F 0687
Provide appropriate foot care.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow podiatry treatment plan and
ensure a timely follow-up appointment with a podiatrist for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for podiatry, of a total
sample of 4 residents, (#1).
Residents Affected - Few
Findings:
Review of resident #1's medical record revealed diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular
disease, hemiplegia (severe loss of strength) and hemiparesis (weakness) following stroke affecting left
non-dominant side.
The American Diabetes Association's in the section titled, Foot Complications described, People with
diabetes can develop many different foot problems. Even ordinary problems can get worse and lead to
serious complications (retrieved from www.diabetes.org on 10/02/24).
Review of resident #1's medical record revealed a podiatry visit report with a date of service of 8/22/24. The
report detailed on physical exam the podiatrist noted resident #1 was unable to differentiate sharp/dull
sensations in both feet. Resident #1 had three nonpalpable (could not be felt by hand) and one diminished
pulse, regarding four pulse points, in her foot and ankle area indicating her blood circulation was diminished
to these areas. Resident #1's diagnoses on this evaluation were: type 2 diabetes with other diabetic
neurological complication, ingrowing nail, tinea unguium (toenail fungus), and nail dystrophy (abnormal
changes in shape, color, texture and growth of nails). In the section of the note titled Follow-up indicated a
partial nail avulsion (removal) was performed on the medial nail plate of the left great toe. Wound care
orders were to apply a topical antibiotic ointment and band-aid to the left great toe for 10 days. The report
listed a follow-up visit for podiatry in 2-3 months, or sooner should any concerns or problems arise.
Review of resident #1's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed that from 8/22/24 through
10/02/24 nursing staff had signed they had cleansed resident #1's left great toe with normal saline, applied
Bactroban (a topical antibiotic) ointment, covered with dry gauze, and secured with tape daily. This
treatment was 32 days longer than the podiatrist had recommended on 8/22/24.
On 10/03/24 at 1:40 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) reviewed resident #1's podiatry wound care report
dated 8/22/24 for the left great toe and compared it to the TAR wound care orders for the left great toe
which continued until 10/02/24. She could not explain why treatment was done longer than the 10 days
recommended by the podiatrist, and confirmed the order on the TAR should have been discontinued.
On 10/04/2024 at 10:56 AM, the DON stated resident #1's assigned nurse had asked her to have the
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 4
Event ID:
105480
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105480
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/04/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at Rosewood
3920 Rosewood Way
Orlando, FL 32808
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0687
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Attending Physician examine resident #1's left great toe on 9/16/24 due to some redness. The DON
confirmed she had not called the podiatrist about the left great toe concern made by the assigned nurse.
The DON verified the attending physician ordered a podiatry referral on 9/16/24., but no podiatry visit had
been scheduled for resident #1 since the referral was made. The DON said that Social Service staff should
schedule the referral visit, and the podiatrist would come to the facility to provide care to the patient.
Residents Affected - Few
On 10/03/24 at 3:29 PM, the Social Service Director confirmed the podiatry referral made on 9/16/24 for
resident #1 had not been scheduled yet. He stated resident #1 was not scheduled to have an appointment
until the next regular time the podiatrist was scheduled to visit the facility and that date had not yet been
set.
On 10/3/24 at 3:30 PM, in a telephone interview, the receptionist at the facility's contracted podiatrist office
stated the podiatrist was not yet scheduled to have a service date at the facility. He confirmed no other
facility visits were on their current schedule.
On 10/04/24 at 10:20 AM, the Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) explained she examined
resident #1's toes today at the request of the DON. She confirmed some redness on the left great toe
where the toenail was no longer present. She explained the redness could relate to, remnants of an
infection. The APRN said she was going to order an antibiotic medication for the possible infection and
added that resident #1's toenails were elongated and should be clipped.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105480
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 4
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105480
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/04/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at Rosewood
3920 Rosewood Way
Orlando, FL 32808
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0690
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate
catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was continent of bladder and bowel
received services such as scheduled toileting or prompted voiding, and the needed assistance to maintain
their continence, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for bowel and bladder/incontinence care, of a total sample of
4 residents, (#1).
Findings:
Resdient #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stroke, type 2 diabetes
mellitus, and partial weakness and paralysis of the left non-dominant side after stroke.
Review of resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident #1
was cognitively intact with no behavioral symptoms or rejection of care necessary to achieve the resident's
goals for health and well-being. Section H of the assessment indicated she was always incontinent of bowel
and bladder and that a toileting program (e.g. scheduled toileting, prompted voiding, or bladder training)
had not been attempted upon admission or reentry. On resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated
[DATE] the same responses for Section H were present, as the previous assessment on 6/27/24.
Toileting tailored to the resident's needs rather than using an absorbent brief has the potential of: increasing
dignity, satisfaction, and support for the holistic needs of the resident when they achieve their highest level
of continence, has the potential to reduce risk of skin breakdown and moisture-associated skin damage
(MASD), and lowered risk of infection, (retrieved on 10/09/24 from www.medline.com.)
On 10/03/24 at 10:20 AM, the MDS Coordinator stated she did not know if resident #1 had the
sensation/urge to void, urinate or have a bowel movement. She said she had never heard resident #1 say if
she had to urinate nor have a bowel movement. The MDS Coordinator confirmed she had heard resident
#1 say after she had voided that she had urinated and/or had a bowel movement, but she was not sure if
the facility even had a mechanical lift or mechanical lift toileting sling to assist resident #1 to the bathroom.
On 10/03/24 at 12:40 PM, resident #1 explained she had the sensation/felt the urge to urinate or have a
bowel movement before it happened. She stated she usually went in her adult brief, but she would use the
toilet instead if it was offered.
On 10/03/24 at 10:00 AM, the Director of Rehabilitation stated resident #1 needed maximum assistance for
toileting and required use of a mechanical lift to transfer between her wheelchair and bed. She
acknowledged there was nothing to prevent staff from utilizing a mechanical lift to transfer resident #1 to the
bathroom/toilet.
On 10/03/24 at 1:40 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) explained the facility did not have any mechanical
lifts designed to transfer residents to a toilet nor any slings to be used with the mechanical lifts designed to
place a resident on a toilet. She said resident #1 had not told the facility she needed to be toileted and that
resident #1 usually told staff after she had already voided. The DON said she was unaware if resident #1
had the sensation/urge to know she needed to void before she
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105480
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 4
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105480
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/04/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Aviata at Rosewood
3920 Rosewood Way
Orlando, FL 32808
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0690
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
would go. She acknowledged she did not have any documentation of a toileting program trial or the offering
of a bed pan for resident #1 since her admission.
On 10/03/24 at 1:45 PM, the DON and Regional Nurse interviewed resident #1 with the surveyor present.
Resident #1 stated she knew when she had to void, by both bladder and bowel. Resident #1 agreed she
would be willing to use a toilet if it was offered.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105480
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 4