing it. If any doctor's increasing
long-acting insulin, they're already assuming that the short acting is on the MAR.
During an interview on 11/14/2024 at 7:10 AM, the DON stated, I was not here the day that this was found,
that they spoke with his daughter, the Unit Manager spoke to her. They did know the concerns with not
providing insulin or ADL [Activities of Daily Living] care. We were still investigating it; I can't tell you why we
didn't investigate more. I knew his blood sugar was 552. I was given that information, but I thought it was
that [Staff A's name] didn't transcribe orders. I guess we did not do a thorough investigation, I can't find any
more than what was done initially and in the town hall meeting. I see that there were more than 12 hours
that the resident was still here after that blood sugar of 552. There are no other accuchecks done after that.
It is my expectation that staff provide a detailed report when going off their shift. The nurse [Staff A, LPN]
should have told [Staff B's name] what the blood sugar was, and he [Staff A, LPN] should have documented
his information in the notes. [Staff A's name] should have asked what high meant if that is what he told her.
She should have followed up on that. I would expect that she called the doctor again and get further orders.
She [Staff B] had the opportunity to call the doctor when he called 911 to get further orders. All the
information should have been put in a progress note from both nurses. I would consider this neglect for both
nurses. I don't know why the staff weren't
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 28 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0835
suspended; I can't give you a reason.
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
During an interview on 11/14/2024 at 4:10 PM, the Administrator stated, I can't say that I thought I needed
to complete a federal report. I was told by [Staff D's name] that she [Resident #1's daughter] was upset and
wanted to talk to us, but I wasn't able to connect with her. We attempted multiple times, but we couldn't
reach her and left messages. When we got [in touch with] her is when I found out about her concerns with
care related to the insulin and with being on the bedpan too long. We did do a QAPI on 10/7 related to the
insulin. I just thought it was because he refused to take his insulin. I guess we did not investigate fully until
after I spoke to his daughter. We thought the problem was that the nurse on admission got the right orders
and there weren't accuchecks ordered. He refused this medication, and I spoke to [Staff B's name], LPN,
and she told me that he [Resident #1] didn't talk to her at all about his insulin during the day before he
called 911. Then they realized that he had orders that were not transcribed from the night nurse when he
came on shift. I did not talk to him [Staff A, LPN] the DON did. I did not implement the abuse and neglect
policies because he refused his medication. I didn't think to. I can't tell you why. We should have done more
investigation. We should have done a QAPI when we realized that his blood sugar was so high, I wasn't
aware of everything. We only did the initial QAPI, we didn't do any others, I think we should have done it, I
can't tell you why we didn't. We did not suspend the nurses; it is our policy to suspend staff pending the
results of an investigation. We initially thought it happened because the resident refused his insulin, not for
neglect. We should follow our abuse and neglect policies and procedures. I didn't think to. I can't tell you
why.
Residents Affected - Few
Review of the policy and procedure titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation & Misappropriation last revision date
of 11/16/2022, last approval date of 4/23/2024 read, Policy: It is inherent in the nature and dignity of each
resident at the center that he/she be afforded basic human rights, including the right to be free from abuse,
neglect, mistreatment, exploitation and/or misappropriation of property. The management of the facility
recognizes these rights and hereby establishes the following statements, policies and procedures to protect
these rights to establish a disciplinary policy which results in a fair and timely treatment of occurrences of
resident abuse. Employees at the center are charged with a continuing obligation to treat residents so they
are free from abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and/or misappropriation of property. No employee may at any
time commit an act of physical, psychological, or emotional abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and or
misappropriation of property against any resident. Violation of this standard will subject employees to
disciplinary action including dismissal provided herein. Definitions: Neglect is the failure of the center, its
employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid
physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. Procedure: 4. Identification: All reported events
(bruises, skin tears, falls, inappropriate or abusive behaviors) will be investigated by the Director of
Nursing/designee. Patterns or trends will be identified that might constitute abuse. This information will be
forwarded to the Executive Director, who will serve as the facility's Abuse Coordinator, and an abuse
investigation will be conducted in the absence of the Executive Director, the Director of Nursing will serve
as the Abuse Coordinator. 5. Investigation: The Abuse Coordinator or his/her designee shall investigate all
reports or allegations of abuse, neglect, misappropriation and exploitation. A Social Service representative
may be offered in the role of resident advocate during a questioning of or interviewing of residents.
Investigations will be accomplished in the following manner. Preliminary Investigation: Immediately upon an
allegation of abuse or neglect, the suspect(s) should be segregated from residents pending the
investigation of the resident allegation. The nurse or Director of Nursing/designee shall perform and
document a thorough nursing evaluation and notify the attending physician. An
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 29 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0835
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
incident report shall be filed by the individual in charge who received the report in conjunction with the
person who reported the abuse. This report shall be filed as soon as possible in order to provide the most
accurate information in a timely fashion and submitted to the Abuse Coordinator. Investigation: The Abuse
Coordinator and/or Director of Nursing shall take statements from the victim, the suspect(s) and all possible
witnesses including all other employees in the vicinity of the alleged abuse. He/she shall also secure all
physical evidence. Upon completion of the investigation, a detailed report shall be prepared. 6. Protection:
Any suspect(s), who is employed or contract service provider, once he/she has(have) been identified, will
be suspended pending the investigation. 7. Reporting/ Response: Any employee or contracted service
provider who witnesses or has knowledge of an act of abuse or alleged allegation of abuse, neglect,
exploitation or mistreatment including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property,
to a resident is obligated to report such information immediately but no later than two hours after the
allegation is made if the events that caused the allegation involve abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury
for not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in
serious bodily injury, to the administrator and to other officials in accordance with state law. In the absence
of the executive director, the director of nursing is designated abuse coordinator. Once an allegation of
abuse is reported, the executive director, as the abuse coordinator, is responsible for ensuring that
reporting is completed timely and appropriately to appropriate officials in accordance with federal and state
regulations, including notification of law enforcement if a reasonable suspicion of crime has occurred.
