Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

AVIATA AT SANTA BARBARACMS #1055881 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0689 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Some Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed provide appropriate interventions to prevent falls for 2 (Residents #1, and #2) of 3 residents surveyed with a history of falls with major injury. Failure to provide appropriate fall interventions creates a potential for falls and fall related injuries to the residents. The findings included: The facility policy on Fall Management Document N-1259 effective 11/30/14 and last revised 7/29/19 reads, Residents are evaluated for fall risk. Patient Centered interventions are initiated, based on resident risk . Purpose: Is to identify residents at risk for falls and establish/modify interventions to decrease the risk of future falls and minimize the potential for resulting injury. Clinical record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Metabolic Encephalopathy, Osteoarthritis, Bradycardia (heart rate below 60 beats per minute) and Idiopathic Hypotension. Review of the care plan initiated on 4/1/24 revealed Resident #1 was at risk for recurrent falls and falls related injuries related to gait/balance problems, incontinence, poor communication, comprehension, unaware of safety needs, hearing problems and a history of falls. On 6/26/24 the facility updated the care plan showing Resident #1 had an actual fall, refusing hipsters (briefs with impact absorbing padding over hips areas). Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment with a target date of 7/8/24 noted the resident's cognition was severely impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 04. Resident #1 required partial/moderate assistance with transferring, did not exhibit behaviors or refuse care. Review of facility's incident investigations revealed on 7/8/24, Resident #1 sustained an unwitnessed fall. X-rays obtained at a local hospital were negative for fracture. Resident #1 complained of pain on and off to the left hip and thigh after the fall. On 7/12/24, a new X-ray showed a questionable fracture of the left femur. Resident #1 was transferred to a local hospital and underwent a surgical repair of the fracture. The facility's investigation showed on 7/8/24 staff did not ensure Resident #1 was wearing the hipsters as per the care plan. (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 3 Event ID: 105588 Printed: 05/28/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 105588 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 02/27/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Aviata at Santa Barbara 216 Santa Barbara Blvd Cape Coral, FL 33991 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Some The corrective action initiated by the facility at the time of the fall included weekly audits to ensure fall precautions and care plans were being followed. Staff A was suspended secondary to not following the care plan, putting the resident at risk. The care plan for actual fall initiated on 6/26/24 and revised on 8/28/24 had a target date of 3/25/25. The goal was for Resident #1 to resume usual activities and minimize the risk of further incident. The interventions included: Provide hipsters as indicated (initiated on 6/26/24) and, Provide Dysem to wheelchair (initiated on 7/9/24). A Dysem (Dycem) is a square piece of blue silicone used to prevent the resident from sliding out of the wheelchair. On 2/25/25 at 10:30 a.m., in an interview Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Staff B said she was assigned to care for Resident #1. She said this was the first day she had been assigned the resident. When asked if Resident #1 was on fall precautions, CNA Staff B said she did not know. On 2/25/24 at 10:32 a.m., Resident #1 was observed sitting in a wheelchair. CNA Staff B assisted the resident to stand up from the chair. No Dysem was observed on the wheelchair. CNA Staff B felt the resident's hips and verified Resident #1 was not wearing the hipsters. CNA Staff B said she did not know where the Dysem was. CNA Staff B looked into the resident's drawer and found the resident's hipsters. CNA Staff B said Resident #1 should be wearing the hipsters during the day and night. On 2/25/24 at 10:47 a.m., a telephone interview was conducted with Resident #1's daughter. The Dysem and hipsters were described to the daughter. Resident #1's daughter said she had not seen a Dysem in the resident's chair and had not seen her wearing hipsters. On 2/25/24 at 12:30 p.m., in an interview the Director of Nursing (DON) said she was not aware Resident #1 sustained a fall resulting in a fracture in July 2024. She said she was not aware Resident #1's fall interventions included hipsters and Dysem to the wheelchair. The DON said staff should sign off the fall prevention interventions daily on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR). On 2/27/25 at approximately 11:00 a.m., in a follow up interview the DON said the current administration did not require documentation of fall intervention on the TAR. She said the interventions were listed on the care plan and the CNA [NAME] (Provides instructions for safe care). She verified there was no documentation verifying the care plan interventions were being completed daily. The DON also verified there was no documentation Resident #1 was refusing to wear hipsters or refusing the Dysem in her wheelchair. (continued on next page) FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 105588 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 3 Printed: 05/28/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 105588 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 02/27/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Aviata at Santa Barbara 216 Santa Barbara Blvd Cape Coral, FL 33991 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Some 2. Clinical Record review revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included history of Moderate Protein Malnutrition, Hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), Pain, and Osteoarthritis. Review of the admission MDS with a target date of 7/12/24 noted the resident's cognition was severely impaired with a BIMS score of 06. Resident #2 required partial/moderate assistance of staff for transfers. He did not refuse care and had no behaviors. Review of the care plan initiated on 7/8/24 revealed Resident #2 was at risk for falls and fall related injuries related to decreased physical mobility, incontinent, and impaired cognition. The care plan initiated on 7/20/24 noted Resident #2 had an actual fall. The goal with a target date of 3/31/25 was to resume usual activities and minimize the risk of further incident. The interventions included: Ensure left side floor mat is in place (initiated on 7/22/24). Ensure right side floor mat is in place (Initiated on 8/8/24). Review of a late entry progress note dated 10/7/24 at 8:00 p.m., revealed Resident #2 was on the floor beside his bed, no complaint or signs and symptoms of injury. Resident #2 was transferred to the wheelchair, then to bed, monitoring frequently. The alert note dated 10/9/24 at 10:30 a.m., documented Resident #2 was sent to the hospital for external rotation of the right leg. Swelling and pain were noted. Resident #2 was re-admitted from the hospital on [DATE] with a diagnosis of closed fracture of the neck of the right femur (thigh bone). On 2/26/25 at 8:30 a.m., and 2/27/25 at 8:10 a.m., Resident #2 was observed lying in bed. There were no floor mats on either side of the bed. No floor mats were observed in Resident #2's room. On 2/27/25 at 8:15 a.m., in an interview CNA Staff C said she did not know if Resident #2 was supposed to have floor mats next to his bed. She said she had not been assigned to the resident for a while, she was just assigned to him today. Staff C verified Resident #2 was in bed and the fall mats were not in place on the right side or the left side of the bed as per the care plan. Staff C verified no fall mats were located in the resident's room. Review of the CNA [NAME] revealed safety instructions that included to ensure the left side floor mat and the right side floor mat were in place. On 2/27/25 at approximately 11:00 a.m., the DON said per the current administration policy, the mats would be listed on the care plan and on the [NAME]. The DON verified the floor mats were listed on Resident #2's care plan and CNA [NAME]. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 105588 If continuation sheet Page 3 of 3

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0689GeneralS&S Epotential for harm

    F689 - Accidents

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 27, 2025 survey of AVIATA AT SANTA BARBARA?

This was a inspection survey of AVIATA AT SANTA BARBARA on February 27, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at AVIATA AT SANTA BARBARA on February 27, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.