F 0684
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interviews and clinical and administrative record review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and
services were provided for 1 of 2 sampled residents, (Resident # 2), reviewed for medical appointments
and/or medical procedures, as evidenced by the facility's failure to provide the necessary nursing
supervision during transport to medical procedure for an incapacitated resident; and failed to ensure the
health care surrogate was fully informed and adhered to preferences voiced or informed when changes are
made prior to implementation. The findings included: Review of the clinical record for Resident #2, revealed
the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Cerebrovascular Accident
(CVA), Hypertension (HTN), Diabetes Mellitus (DM), Dysphagia following cerebral infarction, Epilepsy and
expressive aphasia. Review of the Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE]
revealed the resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 1, indicating severe cognitive
impairment. The resident is dependent on staff for total care of all activities of daily living (ADLs). An
interview was conducted on 07/08/25 in the morning with a family member of Resident #2 who stated that
her non-verbal, total care family member was sent to a facility more than 80 miles away unaccompanied by
nursing staff to receive a procedure under anesthesia.The family member and health care proxy gave
approval for her family member to have a feeding tube inserted and was asked her hospital preferences.
She provided the facility with multiple local hospitals within 15 miles of the facility. The resident was sent to
Miami (80 miles away) without her prior knowledge or approval. She stated the facility contacted her when
the resident had already left the facility and was traveling to Miami. She was informed that her family
member was staying overnight, thus they did not send an aide to accompany her. She stated she had
informed the caller that she did not approve of the transport to Miami, especially for her incapacitated family
member to travel alone with just the transport driver. She further stated the facility was aware that she could
not attend the appointment and requested that they cancel the transport. This was not done. The family
member stated she was later informed that the resident would not be staying overnight but would be
returning to the facility later that day. She further stated that the original information for this appointment she
was provided for [another hospital - Name provided in Palm Beach County] on 06/09/25 and she would be
accompanied by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) since she (the family member) was out of the country.
Since they rescheduled the appointment to 06/10/25, all information changed and it was not approved by
her, who was the health care proxy. Review of the Nursing Progress Note on 06/03/25 at 10:10 AM,
documented, Verbal orders received to send resident to ER [Emergency Room] for PEG [Percutaneous
Endoscopic Gastrostomy] tube placement. Call placed to resident's family member regarding PEG tube
placement and that NP [Nurse Practitioner] would like to send to ER for placement. Resident's family
member would like for resident to go to [Name provided - hospital in Palm Beach County] for PEG tube
placement. This writer will contact resident's family member on transportation
Residents Affected - Few
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 2
Event ID:
105516
Printed: 05/28/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
105516
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/09/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Darcy Hall of Life Care
2170 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
time and when resident will be leaving building, resident's family member verbalized understanding.
Another note at 11:57 from the nurse documented, This writer was made aware that resident is now under
another medical service with new orders received to schedule an appointment with a physician with these
services. On 06/07/25 at 5:00 PM, the Advance Registered Nurse Practitioner (ARNP) documented the
resident is a candidate for a G-tube placement and has an appointment early Monday morning to go to the
hospital on [DATE]. There are no further notes until 06/10/25 at 8:36 AM, which documented Resident left
via stretcher with as needed [PRN] portable oxygen tank with resident accompanied by two transportation
personnel from Nursing Services (transport company). Call then placed to resident's family member that
resident has left the building on her way to the hospital in Miami [area]. It was at that time that resident's
family member stated that she did not authorize resident to go to Miami. Call then placed to the (medical
services) NP regarding resident's family member does not want resident to go to Miami [area] and that the
resident is currently enroute. The Medical Service NP states that she would call this writer back with any
updates. Awaiting return call. An interview was conducted on 07/08/25 at 3:26 PM with the ARNP, who
confirmed that the resident was prescribed to have G-tube placement. He stated there was some mix-up
with transportation on Monday, so the appointment had to be rescheduled. He stated he rescheduled the
appointment and transportation, and when he called the transportation company, [Name provided], they did
not have an order to transport Resident #2 on 06/09 but had placed it for pick-up on 06/10/25.The ARNP
stated he spoke with the family member the previous week and she was on a cruise, so we discussed
having the appointment on Monday, 06/09/25. He doesn't recall whether he mentioned to the family
member that the appointment was in Miami [area], but she did agree with the PEG tube placement. An
interview was conducted on 07/09/25 at 3:44 PM with the Clinical Advisor Nurse Practitioner, who stated
the facility called her the morning the resident was transferred out. She stated she provided clarification to
the family, but she didn't write a progress note. She stated the family was given some misinformation about
the procedure. She informed the family the procedure was a same day intervention, and the resident would
be coming back to the facility. She stated she only provided the clarification to the family. An interview was
conducted on 07/09/25 at 4:00 PM with the nurse, Staff A, who had called the family member on 06/10/25.
She confirmed she was also the nurse who received the original order for the PEG tube placement and she
spoke with the family member. She agreed to the placement of the tube at a local hospital. She was
originally under the impression that the resident would be sent to the emergency room for placement and [a
second family member] provided her with her hospital preferences. She later learned that the resident was
under another medical service, and she thought the Nurse Practitioner (NP) would discuss with the family
member all the details for the procedure. She confirmed she had contacted the resident's family member on
the morning the resident left the facility for the procedure. The family member was apparently unaware that
the resident was traveling to Miami area, and the resident was not accompanied by staff. Staff A stated the
facility does not provide supervision for medical / surgical appointments.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
105516
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 2