Facility staff should be aware of and comply with their individual requirements and responsibilities for
reporting as required by law. Staff should be aware of, and comply with, individual requirements and
responsibilities for reporting as may be required by law. In all cases, the executive director or director of
nursing will ensure notification to the residents' legal guardian, family member, responsible party, or
significant other of the alleged, suspected or observed abuse, neglect or mistreatment, and the resident's
attending physician. Coordination with QAPI: The center will review allegations of abuse, neglect, and
misappropriation of resident property and exploitation during QAPI meetings. QAPI committee will review
information including but not limited to: The thoroughness of the investigation, Protection of the resident(s),
Risk factors identified, Root- cause analysis of the investigation, Systemic changes that may be required.
Review of the policy and procedure titled Notification of Change of Condition last revision date of
12/16/2020 and last approval date of 4/23/2024 read, Policy: The Center to promptly notify the Patient/
Resident, the attending physician and the Resident Representative when there is a change in the status or
condition. Pr[TRUNCATED]
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 30 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0842
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in
accordance with accepted professional standards.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
record review, interview, and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to safeguard medical record
information against unauthorized use, failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records, and failed
to ensure the confidentiality of the medical record for 1 of 7 residents reviewed, Resident #1.
Findings include:
Review of the admission Record for Resident #1 documented an admission date of 10/3/2024 with
diagnoses that include diabetes mellitus type 1, malignant neoplasm of oropharynx (cancer), unspecified
dysphagia (unable to swallow), oropharyngeal phase, type 1 diabetes mellitus without complications,
chronic pulmonary embolism (a blockage in a lung artery caused by a blood clot that has traveled from
elsewhere in the body), chronic kidney disease, unspecified, other acute osteomyelitis (bone infection),
unspecified site, acquired absence of left leg (below knee), essential primary hypertension (high blood
pressure), gastrostomy status (a flexible tube that's surgically inserted into the stomach through the
abdominal wall. It allows for the delivery of nutrition, fluids, and medication directly into the stomach),
hyperlipidemia, unspecified (an abnormally high concentration of fats or lipids in the blood), peripheral
vascular disease, unspecified (blood vessels narrow or become blocked, reducing blood flow to the limbs or
other parts of the body).
Review of Resident #1's physician order dated 10/4/2024 read, Lantus SoloStar Subcutaneous Solution
Pen-injector 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Glargine) Inject 10 units subcutaneously one time a day related to Type
1 Diabetes Mellitus Without Complications.
Review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed Staff A, Licensed Practical
Nurse (LPN), documented a BS (blood sugar) of 552 on 10/6/2024 at 6:00 AM. Staff A, LPN, documented
2, CM (chart code/follow up codes 2 = drug refused).
Review of Resident #1's eMAR (electronic Medication Administration Record) note dated 10/6/2024 at 6:32
AM documented by Staff A, LPN, read, Patient stated, I'm refusing all medications until I get the proper
insulin.
Review of Resident #1's progress note dated 10/6/2024 at 7:00 AM documented by Staff A, LPN, read,
ARNP [Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner] notified of resident's refusal of all morning medications.
Per resident he is refusing all medications until he is receiving the proper insulin. Orders received to
increase current insulin twice daily with blood sugars checked twice daily. No other orders given at this
current time.
Review of text message communication from Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone to the On Call Medical
Doctor (OCMD) on 10/6/2024 at 7:33 AM read, Good Morning, [Resident #1's name] is refusing all of his
medications. He says he's not taking anything until he receives the proper insulin. Per his orders he's
receiving 10 Units of Lantus @ [at] 6 am. He did allow me to check his blood sugar 552.
Review of text message communication from the OCMD to Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone on
10/6/2024 at 8:19 AM read, No sliding scale ordered?
Review of text message communication from Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone to the OCMD on
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 31 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0842
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
10/6/2024 at 8:22 AM read, No, I didn't see any sliding scale he said his Lantus is supposed to be given @
night. And he has another type of insulin he gets. I didn't see anything other than the Lantus.
Review of text message communication from the OCMD to Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone on
10/6/2024 at 10:55 AM read, Based on his sugars, if they have been above 250 everyday, go up to 15 BID
[15 units two times a day] of long-acting insulin and make sure we cover with sliding scale for meals. Let's
also make sure he's getting accuchecks.
Review of text message communication from Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone to the OCMD on
10/6/2024 at 7:55 PM read, I'll change his orders & notify him of the changes & hopefully he complies.
Review of text message communication from Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone to the OCMD on
10/6/2024 at 11:25 PM read, [Resident #1's last name] has continued to call 911 since I arrived this
afternoon. They are loading him up & transporting him, [Resident #1's full name].
Review of Resident #1's medical record showed no orders in the electronic medical record for the orders
from the OCMD.
Review of Resident #1's medical record showed no entries related to the text message communications of
the physician notification or orders.
Review of Resident #1's medical record showed no progress notes documented by Staff B, LPN, of the
EMS (Emergency Medical Services) calls or inaction with the resident at approximately 6:30 PM.
During a telephone interview on 11/13/2024 at 11:35 AM, the OCMD stated, I did receive a call related to
this resident [Resident #1]. The Nurse called me on the afterhours line, and I was told of the residents'
glucose and I actually decided to double the insulin, the Lantus, and increase it to 15 Units twice a day and
to add SSIC [Sliding Scale Insulin Coverage] with insulin coverage AC [before meals] and HS [at bedtime]. I
would say that the professional standard of practice would be to have the blood glucose rechecked after 30
minutes to one hour after high readings to accurately assess if the patient was stabilizing versus the patient
needing further emergency treatment. The staff did not adhere to a professional standard of practice when
they did not notify us that he was refusing treatment. I would expect staff to inform us that a patient had
refused insulin to determine the next steps we needed to do, either increase medications or we send to the
hospital. I would call this unintentional neglect. They did not treat this according to professional standards of
practice. I should have been notified that the patient was refusing his insulin. I was not called about this
again after I gave the orders to them. This was done by a text message thread. We use a HIPAA [Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act] complaint application, but I do not know what the facility uses.
During an interview on 11/14/2024 at 2:09 PM, the Administrator stated, I am aware that staff use their cell
phones to communicate with the providers, the preferred method of communication is a telephone call, but
they still do use their cell phones. There was resident information in the text messages. I don't know if we
have a policy on cell phone usage. It would be a HIPAA violation if they provide PHI [Personal Health
Information]. PHI was in the text thread.
During an interview on 11/14/2024 at 2:15 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, I had this text thread
during our investigation. The ARNP [Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner] sent us copies
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 32 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0842
of the communication the next day.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
During an interview on 11/14/2024 at 4:15 PM, Staff E, LPN, stated, We sometimes will use our personal
cell phones to contact the doctor regarding the care of the residents. I do not have the messages on the
phone, I delete them after. I would use the facility phone to try and reach the doctor.
Residents Affected - Few
During an interview on 11/14/2024 at 4:20 PM, Staff F, LPN, stated, We would use our cell phones to
communicate with the doctor if the facility phone was not working or in the case of an emergency. I do not
have those text messages on my phone, I delete them.
During an interview on 11/14/2024 at 4:28 PM, Staff Q, LPN, stated, I would use my cell phone sometimes.
I would not have any personal health information in the body of the message I would use room numbers
because they can look up the resident. I use the phone mostly because it provides the fastest result.
During an interview on 11/15/2024 at 6:15 AM, Staff R, LPN, stated, We text to get orders if we need to. I
use my cell phone to do that, no they don't have a company phone we use; we use our own phones. I will
text that the resident has a problem, I do use their name and say what is happening, I will keep it on my
phone for about 2 weeks and then I will delete the messages.
During an interview on 11/15/2024 at 6:25 AM, Staff S, LPN, stated, I do text the doctors or the nurse
practitioner to get orders or tell them about changes or if I need something. I do use my own telephone. I do
put in a residents' name, we can't use room numbers as a identifier, it's always a name. I do delete it after I
get the order and put in [name of the electronic medical record software].
During an interview on 11/15/2024 at 6:36 AM, Staff T, LPN, stated, I do use text messages to the on-call
doctor with my cell phone. They don't always call back, it's easier to text them and get an answer. I would
say whatever was happening with the resident. Of course, I identify them [residents] by name we can't use
anything else.
During an interview on 11/15/2024 at 12:10 PM, the Administrator stated, Our policies on cell phone use
don't allow staff to use their personal cell phones. It could be a problem. I would expect staff might use their
cell phone to reach out to the providers via text to have them give them a call. I do not feel that is
appropriate to exchange PHI. We did identify we did have a text thread with information in it. I can't say why
we didn't look deeper into this.
During an interview on 11/15/2024 at 12:10 PM, the DON stated, Using and putting a resident's personal
information on employees personal cell phones is problematic. We do know that personal text messages
are never totally gone even if they are deleted. I would say residents could be upset if they knew this. We
should not put any PHI in a text message. I'm not sure what the policy says directly. It is a resident right to
have their information confidential.
During an interview on 11/15/2024 at 12:50 PM, the APRN stated, The nurses are using text messages to
communicate with me, they use identifiers on text communication such as room number and initials
sometimes I might get just the first name just the last name sometimes I get both first and last names.
During an interview on 11/15/2024 at 12:55 PM, the OCMD stated, The staff would use three digits either in
letters or a room number and give us an update and if it's something that needs
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 33 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0842
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
clarification. The communication goes through a [name of the application]. I don't know how they do it
locally I just know that we have a number that we get messages. I have been provided first and last names
of residents, room numbers also over the texts sent by the nurses. I don't know what they use to text us
with.
During an interview on 11/15/2024 at 1:10 PM, the Medical Director stated, The staff will text us from
unknown numbers We're just getting a request and handling it to make sure the patients are getting what
they need. They will provide us resident names.
During an interview on 11/15/2024 at 3:10 PM, Staff J, LPN, stated, I used to text or call [the ARNP's name]
all the time, she would always respond to me and give me orders. I would delete the messages a few days
later and some I may have had deleted after a month or so. I would make sure the orders were in and were
followed. I would document the interaction with the physician or the nurse practitioner and place the order
for the resident.
During an interview on 11/15/2024 at 3:30 PM, Staff B, LPN, stated, We do use our cell phones to get hold
of the nurse practitioner. I do use my own personal cell phone. Well, the only way I can identify a resident is
by name. I will also use a room number too, but the name also. I do have the zoom app on my telephone
[did show us this app was on her telephone], I don't use this to do text messages. We use this for a
face-to-face communication with the resident. The provider will give us a number and we have a zoom with
the resident. I will delete the texts after I write any orders. No one ever told us we couldn't text on our
phones.
During an interview on 11/18/2024 at 7:00 AM, Staff U, LPN, stated, I did use my cell phone to text the on
call [provider] with my own phone. I did identify who the resident was I was texting about.
During an interview on 11/18/2024 at 7:10 AM, Staff V, LPN, stated, I was texting with my cell phone, but
only when I couldn't get them (the provider) on the phone, I did have times when I used a residents name,
their full name. I wouldn't use just a room number because what if we moved them somewhere else.
Review of the policy and procedure titled Use of Cellular Phones and Personal Electronic Devices with the
revision date of 9/1/2017 and the last approval date of 4/23/2024 read, Policy: In order to maintain privacy
and confidentiality rights of our residents, to be in compliance with HIPAA and to attain an acceptable noise
level for our residents, the use of any non-company issued personal electronic device, such as cellular
telephones, pagers, tablets, or any other personal electronic device is prohibited in resident areas.
Procedure: 1. Employees are not allowed to use personal cellular phones or electronic devices in resident
areas, at any time . 3. HIPAA Protected Health Information (PHI) should never be stored, shared, or
accessed on a personal device. a. Inappropriate use of a cellular device by an employee includes, but is not
limited to, photographing or videoing residents, sharing HIPAA protected information via unsecured
networks such as text message, or electronically sharing resident information that does not meet the
minimum necessary standard on a personal or company device.
Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Complaint text Messaging Communication with the revision
date of 3/1/2022 and the last approval date of 4/23/2024 read, Policy: It is the policy of the Company to
maintain the privacy and confidentiality of resident Protected Health Information (PHI) and electronic PHI
(ePHI) in compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and Health
Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act. The
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 34 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0842
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
purpose of this policy is to establish guidance on short message service (SMS) text messaging by
members of the Company's workforce and address the security risks associated with the transmission of
ePHI via unsecured network. Definitions . Personal Electronic Device- Electronic devices, capable of
communications, data processing and/or computing. Examples are laptops, computers, tablets, e-readers,
smartphones, MP3 players, [NAME] and electronic toys. Protected Health Information (PHI)- Individually
identifiable health information is information held or transmitted by a covered entity or its business
associate, in any form or media, whether electronic, paper, or oral. It is information, including demographic
data that relates to: (1) the individual's past, present, or future physical or mental health or condition, (2) the
provision of health care to the individual, or (3) the past present or future payment for the provision of
health care to the individual, and that identifies the individual for which there is a reasonable basis to
believe it can be used to identify the individual . SMS text messaging maybe used to communicate with your
coworkers, supervisors, partners or vendors for reasons that do not include the transmission of PHI or
where PHI had then de-identified in compliance with company policy HIPAA- 135 and the HIPAA
administrative regulations 45 CFR 164.514 and there is no reasonable basis to believe that the information
can be used to identify an individual.
Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Clinical/Medical records with the last revision date of
8/25/2017 and the last approval date of 4/23/2024 read, Policy: Clinical Records are maintained in
accordance with professional practice standards to provide complete and accurate information on each
resident for continuity of care. The purpose of the clinical record is to document the course of the resident's
plan of care and to provide a medium of communication among health care professionals involved in this
care. The clinical record contains: information to identify the resident, a record of the resident's
assessments, the plan of care, the results of preadmission screening, progress notes which indicate
change toward achieving the care plan objectives. Information contained in the resident's clinical record,
regardless of the form of storage method is considered confidential.
Review of the admission Agreement showed the agreement contained a form on page 9 titled Notification &
Consent Form, which read, Patient Authorization And Consent Form For Disclosure Of Health Information.
Page 10 of the agreement read, Definitions: In this form, the term treatment, healthcare operations,
psychotherapy notes, and protected health information are as defined in HIPAA (45 CFR 164.501). A health
information exchange is in interoperable system that electronically moves and exchanges health
information between approved participating healthcare providers or health information organizations in a
manner that ensures the secure exchange of health information to provide care to patients . Privacy
protection: Participants in an exchange must follow all applicable federal and state privacy laws, including
the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and the Health Information Technology for
Economic and Clinical Health Act, in addition to other related regulations. Further review of the agreement
read, Notice of Privacy Practices: This notice describes how medical information about you may be used
and disclosed and how you can get access to this information please read it carefully. We have summarized
our responsibilities and your rights on this page for a complete description of our privacy practices, please
contact the Facility Privacy Director (Executive Director). Our responsibilities: Our nursing facility is required
to maintain the privacy of your health information, provide you with this notice of our legal duties and
privacy practices with respect to information we collect and maintain about you, abide by the terms of this
notice.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 35 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0867
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop
corrective plans of action.
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to utilize the Quality Assessment and Performance
Improvement (QAPI) process to investigate, develop, and implement an effective performance improvement
plan (PIP) when investigating neglect, change of condition, notification of providers and not following
physician orders for Resident #1, placing all 27 residents who were prescribed long and short acting insulin
at risk. On 10/6/2024 at 6:00 AM, Resident #1 had a blood sugar value of 552 and the on-call provider was
notified of the value and the resident stated he was refusing medications until he received the proper
insulin. Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse, (LPN), did not communicate to Staff B, LPN or transcribe the new
orders into the medical record for the increase in insulin and the addition of sliding scale insulin coverage.
Staff B, LPN, assumed care of Resident #1 at 7:00 AM on 10/6/2024 and did not follow up with the
provider. Staff B, LPN, did not reassess Resident #1's blood glucose or address the need for any orders.
Resident #1 called 911 at approximately 6:30 PM, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) contacted the
facility, spoke with Staff B, LPN, who instructed EMS the resident did not need help. Again at 11:15 PM,
Resident #1 called 911 and was subsequently transferred to the hospital and was admitted to the Intensive
Care Unit with a diagnosis of Diabetic Ketoacidosis.
The facility's failure to develop and implement appropriate plans of actions after identifying the systemic
breakdown for failure to implement policy and procedures for neglect and change of condition led to a
determination of Immediate Jeopardy at a scope and severity of isolated (J).
The Nursing Home Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on November 18, 2024, at 2:50
PM.
The Immediate Jeopardy began on October 6, 2024, and was removed on site on November 18, 2024.
Findings include:
Review of the admission Record for Resident #1 documented an admission date of 10/3/2024 with
diagnoses that include diabetes mellitus type 1, malignant neoplasm of oropharynx (cancer), unspecified
dysphagia (unable to swallow), oropharyngeal phase, type 1 diabetes mellitus without complications,
chronic pulmonary embolism (a blockage in a lung artery caused by a blood clot that has traveled from
elsewhere in the body), chronic kidney disease, unspecified, other acute osteomyelitis (bone infection),
unspecified site, acquired absence of left leg (below knee), essential primary hypertension (high blood
pressure), gastrostomy status (a flexible tube that's surgically inserted into the stomach through the
abdominal wall. It allows for the delivery of nutrition, fluids, and medication directly into the stomach),
hyperlipidemia, unspecified (an abnormally high concentration of fats or lipids in the blood), peripheral
vascular disease, unspecified (blood vessels narrow or become blocked, reducing blood flow to the limbs or
other parts of the body).
Review of Resident #1's physician order dated 10/4/2024 read, Lantus SoloStar Subcutaneous Solution
Pen-injector 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Glargine) Inject 10 units subcutaneously one time a day related to Type
1 Diabetes Mellitus Without Complications.
Review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed Staff A, LPN, documented a BS
(blood sugar) of 552 on 10/6/2024 at 6:00 AM. Staff A, LPN, documented 2, CM (chart code/follow up
codes 2 = drug refused).
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 36 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0867
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
Review of Resident #1's eMAR (electronic Medication Administration Record) note dated 10/6/2024 at 6:32
AM documented by Staff A, LPN, read, Patient stated, I'm refusing all medications until I get the proper
insulin.
Review of Resident #1's progress note dated 10/6/2024 at 7:00 AM documented by Staff A, LPN, read,
ARNP [Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner] notified of resident's refusal of all morning medications.
Per resident he is refusing all medications until he is receiving the proper insulin. Orders received to
increase current insulin twice daily with blood sugars checked twice daily. No other orders given at this
current time.
Review of text message communication from Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone to the On Call Medical
Doctor (OCMD) on 10/6/2024 at 7:33 AM read, Good Morning, [Resident #1's name] is refusing all of his
medications. He says he's not taking anything until he receives the proper insulin. Per his orders he's
receiving 10 Units of Lantus @ [at] 6 am. He did allow me to check his blood sugar 552.
Review of text message communication from the OCMD to Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone on
10/6/2024 at 8:19 AM read, No sliding scale ordered?
Review of text message communication from Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone to the OCMD on
10/6/2024 at 8:22 AM read, No, I didn't see any sliding scale he said his Lantus is supposed to be given @
night. And he has another type of insulin he gets. I didn't see anything other than the Lantus.
Review of text message communication from the OCMD to Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone on
10/6/2024 at 10:55 AM read, Based on his sugars, if they have been above 250 everyday, go up to 15 BID
[15 units two times a day] of long-acting insulin and make sure we cover with sliding scale for meals. Let's
also make sure he's getting accuchecks.
Review of text message communication from Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone to the OCMD on
10/6/2024 at 7:55 PM read, I'll change his orders & notify him of the changes & hopefully he complies.
Review of text message communication from Staff A, LPN's personal cellular phone to the OCMD on
10/6/2024 at 11:25 PM read, [Resident #1's last name] has continued to call 911 since I arrived this
afternoon. They are loading him up & transporting him, [Resident #1's full name].
Review of Resident #1 medical record did not contain any documentation of the test message
communication between the facility and the OCMD.
Review of Resident #1's Interact SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendations)
Communication form documented by Staff A, LPN, dated 10/6/2024 at 11:25 PM read, Situation: the
change in condition (CIC) reported on this CIC evaluation are: other change in condition. At the time of
evaluation patient vital signs, weight and blood sugar were blood pressure 130/77, pulse 82, temperature
98.2, pulse oximetry 96% on room air, blood glucose of 552 obtained at 6:45 AM on 10/06/24. Outcomes of
physical assessment: positive findings reported were mental status evaluation with no change observed.
Functional status evaluation with no changes observed. Patient called 911 on his personal cell phone and
stated, I want out of this place. Primary Care Provider Feedback: Primary Care Provider responded with the
following feedback: Recommendations: No new orders given at this time.
Review of Resident #1's medical record did not contain any documentation of further blood glucose checks
after the glucose level of 552 was documented at approximately 6:00 AM.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 37 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0867
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
Review of the hospital ED (Emergency Department) provider notes for Resident #1 dated 10/6/2024 at
11:51 PM read, Chief complaint: Patient presents with high blood sugar. Patient is an 81 y.o. [year old] M
[male] with a PMH [Past Medical History] of oropharyngeal SCC [squamous cell cancer of throat], DVT
[Deep Vein Thrombosis], PVD [Peripheral Vascular Disease], T1D [Type 1 Diabetes], HTN [Hypertension],
and osteomyelitis who presents from an outside rehab after having unreadable glucose levels on his
monitor. He states that at the outside rehab were not following his strict insulin regimen trying to give a
different type of insulin. Per EMS [Emergency Medical Services] he was declining the insulin the outside
rehab was trying to give him. He was recently admitted on 10/3 for pneumonia and was discharged to
rehab NPO [nothing by mouth] with swallow study pending (gastrostomy tube in place). BASIC
METABOLIC PANEL - Abnormal; Notable for the following components: Glucose 745, Anion Gap 34.
Medical Evaluation Initiated: Attestation: The patient is critical due to DKA [Diabetic Ketoacidosis]. admitted
to the ICU [Intensive Care Unit].
Review of the document titled Ad Hoc Quality Assurance & Performance Improvement Meeting dated
10/7/2024 attended and signed by the Administrator, Social Services Director, MDS Coordinator,
Housekeeping/Laundry, Business Office, the DON, Activities, Therapy, Medical Director, Dining/Nutrition
and 4 other attendees with no job title, read, Reason for Meeting: Type 1 & 2 diabetes. Opportunity for
Improvement: Notification of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes upon admission with NP/MD [Nurse
Practitioner/Medical Doctor] to ensure insulin orders are verified and correct to decrease delayed treatment.
Data (Assess Current Situation- What were the results/trend): Failure to notify provider with type 1 diabetic
glucose monitoring results in a timely manner. Analysis (Root Cause analysis): Failure to notify provider
related to abnormal glucose levels, failure follows transcribe orders from provider to [name of the electronic
medical record software]. Plan: Key staff to be educated on type 1 and type 2 diabetes and when to notify
NP/MD. Parameters when notifying provider. Audits for all new admits/resident with diabetic dx [diagnosis]
to be reviewed in the clinical meeting daily. Review on next monthly QAPI meeting. Responsible Team
Members(s): DCS [Director of Clinical Services]/designee, ADCS [Assistant Director of Clinical
Services]/designee, UM [Unit Manager), IDT [Interdisciplinary Team].
During an interview on 11/13/2024 at 9:25 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, I was not here for the
incident, I found out after I returned that Tuesday. That was the 8th [10/8/2024]. With a blood sugar that high
the nurse should have notified the doctor that he [Resident #1] was refusing his insulin and why he was
refusing it. The nurse in charge of his care was not acting within the professional standards of practice for
treating hyperglycemia in a type 1 diabetic. He [Staff A, LPN] should have notified the doctor immediately
when he [Resident #1] refused his insulin. He [Staff A, LPN] did not transcribe the orders, and he should
have stayed and transcribed the orders he got. The nurse got the high blood sugar and spoke to someone. I
don't know who he spoke with, I don't know their name, you will have to ask [the Administrator's name] and
got new orders. I don't know if or what he told the nurse that came on in the day shift. I don't know what the
day shift nurse did after that. This shouldn't have happened; this should have been avoided. The nurse that
admitted him should have read everything when it comes to the discharge summary, and they would have
seen all the other orders instead of just the one piece of paper. The blood sugar should have been
rechecked. It was not rechecked the rest of the day. I would consider this neglect. I don't know why the
abuse and neglect policies were not followed. We should have completed a RCA [root cause analysis] and
we should have implemented the abuse policy and procedure back on the 7th [10/7/2024].
During an interview on 11/13/2024 at 2:49 PM, Staff D, LPN, Unit Manager, stated, I found out [about
incident] when his daughter called me, she called on that Monday [10/7/2024]. She was upset about him
not getting his insulin and about what happened, this was
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 38 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0867
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
after he went to the hospital. She said she was a nurse and couldn't understand how we could make a
mistake like this. She was very upset about it. She was upset that he was not given his proper insulin and
that he was now in Diabetic Ketoacidosis. I told [The Administrator's name].
During an interview on 11/13/2024 at 3:18 PM, the Administrator stated, I found out about the situation
when I returned to work. I was finally able to speak with the daughter on 10/20/2024. I didn't file a report on
10/7/2024 because we saw on the chart that they only had orders for Lantus, we didn't think it was an issue
until he started refusing the medication. The report should have been done, that is the best practice. [Staff
A, LPN's name] got the order. It was not placed in [name of the electronic medical record software]. We
investigated and did a QAPI Ad hoc [from Latin meaning for this] meeting on 10/7/2024. I talked to [Staff B's
name], she said that the resident refused medications and [Staff A's name] spoke to the nurse practitioner
and got orders. The nurse forgot to transcribe the orders into [name of the electronic medical record
software]. There was no documentation in [name of the electronic medical record software].
During an interview on 11/13/2024 at 3:43 PM, Staff B, LPN, stated, I did take care of this resident
[Resident #1]. He did not refuse care when I took care of him. I was told by the night nurse [Staff A, LPN]
that his blood sugar was high. I don't remember him telling me what the blood sugar was, he just said it was
high. He did not refuse care that day. I did not try to get another accucheck, he didn't have orders to
recheck his blood sugar. I didn't have orders to recheck the blood sugar. I wasn't told how high the blood
sugar was. I did not ask how high it was. I was in the front [area of building] charting and apparently, he
called 911. I was called and asked if he needed help, I told them [EMS] no, I would check on him. I went to
the room, and he said, You are trying to kill me. I asked him why and he told me that 'his blood sugar, his
insulin was wrong, and he needed to get short acting insulin, and we weren't ordering it for him. I told him
that he had orders for long-acting insulin and that he refused to take it. He told me Yes, I do, but because I
need short acting insulin I need to get out of here and you all are trying to kill me. This could have been
avoided, I should have rechecked his blood sugar, I don't know why I didn't.
During an interview on 11/14/2024 at 7:10 AM, the DON stated, I was not here the day that this was found,
that they spoke with his daughter, the Unit Manager spoke to her. They did know the concerns with not
providing insulin or ADL [Activities of Daily Living] care. We were still investigating it; I can't tell you why we
didn't investigate more. I knew his blood sugar was 552. I was given that information, but I thought it was
that [Staff A's name] didn't transcribe orders. I guess we did not do a thorough investigation, I can't find any
more than what was done initially and in the town hall meeting. I see that there were more than 12 hours
that the resident was still here after that blood sugar of 552. There are no other accuchecks done after that.
It is my expectation that staff provide a detailed report when going off their shift. The nurse [Staff A, LPN]
should have told [Staff B's name] what the blood sugar was, and he [Staff A, LPN] should have documented
his information in the notes. [Staff A's name] should have asked what high meant if that is what he told her.
She should have followed up on that. I would expect that she called the doctor again and get further orders.
She [Staff B] had the opportunity to call the doctor when he called 911 to get further orders. All the
information should have been put in a progress note from both nurses. I would consider this neglect for both
nurses. I don't know why the staff weren't suspended; I can't give you a reason.
During an interview on 11/14/2024 at 4:10 PM, the Administrator stated, I can't say that I thought I needed
to complete a federal report. I was told by [Staff D's name] that she [Resident #1's daughter] was upset and
wanted to talk to us, but I wasn't able to connect with her. We attempted multiple times, but we couldn't
reach her and left messages. When we got [in touch with] her is when I found
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 39 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0867
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
out about her concerns with care related to the insulin and with being on the bedpan too long. We did do a
QAPI on 10/7 related to the insulin. I just thought it was because he refused to take his insulin. I guess we
did not investigate fully until after I spoke to his daughter. We thought the problem was that the nurse on
admission got the right orders and there weren't accuchecks ordered. He refused this medication, and I
spoke to [Staff B's name], LPN, and she told me that he [Resident #1] didn't talk to her at all about his
insulin during the day before he called 911. Then they realized that he had orders that were not transcribed
from the night nurse when he came on shift. I did not talk to him [Staff A, LPN] the DON did. I did not
implement the abuse and neglect policies because he refused his medication. I didn't think to. I can't tell you
why. We should have done more investigation. We should have done a QAPI when we realized that his
blood sugar was so high, I wasn't aware of everything. We only did the initial QAPI, we didn't do any others,
I think we should have done it, I can't tell you why we didn't. We did not suspend the nurses; it is our policy
to suspend staff pending the results of an investigation. We initially thought it happened because the
resident refused his insulin, not for neglect. We should follow our abuse and neglect policies and
procedures. I didn't think to. I can't tell you why.
Review of the policy and procedure titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program
(QAPI) last revision date of 10/24/2022 and last approval date of 4/23/2024, read, Policy: The Center and
organization has a comprehensive, data-driven quality assurance performance improvement program that
focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life. Procedure: 1. The center's QAPI program
is ongoing comprehensive review of care and services provided to residents. Leadership: The Center
Executive Director is accountable for the overall implementation and functioning of the QAPI program. This
includes but is not limited to: a). Implementation. b). Identify priorities. c). Ensures adequate resources. d).
Ensures performance indicators, resident and staff input and other information is used to prioritize
problems and opportunities. e). Ensures corrective actions are implemented to address identified problems
in systems. f). Evaluates the effectiveness of actions. g). Establishes expectations for safety, quality, rights,
and choice and respect. 5. The quality assessment and assurance committee (QAA) meetings are at least
quarterly but may be held more frequently as appropriate. Systemic Analysis and Action: 11. The center will
establish and utilize a systemic approach to identify underlying causes of problems, including but not
limited to: a. Root cause analysis. b. Failure Mode Effective Analysis. 12. The center will develop corrective
actions based on the information gathered and review effectiveness of the actions. 13. The center will
review and develop corrective actions on medical errors and adverse events. a. Center obtain and review
information on any medical error and adverse event. b. Utilize a systemic approach to identify underlying
cause. c. Develop and monitor action plans. Identifying Quality Deficiencies and Corrective Action: The
center will monitor department performance systems to identify issues and adverse events. 14. Center will
review department system data. 15. If a quality deficiency is identified, the committee will oversee the
development of corrective action(s). 16. The center may choose the method of corrective action i.e. 'Plan,
Do, Study, Act' or 'Performance Improvement Project.' Performance Improvement Projects: The center
utilizes performance improvement projects to improve a systemic problem or improve quality in absence of
a problem. Performance Improvement Projects (PIPs) are based on the center services and resources
identified in the Facility Assessment. 17. At a minimum, the center must conduct one performance
improvement project annually. a). The PIP should focus on high risk or problem prone areas, identified by
the center. b). The team may consist of one or more team members. c. The team will complete the following
functions: i. Collect and analyze data, ii. Determine Root Cause, iii. Determine steps for resolution, iv.
Implement corrective action(s),
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 40 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0867
v. Evaluate the effectiveness of the action(s), vi. Report progress to the QAPI committee.
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was removed onsite on 11/18/2024 after the receipt of an acceptable IJ
removal plan. The facility has completed the following steps to remove the immediate jeopardy. On
11/15/2024, the Executive Director received education from the Regional [NAME] President on the CMS
Five (5) Elements of Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QA/PI) and reviewed the findings
indicating facility failed to identify areas not in compliance regarding the nurse failing to reassess the
resident, failed to document the change-in-condition, lack of shift-to-shift report, insulin administration,
Abuse and Neglect identification and process, failed to follow policies and procedures when transferring
resident to the hospital , and lack of communication between staff and providers. The Executive Director
was educated on the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QA/PI) process to include education
on identifying a problem, starting and completing an investigation, and implementing a Performance
Improvement Plan (PIP) and Plan of Correction (POC). The Executive Director was educated on the
reporting process of a potential deficient practice to the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement
(QA/PI) by notifying the Executive Director and/or Director of Nursing. On 11/18/2024 Key staff ( to include
the Medical Director, Director of Nursing, Infection preventionist, Wound Care Nurse, Activities Director,
Medical Records, Human Resourses, Business Office Mangers, and the Environmental Services Manager)
were educated on the CMS Five (5) Elements of Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QA/PI) and
reviewed the findings indicating facility failed to identify areas not in compliance regarding the nurse failing
to reassess the resident, failed to document the change-in-condition, lack of shift-to-shift report, insulin
administration, Abuse and Neglect identification and process, failed to follow policies and procedures when
transferring resident to the hospital , and lack of communication between staff and providers. Key staff were
educated on the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QA/PI) process to include education on
identifying a problem, starting and completing an investigation, and implementing a Performance
Improvement Plan (PIP) and Plan of Correction (POC). On 11/18/2024, an Ad Hoc that involved the
Executive Director, Medical Director, Director of Nursing identified the root cause analysis was the facility
failed to initiate/implement the abuse/neglect policy including a complete investigation. The facility failed to
identify areas not in compliance regarding the nurse failing to reassess the resident, failed to document the
change-in-condition, lack of shift-to-shift report, insulin administration, Abuse/Neglect identification and
process, failed to follow policies and procedures when transferring the resident to the hospital and lack of
communication between staff and providers.
Residents Affected - Few
Review of the facility records documented the Executive Director received education from the Regional
[NAME] President on the CMS Five (5) Elements of Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QA/PI)
and reviewed the findings indicating facility failed to identify areas not in compliance regarding the nurse
failing to reassess the resident, failed to document the change-in-condition, lack of shift-to-shift report,
insulin administration, Abuse and Neglect identification and process, failed to follow policies and
procedures when transferring resident to the hospital , and lack of communication between staff and
providers. The Executive Director was educated on the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement
(QA/PI) process to include education on identifying a problem, starting and completing an investigation,
and implementing a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) and Plan of Correction (POC). The Executive
Director was educated on the reporting process of a potential deficient practice to the Quality Assurance
Performance Improvement (QA/PI) by notifying the Executive Director and/or Director of Nursing. Review of
the Ad Hoc QAPI meeting held on 11/18/2024 that involved the Executive Director, Medical Director,
Director of Nursing identified the root cause analysis was the facility failed to initiate/implement the
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 41 of 42
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105460
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at North Florida
6700 NW 10th Place
Gainesville, FL 32605
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0867
abuse/neglect policy including a complete investigation.
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
During staff interviews conducted 11/13/2024 through 11/19/2024, 19 Licensed Practical Nurses, 2
Registered Nurses, the Executive Director, Director of Clinical Services, Assistant Director of Clinical
Services, Wound Care Nurse, Staffing Coordinator, Business Office manager and Social Service Manager
verified receiving the training and verbalized understanding of the abuse and neglect, changes in condition
policies and procedures, resident reassessment after changes in condition and the process for QAPI
investigation and reporting.
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105460
If continuation sheet
Page 42 of 42